Advertisement

Marine Biology

, Volume 148, Issue 1, pp 205–212 | Cite as

Sexual dimorphism in the buccal cavity of paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfishes (Pisces: Apogonidae)

  • A. Barnett
  • D. R. Bellwood
Research Article

Abstract

The mechanical basis of mouthbrooding in the coral reef cardinalfish (family Apogonidae) has yet to be established. Sexual dimorphism in the anatomy of the oral jaws and buccal cavity of seven species of paternal mouthbrooding apogonids was therefore investigated. A novel silicon injecting technique was used to quantify between sexes differences in size and shape of the buccal cavity. Osteological and morphological measurements were also examined to identify the structural features associated with variation in buccal volumes. Males buccal volumes were proportionally larger by 20–42% in five of the seven species (P<0.01), a change that was largely a result of an increase in the depth of buccal cavity. Absence of distinct osteological differences between sexes suggests that changes in the soft anatomy are primarily responsible for the increased buccal volume in males. The average increase of 31% in buccal volume of males appears to reflect their role in mouthbrooding. This is the first study to demonstrate sexual dimorphism of the buccal cavity of multiple mouthbrooding species.

Keywords

Sexual Dimorphism Great Barrier Reef Buccal Cavity Principal Component Analysis Result Brooding Female 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Depczynski and F. Merida for field assistance and A. Hoey, C. Fulton and M. Hooganboom and N. Konow for helpful discussions and advice. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council. Contribution# of the Centre for Coral Reef Biodiversity. JCU animal experimentation ethics approval# A650

References

  1. Aerts P (1991) Hyoid morphology and movements relative to abducting forces during feeding in Astatotilapia elegans (Teleostei: Cichlidae). J morphol 208:323–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen GR, Steene R, Humann P, Deloach N (2003) Reef fish identification: tropical Pacific. New World Publications, Inc. FloridaGoogle Scholar
  3. Barel CDN (1983) Towards a constructional morphology of cichlid fishes (Teleostei, Perciformes). Ned J Zool 33(4):357–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basola AL (1990) Female preference for sword length in the green swordtail, Xiphophorus helleri (Pisces: Poeciliidae). Anim Behav 40:332–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell EM, Lockyear JF, Mcpherson JM, Marsden AD, Vincent CJ (2003) First field studies of an endangered South African seahorse, Hippocampus capensis. Environ Biol Fishes 67:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bellwood DR, Wainwright PC (2002) The history and biogeography of fishes on coral reefs. In: Sale PF (ede) Coral reef fishes. Dynamics and diversity in a complex ecosystem. Academic press, San Diego, pp 33–55Google Scholar
  7. Hechter RP, Moodie PF, Moodie GEE (2000) Pectoral fin asymmetry, dimorphism and fecundity in the brook stickleback, Culea inconstans. Behaviour 137:999–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess HC (1993) Male mouthbrooding in jawfishes (Opistognathidae): constraints on polygyny. Bull Mar Sci 52(2):806–818Google Scholar
  9. Iguchi K, Hino T (1998) Dimorphism in the dorsal fin shape of immature ayu, Plecoglossus altivelis, through a status-dependent secondary change. Ichthyol Res 46(2):209–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ikejima K, Shimizu M (1997) Annual reproductive cycle and sexual dimorphism in the dragonet, Repomucenus valenciennei, in Tokyo Bay, Japan. Ichthyol Res 45(2):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Iles TD, Holden MJ (1969) Bi-parental mouth brooding in Tilapia galilaea (Pisces, Cichlidae). J Zool Lond 158:327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jaroensutasinee M, Jaroensutasinee K (2001) Sexual size dimorphism and male contest in wild Siamese fighting fish. J Fish Biol 59:1614–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kuwamura T (1985a) Sex of the brooder, with reference to ancestral parental behaviour and reproductive success. In: Indo-Pacific fish biology Proceedings of Second International Conference, p 946Google Scholar
  14. Kuwamura T (1985b) Social and reproductive behaviour of three mouthbrooding cardinalfishes, Apogon doederleini, A. niger and A. notatus . Environ Biol Fishes 13(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marnane MJ, Bellwood DR (2002) Diet and nocturnal foraging in cardinalfishes (Apogonidae) at One Tree Reef, Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 231:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Munday PL, Wilson SK (1997) Comparative efficacy of clove oil and other chemicals in anaesthetization of Pomacentrus amboinensis, a coral reef fish. J Fish Biol 51:931–938Google Scholar
  17. Okuda N (1999) Sex roles are not always reversed when the potential reproductive rate is higher in females. Am Nat 153:540–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Okuda N (2001) The costs of reproduction to males and females of a paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon notatus. J Fish Biol 58(3):776–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Okuda N, Miyazaki M, Yanagisawa Y (2002) Sexual difference in buccal morphology of the paternal mouthbrooding cardinalfish Apogon doederleini . Zoo Sci 19:801–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oliveira RF, Almada VC (1995) Sexual dimorphism and allometry of external morphology in Orechromis mossambicus. J Fish Biol 46:1055–1064Google Scholar
  21. Oppenheimer JR (1970) Mouthbreeding in fishes. Anim Behav 18:493–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostlund -Nilsson S, Nilsson GE (2004) Breathing with a mouth full of eggs:respiratory consequences of mouthbrooding in cardinalfish. Proc R Soc Lond 271:1015–1022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Randall JE, Allen GR, Steene RC (1990) Fishes of the Great Barrier Reef and Coral Sea. Crawford House Press, BathurstGoogle Scholar
  24. Takahashi E, Connolly RM, Lee SY (2003) Growth and reproduction of double ended pipefish, Syngnathoides biaculeatus, in Moreton Bay, Queensland, Australia. Environ Biol Fishes 67:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wainwright PC, Bellwood DR, Westneat MW, Grubich JR, Hoey AS (2004) A functional morphospace for the skull of labrid fishes: patterns of diversity in a complex biomechanical system. Biol J Linn Soc 82:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zama A, Hattori J (1975) Sexual dimorphism of a triggerfish, Sufflamen fraenatus, and record of its juvenile from Kominato, Chiba Prefecture, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 22(3):171–174Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Coral Reef Biodiversity, Department of Marine BiologyJames Cook UniversityTownsvilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations