Advertisement

Flow rate and fixation of ACQ-D preservative in poplar living tree after injection

  • Zhu Liu
  • Xuan Wang
  • Yaoli ZhangEmail author
  • Liang Wen
  • Lin Zheng
  • Liping Cai
Original
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

To address the concerns regarding the groundwater contamination caused by the leachate from traditional alkaline copper quaternary (ACQ) pressure-treated wood, this study used a method of injecting preservative to living tree as it grows. The fixation and distribution of the preservative at different heights of the tree were examined using the software Image-Pro Plus and by scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. It was found that the preservative flow rate in living trees was significantly affected by the solar radiation intensity and air temperature, whereby solar radiation played a more significant role. The leaching test results indicated that, compared with pressure-treated samples, the ACQ-D leaching rate of the injection-treated samples was reduced. The preservative was mainly distributed in vessels and fibers. The increase in contents of carbon elements C1 and C3 indicated that the preservative was stably fixed in trees. It was also revealed that the fixation sites of copper were mainly hemicellulose and lignin.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the financial supports of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 31670558) and Key national research and development programs of China (Grant Number: 2017YFD0600202) and Jiangsu Students’ Project for Innovation Training Program (JS-SPITP) (Grant Number: 201710298052Z).

References

  1. Boucherie (1856) Boucherie’s process for preserving wood from decay. Sci Am 11(50):395Google Scholar
  2. Craciunl R, Kamdem PD (1997) XPS and FTIR applied to the study of waterborne copper naphthenate wood preservatives. Holzforschung 51:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dubey B, Helena SMG, Townsend TG (2007) Quantities of arsenic treated wood in Hurricane Katrina demolition debris. Environ Sci Technol 41:1533–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fadillah AM, Hadi YS, Massijaya MY, Ozarska B (2014) Resistance of preservative treated mahogany wood to subterranean termite attack. J Indian Acad Wood Sci 11:140–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13196-014-0130-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fan Y, Wang Y, Yu N, Deng L, Chen Z (2016) Study on the retention and distributions of the copper-based preservative in standing tree Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata). Adv Mater Sci Eng 2016:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/6163179 Google Scholar
  6. Griggs JL, Rogers KR, Nelson C, Luxton T, Platten WE, Bradham KD (2017) In vitro bioaccessibility of copper azole following simulated dermal transfer from pressure-treated wood. Sci Total Environ 598:413–420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasan AR, Hu L, Solo-Gabriele HM, Fieber L, Cai Y, Townsend TG (2010) Field-scale leaching of arsenic, chromium and copper from weathered treated wood. Environ Pollut 158:1479–1486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.12.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hölttä T, Linkosalo T, Riikonen A, Sevanto S, Nikinmaa E (2015) An analysis of Granier sap flow method, its sensitivity to heat storage and a new approach to improve its time dynamics. Agric For Meteorol 211–212:2–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Humar M, Thaler N (2017) Performance of copper treated utility poles and posts used in service for several years. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 116:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Juhász Á, Sepsi P, Nagy Z, Tőkei L, Hrotkó K (2013) Water consumption of sweet cherry trees estimated by sap flow measurement. Sci Hortic 164:41–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Juice SM, Templer PH, Phillips NG, Ellison AM, Pelini SL (2016) Ecosystem warming increases sap flow rates of northern red oak trees. Ecosphere 7:10.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim JY, Kim TS, Eom IY, Kang SM, Cho TS, Choi IG, Choi JW (2012) Characterization of pyrolytic products obtained from fast pyrolysis of chromated copper arsenate (CCA)- and alkaline copper quaternary compounds (ACQ)-treated wood biomasses. J Hazard Mater 227–228:445–452.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.05.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kukowski K, Martinska V, Sedgeman CA, Kuplic P, Kozliak EI, Fisher S, Kubatova A (2017) Fate of triazoles in softwood upon environmental exposure. Chemosphere 184:261–268.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.168 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee D, Lee MJ, Son D-W, Park B-D (2005) Adhesive performance of woods treated with alternative preservatives. Wood Sci Technol 40:228–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-005-0036-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Macchioni N, Pizzo B, Capretti C (2016) An investigation into preservation of wood from Venice foundations. Constr Build Mater 111:652–661.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mader A, Schirò A, Brischetto M, Pizzo B (2011) Interactions and penetration of polymers and nanolatexes into wood: an overview. Prog Org Coat 71:123–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2011.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michell AJ, Watson AJ, Higgins HG (1965) An infrared spectroscopic study of delignification of Eucalyptus regnans. Tappi 48:520–532Google Scholar
  18. Nakamoto K (1978) Infrared and Raman spectra of inorganic and coordination compounds. J Organomet Chem 156:C47–C48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nguyen YYH, Li S, Li J, Liang T (2013) Micro-distribution and fixation of a rosin-based micronized-copper preservative in poplar wood. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 83:63–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2013.02.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ruddick JNR, Yamamoto K, Wong PC, Mitchell KAR (1993) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analysis of CCA-treated wood. Holzforschung 47:458–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Slahor JJ, Hassler CC, DeGroot RC, Park BD (1997) Preservative treatment evaluation of red maple and yellow poplar with ACQ-B. For Prod J 47:50–54Google Scholar
  22. Taghiyari HR, Kalantari A, Ghorbani M, Bavaneghi F, Akhtari M (2015) Effects of fungal exposure on air and liquid permeability of nanosilver- and nanozincoxide-impregnated Paulownia wood. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 105:51–57.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tao W, Shi S, Kroll CN (2013) Influences of wood preservation, lumber size, and weather on field leaching of red pine lumber. J Hazard Mater 260:296–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.05.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ung YT, Cooper PA (2005) Copper stabilization in ACQ-D treated wood: retention, temperature and species effects. Holz Roh- Werkst 63:186–191.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00107-004-0555-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitehead D, Barbour MM (2003) A demonstration of the theoretical prediction that sap velocity is related to wood density in the conifer Dacrydium cupressinum. New Phytol 158:477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xia GM, Kang SZ, Li FS, Zhang JH, Zhou QY (2008) Diurnal and seasonal variations of sap flow of Caragana korshinskii in the arid desert region of north-west. China Hydrol Process 22:1197–1205.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yu LL, Cao JZ, Gao W, Su HT (2011) Evaluation of ACQ-D treated Chinese fir and Mongolian Scots pine with different post-treatments after 20 months of exposure. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 65:585–590.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2011.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang J, Kamdem DP (1999) Interaction of copper-amine with southern pine: retention and migration. Wood Fiber Sci 32:332–339Google Scholar
  29. Zhang J, Kamdem DP (2000) FTIR characterization of copper ethanolamine—wood interaction for wood preservation. Holzforschung 54:119–122Google Scholar
  30. Zhang ZL, Yang T, Mi N, Wang Y, Li GY, Wang LH, Xie YJ (2016) Antifungal activity of monoterpenes against wood white-rot fungi. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 106:157–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhu Liu
    • 1
  • Xuan Wang
    • 1
  • Yaoli Zhang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liang Wen
    • 1
  • Lin Zheng
    • 1
  • Liping Cai
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Material Science and EngineeringNanjing Forestry UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Energy EngineeringUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations