Advertisement

Effect of micro-pit texture parameters on characteristics of friction between cemented carbide and wood

  • Weiguang LiEmail author
  • Zhankuan Zhang
Original
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Micro-pit texture has been shown to improve the characteristics of friction between the surfaces of the material. The influence of micro-pit texture parameters on the coefficient of friction between the wood surface and cemented carbide was investigated, so as to provide reference and guidance for the design of textures for the surface of wood cutting tools. By establishing a basic model of friction in wood cutting, the main factors affecting the friction force were analyzed. Friction was analyzed in both air-dried and green specimens of wood from the northeast China ash (Fraxinus spp.). The influence of the depth, area ratio and the diameter of the micro-pit on the friction coefficient was compared. The coefficient of friction between the micro-pit texture surface with a diameter of 80 μm and the surface of air-dried and green specimen was less than of non-textured samples, with a friction coefficient of 0.1461 and 0.1184, respectively. When the diameter of the pits was 120 μm, the optimal micro-pit area ratio was 10% and 20% for the air-dried specimen and green specimen of the ash, respectively. When the size of the textured area and the diameter of the pits remain unchanged, changes in the depth of the micro-pits do not have an obvious influence on the friction coefficient. Therefore, the friction coefficient can be reduced by optimizing the diameter and area of the micro-pit surface texture.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are very grateful for financial support from the “Fundamental Research Funds of the Research Institute of Forest New Technology, CAF” (CAFYBB2018SZ015).

References

  1. Beer P (2005) In situ examinations of the friction properties of chromium coated tools in contact with wet wood. Tribol Lett 18(3):373–376.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-004-2767-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer P, Gogolewski P, Klimke J, Krel A (2007) Tribological behaviour of sub-micron cutting-ceramics in contact with wood-based materials. Tribol Lett 27(2):155–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-007-9212-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bowden F, Tabor D (1950) The friction and lubrication of solids. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Cao PX (1997) The progress of woodworking tools anti-wear technology. China For Sci Technol 6:10–12Google Scholar
  5. Duan R, Deng J, Ge D, Ai X, Liu Y, Meng R (2017) An approach to predict derivative-chip formation in derivative cutting of micro-textured tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 1–2:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1285-y Google Scholar
  6. Guan N, Thunell B, Lyth K (1983) On the friction between steel and some common Swedish wood species. Holz Roh- Werkst 41(2):55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guo XL, Zhu ZL, Ekevad M, Bao X, Cao PX (2017) The cutting performance of Al2O3 and Si3N4 ceramic cutting tools in the milling plywood. Adv Appl Ceram 1:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17436753.2017.1368946 Google Scholar
  8. Kawasegi N, Sugimori H, Morimoto H, Morita N, Hori I (2009) Development of cutting tools with microscale and nanoscale textures to improve frictional behavior. Precis Eng 33(3):248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2008.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klamecki BE (1976) Friction mechanisms in wood cutting. Wood Sci Technol 10(3):209–214.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li WG, Zhang ZK (2018) Effect of surface micro-texture cemented carbide on characteristics of friction of birch. J For Eng 3(1):103–108.  https://doi.org/10.13360/j.issn.2096-1359.2018.01.017 Google Scholar
  11. McKenzie WM (1961) Fundamental analysis of the wood-cutting process. Nippon Nogeikagaku Kaishi 42:152–157Google Scholar
  12. McKenzie WM (1991) Friction coefficient as a guide to optimum rake angle in wood machining. Wood Sci Technol 25(5):397–401.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00226179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McKenzie WM, Karpovich H (1968) The frictional behaviour of wood. Wood Sci Technol 2(2):139–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394962 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McMillin CW, Truett J, Lemoine T, Manwiller FG (1970) Friction coefficient of oven-dry Spruce Pine on steel, as related to temperature and wood properties. Wood Fiber 2:6–11Google Scholar
  15. Murase Y (1979) Effect of temperature on friction between wood and steel (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 25:264–271Google Scholar
  16. Murase Y (1980) Coefficient of friction and surface temperature in the sliding friction between wood and steel. Mokuzai Gakkaishi 26:571–575Google Scholar
  17. Ohtani T, Iida R, Nakai T, Adachi K, Abe K, Toba K (2016) Smoothness of a spruce surface rubbed with a metal tool under high-speed friction. J Wood Sci 62(4):377–380.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-016-1560-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Seki M, Tanaka S, Miki T, Shigematsu I, Kanayama K (2016) Characteristics of friction between metal tool and wood impregnated with phenol formaldehyde (PF) resin during exposure to high pressure. J Wood Sci 62(3):1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-016-1551-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Forestry New TechnologyChinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChina
  2. 2.Research Institute of Wood IndustryChinese Academy of ForestryBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations