Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 6, pp 2255–2270 | Cite as

Population dynamics of naturalised Manila clams Ruditapes philippinarum in British coastal waters

  • John Humphreys
  • Richard W. G. Caldow
  • Selwyn McGrorty
  • Andrew D. West
  • Antony C. Jensen
Research Article

Abstract

The Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum was introduced to Poole Harbour (lat 50°N) on the south coast of England in 1988 as a novel species for aquaculture. Contrary to expectations, this species naturalised. We report on individual growth patterns, recruitment, mortality and production within this population. On the intertidal mudflats the abundance of clams (>5 mm in length) varied seasonally between 18 and 56 individuals m−2. There appear to be two recruitment events per year and there were 6 year classes in the population. A mid-summer decline in abundance was partly due to increased mortality but probably also a result of down-shore migration in response to high water temperatures and the development of anoxic conditions. A winter fishery removes c 75% of clams of fishable size (maximum shell length ≥40 mm) and c 20% of the annual production. The fishery depresses the maximum age and size attained by the clams but appears to be sustainable. Clam mortality due to factors other than fishing is highest in late-winter to early spring. The growth of the clams is intermediate in comparison with many published studies but remarkably good given their intertidal position. As on the coasts of the Adriatic Sea, where the clam is also non-native, the Manila clam has thrived in a shallow, eutrophic, lagoon-like system on the English coast. While the Poole Harbour population is currently Europe’s most northerly reported self-sustaining, naturalised population, given forecasts of increasing air and sea temperatures it might be expected that this species will eventually spread to more sites around the coasts of Northern Europe with associated economic and ecological consequences.

Keywords

Seed Shrimp Manila Clam Total Annual Production Maximum Shell Length Minimum Landing Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Southern Sea Fisheries Committee, Poole Harbour Commissioners, the Consumer Protection Services, Borough of Poole and English Nature for their agreement in allowing us to gather Manila clams from Poole Harbour. We are grateful also to Danielle Aveling of the Environment Agency for the provision of water surface temperature data. We would like to thank S. Durell and R. Stillman with help in gathering some of the samples, and S. Smith and M. Langran of the CEH Library Service for collating reprints of the studies cited in this paper. Two anonymous referees provided helpful comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Bartoli M, Nizzoli D, Viaroli P, Turolla E, Castaldelli G, Fano EA, Rossi R (2001) Impact of Tapes philippinarum farming on nutrient dynamics and benthic respiration in the Sacca di Goro. Hydrobiologia 455:203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beninger PG, Lucas A (1984) Seasonal variations in condition, reproductive activity, and gross biochemical composition of two species of adult clam reared in a common habitat: Tapes decussatus L. (Jeffreys) and Tapes philippinarum (Adams & Reeve). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 79:19–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beukema JJ, Essink K, Michaelis H, Zwarts L (1993) Year-to-year variability in the biomass of macrobenthic animals on the tidal flats of the Wadden Sea: how predictable is this food source for birds? Neth J Sea Res 31:319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breber P (2002) Introduction and acclimatisation of the Pacific carpet clam Tapes philippinarum, to Italian waters. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 120–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byers JE (2005) Marine reserves enhance abundance but not competitive impacts of a harvested nonindigenous species. Ecology 86:487–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caldow RWG, McGrorty S, West AD, Durell SEA leV dit, Stillman RA, Anderson S (2005) Macro-invertebrate fauna in the inter-tidal mudflats. In: Humphreys J, May V (eds). The ecology of poole harbour. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 91–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvez I, Guillou J (1998) Impact of winter mortalities on post-larval and juvenile stages, in Ruditapes philippinarum from western Brittany. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 78: 1381–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crisp DJ (1984) Energy flow measurements. In: Holme NA, McIntyre AD (eds) Methods for the study of marine benthos. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 284–372Google Scholar
  9. de Montaudouin X (1997) Potential of bivalves’ secondary settlement differs with species: a comparison between cockle (Cerastoderma edule) and clam (Ruditapes philippinarum) juvenile resuspension. Mar Biol 128:639–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elston RA, Cheney DP, Macdonald BF, Suhrbier AD (2003) Tolerance and response of Manila clams, Venerupis philippinarum (A. Adams and Reeve, 1850) to low salinity. J Shellfish Res 22:667–674Google Scholar
  11. Figueras A, Robledo JAF, Novoa B (1996) Brown ring disease and parasites in clams (Ruditapes decussatus and R. philippinarum) from Spain and Portugal. J Shellfish Res 15:363–368Google Scholar
  12. Goulletquer P (1989) Mortalité hivernale chez la palourde japonaise Ruditapes philippinarum sur le littoral Atlantique: aspects biochimique et écophysiologique. Haliotis 17:152–163Google Scholar
  13. Goshima S, Ide N, Fujiyoshi Y, Noda T, Nakao S (1996) Reproductive cycle and shell growth of transplanted Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum in Saroma Lagoon. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 62:195–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hiddink JG (2003) Modelling the adaptive value of intertidal migration and nursery use in the bivalve Macoma balthica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 252:173–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hulme PE (2003) Biological invasions: winning the science battles but losing the conservation war? Oryx 37:178–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Jenkins G. (2002) Climate change scenarios for the United Kingdom. The UKCIP02 briefing report. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Humphreys J (2005) Salinity and tides in Poole Harbour: estuary or lagoon? In: Humphreys J, May V (Eds) The ecology of Poole Harbour. Elesevier, Amsterdam pp 35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Humphreys J, May V (2005) Introduction: Poole Harbour in context. In: Humphreys J, May V (eds) The ecology of Poole Harbour. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  19. Ikematsu W (1957) Ecological studies on the clam, Tapes japonica (Reeve) II. On the setting season and the growth in early young stage. Bull Jap Soc Sci Fish 22:736–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ishii R, Sekiguchi H, Nakahara Y, Jinnai Y (2001) Larval recruitment of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum in Ariake Sound, southern Japan. Fish Sci 67:579–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen AC, Humphreys J, Caldow RWG, Grisley C, Dyrynda PEJ (2004) Naturalization of the Manila clam (Tapes philippinarum), an alien species, and establishment of a clam fishery within Poole Harbour, Dorset. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 84:1069–1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen A, Humphreys J, Caldow R, Cesar C (2005) The Manila clam in Poole Harbour. In: Humphreys J, May V (eds) The ecology of Poole Harbour. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 163–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laing ISD, Utting SD (1994) The physiology and biochemistry of diploid and triploid clams (Tapes philippinarum) larvae and juveniles. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 184:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Langston WJ, Chesman BS, Burt GR, Hawkins SJ, Readman J, Worsfold P (2003) Site characterisation of the South West European Marine Sites. Poole Harbour SPA. Marine Biological Association Occasional publication No 12. 164ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Laruelle F, Guillou J, Paulet YM (1994) Reproductive pattern of the clams, Ruditapes decussatus and R. philippinarum on intertidal flats in Brittany. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 74:351–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee SY (1996) Distribution pattern and interaction of two infaunal bivalves, Tapes philippinarum (Adams and Reeve) and Anomalocardia squamosa (Linnaeus) (Bivalvia: Veneridae). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 201:253–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (2002) Alien species in European waters. In: Leppäkoski E, Gollasch S, Olenin S (eds) Invasive aquatic species of Europe. Distribution, impacts and management. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Macdonald PDM, Green PEJ (1988) User’s Guide to Program MIX: an interactive program for fitting mixtures of distributions. Release 2.3. Ichthus Data Systems, ONGoogle Scholar
  29. McGrorty S, Clarke RT, Reading CJ, Goss-Custard JD (1990) Population dynamics of the mussel Mytilus edulis: density changes and regulation of the population in the Exe estuary, Devon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 67:157–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Melià P, De Leo GA, Gatto M (2004) Density and temperature-dependence of vital rates in the Manila clam Tapes philippinarum: a stochastic demographic model. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 272:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Menesguen A, Flassch J-P, Nédélec J (1984) Utilisation de l’analyse mathématique de la croissance dans la comparaison de diverses techniques d’élevage de la Palourde. Oceanol Acta 7:499–507Google Scholar
  32. Miller MB, Chew K, Jones CR, Goodwin L, Magoon CD (1978) Manila clam seeding as an approach to clam population enhancement. Wash Sea Grant Publ, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  33. Mistri M (2004) Prey preference of Carcinus aestuarii: possible implications with the control of an invasive mytilid and Manila clam culture in a northern Adriatic lagoon. Aquaculture 230:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miyawaki D, Sekiguchi H (1999) Interannual variation of bivalve populations on temperate tidal flats. Fish Sci 65:817–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mooney HA, Cleland EE (2001) The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:5446–5451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mortensen SH, Strand Ø (2000) Releases and recaptures of Manila clams (Ruditapes philippinarum) introduced to Norway. Sarsia 85:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nakamura Y, Hagino M, Hiwatari T, Iijima A, Kohata K, Furota T (2002) Growth of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum in Sanbanse, the shallow coastal area in Tokyo Bay. Fish Sci 68:1309–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nosho TY, Chew KK (1972) The setting and growth of the Manila clam, Venerupis japonica (Deshayes), in Hood Canal, Washington. Proc Natl Shellfish Assoc 62:50–58Google Scholar
  39. Ohba S (1959) Ecological studies in the natural population of a clam, Tapes japonica, with special reference to seasonal variations in the size and structure of the population and to individual growth. Biol J Okayama Univ 5:13–43Google Scholar
  40. Ponurovskii SK (2000) Size and age structures of the bivalve mollusk Ruditapes philippinarum population in the shallow waters of South Primor’e. Oceanology 40:693–699Google Scholar
  41. Ponurovskii SK, Selin NI (1988) Distribution, population structure, and growth of the bivalve molusk Ruditapes philippinarum in Vostok Bay, Sea of Japan. Sov J Mar Biol 1:11–15Google Scholar
  42. Quayle DB (1949) Movements in Venerupis (Paphia) pallustra (Montagu). Proc Malac Soc Lond 28:31–37Google Scholar
  43. Ricciardi A, Bourget E (1998) Weight-to-weight conversion factors for marine benthic macroinvertebrates. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Robert R, Trut G, Laborde JL (1993) Growth, reproduction and gross biochemical composition of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum in the Bay of Arcachon, France. Mar Biol 116:291–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Silina AV, Popov AM (1989) Investigation of linear growth of the bivalve mollusc Ruditapes philippinarum from Peter the Great Bay (Sea of Japan) by the shell structure. Sov J Mar Biol 4:265–271Google Scholar
  46. Skarlato OA (1981) Bivalve molluscs from the temperate latitudes of the Western Pacific Ocean. Nauka, LeningradGoogle Scholar
  47. Solidoro C, Melaku Canu D, Rossi R (2003) Ecological and economic considerations on fishing and rearing of Tapes philippinarum in the lagoon of Venice. Ecol Model 170:303–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Solidoro C, Pastres R, Melaku Canu D, Pellizzato M, Rossi R (2000) Modelling the growth of Tapes philippinarum in Northern Adriatic lagoons. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 199:137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sorokin II, Giovanardi O, Pranovi F, Sorokin PI (1999) Need for restricting bivalve culture in the southern basin of the Lagoon of Venice. Hydrobiologia 400:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas NS, Caldow RWG, McGrorty S, Durell SEA leV dit, West AD, Stillman RA (2004) Bird invertebrate prey availability in Poole Harbour. Poole Harbour Study Group, WarehamGoogle Scholar
  51. Toba DR, Thompson DS, Chew KK, Anderson GJ, Miller MB (1992) Guide to Manila clam culture in Washington. Wash Sea Grant Publ, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  52. Uzaki N, Kai M, Aoyama H, Suzuki T (2003) Changes in mortality rate and glycogen content of the Manila clam Ruditapes philippinarum during the development of oxygen-deficient waters. Fish Sci 69:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Welch BL (1951) On the comparison of several mean values an alternative approach. Biometrika 38:330–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Humphreys
    • 1
  • Richard W. G. Caldow
    • 2
  • Selwyn McGrorty
    • 2
  • Andrew D. West
    • 2
  • Antony C. Jensen
    • 3
  1. 1.Old Royal Naval CollegeUniversity of GreenwichGreenwich, LondonUK
  2. 2.Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, CEH DorsetWinfrith Technology CentreDorchesterUK
  3. 3.School of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography CentreUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK

Personalised recommendations