High genetic diversity of the symbiotic dinoflagellates in the coral Pocillopora meandrina from the South Pacific
- 255 Downloads
Symbioses between dinoflagellates in the genus Symbiodinium (commonly referred to as zooxanthellae) and scleractinian corals are an essential feature for the maintenance of coral reefs. The fine-scale diversity and population structure of the zooxanthellae inhabiting the coral Pocillopora meandrina, a major reef building species in Polynesia, was examined. We used two polymorphic microsatellites to study seven populations from the South Pacific, whose host structuring has been previously investigated. The symbionts of P. meandrina showed high levels of diversity, with more than one zooxanthella genotype being identified in most of the host individuals. Genetic differentiation between symbiont populations was detected at a large scale (2,000 km) between the Tonga and the Society Archipelagos. Within the Society Archipelago, the two most remote populations (Tahiti and Bora-Bora; 200 km apart) were only weakly differentiated from each other. Statistical tests demonstrated that the symbiont genetic structure was not correlated with that of its host, suggesting that dispersal of the symbionts, whether they are transported within a host larva or free in the water, depends mainly on distance and water currents. In addition, the data suggests that hosts may acquire new symbionts after maternal transmission, possibly following a disturbance event. Lastly, the weak differentiation between symbiont populations of P. verrucosa and P. meandrina, both from Moorea, indicated that there was some host-symbiont fine-scale specificity detectable at the genetic resolution offered by microsatellites.
KeywordsSymbiodinium Pocillopora Microsatellite South Pacific Genetic diversity Dinoflagellate
We thank Scott R. Santos for helpful advice, valuable comments and corrections, and Todd C. LaJeunesse for his help in zooxanthellae identification and relevant comments. We also thank the three anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the manuscript. We thank the French Ministère de l’Outremer. This research was supported by a grant from the EPHE PPF network to Michel Veuille, by a grant from the TotalFinaElf Foundation to Mehdi Adjeroud, and by a Docteur-Ingénieur fellowship from the CNRS to Hélène Magalon.
- Brown BE, Dunne RP, Goodson MS, Douglas AE (2002) Experience shapes the susceptibility of a reef coral to bleaching. Coral Reefs 21:119–126Google Scholar
- Hunter CL, Morden CW, Smith CM (1997) The utility of ITS sequences in assessing relationships among zooxanthellae and corals. Proc 8th Int Coral Reef Sym 2:1599–1602Google Scholar
- LaJeunesse TC, Bhagooli R, Hidaka M, deVantier L, Done T, Schmidt GW, Fitt WK, Hoegh GO (2004a) Closely related Symbiodinium spp. differ in relative dominance in coral reef host communities across environmental, latitudinal and biogeographic gradients. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 284:147–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- LaJeunesse TC, Thornhill DJ, Cox EF, Stanton FG, Fitt WK, Schmidt GW (2004b) High genetic diversity and host specificity observed among symbiotic dinoflagellates in reef coral communities from Hawaii. Coral reefs 23: 596–603Google Scholar
- Rougerie F, Wauthy B (1986) L’Ocean qui nous entoure p73–78. Encyclopédie de la POlynésie vol I: les îles océaniques, Multipress. Papeete, Polynésie FrançaiseGoogle Scholar
- Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L (2000) Arlequin ver. 2.000: A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
- Trench RK (1993) Microalgal-invertebrate symbioses: a review. Endocyt Cell Res 9:135–175Google Scholar
- van Oppen MJ, McDonald BJ, Willis B, Miller DJ (2001a) The evolutionary history of the coral genus Acropora (Scleractinia, Cnidaria) based on a mitochondrial and a nuclear marker: reticulation, incomplete lineage sorting, or morphological convergence? Mol Biol Evol 18:1315–1329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Weir B, Cockerham C (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370Google Scholar