Marine Biology

, Volume 148, Issue 4, pp 799–805 | Cite as

The trophic linkage between zooplankton and benthic suspension feeders: direct evidence from analyses of bivalve faecal pellets

  • Wai Hing Wong
  • Jeffrey S. LevintonEmail author
Research Article


Using radiotracer (14C) and microscopic observation, we demonstrated that mussels (Mytilus edulis and Perna viridis) could be predators of mesozooplankton (rotifer Brachionus plicatilis). At radio-labelled rotifer densities of 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0 individual ml−1, faecal pellets of mussels showed different degrees of radio signals and most of the faecal pellets were expelled 4 h after pulse feeding on rotifers. The maximum gut retention time (GRT) of 14C-labelled rotifers in the digestive diverticula did not o show any significant difference between the two mussel species or the different densities of rotifers, and the averaged GRT was 43.4±3.06 h (mean ± SE). At a rotifer density of 4.5 individual ml−1, rotifer lorica pieces and rotifer bodies without eggs were found in faeces of M. edulis, while in the pseudofaeces, only complete rotifer bodies were found.


Phytoplankton Microalgae Bivalve Faecal Pellet Isochrysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



All the reviewers are appreciated for their suggestions and comments. We also thank Lora Pride for her review to improve the quality of an early version of this manuscript. This work was supported by the Hudson River Foundation (00798A) and the US National Science Foundation (OCE 9811380). Green mussels were collected by Dr. Patrick Baker. We thank Dr. Nicholas Fisher and Benjamin Twining for their laboratory support.


  1. Blackmore G, Wang W-X (2004) The transfer of cadmium, mercury, methylmercury, and zinc in an intertidal rocky shore food chain. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 307:91–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brillant MGS, MacDonald BA (2000) Postingestive selection in the sea scallop, Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin): the role of particle size and density. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 253:211–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dame RF (1996) Ecology of marine bivalves: an ecosystem approach. CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davenport J, Smith RJJW, Packer M (2000) Mussels Mytilus edulis: significant consumers and destroyers of mesozooplankton. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 198:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dupuy C, Vaquer A, Lam-Hoai T, Rougier C, Mazouni N, Lautier J, Collos Y, Le Gall S (2000) Feeding rate of the oyster Crassostrea gigas in a natural planktonic community of the Mediterranean Thau Lagoon. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 205:171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ejdung G, Elmgren R (1998) Predation on newly settled bivalves by deposit-feeding amphipods: a Baltic Sea case study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 168:87–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ejdung G, Byrén L, Elmgren R (2000) Benthic predator–prey interactions: evidence that adult Monoporeia affinis (Amphipoda) eat postlarval Macoma balthica (Bivalvia). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 253:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haven DS, Morales-Alamo R (1966) Aspects of biodeposition by oysters and other invertebrate filter feeders. Limnol Oceanogr 11:487–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ingrao DA, Mikkelsen PM, Hicks DW (2001) Another introduced marine mollusk in the Gulf of Mexico: the Indo-Pacific green mussel, Perna viridis, in Tampa Bay, Florida. J Shellfish Res 20:13–19Google Scholar
  10. Jasprica N, Caric M, Bolotin J, Rudenjak-Lukenda M (1997) The Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lmk.) growth rate response to phytoplankton and microzooplankton population density in the Mali Ston Bay (Southern Adriatic). Period Biol 99:255–264Google Scholar
  11. Kreeger DA, Newell RIE (1996) Ingestion and assimilation of carbon from cellulolytic bacteria and heterotrophic flagellates by the mussels Geukensia demissa and Mytilus edulis (Bivalvia, Mollusca). Aquat Microb Ecol 11:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Le Gall S, Hassen MB, Le Gall P (1997) Ingestion of a bacterivorous ciliate by the oyster Crassostrea gigas: protozoa as a trophic link between picoplankton and benthic suspension-feeders. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 152:301–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lehane C, Davenport J (2002) Ingestion of mesozooplankton by three species of bivalve: Mytilus edulis, Cerastoderma edule and Aequipecten opercularis. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 82:615–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. MacIsaac HJ, Sprules WG, Leach JH (1991) Ingestion of small-bodied zooplankton by zebra mussels (Dreissena polymorpha): can cannibalism on larvae influence population dynamics. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 48:2051–2060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Officer CB, Smayda TJ, Mann R (1982) Benthic filter feeding—a natural eutrophication control. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 9:203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Park GS, Marshall HG (2000) The trophic contributions of rotifers in tidal freshwater and estuarine habitats. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 51:729–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Roditi HA, Fisher NS (1999) Rates and routes of trace element uptake in zebra mussels. Limnol Oceanogr 44:1730–1749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shumway SE, Selvin R, Schick DF (1987) Food resources related to habitat in the scallop Placopecten magellanicus (Gmelin, 1791): a qualitative study. J Shellfish Res 6:89–95Google Scholar
  19. Starkweather PL, Gilbert JJ (1977) Radiotracer determination of feeding in Brachionus calyciflorus: the importance of gut passage times. Arch Hydrobiol Ergeb Limnol 8:261–263Google Scholar
  20. Ward JE, Levinton JS, Shumway SE, Cucci T (1997) Site of particle selection in a bivalve mollusc. Nature 390:131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ward JE, Levinton JS, Shumway SE, Cucci T (1998) Particle sorting in bivalves: in vivo determination of the pallial organs of selection. Mar Biol 131:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wong WH, Levinton JS (2004) Culture of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis fed both phytoplankton and zooplankton: a microcosm experiment. Aquat Res 35:965–969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wong WH, Levinton JS, Twining BS, Fisher NS (2003a) Assimilation of micro- and mesozooplankton by zebra mussels: a demonstration of the food web link between zooplankton and benthic suspension feeders. Limnol Oceanogr 48:308–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wong WH, Levinton JS, Twining BS, Fisher NS, Kelaher BP, Alt AK (2003b) Carbon assimilation from rotifer Brachionus plicatilis by mussels, Mytilus edulis and Perna viridis: a potential food web link between zooplankton and benthic suspension feeders in the marine system. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 253:175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and EvolutionState University of New YorkStony BrookUSA
  2. 2.Louisiana Universities Marine ConsortiumChauvinUSA

Personalised recommendations