Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 152, Issue 2, pp 461–473 | Cite as

Population structure and life history of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in the SW Pacific: inferences from otolith chemistry

  • Ronald E. Thresher
  • Craig H. Proctor
Research Article

Abstract

We examined site differences in the elemental composition of the primordium and ontogenetic variability of Sr in otoliths of fish from Australia and New Zealand and, as an out-group, the North Atlantic. Differences among sites in primordium composition are slight, but significant for all five elements assayed (Sr, Pb, Cu, Zn and Hg), but principally reflect differences between the North Atlantic and SW Pacific specimens, do not replicate for independent samples in the SW Pacific and constitute a poor “natural tag” in roughy, with <25% of fish successfully assigned to source location. However, mean Sr weight-fractions at the primordium showed similar latitudinal variation across sites in Australia, New Zealand and the Tasman Sea, indicating both spatially structured populations and a common structuring process across the region. Comparisons of ontogenetic variability of Sr in otoliths from juveniles and young adults within and between sites in the SW Pacific strongly support the hypothesis that variability in this element is site-specific and environmentally sensitive, although the environmental factors involved are not obvious. The otolith analysis confirms previous suggestions that juvenile and adult Hoplostethus atlanticus are relatively sedentary, but also indicates that the population sub-structuring by age within sites is more complex and there are likely to be more spawning areas in Australian waters than previously thought. More broadly, although single point analysis of otolith composition at the primordium resolves a population structure in roughy, alone it is not precise enough to test hypotheses about the processes causing this structure. Ontogenetic variability in Sr provides better resolution of spatial structure, even in a relatively homogenous marine environment like the deep ocean, and also provides insight into behavioural and ecological factors. Ontogenetic analyses of Sr in otoliths are expensive to obtain, require more effort in specimen preparation than single point analyses, and are difficult to compare statistically, but the increased information they yield warrants their broader consideration in marine species.

Keywords

PIXE Nursery Area Discriminant Function Analysis Stock Structure Orange Roughy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank staff of the Micro-Beam Laboratory at CSIRO Division of Minerals (Clayton, Victoria) for technical advice and assistance with WD-EPMA analyses, staff at the Heavy Ion Analytical Facility at CSIRO Exploration and Geoscience (North Ryde, NSW) for technical advice and assistance with PIXE analyses, and R. Bailey, K. Evans, C. Mackinnon and D. Mills for their assistance in preparing otoliths. We particularly thank the skippers and crews of commercial fishing vessels for their assistance in obtaining samples of fish for otoliths, as well as D. Evans of Western Australia Department of Fisheries, M. Scott of Aust. Fisheries Management Authority, the Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, the Central Aging Facility (MAFRI), and the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NZ). Finally we thank N. Bax, R. Ward and two anonymous referees for constructive comments on the MS. This work was supported by grants from the Australian Fisheries Research and Development Corporation and the Australian Fisheries Management Authority, as well as by CSIRO.

References

  1. Ashford JR, Jones CM, Hoffman E, Everson I, Moreno C, Dunamel G, Williams R (2005) Can otolith elemental signatures record the capture site of Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides), a fully marine fish in the Southern Ocean? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 62:2832–2840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bax NJ, Tilzey R, Lyle JM, Wayte SE, Kloser R, Smith ADM (2005) Providing management advice for deep-sea fisheries: lessons learned from Australia’s orange roughy fisheries, pp 259–272. In: Shotton R (ed) Deep Sea 2003: conference on the governance and management of deep-sea fisheries. Part 1. FAO, Rome, 718 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell JD, Lyle JM, Bulman CM, Graham KJ, Newton GM, Smith DC (1992) Spatial variation in reproduction, and occurrence of non-reproductive adults, in orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus Collett (Trachichthyidae), from south-eastern Australia. J Fish Biol 40:107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergenius MAJ, Mapstone BD, Begg GA, Murchie CD (2005) The use of otolith chemistry to determine stock structure of three epinepheline serranid coral reef fishes on the Great barrier Reef, Australia. Fish Res 72:253–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branch TA (2001) A review of orange roughy Hoplostethus atlanticus fisheries, estimation methods, biology and stock structure. S Afr J Mar Sci 23:181–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brothers E, Thresher RE (2004) Statolith chemical analysis as a means of identifying stream origins of lampreys in Lake Huron. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:1107–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulman CM, Koslow JA (1995) Development and depth distribution of the eggs of the orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus (Pisces: Trachichthyidae), off southeastern Australia. Mar Freshw Res 46:697–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campana SE (1999) Chemistry and composition of fish otoliths: pathways, mechanisms and applications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:263–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campana SE, Gagne JA, McLaren JW (1995) Elemental fingerprinting of fish otoliths using ID-ICPMS. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 122:115–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campana SE, Thorrold SR, Jones CM, Günther D, Tubrett M, Longerich H, Jackson S, Halden M, Kalish JM, Piccoli P, de Pontual H, Troadec H, Panfili J, Secor DH, Severin KP, Sie SH, Thresher RE, Teesdale WJ, Campbell JL (1997) Comparison of accuracy, precision and sensitivity in elemental assays of fish otoliths using the electron microprobe, proton-induced X-ray emission, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:2068–2079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edmunds JS, Caputi N, Morita M (1991) Stock discrimination by trace-element analysis of otoliths of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus), a deep-water marine teleost. Aust J Mar Freshw Res 42:383–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald JL, Thorrold SR, Bailey KM, Brown AL, Severin KP (2004) Elemental signatures in otoliths of larval walleye Pollock (Theragra chalcogramma) from the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Fish Bull (US) 102:604–616Google Scholar
  13. Friedland KD, Reddin DG, Shimizu N, Hass RE, Youngson AF (1998) Strontium:calcium ratios in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) otoliths and observations on growth and maturation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 55:1158–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gauldie RW, Jones JB (2000) Stocks, or geographically separated populations of the New Zealand orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, in relation to parasite infestation, growth rate, and otolith shape. Bull Mar Sci 67:949–971Google Scholar
  15. Gunn JS, Harrowfield IR, Proctor CH, Thresher RE (1992) Wavelength dispersive electron probe microanalysis of calcified tissues in fishes—analysis of techniques appropriate to studies of age and stock discrimination. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 158:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Horn PL, Tracey DM, Clark MR (1998) Between area differences in age and length at first maturity of the orange roughy Hoplostethus atlanticus. Mar Biol 132:187–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lester RJ, Sewell KB, Barnes A, Evans K (1988) Stock discrimination of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) by parasite analysis. Mar Biol 99:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mace PM, Feanaughty JM, Coburn RP, Doonan IJ (1990) Growth and productivity of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) on the north Chatham Rise NZ. J Mar Freshw Res 24:105–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller MB, Clough AM, Baston JN, Vachet RW (2006) Transition metal binding in cod otolith proteins. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 329:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Proctor CH, Thresher RE (1998) Effects of specimen handling and otolith preparation on the concentration of elements in fish otoliths. Mar Biol 131:681–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rooker JR, Secor DH, Zdanowicz VS, De Metrio G, Relini LO (2003) Identification of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) stocks from putative nurseries using otolith chemistry. Fish Oceanogr 12:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Secor DH (1992) Application of otolith microchemistry analysis to investigate anadromy in Chesapeake Bay striped bass Morone saxatilis. Fish Bull (US) 90:798–806Google Scholar
  23. Sie SH, Thresher RE (1992) Micro-PIXE analysis of fish otoliths: methodology and evaluation of first results for stock discrimination. Int J PIXE 2:357–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith PJ, Robertson SG, Horn PL, Bull B, Anderson OF, Stantob BR, Oke CS (2002) Multiple techniques for determining stock relationships between orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, fisheries in the eastern. Tasman Sea Fish Res 58:119–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thresher RE, Proctor CH, Gunn JS, Harrowfield IR (1994) An evaluation of geographic variation in otolith composition as a means of stock delineation and identification of nursery areas in a temperate groundfish, Nemadactylus macropterus (Cheilodactylidae). Fish Bull (US) 92:817–840Google Scholar
  26. Thresher RE, Proctor CH (1995) Otoliths unlock mysteries of the deep. Aust Fish 1995:19–21Google Scholar
  27. Thresher RE, Mills DJ, Proctor CH, Ianelli JN (eds) (1997) In: Proceedings of the international symposium on skeletal microanalysis of marine fish stocks, Hobart, Tasmania, 2–6 March 1992, CSIRO Marine Laboratories Report 230, Hobart, Australia, 175 ppGoogle Scholar
  28. Thresher RE (1999) Otolith composition as a means of stock delineation in fishes: a review and evaluation. Fish Sci 43:165–204Google Scholar
  29. Zeldis JR, Grimes PJ, Ingerson JKV (1994) Ascent rates, vertical distribution, and a thermal history model of development of orange roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, eggs in the water column. Fish Bull (US) 93:373–385Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric ResearchHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations