Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 3, pp 1077–1085 | Cite as

Pinna nobilis L., 1758 age determination by internal shell register

  • J. R. Garcia-MarchEmail author
  • A. Márquez-Aliaga
Research Article


The age of the Mediterranean endemic Bivalve mollusc Pinna nobilis is estimated using the total size and the number and position of posterior adductor muscle scars (PAMS): a series of straight lines and rings observed in the dorsal nacre-lobe. Nevertheless, the position of PAMS of adult individuals inhabiting the same population and depth is highly variable. To assess the source of this variability, the shells of nine individuals were cut into radial sections along PAMS and the inner register was studied. The cuts showed clear marks of the inner register formed around the PAMS composed by a short nacre tongue introduced within the calcitic layer and two calcitic strips of differing colour (bright and dark). The three components are directed towards the posterior of the shell. The marks of the inner register coincide only with the straight lines of PAMS, but are observed in an anterior position further than the straight lines and rings, and in a posterior position further than the rings. Also, some of the most posterior marks can be observed one under the other in the oldest individuals. The existence of the inner register’s marks in a position further anterior than the straight lines and rings implies that a variable number of PAMS are obscured beneath nacreous deposits. Eventually, we advise against the utilization of PAMS to study P. nobilis age. We instead recommend the use of the inner register as it records more accurately the life history of the individuals, and data indicates that each mark is formed annually.


Calcite Internal Register Adult Individual Empty Shell Nacreous Layer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are grateful to J.G. Carter, N. Vicente, A.M. García-Carrascosa, A.L. Peña Cantero and M. Goodstadt for their support and constructive criticism of the manuscript and Araceli Terrones, for her help with the processing of the shells. The research was partially funded by the project KGL2005-015201BTE of the Spanish Science Education Ministry.


  1. Bhattacharya CG (1967) A simple method of resolution of a distribution into Gaussian components. Biometrics 23:115–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Butler AJ (1987) Ecology of Pinna bicolor Gmelin (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in Gulf St Vincent, South Australia: density, reproductive cycle, recruitment, growth and mortality at three sites. Aust J Mar Freshwat Res 38:743–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler AJ, Brewster FJ 1979 Size distributions and growth of the Fan-shell Pinna bicolor Gmelin (mollusca: Eulamelibranchia) in South Australia. Aust J Mar Freshwat Res 30:25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carter JG (1980) Environmental and biological controls of Bivalve shell mineralogy and microstructure. In: Rhoads DC, Lutz RA (eds) Skeletal growth of aquatic organisms biological records of environmental change. New York, London, pp 69–114Google Scholar
  5. Cohen AL, Branch GM (1992) Environmentally controlled variation in the structure and mineralogy of Patella granularis shells from the coast of southern Africa: implications for paleotemperature assessments. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 9:49–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dodd JR (1964) Environmentally controlled variation in the shell structure of a pelecypod species. J Paleontol 38:1065–1071Google Scholar
  7. Francillon-Vieillot H, de Bufférnil V, Castanet J, Géraudie J, Meunier FJ, Sire JY, Zylberberg L, de Ricqlès A (1990) Microstructure and mineralization of vertebrate skeletal tissues. In: Carter JG (ed) Skeletal biomineralization: patterns, processes and evolutionary trends, vol I. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 471–530Google Scholar
  8. García-March JR (2006) Aportaciones al conocimiento de la Biología de Pinna nobilis Linneo, 1758 (Mollusca: Bivalvia) en el litoral mediterráneo Ibérico. Publication Service of the University of Valencia, ValenciaGoogle Scholar
  9. García-March JR, García-Carrascosa AM, Peña AL, Wang YG (2006) Population structure, mortality and growth of two populations of Pinna nobilis Linnaeus, 1758 located at different depths in Moraira bay (Alicante, western Mediterranean). Mar Biol. DOI 10.1007/s00227-006-0386-1Google Scholar
  10. García-March JR, Márquez-Aliaga A, Carter JC. The duplivincular ligament of recent Pinna nobilis L., 1758: further evidence for Pterineid ancestry of the Pinnoidea. J Paleontol. (in press)
  11. Kennedy H, Richardson CA, Duarte CM, Kennedy DP (2001) Oxygen and carbon stable isotopic profiles of the fan mussel, Pinna nobilis, and reconstruction of sea surface temperatures in the Mediterranean. Mar Biol 139(6):1115–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Margaleff, R (ed) (1998) Ecología. Ediciones Omega S.A., BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  13. Moreteau JC, Vicente N (1980) Etude morphologique et croissance de Pinna nobilis L. (Mollusque Eulamelibranche) dans le parc national sous-marin de Port-Cros (Var-France). Vie Marine 2:52–58Google Scholar
  14. Quinn G, Keough M (eds) (2004) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Richardson CA, Kennedy H, Duarte CM, Kennedy DP, Proud SV (1999) Age and growth of the fan mussel Pinna nobilis from south-east Spanish Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadows. Mar Biol 133:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Richardson CA, Peharda M, Kennedy H, Kennedy P, Onofri V (2004) Age, growth rate and season of recruitment of Pinna nobilis (L) in the Croatian Adriatic determined from Mg:Ca and Sr:Ca shell profiles. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 299:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Taylor JD, Kennedy WJ, Hall A (1969) The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. Introduction. Nuculacea-Trigonacea. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology. Supplement 3. LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Ubukata T (2001) Stacking increments: a new model and morphoespace for the analysis of Bivalve shell growth. Hist Biol 15:303–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vicente N (1990) Estudio ecológico y protección del molusco lamelibranquio Pinna nobilis L. 1758 en la costa mediterránea. Iberus 9(1–2):269–279Google Scholar
  20. Wang YG (2004) Estimation of growth parameters from multiple-recapture data. Biometrics 60:670–675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zavodnik D, Hrs-Brenko M, Legac M (1991) Synopsis on the fan shell Pinna nobilis L. in the eastern Adriatic sea. In: Boudouresque CF, Avon M, Gravez V (eds) Les Espèces Marines à Protéger en Méditerranée. Gis Posidonie publ. Marseille pp 169–178Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marine Biology LaboratoryUniversity of ValenciaBurjassot (Valencia)Spain
  2. 2.Instituto Cavanilles de Biodiversidad y Biología Evolutiva, Departamento de GeologíaUniversitat de ValenciaBurjassot (Valencia)Spain

Personalised recommendations