Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 4, pp 1375–1383 | Cite as

Cephalopod hatchling growth: the effects of initial size and seasonal temperatures

  • Stephen C. LeporatiEmail author
  • Gretta T. Pecl
  • Jayson M. Semmens
Research Article


Temperature is known to have a strong influence on cephalopod growth during the early exponential growth phase. Most captive growth studies have used constant temperature regimes and assumed that populations are composed of identically sized individuals at hatching, overlooking the effects of seasonal temperature variation and individual hatchling size heterogeneity. This study investigated the relative roles of initial hatchling size and simulated natural seasonal temperature regimes on the growth of 64 captive Octopus pallidus over a 4-month period. Initial weights were recorded, and daily food consumption and fortnightly growth monitored. Two temperature treatments were applied replicating local seasonal water temperatures: spring/summer (14–18°C) and summer/autumn (18–14°C). Overall octopuses in the spring/summer treatment grew at a rate of 1.42% bwd−1 (% body weight per day) compared to 1.72% bwd−1 in the summer/autumn treatment. Initial size influenced growth rate in the summer/autumn treatment with smaller octopuses (<0.25 g) growing faster at 1.82% bwd−1 compared to larger octopuses at 1.68% bwd−1. This was opposite to individuals in the spring/summer treatment where smaller octopuses grew slower at 1.29% bwd−1 compared to larger octopuses at 1.60% bwd−1. Initial size influenced subsequent growth, however, this was dependent on feeding rate and appears to be secondary to the effects of temperature.


Initial Size Carapace Width Instantaneous Growth Rate Total Feed Cephalopod Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank Jessica André, TAFI staff and students for their assistance in the maintenance and set up of the culture system, and Michael and Craig Hardy for catching brood stock. This experiment complied with current Tasmanian and Australian laws and approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the University of Tasmania under project No. A0008130.


  1. Aguado Gimenez F, Garcia Garcia B (2002) Growth and food intake models in Octopus vulgaris Curvier (1797): influence of body weight, temperature, sex and diet. Aquac Int 10:361–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrose RF (1988) Population dynamics of Octopus bimaculatus: influence of life history patterns, synchronous reproduction and recruitment. Malacologia 29(1):23–39Google Scholar
  3. Boletzky SV (1994) Embryonic development of cephalopods at low temperatures. Antarct Sci 6(2):139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buresch KM, Hanlon RT, Maxwell MR, Ring R (2001) Microsatellite DNA markers indicate a high frequency of multiple paternity within individual field-collected egg capsules of the squid Loligo pealeii. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 210:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caveriviere A, Domain F, Diallo A (1999) Observations on the influence of temperature on the length of embryonic development in Octopus vulgaris (Senegal). Aquat Living Resour 12(2):151–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Challier L, Dunn MR, Robin JP (2005) Trends in age-at-recruitment and juvenile growth of cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis, from the English Channel. ICES J Mar Sci 62:1671–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cortez T, Gonzalez AF, Guerra A (1999) Growth of Octopus mimus (Cephalopoda, Octopodidae) in wild populations. Fish Res 42:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeRusha RH, Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1987) Laboratory growth, reproduction and life span of the Pacific pygmy octopus, Octopus diguetti. Pac Sci 41:104–121Google Scholar
  9. Emery AM, Wilson IJ, Craig S, Boyle PR, Noble LR (2001) Assignment of paternity groups without access to paternal genotypes: multiple mating and development plasticity in squid. Mol Ecol 10:1265–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forsythe JW (1984) Octopus joubini (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): a detailed study of growth through the full life cycle in a closed seawater system. J Zool (Lond) 202:393–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Forsythe JW (1993) A working hypothesis of how seasonal temperature change may impact the field growth of young cephalopods. In: Okutani T, O’Dor RK, Kubodera T (eds) Recent advances in cephalopod fisheries biology. Tokai University Press, Tokyo, pp 133–143Google Scholar
  12. Forsythe JW (2004) Accounting for the effects of temperature on squid growth in nature: from hypothesis to practice. Mar Freshw Res 55:331–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Forsythe JW, Hanlon RT (1988) Effect of temperature on laboratory growth, reproduction and life span of Octopus bimaculoides. Mar Biol 98:369–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forsythe JW, Van Heukelem WF (1987) Growth. In: Boyle PR (ed) Cephalopod life cycles, vol 2. Academic, London, pp 135–155Google Scholar
  15. Forsythe JW, Walsh LS, Turk PE, Lee PG (2001) Impact of temperature on juvenile growth and age at first egg laying of the Pacific reef squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana reared in captivity. Mar Biol 138:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garcia Garcia B, Aguado Gimenez F (2002) Influence of diet on ongrowing and nutrient utilization in the common octopus (Octopus vulgaris). Aquaculture 211:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatfield EMC (2000) Do some like it hot? Temperature as a possible determinant of variability in the growth of the Patagonian squid, Loligo gahi (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Fish Res 47:27–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hatfield EMC, Hanlon RT, Forsythe JW, Grist EPM (2001) Laboratory testing of a growth hypothesis for juvenile squid Loligo pealeii (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:845–857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iglesias J, Otero JJ, Moxica C, Fuentes L, Sanchez FJ (2004) The completed life cycle of the octopus (Octopus vulgaris, Cuvier) under culture conditions: para larval rearing using Artemia and zoeae, and first data on juvenile growth up to 8 months of age. Aquac Int 12:481–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ikeda Y, Wada Y, Arai N, Sakamoto W (1999) Note on size variation of body and statoliths in the oval squid Sepioteuthis lessoniana hatchlings. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 79:757–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ito H (1983) Some observations on the embryonic development of Paroctopus conispadiceus (Mollusca Cephalopoda). Bull Hokkaido Reg Fish Res Lab 48:93–105Google Scholar
  22. Jackson GD (1994) Statolith age estimates of the loliginid squid Loligo opalescens (Mollusca: Cephalopoda): corroboration with culture data. Bull Mar Sci 54(2):554–557Google Scholar
  23. Mangold K (1983) Food, feeding and growth in cephalopods. Mem Nat Mus Victoria 44:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miliou H, Fintikaki M, Kountouris T, Verriopoulos G (2005) Combined effects of temperature and body weight on growth and protein utilization of the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris. Aquaculture 249:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pecl GT, Moltschaniwskyj NA (1999) Somatic growth processes: how are they altered in captivity? Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1133–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pecl G, Steer MA, Hodgson K (2004) The role of hatchling size in generating the intrinsic size-at-age variability of cephalopods: extending the Forsythe hypothesis. Mar Freshwater Res 55Google Scholar
  27. Rodriguez C, Carrasco JF, Arronte JC, Rodriguez M (2006) Common octopus (Octopus vulgaris Cuvier, 1797) juvenile ongrowing in floating cages. Aquaculture 254:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Segawa S, Nomoto A (2002) Laboratory growth, feeding, oxygen consumption and ammonia excretion of Octopus ocellatus. Bull Mar Sci 7(2):801–813Google Scholar
  29. Steer MA, Pecl GT, Moltschaniwskyj NA (2003) Are bigger calamary Sepioteuthis australis hatchlings more likely to survive? A study based on statolith dimensions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 261:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Steer MA, Moltschaniwskyj NA, Nichols PD, Miller M (2004) The role of temperature and maternal ration in embryo survival: using the dumpling squid Euprymna tasmanica as a model. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 307:73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stranks TN (1988) Rediscription of Octopus pallidus (Cehpahlopoda: Octopodidae) from southeastern Australia. Malacologia 29(1):275–287Google Scholar
  32. Tracey S, Steer MA, Pecl GT (2003) Life history traits of the temperate mini-maximalist Idiosepius notoides, (Cephalopoda: Sepioidea). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 83:1297–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wood JB, O’Dor RK (2000) Do larger cephalopods live longer? Effects of temperature and phylogeny on interspecific comparisons of age and size at maturity. Mar Biol 136:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen C. Leporati
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gretta T. Pecl
    • 1
  • Jayson M. Semmens
    • 1
  1. 1.Tasmanian Aquaculture Fisheries Institute, Marine Research LaboratoriesUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations