Wave exposure effects on population structure and recruitment in the mussel Perna perna suggest regulation primarily through availability of recruits and food, not space
- 237 Downloads
Recruitment and population structure of Perna perna in low shore mussel beds were investigated over 15 months at six sites along the south coast of South Africa. Initial, subjective classification of sites as wave exposed or wave sheltered (three of each) was confirmed using the dissolution of cement blocks to measure average water flux and dynamometers for maximum wave force. Recruitment occurred throughout the year, but recruit (1–5 mm) densities were significantly higher from January to April 1996 on both shore types. Recruit densities were positively correlated with adult (>15 mm) densities for both shore types (P < 0.05) but the correlations were extremely weak (r2 < 0.06 in each case). In areas with 100% cover, adult size (mean and maximum lengths) was greater on exposed sites, but density showed the reverse and was negatively correlated with maximum wave strength (r = −0.84). Despite differences in adult densities and sizes, biomass, which is a product of the two, showed no significant difference between the two shore types (ANOVA P > 0.05). Thus wave exposure dramatically affects density, recruitment and mussel size, but not recruitment timing or biomass where there is 100% cover, and mediates a three-way interaction among food supply, larval supply and intraspecific competition for space. In contrast to shores with saturation recruitment, mussel biomass here appears to be limited by recruit supply and constraints of food, especially on sheltered shores, while density is regulated through intraspecific competition for space primarily on exposed shores and at small spatial scales.
KeywordsIntraspecific Competition Perna Wave Exposure Adult Density Mussel Population
We gratefully acknowledge funding from the National Research Foundation of South Africa and Rhodes University. This research complied with the laws of South Africa.
- Ballantine WJ (1961) A biologically-defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rocky shores. Field Stud 1:1–19Google Scholar
- Crawford RJM, Bower DF (1983) Aspects of growth, recruitment and conservation of the brown mussel Perna perna along the Tsitsikamma coast. Koedoe 26:123–133Google Scholar
- van Erkom Schurink C, Griffiths CL (1990) Marine mussels of Southern Africa-their distribution patterns, standing stocks, exploitation and culture. J Shellfish Res 9:75–85Google Scholar
- Grant J, Dowd M, Thompson K, Emerson C, Hatcher A (1993) Perspectives on field studies and related biological models of bivalve growth and carrying capacity. In: Dame RF (ed) Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes. Series G, vol. 33 Springer, Heidelberg, pp 371–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harger JRE (1970) The effect of wave impact on some aspects of the biology of sea mussels. Veliger 12:401–414Google Scholar
- Harger JRE, Landenberger DE (1971) The effect of storms as a density dependent mortality factor on populations of sea mussels. Veliger 14:195–201Google Scholar
- Hepburn HR, Sinclair GS, Davidoff MR, Moss EA, Chandler HD, Ripley S (1979) Byssus threads and their tenacity. S Afr J Sci 75:187–189Google Scholar
- Hunt HL, Scheibling RE (2000) Movement and wave dislodgement of mussels on a wave-exposed rocky shore. Veliger 45:273–277Google Scholar
- Jenkins SR, Aberg P, Cervin G, Coleman RA, Delany J, Della Santina P, Hawkins SJ, LaCroix E, Myers AA, Lindegarth M, Power AM, Roberts MF, Hartnoll RG (2000) Spatial and temporal variation in settlement and recruitment of the intertidal barnacle Semibalanus balanoides (L.) (Crustacea: Cirripedia) over a European scale. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 243:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lasiak TA (1993) The shellfish gathering practises of indigenous people in Transkei: patterns, preferences and perceptions. S Afr J Ethnol 16:115–120Google Scholar
- Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall Inc., New JerseyGoogle Scholar