Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 6, pp 1539–1554 | Cite as

Denoising module for wood texture images

  • Lydia Binti Abdul Hamid
  • Nenny Ruthfalydia Rosli
  • Anis Salwa Mohd KhairuddinEmail author
  • Norrima Mokhtar
  • Rubiyah Yusof


The need for an effective automatic wood species identification system is becoming critical in the timber industry with the intention to sustain and improve productivity and quality of the timber products in furniture industry and housing industry. The first stage in an automatic wood recognition system is the image acquisition process where wood images are captured and stored in the database. Good quality wood images must be obtained during the acquisition process in order to guarantee effective results. One of the main issues in identifying wood species effectively is the blurred images of wood texture captured during the image acquisition process. To cater the above-mentioned problem, wood image denoising process is crucial for the timber industry. An image denoising module is proposed to improve the image representation of the wood texture by using the expectation–maximization (EM) adaption algorithm. Then, image quality assessment techniques are applied to evaluate the quality of the denoised wood images. Finally, the performance of the proposed denoising technique is compared to several denoising techniques at various noise levels. In this research, 52 wood species are used where the size of each wood image is 768 × 576 pixels with 256 gray levels at 300 dpi resolution. Experimental results tabulate the mean and standard deviation of the image quality assessment values for each technique at various noise levels. It can be seen that the proposed method EM adaption filter gives the best peak signal-to-noise ratio performance compared to other techniques. In conclusion, the proposed EM adaptation method gives the best performance in denoising the wood texture images at various noise levels compared to other techniques, such as homomorphic filtering, direct inverse filter, Wiener filter, constrained least squares, Lucy–Richardson algorithm, and EM filter.



Funding was provided by RU Grant—Faculty Programme by Faculty of Engineering, University of Malaya with project number RF001A-2018.


  1. Bremanath R, Nithiya B, Saipriya R (2009) Wood species recognition using GLCM and correlation. In: International conference on advances in recent technology in communication and computing, pp 615– 619Google Scholar
  2. Dahle GA (2017) Influence of bark on mapping of mechanical strain using digital image correlation. Wood Sci Technol 51(6):1469–1477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dawson-Andoh B, Adedipe OE (2012) Rapid spectroscopic separation of three Canadian softwoods. Wood Sci Technol 46:1193–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denzler JK, Weidenhiller A, Golser M (2013) Comparison of different approaches for automatic bark detection on log images. Wood Sci Technol 47:749–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dosselmann R, Yang XD (2011) A comprehensive assessment of the structural similarity index. J Signal Image Video Process 5(1):81–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Furuya H, Eda S, Shimamura T (2009) Image restoration via wiener filtering in the frequency domain. WSEAS Trans Signal Process 5(2):63–73Google Scholar
  7. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE (2008) Digital image processing, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  8. Ibrahim I, Mohd Khairuddin AS, Abu Talip MS (2017) Tree species recognition system based on macroscopic image analysis. Wood Sci Technol 51:431–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khalid M, Yusof R, Mohd Khairuddin AS (2011) Improved tropical wood species recognition system based on multi-feature extractor and classifier. Int Sch Sci Res Innov 5(11):1490–1496Google Scholar
  10. Kudelka M Jr (2012) Image quality assessment. In: WDS’12 proceedings of contributed papers, part 1, pp 94–99Google Scholar
  11. Li C, Bovik AC (2010) Content-partitioned structural similarity index for image quality assessment. Signal Process Image Commun 25(7):517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Luo E, Chan SH, Nguyen TQ (2016) Adaptive image denoising by mixture adaptation. IEEE Trans Image Process 20(10):4489–4503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pahlberg T, Johansson E, Hagman O, Thurley M (2015) Wood fingerprint recognition using knot neighbourhood K-plet descriptors. Wood Sci Technol 49(1):7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ruffinatto F, Crivellaro A, Wiedenhoeft AC (2015) Review of macroscopic features for hardwood and soft-wood identification and a proposal for a new character list. IAWA J 36:208–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sebera V, Praus L, Tippner J, Kunecky J, Čepela J, Wimmer R (2014) Using optical full-field measurement based on digital image correlation to measure strain on a tree subjected to mechanical load. Trees 28(4):1173–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thakur M, Datar S (2014) Image restoration based on deconvolution by Richardson Lucy algorithm. Int J Eng Trends Technol (IJETT) 14(4):161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Varnan CS, Jagan A, Rao Jaspreet DS (2015) Image quality assessment techniques. Int J Sci Technol 2(3):2108–2113Google Scholar
  18. Wheeler EA (2011) In-sideWood—a web resource for hardwood anatomy. IAWA J 32(2):199–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yadav M, Omprakash M (2013) A comparative study for deblurred motion blurred images. Int J Emerg Res Manag Technol 2(10):5Google Scholar
  20. Yusof R, Khalid M, Mohd Khairuddin AS (2013a) Application of kernel-genetic algorithm as nonlinear feature selection in tropical wood species recognition system. Comput Electron Agric 93:68–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yusof R, Khalid M, Mohd Khairuddin AS (2013b) Fuzzy logic-based pre-classifier for tropical wood species recognition system. Mach Vis Appl 24:1589–1604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zamri IP, Cordova F, Mohd Khairuddin AS, Mokhtar N, Rubiyah Y (2016) Tree species classification based on image analysis using Improved-basic gray level aura matrix. Comput Electron Agric 124:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang L, Dong W, Zhang D, Shi G (2010) Two-stage image denoising by principal component analysis with local pixel grouping. Pattern Recognit 43(4):1531–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lydia Binti Abdul Hamid
    • 1
  • Nenny Ruthfalydia Rosli
    • 2
  • Anis Salwa Mohd Khairuddin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Norrima Mokhtar
    • 1
  • Rubiyah Yusof
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Malaysia Japan International Institute of TechnologyUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations