Seasonal variation in movement, aggregation and destructive grazing of the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) in relation to wave action and sea temperature
- 518 Downloads
Hydrodynamic forces are an important determinant of subtidal community structure, particularly when they limit the distribution and foraging ability of mobile consumers. We examined the effect of wave action on the rate of movement and destructive grazing of a kelp bed by the green sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis) under field conditions. We measured density and rate of advance at fixed intervals along ∼100 m of a grazing front over 1 year, and quantified individual movement rates in the barrens 5–10 m behind the urchin front using a time-lapse videography. Seasonal variation in the mean rate of advance of the front (range: 0–4 m month−1) was explained by changes in urchin density at the front (120–360 individuals m−2), which in turn varied inversely with significant wave height (0.5–2 m). Water temperature (0.8–17.6°C) had no effect on the rate of advance or on urchin density (aggregation) at the front, except when temperature exceeded 17°C. Movement of individual urchins also was affected by wave action: we observed a significant decrease in speed and displacement of urchins with increasing significant wave height. Wave action had no effect on the proportion of urchins moving or the degree of linearity of their movements. We propose that the decrease in urchin density at the front associated with increased wave action, results from de-aggregation, which reduces the risk of dislodgement, combined with a reduction in urchin movement in barrens, which supplies new urchins to the front.
KeywordsVideo Sequence Significant Wave Height Front Advance Urchin Density Strongylocentrotus Droebachiensis
We are indebted to J. Lindley for is invaluable assistance with fieldwork. We also thank D. Lyons, M. Saunders, P. Gagnon, D. Knip, A. Schmidt, and Dr. A. Pinder for diving assistance. We are grateful to Dr. M. Barbeau for providing the underwater video camera. The research was funded by a Discovery Grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to RES. J-SL-G was supported by scholarships from Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies and NSERC.
- Himmelman JH (1984) Urchin feeding and macroalgal distribution in Newfoundland, Eastern Canada. Naturaliste Can 111:337–348Google Scholar
- Lawrence JM (1975) On the relationships between marine plants and sea urchins. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 13:213–286Google Scholar
- Lissner AL (1978) Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of the sea urchin Centrostephanus coronatus Verrill at Santa Catalina Island. PhD Thesis, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
- Velimirov B, Griffiths CL (1979) Wave-induced kelp movement and its importance for community structure. Bot Mar 22:169–172Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar