Cephalopod hatchling growth: the effects of initial size and seasonal temperatures
- 361 Downloads
Temperature is known to have a strong influence on cephalopod growth during the early exponential growth phase. Most captive growth studies have used constant temperature regimes and assumed that populations are composed of identically sized individuals at hatching, overlooking the effects of seasonal temperature variation and individual hatchling size heterogeneity. This study investigated the relative roles of initial hatchling size and simulated natural seasonal temperature regimes on the growth of 64 captive Octopus pallidus over a 4-month period. Initial weights were recorded, and daily food consumption and fortnightly growth monitored. Two temperature treatments were applied replicating local seasonal water temperatures: spring/summer (14–18°C) and summer/autumn (18–14°C). Overall octopuses in the spring/summer treatment grew at a rate of 1.42% bwd−1 (% body weight per day) compared to 1.72% bwd−1 in the summer/autumn treatment. Initial size influenced growth rate in the summer/autumn treatment with smaller octopuses (<0.25 g) growing faster at 1.82% bwd−1 compared to larger octopuses at 1.68% bwd−1. This was opposite to individuals in the spring/summer treatment where smaller octopuses grew slower at 1.29% bwd−1 compared to larger octopuses at 1.60% bwd−1. Initial size influenced subsequent growth, however, this was dependent on feeding rate and appears to be secondary to the effects of temperature.
KeywordsInitial Size Carapace Width Instantaneous Growth Rate Total Feed Cephalopod Species
The authors would like to thank Jessica André, TAFI staff and students for their assistance in the maintenance and set up of the culture system, and Michael and Craig Hardy for catching brood stock. This experiment complied with current Tasmanian and Australian laws and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Tasmania under project No. A0008130.
- Ambrose RF (1988) Population dynamics of Octopus bimaculatus: influence of life history patterns, synchronous reproduction and recruitment. Malacologia 29(1):23–39Google Scholar
- DeRusha RH, Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1987) Laboratory growth, reproduction and life span of the Pacific pygmy octopus, Octopus diguetti. Pac Sci 41:104–121Google Scholar
- Forsythe JW (1993) A working hypothesis of how seasonal temperature change may impact the field growth of young cephalopods. In: Okutani T, O’Dor RK, Kubodera T (eds) Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 133–143Google Scholar
- Forsythe JW, Van Heukelem WF (1987) Growth. In: Boyle PR (ed) Cephalopod life cycles, vol 2. Academic, London, pp 135–155Google Scholar
- Ito H (1983) Some observations on the embryonic development of Paroctopus conispadiceus (Mollusca Cephalopoda). Bull Hokkaido Reg Fish Res Lab 48:93–105Google Scholar
- Jackson GD (1994) Statolith age estimates of the loliginid squid Loligo opalescens (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): corroboration with culture data. Bull Mar Sci 54(2):554–557Google Scholar
- Pecl G, Steer MA, Hodgson K (2004) The role of hatchling size in generating the intrinsic size-at-age variability of cephalopods: extending the Forsythe hypothesis. Mar Freshwater Res 55Google Scholar
- Segawa S, Nomoto A (2002) Laboratory growth, feeding, oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion of Octopus ocellatus. Bull Mar Sci 7(2):801–813Google Scholar
- Stranks TN (1988) Rediscription of Octopus pallidus (Cehpahlopoda: Octopodidae) from southeastern Australia. Malacologia 29(1):275–287Google Scholar