UV induces reactive oxygen species, damages sperm, and impairs fertilisation in the sea urchin Anthocidaris crassispina
- 516 Downloads
We demonstrated that environmentally relevant levels of UVA and UVB can reduce sperm motility (UVA: by 38–58%; UVB: by 42–85%; P < 0.05) and subsequently fertilisation success (UVA: by 38–72%; UVB: by 91–98%; P < 0.05) of urchins (Anthocidaris crassispina) in a dose-dependent manner, implicating that recruitment of urchin populations might be reduced by UVR (ultraviolet radiation) prevailing in their natural habitats. Concomitantly, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was enhanced by UVA and UVB in a dose-dependent manner (UVA: by 1.3-fold; UVB: by 6.6–7.3-fold; P < 0.05), and the increase in ROS resulted in an increase in lipid peroxidation (LPO) in urchin sperm (UVA: by 4.2–7.2-fold; UVB: by 2.3–2.7-fold; P < 0.05). This study demonstrated that ROS production and oxidative damages enhanced by UVR may account for the observed declines in sperm motility and fertilisation, and suggests that levels of UVR prevailing in the environment may pose a significant threat to the reproductive success of natural populations of urchins spawning in shallow waters.
KeywordsReactive Oxygen Species Production Sperm Motility Dissolve Organic Matter Fertilisation Success Sperm Quality
This research was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (9040655 CityU 1091/01 M). We thank Dr. Put Ang of the Chinese University of Hong Kong for collecting urchins for this experiment. The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
- Anderson S, Hoffman J, Wild G, Bosch I, Karentz D (1993) Cytogenetic, cellular, and developmental responses in Antarctic sea urchins (Sterechinus neumayeri) following laboratory ultraviolet-B and ambient solar radiation exposure. Antarct J 28:115–116Google Scholar
- Béland F, Browman HI, Rodriguez CA, St-Pierre JF (1999) Effect of solar ultraviolet radiation (280–400 nm) on the eggs and larvae of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56(6):1058–1067Google Scholar
- Chapman GA (1995) Sea urchin sperm cell test. In: Rand GM (ed) Fundamentals of aquatic toxicology: effects, environmental fate, and risk assessment. Taylor and Francis, Washington, pp 189–206Google Scholar
- DeLamirande E, Gagnon C (1992) Reactive oxygen species and spermatozoa. I. Effects on the motiliry of intact spermatozoa and on sperm axonemes. J Androl 13:368–378Google Scholar
- Madronich S, McKenzie RL, Caldwell MM, Bjorn LO (1995) Changes in ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. Ambio 24:143–152Google Scholar
- Shick JM, Lesser MP, Stochaj WR (1991) Ultraviolet-radiation and photooxidative stress in zooxanthellate Anthozoa: the sea anemone Phyllodiscus semoni and the octocoral Clavularia sp. Symbio 10:145–173Google Scholar
- Tyler MS (ed) (2000) Developmental biology: a guide for experimental study. Sinauer Associates, Inc, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
- Whitehead RF, De Mora SJ, Demers S (2000) Enhanced UV radiation—a new problem for the marine environment. In: De Mora SJ, Demers S, Vernet M (eds) The effect of UV radiation in the marine environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–34Google Scholar
- WHO (World Health Organization) (1994) Environmental health criteria 160: ultraviolet radiation. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- WMO (World Meteorological Organization) (2003) Scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2002. Global ozone research and monitoring project—report no. 47, GenevaGoogle Scholar