Advertisement

Wood Science and Technology

, Volume 52, Issue 5, pp 1313–1330 | Cite as

Effects of maleated polypropylene content on the extended creep behavior of wood‒polypropylene composites using the stepped isothermal method and the stepped isostress method

  • Chung-Wei Huang
  • Teng-Chun Yang
  • Tung-Lin Wu
  • Ke-Chang Hung
  • Jyh-Horng Wu
Original
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of maleated polypropylene (MAPP) as a coupling agent for improving the physico-mechanical properties and creep resistances of wood‒polypropylene composites (WPCs). The results revealed that the composites with MAPP showed significantly decreased water absorption and thickness swelling, while the flexural properties and the wood screw holding strength increased as the MAPP content increased up to 3 wt%. Additionally, flexural creep tests were conducted at a series of elevated temperatures and stresses using the stepped isothermal method (SIM) and the stepped isostress method (SSM), respectively. The SSM-predicted creep compliance curves fit better with the experimental data than the SIM-predicted curves. On the other hand, the creep master curves for all of the WPCs were constructed from different SSM test conditions and were highly consistent with the long-term experimental creep data. The creep resistance values of the composites with MAPP were greater than those without MAPP, especially for the WPC with 5 wt% MAPP (WPCM5), due to the improvement in the interfacial compatibility between the wood fibers and PP matrix. Furthermore, according to the SSM-predicted creep behavior, the improvement in creep resistance (ICR) of WPCM5 reached 61% over a 20-year period compared to the WPC without MAPP.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by a Research Grant from the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 105-2628-B-005-002-MY3).

References

  1. Acha BA, Reboredo MM, Marcovich NE (2007) Creep and dynamic mechanical behavior of PP-jute composites: effect of the interfacial adhesion. Compos Part A 38:1507–1516.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achereiner F, Engelsing K, Bastian M, Heidemeyer P (2013) Accelerated creep testing of polymers using the stepped isothermal method. Polym Test 32:447–454.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2013.01.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adhikary KB, Pang S, Staiger MP (2008) Dimensional stability and mechanical behavior of wood–plastic composites based on recycled and virgin high-density polyethylene (HDPE). Compos Part B 39:807–815.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alwis KGNC, Burgoyne CJ (2008) Accelerated creep testing for aramid fibres using the stepped isothermal method. J Mater Sci 43:4789–4800.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-008-2676-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashori A, Sheshmani S (2010) Hybrid composites made from recycled materials: moisture absorption and thickness swelling behavior. Bioresour Technol 101:4717–4720.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.060 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Ayrilmis N, Jarusombuti S, Fueangvivat V, Bauchongkol P (2011) Effect of thermal-treatment of wood fibers on properties of flat-pressed wood plastic composites. Polym Degrad Stab 96:818–822.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.02.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bledzki AK, Faruk O (2004) Creep and impact properties of wood fibre–polypropylene composites: influence of temperature and moisture content. Compos Sci Technol 64:693–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00291-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bledzki AK, Letman M, Viksne A, Rence L (2005) A comparison of compounding processes and wood type for wood fibre-PP composites. Compos Part A 36:789–797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinson HF, Brinson LC (2008) Polymer engineering science and viscoelasticity, an introduction. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clemons CM, Ibach RE (2004) Effects of processing method and moisture history on laboratory fungal resistance of wood‒HDPE composites. Forest Prod J 54:50–57. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/6355
  11. Das M, Chakraborty D (2008) Evaluation of improvement of physical and mechanical properties of bamboo fibres due to alkali treatment. J Appl Polym Sci 107:522–527.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.26155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dasappa P, Lee-Sullivan P, Xiao X (2009) Temperature effects on creep behavior of continuous fiber GMT composites. Compos Part A 40:1071–1081.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.04.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dittenber DB, Ganga Rao HVS (2012) Critical review of recent publications on use of natural composites in infrastructure. Compos Part A 43:1419–1429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Espert A, Vilaplana F, Karlsson S (2004) Comparison of water absorption in natural cellulosic fibres from wood and one-year crops in polypropylene composites and its influence on their mechanical properties. Compos Part A 35:1267–1276.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felix JM, Gatenholm P (1991) The nature of adhesion in composites of modified cellulose fibers and polypropylene. J Appl Polym Sci 42:609–620.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1991.070420307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao H, Xie Y, Ou R, Wang Q (2012) Grafting effects of polypropylene blends with maleic anhydride on the properties of the resulting wood-plastic composites. Compos Part A 43:150–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giannopoulos IP, Burgoyne CJ (2011) Prediction of the long-term behaviour of high modulus fibres using the stepped isostress method (SSM). J Mater Sci 46:7660–7671.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5743-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giannopoulos IP, Burgoyne CJ (2012) Accelerated and real-time creep and creep-rupture results for aramid fibers. J Appl Polym Sci 125:3856–3870.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.36707 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hadid M, Rechak S, Tati A (2004) Long-term bending creep behavior prediction of injection molded composite using stress-time correspondence principle. Mater Sci Eng, A 385:54–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.04.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hadid M, Guerira B, Bahri M, Zouani A (2014) Assessment of the stepped isostress method in the prediction of long term creep of thermoplastics. Polym Testing 34:113–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hung KC, Wu JH (2010) Mechanical and interfacial properties of plastic composite panels made from esterified bamboo particles. J Wood Sci 56:216–221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10086-009-1090-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hung KC, Wu TL, Chen YL, Wu JH (2015) Assessing the effect of wood acetylation on mechanical properties and extended creep behavior of wood/recycled-polypropylene composites. Constr Build Mater 108:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones CJFP, Clarke D (2007) The residual strength of geosynthetic reinforcement subjected to accelerated creep testing and simulated seismic events. Geotext Geomembr 25:155–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kazayawoko M, Balatinecz JJ, Woodhams RT (1997) Diffuse reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectra of wood fibers treated with maleated polypropylenes. J Appl Polym Sci 66:1163–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19971107)66:6%3C1163::AID-APP16%3E3.0.CO;2-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keener TJ, Stuart RK, Brown TK (2004) Maleated coupling agents for natural fibre composites. Compos Part A 35:357–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klyosov A (2007) Wood–plastic composites. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar V, Tyagi L, Sinha S (2011) Wood flour–reinforced plastic composites: a review. Rev Chem Eng 27:253–264.  https://doi.org/10.1515/REVCE.2011.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee CH, Wu TL, Chen YL, Wu JH (2010) Characteristics and discrimination of five types of wood–plastic composites by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy combined with principal component analysis. Holzforschung 64:699–704.  https://doi.org/10.1515/HF.2010.104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li X, Tabil LG, Panigrahi S (2007) Chemical treatments of natural fiber for use in natural fiber-reinforced composite: a review. J Polym Environ 15:25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu H, Wu Q, Han G, Yao F, Kojima Y, Suzuki S (2008) Compatibilizing and toughening bamboo flour-filled HDPE composites: mechanical properties and morphologies. Compos Part A 39:1891–1900.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mishra S, Naik JB, Patil YP (2000) The compatibilishing effect of maleic anhydride on swelling and mechanical properties of plant-fiber-reinforced novolac composites. Compos Sci Technol 60:1729–1735.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00056-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohanty S, Nayak SK, Verma SK, Tripathy SS (2004) Effect of MAPP as a coupling agent on the performance of jute-PP composites. J Reinf Plast Comp 23:625–637.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684404032868 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nuñez AJ, Marcovich NE, Aranguren MI (2004) Analysis of the creep behavior of polypropylene–wood flour composites. Polym Eng Sci 44:1594–1603.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.20157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Oksman K, Skrifvars M, Selin JF (2003) Natural fibres as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1317–1324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00103-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ou R, Zhao H, Sui S, Song Y, Wang Q (2010) Reinforcing effects of Kevlar fiber on the mechanical properties of wood-flour/high-density-polyethylene composites. Compos Part A 41:1272–1278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pelaez-Samaniego MR, Yadama V, Lowell E, Espinoza-Herrera R (2013) A review of wood thermal pretreatments to improve wood composite properties. Wood Sci Technol 47:1285–1319.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-013-0574-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qiu W, Zhang F, Endo T, Hirotsu T (2003) Preparation and characteristics of composites of high-crystalline cellulose with polypropylene: effects of maleated polypropylene and cellulose content. J Appl Polym Sci 87:337–345.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.11446 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rowell RM (1983) Chemical modification of wood. For Prod Abstr 6:363–382Google Scholar
  39. Saba N, Paridah MT, Jawaid M (2015) Mechanical properties of kenaf fibre reinforced polymer composite: a review. Constr Build Mater 76:87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schneider MH, Vasic S, Lande S, Phillips JG (2003) Static bending and toughness of wood polymer composites (yellow birch and basswood). Wood Sci Technol 37:165–176.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-003-0189-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tajvidi M, Falk RH, Hermanson JC (2005) Time-temperature superposition principle applied to a kenaf fiber/high density polyethylene composites. J Appl Polym Sci 97:1995–2004.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.21648 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanks JD, Rader KE, Sharp SR (2017) Accelerated creep and creep-rupture testing of transverse unidirectional carbon/epoxy lamina based on the stepped isostress method. Compos Struct 159:455–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.09.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Xie Y, Xiao Z, Grüneberg T, Militz H, Hill CAS, Steuernagel L, Mai C (2010) Effects of chemical modification of wood particles with glutaraldehyde and 1,3-dimethylol-4,5-dihydroxyethyleneurea on properties of the resulting polypropylene composites. Compos Sci Technol 70:2003–2011.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.07.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Xu B, Simonsen J, Rochefort WE (2001) Creep resistance of wood-filled polystyrene/high-density polyethylene blends. J Appl Polym Sci 79:418–425.  https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4628(20010118)79:3%3C418::AID-APP40%3E3.0.CO;2-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu Y, Wu Q, Lei Y, Yao F (2010) Creep behavior of bagasse fiber reinforced polymer composites. Bioresour Technol 101:3280–3286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Xu Y, Lee SY, Wu Q (2011) Creep analysis of bamboo high-density polyethylene composites: effect of interfacial treatment and fiber loading level. Polym Compos 32:692–699.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.21088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang TC, Wu TL, Hung KC, Chen YL, Wu JH (2015) Mechanical properties and extended creep behavior of bamboo fiber reinforced recycled poly(lactic acid) composites using the time-temperature superposition principle. Constr Build Master 93:558–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yeo SS, Hsuan YG (2009) Predicting the creep behavior of high density polyethylene geogrid using stepped isothermal method. In: Martin JW, Ryntz RA, Chin J, Dickie RA (eds) Service life prediction of polymeric materials: global perspectives. Springer, New York, pp 205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yeo SS, Hsuan YG (2010) Evaluation of creep behavior of high density polyethylene and polyethylene-terephthalate geogrids. Geotext Geomembr 28:409–421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang F, Endo T, Qiu W, Yang L, Hirotsu T (2002) Preparation and mechanical properties of composite of fiPrepa cellulose and maleated polyethylene. J Appl Polym Sci 84:1971–1980.  https://doi.org/10.1002/app.10428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chung-Wei Huang
    • 1
  • Teng-Chun Yang
    • 1
  • Tung-Lin Wu
    • 1
  • Ke-Chang Hung
    • 1
  • Jyh-Horng Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ForestryNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations