Advertisement

Assessing internal soundness of hardwood logs through acoustic impact test and waveform analysis

  • Feng Xu
  • Yunfei LiuEmail author
  • Xiping WangEmail author
  • Brian K. Brashaw
  • Lon A. Yeary
  • Robert J. Ross
Original
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore the potential of an acoustic impact test as a nondestructive evaluation procedure to assess the soundness of hardwood logs in terms of internal decay, void, and defect ratio. Fifteen logs of four hardwood species (black cherry, white oak, red oak, and cottonwood) were obtained and subjected to acoustic impact testing. The logs were subsequently dissected for visual examination and physical mapping of the internal defects. The acoustic response signals were analyzed to derive acoustic velocity (through FFT), time centroid (through moment analysis), and the first- and second-order damping ratio (through continuous wavelet transform). The longitudinal acoustic velocity was found to have a negative, nonlinear relationship with defect ratio (R2 = 0.72), but it lacked sensitivity to small defects and was affected by species. Time centroid proved to be a better predictor than acoustic velocity with an improved correlation with log defect ratio (R2 = 0.87). Wavelet-based damping ratio was found to have a close linear relationship with log defect ratio. Comparing with the first-order damping ratio, the second-order damping ratio had a better predicting power (R2 = 0.92) and was not affected by type and location of defects. The results further indicated that a combination of acoustic velocity, time centroid, and the first- and second-order damping ratios could yield the optimal prediction of log defect ratio. However, considering the sensitivity and simplicity of the waveform analysis, the second-order damping ratio of the response signals could be the best single predicting parameter for assessing the internal soundness of hardwood logs.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted through research cooperation between the USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory (FPL) and Nanjing Forestry University (NFU), China, and was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31170668), the Priority Academic Program Development (PAPD) of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and the NFU Innovation Grant for Outstanding PhD Dissertations (Grant No. 163070682). The authors acknowledge the technical support from the Engineering Mechanics and Remote Sensing Laboratory (EMRSL) at the FPL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding authors state that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Addis T, Buchanan AH, Walker JCF (1997) Log segregation into stiffness classes. In: Ridoutt BG (ed) Managing variability in resource quality. FRI Bulletin No. 202, Forest Research Institute, Rotorua, pp 7–10Google Scholar
  2. Addis T, Buchanan AH, Walker JCF (2000) Selecting trees for structural timber. Holz Roh-Werkst 58(3):162–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ASTM (2003) Standard test methods for direct moisture content measurement of wood and wood-base materials. ASTM D4442-92. America Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayissa WL, Haritos N, Thelandersson S (2008) Vibration-based structural damage identification using wavelet transform. Mech Syst Signal Process 22(5):1194–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carmona R, Hwang WL, Torrésani B (1998) Practical time–frequency analysis: Gabor and wavelet transforms with an implementation in S. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter P, Lausberg M (2003) Application of Hitman acoustic technology—the Carter Holt Harvey experience. FIEA paper, p 6Google Scholar
  7. Carter P, Briggs D, Ross RJ, Wang X (2005) Acoustic testing to enhance western forest values and meet customer wood quality needs. PNW-GTR-642. In: Harrington CA, Schoenholtz SH (eds) Productivity of western forests: a forest products focus. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, pp 121–129Google Scholar
  8. Chui C (2006) An introduction to wavelets. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  9. Delprat N, Escudié B, Guillemain P, Kronland-Martinet R, Tchamitchian P, Torrésani B (1992) Asymptotic wavelet and Gabor analysis: extraction of instantaneous frequencies. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 38(2):644–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Essien C, Via BK, Cheng Q, Gallagher T, McDonald T, Wang X, Eckhardt LG (2017) Multivariate modeling of acoustomechanical response of 14-year-old suppressed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) to variation in wood chemistry, microfibril angle and density. Wood Sci Technol 51:475–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harris P, Petherick R, Andrews M (2002) Acoustic resonance tools. In: Proceedings 13th international symposium on nondestructive testing of wood, 19–21 Aug 2002, Berkeley, CA, pp 195–201Google Scholar
  12. Huang CL, Londstrom H, Nakada R, Ralston J (2003) Cell wall structure and wood properties determined by acoustics—a select review. Holz Roh-Werkst 61:321–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Le TP, Paultre P (2013) Modal identification based on the time-frequency domain decomposition of unknown-input dynamic tests. Int J Mech Sci 71:41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mallat S (1999) A wavelet tour of signal processing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  15. Pellerin RF, DeGroot RC, Esenther GR (1985) Nondestructive stress wave measurements of decay and termite attack in experimental wood units. In: Proceedings, 5th nondestructive testing of wood, September 9–11, 1985, Pullman, WA. Washington State University, Pullman, WA, pp 319–353Google Scholar
  16. Ross RJ, Wang X, Brashaw BK (2005) Inspection and monitoring techniques for bridges and civil structures. In: Fu G (ed) Detecting decay in wood component. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 100–114Google Scholar
  17. Ruzzene M, Fasana A, Garibaldi L, Piombo B (1997) Natural frequencies and dampings identification using wavelet transform: application to real data. Mech Syst Signal Process 11(2):207–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Steele PH, Harless TEG, Wagner FG, Kumar L, Taylor FW (1994) Increased lumber value from optimum orientation of internal defects with respect to sawing pattern in hardwood sawlogs. Forest Prod J 44(3):69–72Google Scholar
  19. Thomas RE (2008) Predicting internal yellow-poplar log defect features using surface indicators. Wood Fiber Sci 40(1):14–22Google Scholar
  20. Thomas RE (2010) Validation of an internal hardwood log defect prediction model. In: Fei et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 17th central hardwood forest conference, April 5–7, 2010, Lexington, KY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-P-78. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, pp 77–82Google Scholar
  21. Thomson WT, Dahleh MD (1998) Theory of vibration with applications, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  22. Titta M, Beall FC, Biernacki JM (1998) Acousto-ultrasonic assessment of internal decay in glulam beams. Wood Fiber Sci 30(3):259–272Google Scholar
  23. Ülker-Kaustell M, Karoumi R (2011) Application of the continuous wavelet transform on the free vibrations of a steel-concrete composite railway bridge. Eng Struct 33(3):911–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wang X, Ross RJ, Green DW, Brashaw B, Englund K, Wolcott M (2004) Stress wave sorting of red maple logs for structural quality. Wood Sci Technol 37(6):531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang X, Wiedenbeck J, Ross RJ, Forsman JW, Erickson JR, Pilon C, Brashaw BK (2005) Nondestructive evaluation of incipient decay in hardwood logs. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-162. USDA, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, WI, pp 1–11Google Scholar
  26. Wang X, Carter P, Ross RJ, Brashaw BK (2007) Acoustic assessment of wood quality of raw forest materials—a path to increased profitability. For Prod J 57(5):6–14Google Scholar
  27. Wang X, Stelzer HE, Wiedenbeck J, Lebow PK, Ross RJ (2009) Assessing wood quality of borer-infested red oak logs with a resonance acoustic technique. Wood Fiber Sci 41(2):180–193Google Scholar
  28. Wang X, Verrill S, Lowell E, Ross RJ, Herian VL (2013) Acoustic sorting models for improved log segregation. Wood Sci Technol 45(4):343–352Google Scholar
  29. Wang X, Thomas E, Xu F, Liu Y, Brashaw BK, Ross RJ (2018) Defect detection and quality assessment of hardwood logs: part 2—combined acoustic and laser scanning system. Wood Fiber Sci 50(3):310–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xu F, Liu YF (2011) Feature extraction of acoustic emission signals based on median filter-singular value decomposition and empirical mode decomposition. Chin J Sci Instrum 32(12):2712–2719Google Scholar
  31. Xu F, Wang X, Liu Y, Brashaw BK, Yeary LA (2017) Assessing internal soundness of hardwood logs by acoustic impact testing. In: Wang X, Senalik CA, Ross RJ (eds) Proceedings: 20th international nondestructive testing and evaluation of wood symposium. General technical report FPL-GTR-249. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, pp 446–455Google Scholar
  32. Xu F, Wang X, Thomas E, Liu Y, Brashaw BK, Ross RJ (2018) Defect detection and quality assessment of hardwood logs: part 1—acoustic impact test and wavelet analysis. Wood Fiber Sci 50(3):291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Information Science and TechnologyNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Forest Products LaboratoryUSDA Forest ServiceMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Mississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations