Marine Biology

, Volume 148, Issue 5, pp 953–962 | Cite as

The effects of boat propeller scarring intensity on nekton abundance in subtropical seagrass meadows

  • Dana D. Burfeind
  • Gregory W. StunzEmail author
Research Article


Seagrasses play a critical role in the function and structure of coastal ecosystems, and they are an important habitat for a variety of marine organisms. Damage to seagrass beds caused by boat propeller scarring is significant in many areas. This study was designed to assess the impact of varying scarring intensities on nekton density. We selected ten replicate (10 m×25 m quadrats) sites representing four distinct scarring intensities: reference (0%), low (5% or less), moderate (5–15%), and severe (>15%). Sites were sampled in 2003–2004 for nekton during four seasons (summer, fall, winter, and spring) using epibenthic sleds. There were eight taxa numerically dominant in all seasons and an additional four seasonally dominant species. We were unable to detect a significant effect of propeller scarring on nekton density at any scarring level. Additionally, regression analysis indicated no relationship between scarring intensity and nekton density. These results suggest that propeller scarring intensities of up to ca. 27% may not impact nekton densities. However, seagrass loss, higher scarring intensity, and scale may play a critical role in determining the impact of propeller scarring on nekton.


Blue Crab Submerge Aquatic Vegetation Seagrass Meadow Total Catch Grass Shrimp 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank the Members of the Fisheries Ecology Lab at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi for their help on this project. Special thanks to Brooke Stanford, Ryan Fikes, Megan Reese, Amanda Bushon, and Annette Cardona for their hours of assistance in the field and laboratory, and to Steve Moore for producing Fig. 1. We gratefully acknowledge the comments and input by Chris Onuf. We would like to thank Ken Dunton of UTMSI and Richard Watson for flights over the study area. We would also like to thank anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the earlier drafts of the manuscript.


  1. Attrill MJ, Strong JA, Rowden AA (2000) Are macroinvertebrate communities influenced by seagrass structural complexity? Ecography 23:114–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck MW, Heck KL, Able KW, Childers DL, Eggleston DB, Gillanders BM, Halpern B, Hays CG, Hoshino K, Minello TJ, Orth RJ, Sheridan PF, Weinstein MP (2001) The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. BioScience 5:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell SS, Hall MO, Soffian S, Madley K (2002) Assessing the impact of boat propeller scars on fish and shrimp utilizing seagrass beds. Ecol Appl 12:206–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Britton JC, Morton B (1997) Shore ecology of the Gulf of Mexico, 3rd edn. University of Texas Press, AustinGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellanos DL, Rozas LP (2001) Nekton use of submerged aquatic vegetation, marsh, and shallow unvegetated bottom in the Atchafalaya River Delta, a Louisiana tidal freshwater ecosystem. Estuaries 24:184–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawes CJ, Andorfer J, Rose C, Uranowski C, Ehringer N (1997) Regrowth of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum into propeller scars. Aquat Bot 59:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doak DF, Marino PC, Kareiva PM (1992) Spatial scale mediates the influence of habitat fragmentation on dispersal success: implications for conservation. Theor Popul Biol 41:315–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunton KH, Schonberg SS (2002) Assessment of propeller scarring in seagrass beds of the south Texas coast. J Coast Res 37:100–110Google Scholar
  9. Eggleston DB, Elis WE, Etherington LL, Dahlgren CP, Posey MH (1999) Organism responses to habitat fragmentation and diversity: habitat colonization by estuarine macrofauna. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 236:107–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eleuterius LN (1987) Seagrass ecology along the coasts of Alabama, Louisiana, and Mississippi. In: Durako MJ, Phillips RC, Lewis RR (eds) Proceedings of the symposium on subtropical–tropical seagrasses of the Southeastern United States. Florida Marine Research Publication No. 42. Florida Department of Natural Resources, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  11. Fahrig L, Merriam G (1994) Conservation of fragmented populations. Conserv Biol 8:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fonseca MS, Bell SS (1998) Influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort, North Carolina, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 171:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haila Y (2002) A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecol Appl 12:321–334Google Scholar
  14. Heck KL, Thoman TA (1981) Experiments on predator–prey interactions in vegetated aquatic habitats. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 53:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heck KL, Thoman TA (1984) The nursery role of seagrass meadows in the upper and lower reaches of the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 7:70–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heck KL, Coen LD, Morgan SG (2001) Pre- and post-settlement factors as determinants of juvenile blue crab Callinectes sapidus abundance: results from the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 222:163–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heck KL, Hays G, Orth RJ (2003) Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hemminga MA, Duarte CM (2000) Seagrass ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Holt SA, Kitting CL, Arnold CR (1983) Distribution of young red drums among different sea-grass meadows. Trans Am Fish Soc 112:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hovel KA, Lipcius RN (2002) Effects of seagrass habitat fragmentation on juvenile blue crab survival and abundance. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 271:75–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levin P, Petrik R, Malone J (1997) Interactive effects of habitat selection, food supply and predation on recruitment of an estuarine fish. Oecologia 112(1):55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lipton DW, Wellman KF, Shiefer IC, Weiher RF (1995) Economic valuation of natural resources—a handbook for coastal resource policymakers. NOAA Coastal Ocean Program Decision Analysis Series No. 5. NOAA Coastal Ocean Office, Silver SpringGoogle Scholar
  23. McGarigal K, Cushman SA (2002) Comparative evaluation of experimental approaches to the study of habitat fragmentation effects. Ecol Appl 12(2):335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Minello TJ (1999) Nekton densities in shallow estuarine habitats of Texas and Louisiana and the identification of essential fish habitat. In: Benaka LR (eds) Fish habitat: essential fish habitat, and rehabilitation. American Fisheries Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  25. Minello TJ, Webb JW (1997) Use of natural and created Spartina alterniflora salt marshes by fishery species and other aquatic fauna in Galveston Bay, Texas, USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 151(1–3):165–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Onuf CP (1994) Seagrasses, dredging and light in Laguna Madre, Texas, U.S.A. Est Coast Shelf Sci 39:75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Orth RJ, Heck KL, Van Montfrans JV (1984) Faunal communities in seagrass beds: a review of the influence of plant structure and prey characteristics on predator–prey relationships. Estuaries 7:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Quammen ML, Onuf CP (1993) Laguna Madre—seagrass changes continue decades after salinity reduction. Estuaries 16:302–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robbins BD, Bell SS (1994) Seagrass landscapes: a terrestrial approach to the marine subtidal environment. Trends Ecol Evol 9:301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rooker JR, Holt GJ, Holt SA (1998) Vulnerability of newly settled red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) to predatory fish: is early-life survival enhanced by seagrass meadows. Mar Biol 131:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rozas LP, Minello TJ (1998) Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a south Texas (USA) estuary. Bull Mar Sci 63:481–501Google Scholar
  32. Rozas LP, Odum WE (1988) Occupation of submerged aquatic vegetation by fishes: testing the roles of food and refuge. Oecologia 77:101–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sargent FJ, Leary TJ, Crewz D, Jruer CR (1995) Scarring of Florida’s seagrasses: assessment and management options. Technical Report TR-1. Florida Marine Research Institute, St. PetersburgGoogle Scholar
  34. Saunders DA, Hobbs RJ, Margules CR (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: a review. Conserv Biol 5:18–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. SCPT (Seagrass Conservation Plan for Texas) (1999) Texas Parks and Wildlife, AustinGoogle Scholar
  36. Short FT, Burdick DM, Kaldy JE (1995) Mesocosm experiments quantify the effects of eutrophication on eelgrass, Zostera marina. Limnol Oceanogr 40:740–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Short FT, Wyllie-Echeverria S (1996) Natural and human induced disturbance of seagrasses. Environ Conserv 23:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stunz GW, Minello TJ (2001) Habitat-related predation on juvenile wild-caught and hatchery-reared red drum Sciaenops ocellatus (Linnaeus). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 260:13–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stunz GW, Minello TJ, Levin PS (2002a) A comparison of early juvenile red drum densities among various habitat types in Galveston Bay, Texas. Estuaries 25:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stunz GW, Minello TJ, Levin PS (2002b) Growth of newly settled red drum Sciaenops ocellatus in different estuarine habitat types. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 238:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Summerson HC, Peterson CH (1984) Role of predation in organizing benthic communities of a temperate-reef zone seagrass bed. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 15:63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tomasko DA, Lapointe BE (1991) Productivity and biomass of Thalassia testudinum as related to water column availability and epiphyte levels: field observations and experimental studies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 75:9–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uhrin AV, Holmquist JG (2003) Effects of propeller scarring on macrofaunal use of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 250:61–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zieman JC (1976) The ecological effects of physical damage from motor boats on turtle grass beds in southern Florida. Aquat Bot 2:127–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zimmerman RJ, Minello TJ (1984) Densities of Penaeus aztecus, Penaeus setiferus, and other natant macrofauna in a Texas salt marsh. Estuaries 7:421–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering, Center for Water StudiesUniversity of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations