Marine Biology

, Volume 148, Issue 4, pp 807–815 | Cite as

Low genetic differentiation between isolated populations of the colonial ascidian Symplegma rubra Monniot, C. 1972

  • Gustavo Muniz DiasEmail author
  • Luiz Francisco Lembo Duarte
  • Vera Nisaka Solferini
Research Article


Pelagic larvae are highly important for maintaining the gene flow among populations of sessile marine invertebrates. Colonial ascidians consist, exclusively, of brooding species, with lecithotrophic larvae that have a limited dispersal. As a result, there is a marked differentiation among populations. In this work, we used allozyme electrophoresis to access the genetic variation in four populations of Symplegma rubra, a colonial ascidian frequently found in the intertidal zone of Southeastern Brazilian coast. High variability was found at three of the four sites sampled, the exception being Praia Grande in the State of Rio de Janeiro. At this site, there was a great preponderance of clones, which possibly reflected the enclosed nature of the location and its low water circulation that reduce the dispersal capabilities of these animals. S. rubra did not conform to expectations for random mating (Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium): there was a deficit of heterozygotes that was more related to the small population size than to inbreeding processes, since Fis analysis per locus revealed a deficiency of heterozygotes at only one locus—MDH*. The greatest variation in allele frequency was found for GPI-2*. Analyses of genetic variability revealed moderate differentiation among the populations (FST=0.051), which was unexpected for a species with a low dispersal capability. Rafting, a frequently underestimated means of dispersal, may be the main mode of gene flow in this species over large areas, since colonies of S. rubra are frequently seen growing on drift material and there is no evidence that the larva survive for a long time in the plankton.


Polymorphic Locus Asexual Reproduction Larval Dispersal Pelagic Larva Colonial Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We are indebted to Centro de Biologia Marinha da Universidade de São Paulo for providing logistical support. We offer thanks to CGM Delboni for help in the sampling and SCS Andrade, MT Grombone, MT Almeida, A Abreu and especially J José for help in the data analysis. We are also grateful to three anonymous referees whose comments greatly improved the manuscript. One of us (GMD) also offers thanks to CAPES for the grant that supported his studies for the master degree.

This work was supported by the State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) within the BIOTA/FAPESP—The Biodiversity Virtual Institute Program (


  1. Aron S, Solé-Cava AM (1991) Genetic evaluation of the taxonomic status of two varieties of the cosmopolitan ascidian Botryllus niger (Ascidiaceae: Botryllidae). Biochem Syst Ecol 19:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ayre DJ (1983) The effects of asexual reproduction and intergenotypic aggression on the genotypic structure of populations of the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Oecologia 57:158–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayre DJ, Davis AR, Billingham M, Llorens T, Styan C (1997) Genetic evidence for contrasting patterns of dispersal in solitary and colonial ascidians. Mar Biol 130:51–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayre DJ, Hughes TP (2000) Genotypic diversity and gene flow in brooding and spawning corals along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Evolution 54:1590–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayre DJ, Read J, Wishart J (1991) Genetic subdivision within the eastern Australian population of the sea anemone Actinia tenebrosa. Mar Biol 109:379–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F (1996–2001) GENETIX (Version 4.02), logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, MontpellierGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Shlomo R, Douek J, Rinkevich B (2001) Heterozygote deficiency and chimerism in remote populations of a colonial ascidian from New Zealand. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 209:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black W, Krafsur E (1985) A FORTRAN program for analysis of genotypic frequencies and description of the breeding structure of populations. Theor Appl Genet 70:484–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohonak AJ (1999) Dispersal, gene flow and population structure. Q Rev Biol 74:21–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burnett WJ, Benzie JAH, Beardmore JA, Ryland JS (1995) Patterns of genetic subdivision in populations of a clonal cnidarian, Zoanthus coppingeri, from the Great Barrier Reef. Mar Biol 122:665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burton RS (1983) Protein polymorphisms and genetic differentiation of marine invertebrate populations. Mar Biol Lett 4:193–206Google Scholar
  12. Burton RS (1986) Evolutionary consequences of restricted gene flow among natural populations of the copepod, Trigriopus californicus. Bull Mar Sci 39:526–535Google Scholar
  13. Burton RS (1996) Molecular tools in marine biology. J Exo Mar Biol Ecol 200:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clayton J, Tetriak D (1972) Amine citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J Fisher Res Board Can 29:1169–1172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalby JE (1997) Reproductive and electrophoretic evidence for genetic maintenance of dimorphism in the ascidian Pyura stolonifera near Melbourne, Australia. Ophelia 47:227–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Davis AR, Butler AJ (1989) Direct observations of larval dispersal in the colonial ascidian Podoclavella-moluccensis Sluiter—Evidence for closed populations. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 127:189–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fadlallah YH (1982) Reproductive ecology of the coral Astrangia lajollaensis: sexual and asexual patterns in a kelp forest habitat. Oecologia 55:379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goudet J (1995) Fstat (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statics. J Hered 86:485–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grosberg RK (1987) Limited Dispersal and proximty-dependent mating success in the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Evolution 41:372–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grosberg RK (1991) Sperm-mediated gene flow and the genetic structure of a population of the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Evolution 45:130–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (1997) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics and evolution. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Hedgecock D (1986) Is gene flow from pelagic larval dispersal important in the adaptation and evolution of marine invertebrates?. Bull Mar Sci 39:550–564Google Scholar
  23. Hines AH (1986) Larval problems and perspectives in life histories of marine invertebrates. Bull Mar Sci 39:506–525Google Scholar
  24. Hoffmann RJ (1981) Evolutionary genetics of Metridium senile I Kinetic differences in phosphoglucose isomerase allozymes. Biochem Genet 19:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchinson DW, Templeton AR (1999) Correlation of pairwise genetic and geographic distance measures: inferring the relative influences of gene flow and drift on the distribution of genetic variability. Evolution 53:1898–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackson JBC (1977) Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptative significance of solitary and colonial strategies. Am Nat 111:743–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson JBC (1986) Modes of dispersal of clonal benthic invertebrates: consequences for species’ distributions and genetic structure of local populations. Bull Mar Sci 39:588–606Google Scholar
  28. Johnson MS, Black R (1984) The Wahlund effect and the geographical scale of variation in the intertidal limpet Siphonaria sp. Mar Biol 79:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jokiel PL (1984) Long distance dispersal of reef corals by rafting. Coral Reefs 3:113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jokiel PL (1989) Rafting of reef corals and other organisms at Kwajalein Atoll. Mar Biol 101:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lambert CC, Lambert G (1998) Non-indigenous ascidians in southern California harbors and marinas. Mar Biol 130:675–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lambert CC, Lambert G (2003) Persistence and differential distribution of nonindigenous ascidians in harbors of the Southern California Bight. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 259:145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Levinton J (1973) Genetic-variation in a gradient of environmental variability—marine bivalvia (Mollusca). Science 180:75–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin L, Flexor JM, Valentin JL (1989) The influence of the “El Niño” phenomenon on the enhancement or annihilation of Cabo Frio upwelling on the Brazilian coast of the State of Rio de Janeiro. In: International symposium on global changes in South America during the quaternary. Special Publ. N° 1. Associação Brasileira de Estudos do Quaternário, São Paulo, pp225–227Google Scholar
  35. Millar RH (1971) The Biology of ascidians. Adv Mar Biol 9:33–100Google Scholar
  36. Miller MP (1997) Tools for population genetic analysis (TFPGA) 1.3: a Windows program for the analysis of allozyme and molecular population genetic data. Logan, UTGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller KJ (1998) Short-distance dispersal of black coral larvae: inference from spatial analysis of colony genotypes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 163:225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nei M (1978) Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583–590PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Neigel JE (1997) Population genetics and demography of marine species. In: Ormond RFG, Gage JD, Angel MV (eds) Marine biodiversity: patterns and processes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 274–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Palmer AR, Strathmann RR (1981) Scale of dispersal in varying environments and its implications for life histories of marine invertebrates. Oecologia 48:308–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Palumbi SR (1994) Genetic divergence, reproductive isolation, and marine speciation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 25:547–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palumbi SR (2003) Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:S146–S158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Powell R (1971) Genetic polymorphisms in varied environments. Science 174:1035–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rocha RM (1991) Replacement of the compound ascidians species in a southeastern fouling community. Bol Inst Oceanogr 39:141–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Russo CAM, Solé-Cava AM, Thorpe JP (1994) Population structure and genetic variation in two tropical sea anemones (Cnidaria, Actinidae) with different reproductive strategies. Mar Biol 119:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schilthizen M, Lombaerts M (1994) Population structure and levels of gene flow in the mediterranean land snail Albinaria corrugata (Pulmonata: Clausiliidae). Evolution 48:577–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaw CR, Prasad R (1970) Starch gel electrophoresis of enzymes—a compilation of recipes. Biochem Genet 4:297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shick JM, Hoffmann RJ, Lamb AN (1979) Asexual reproduction, population structure, and genotype-environment interactions in sea anemones. Am Zool 19:699–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Slatkin M (1985) Gene flow in natural populations. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:393–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natual-populations. Science 236:787–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solé-Cava AM, Thorpe JP (1991) High-levels of genetic variation in natural populations of marine lower invertebrates. Biol J Linn Soc 44:65–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Solé-Cava AM, Thorpe JP, Todd CD (1994) High genetic similarity between geographically distant populations in a sea anemone with low dispersal capabilities. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 74:895–902Google Scholar
  53. Stoddart JA, Taylor JF (1988) Genotypic diversity: estimation and prediction in samples. Genetics 118:705–711PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoner DS, Ben-Shlomo R, Rinkevich B, Weissman IL (2002) Genetic variability of Botryllus schlosseri invasions to the east and west coasts of the USA. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strathmann R (1974) The spread of sibling larvae of sedentary marine invertebrates. Am Nat 108:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wada H, Makabe KW, Nakauchi M, Stoh AN (1992) Phylogenetic relationships between solitary and colonial ascidians, as inferred from the sequence of the central region of their respective 18S r DNA. Biol Bull 183:448–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitlock MC, McCauley DE (1999) Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: F st≠1/(4 Nm+1). Heredity 82:117–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilkins NP (1977) Genetic variability in littoral gastropods—phosphoglucose isomerase and phosphoglucomutase in Patella vulgata and Patella aspera. Mar Biol 40:151–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Worcester SE (1994) Adult rafting versus larval swimming: dispersal and recruitment of a botryllid ascidian on eelgrass. Mar Biol 121:309–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wright S (1978) Evolution and the genetics of populations. Variability within and among natural populations, vol 4. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  62. Yamada SB (1989) Are direct developers more locally adapted than planktonic developers?. Mar Biol 103:403–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yund PO (1995) Gene flow via the dispersal of fertilizing sperm in a colonial ascidian (Botryllus schlosseri): the effect of male density. Mar Biol 122:649–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yund PO, O’Neil PG (2000) Microgeographic genetic differentiation in a colonial ascidian (Botryllus schlosseri) population. Mar Biol 137:583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gustavo Muniz Dias
    • 1
    Email author
  • Luiz Francisco Lembo Duarte
    • 1
  • Vera Nisaka Solferini
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Instituto de BiologiaUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)CampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations