Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 151, Issue 1, pp 31–39 | Cite as

Comparative analysis on the genetic population structures of the deep-sea whelks Buccinum tsubai and Neptunea constricta in the Sea of Japan

  • Akira Iguchi
  • Shinpei Takai
  • Masahiro Ueno
  • Tsuneo Maeda
  • Takashi Minami
  • Isao Hayashi
Research Article

Abstract

The population structures of Buccinum tsubai and Neptunea constricta were compared using partial sequences of the mitochondrial COI gene. B. tsubai included four genetically distinguishable subpopulations (Hokkaido, Yamagata-Toyama, Yamato Bank, and San’in), which is consistent with the results of our previous study using mitochondrial 16SrRNA sequences. The genetic structure of N. constricta was also clear, but the lineage sorting corresponding to the geographical distribution was not as clear as that of B. tsubai. The difference between the genetic structures of these two species might be due to a difference in either their dispersal abilities or the historic distribution patterns in the Sea of Japan. The fossil record and nested clade analyses support the latter alternative. The four subpopulations of B. tsubai are estimated to have diverged 0.42–1.46 million years ago, providing support for the existence of intermediate water of normal salinity and oxygen concentration capable of sustaining B. tsubai between the low-salinity surface water and anoxic deep water during the Pleistocene glacial periods. The genetic diversity of the Yamato Bank subpopulation of B. tsubai was lower than that of the other subpopulations, which is likely attributable to the small size of the Yamato Bank subpopulation.

Keywords

Genetic Population Structure Intermediate Water Submarine Canyon Nest Clade Mismatch Distribution Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank many collaborators for collection of samples. We are grateful to K. Amano, D. de Jong, and D. Miller for their advice. Comments received by editor and anonymous reviewers were extremely helpful in improving the original submission.

References

  1. Amano K (1997) Biogeography of the genus Neptunea (Gastropoda:Buccinidae) from the Pliocene and the lower Pleistocene of the Japan Sea borderland. Paleontol Res 1:274–284Google Scholar
  2. Amano K (2003) Biogeography and the Pleistocene extinction of neogastropods in the Japan Sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 202:245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amano K, Watanabe M (2001) Taxonomy and distribution of Plio-Pleistocene Buccinum (Gastropoda:Buccinidae) in northeast Japan. Paleontol Res 5:215–226Google Scholar
  4. Amio M (1963) A comparative embryology of marine gastropods, with ecological considerations. J Shimonoseki Univ Fish 12:229–355 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  5. Avise JC (1994) Molecular markers, natural history and evolution. Chapman & Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9:1657–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genitics 131: 479–491Google Scholar
  8. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3:294–299Google Scholar
  9. Golikov AN (1963) Gastropods of the genus Neptunea Bolten. Fauna USSR, vol V, Molluscs, 217 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  10. Golikov AN (1980) The molluscs Buccininae of the world Ocean. Fauna USSR, vol V, Mollusca, 465 pp (in Russian)Google Scholar
  11. Hellberg ME, Vacquier VD (1999) Rapid evolution of fertilization selectivity and lysin cDNA sequences in teguline gastropods. Mol Biol Evol 16:839–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iguchi A, Ueno M, Maeda T, Minami T, Hayashi I (2004) Genetic population structure of the deep-sea whelk Buccinum tsubai in the Japan Sea. Fish Sci 70:569–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Itaki T (2001) Radiolarian faunal changes in the eastern Japan Sea during the last 30 kyr. News Osaka Micropaleontol 12:359–374 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  14. Itaki T, Ikehara K, Motoyama I, Hasegawa S (2004) Abrupt ventilation changes in the Japan Sea over the last 30 ky: evidence from deep dwelling radiolarians. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 208:263–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kato F (1979) Studies on the distribution of four species of edible deep-sea whelk (Mollusca, Buccinidae) in the Japan Sea. Bull Jpn Sea Reg Fish Res Lab 30:15–27 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  16. Kimura M (1980) A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kojima S, Segawa R, Hayashi I, Okiyama M (2001) Phylogeography of a deep-sea demersal fish, Bothrocara hollandi, in the Japan Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 217:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kojima S, Hayashi I, Kim D, Iijima A, Furuta T (2004) Phylogeography of an intertidal direct-developing gastropod Batillaria cumingi around the Japanese Islands. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 276:161–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen BI, Nei M (2001) MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software, Arizona State University, Tempe, ArizonaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kyle CJ, Boulding EG (2000) Comparative population genetic structure of marine gastropods (Littorina spp.) with and without pelagic larval dispersal. Mar Biol 137:835–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nishimura S (1968) The zoographical aspects of the Japan sea Part IV. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 15:329–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishimura S (1969) The zoographical aspects of the Japan sea Part V. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 17:67–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oba T, Kato M, Kitazato H, Koizumi I, Omura A, Sakai T, Takayama T (1991) Paleoenvironmental changes in the Japan Sea during the last 85,000 years. Paleoceanography 6:499–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ohshima K (1990) The history of straits around Japanese Islands in the Late-Quaternary. Quat Res (Tokyo) 29:193–208 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  25. Okutani T (2000) Marine mollusks in Japan. Tokai University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  26. Posada D, Crandall KA, Templeton AR (2000) GEODIS: a program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Mol Ecol 9:487–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers AR (1995) Genetic evidence for a Pleistocene population expansion. Evolution 49:608–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbour-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
  29. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin ver. 2.000: a software for population genetic data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  30. Seto Y (1999) Study on rearing deep-sea whelks using deep ocean water. JADOWA News 3:11–14 (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  31. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using Parsimony (* and other methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  32. Tada R (1994) Paleoceanographic evolution of the Japan Sea. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 108:487–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tada R, Irino T (1999) Land-ocean linkages over orbital and millennial timescales recorded in late Quaternary sediments of the Japan Sea. Paleoceanography 14:236–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Templeton AR, Sing CF (1993) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. IV. Nested analyses with cladogram uncertainty and recombination. Genetics 134:659–669PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Templeton AR, Boerwinkle E, Sing CF (1987) A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping. I. Basic theory and an analysis of alcohol dehydrogenase activity in Drosophila. Genetics 117:343–351PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Templeton AR, Routman E, Phillips CA (1995) Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the tiger salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics 140:769–782Google Scholar
  37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 24:4876–4882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsuchida E, Hayashi I (1994) Characteristics of lower-sublittoral and bathyal molluscs in the western area of the Japan Sea. Bull Jpn Sea Natl Fish Res Inst 44:81–129 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  39. Webber HH (1977) Gastropoda: Prosobranchia. In: Giesc AC, Pearse JS (eds) Reproduction of marine invertebrates, vol IV, Molluscs: gastropods and cephalopods. Academic, New York, 77 ppGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Iguchi
    • 1
  • Shinpei Takai
    • 1
  • Masahiro Ueno
    • 2
  • Tsuneo Maeda
    • 3
  • Takashi Minami
    • 4
  • Isao Hayashi
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Applied Biosciences, Graduate School of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Field Science Education and Research CenterKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Toyama Prefecture Fisheries Research InstituteToyamaJapan
  4. 4.Japan Sea National Fisheries Research InstituteNiigataJapan

Personalised recommendations