Nodularin accumulation during cyanobacterial blooms and experimental depuration in zooplankton
Cyanobacterial blooms are a common phenomenon in the Baltic Sea, and the hepatotoxin nodularin has been frequently detected in certain Baltic Sea fishes and mussels. However, there is no knowledge about the naturally occurring concentrations of nodularin in Baltic Sea zooplankton. The aim of this study was to survey the concentrations of nodularin in natural zooplankton assemblages, and to study the depuration of nodularin in one common copepod species, Eurytemora affinis, experimentally. The nodularin concentrations in common zooplankton species were determined from field-collected samples from the northern Baltic Proper in 2001 and 2002, during cyanobacterial blooms, and the samples were analysed by ELISA immunoassay. Nodularin could be detected from the field-collected zooplankton, suggesting that during a natural bloom event toxins accumulate in their tissues. The concentrations were relatively low (0.07±0.01 μg g−1 ww), ranging from below detection limit to 0.62 μg g−1 ww. Some variation occurred in the concentrations between species and years; generally concentrations were higher in 2001 than in 2002. In the depuration experiment E. affinis copepods were fed with toxic Nodularia spumigena for 24 h, and their toxin contents were monitored for 24 h after transferring them to filtered seawater. A rapid decrease in nodularin concentrations occurred during the first 0.5–3 h after the exposure. However, after a 24-h depuration period in filtered seawater, nodularin could be still detected in E. affinis tissues, indicating that part of the accumulated nodularin, or its derivatives, could be transferred to planktivores.
KeywordsPhytoplankton Cyanobacterial Bloom Zooplankton Species Copepod Species Planktivorous Fish
Prof. Kaarina Sivonen (University of Helsinki) is acknowledged for providing the Nodularia spumigena strain AV1; Eveliina Lindén, Sanna Rönkkönen and Hermanni Backer for help with collecting the zooplankton samples during summer 2002; Maija Huttunen and Emil Vahtera for counting the phytoplankton samples; and Jari-Pekka Pääkkönen for help in calculations. Marko Reinikainen and Marja Koski gave valuable comments on the manuscript. This study was financed by Walter and Andrée de Nottbeck Foundation, Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation, Finnish Cultural Foundation, the Academy of Finland (grant number 50679) and the Brazilian National Council for Research (CNPq). Two anonymous referees are acknowledged for constructive criticism.
- Kahru M, Horstmann U, Rud O 1994: Satellite detection of increased cyanobacteria blooms in the Baltic Sea—natural fluctuation or ecosystem change. Ambio 23:469–472Google Scholar
- Kononen K, Sivonen K, Lehtimäki J (1993) Toxicity of phytoplankton blooms in the Gulf of Finland and Gulf of Bothnia, Baltic Sea. In: Smayda TJ, Shimizu Y (eds) Toxic phytoplankton blooms in the sea. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–273Google Scholar
- Kozlowsky-Suzuki B, Karjalainen M, Lehtiniemi M, Engström-Öst J, Koski M, Carlsson P (2003) Feeding, reproduction and toxin accumulation by the copepods Acartia bifilosa and Eurytemora affinis in the presence of the toxic cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 249:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kozlowsky-Suzuki B (2004): Effects of toxin-producing phytoplankton on copepods: feeding, reproduction and implications to the fate of toxins. PhD Thesis, Lund University, 118 pGoogle Scholar
- Raid T, Lankov A (1995) Recent changes in the growth and feeding of Baltic herring and sprat in the northeastern Baltic Sea. Proc Est Acad Sci Ecol 5:38–55Google Scholar
- Sipiä VO, Kankaanpää HT, Pflugmacher S, Flinkman J, Furey A, James KJ (2002a) Bioaccumulation and detoxication of nodularin in tissues of flounder (Platichthys flesus), mussels (Mytilus edulis, Dreissena polymorpha), and clams (Macoma balthica) from the northern Baltic Sea. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 53:305–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sivonen K, Jones G (1999) Cyanobacterial toxins. In: Chorus I, Bartram J (eds) Toxic cyanobacteria in the water. E & FN Spon, London, pp 41–111Google Scholar
- Vihervuori A, Ahvonen A (1997) Miten kalankulutusta arvioidaan? Kalavirrat - tietoa kalan tarjonnasta ja käytöstä. Riista- ja kalatalouden tutkimuslaitos (in Finnish). SVT-Ympäristö 1997:13. pp 34–39Google Scholar
- Ward CJ, Lee EYC, Beattie KA, Codd GA (1998) Colorimetric protein phosphatase inhibition assay for microcystins and nodularin in laboratory cultures and natural blooms of cyanobacteria. In: Reguera B, Blanco J, Fernández ML, Wyatt T (eds) Proceedings of VIII international conference harmful algae. Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Paris, pp 541–544Google Scholar