Advertisement

Vitamin D, Autoimmune Disease and Rheumatoid Arthritis

  • Stephanie R. Harrison
  • Danyang Li
  • Louisa E. Jeffery
  • Karim Raza
  • Martin HewisonEmail author
Open Access
Review

Abstract

Vitamin D has been reported to influence physiological systems that extend far beyond its established functions in calcium and bone homeostasis. Prominent amongst these are the potent immunomodulatory effects of the active form of vitamin D, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3). The nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) for 1,25-(OH)2D3 is expressed by many cells within the immune system and resulting effects include modulation of T cell phenotype to suppress pro-inflammatory Th1 and Th17 CD4+ T cells and promote tolerogenic regulatory T cells. In addition, antigen-presenting cells have been shown to express the enzyme 1α-hydroxylase that converts precursor 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD3) to 1,25-(OH)2D3, so that immune microenvironments are able to both activate and respond to vitamin D. As a consequence of this local, intracrine, system, immune responses may vary according to the availability of 25-OHD3, and vitamin D deficiency has been linked to various autoimmune disorders including rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The aim of this review is to explore the immune activities of vitamin D that impact autoimmune disease, with specific reference to RA. As well as outlining the mechanisms linking vitamin D with autoimmune disease, the review will also describe the different studies that have linked vitamin D status to RA, and the current supplementation studies that have explored the potential benefits of vitamin D for prevention or treatment of RA. The overall aim of the review is to provide a fresh perspective on the potential role of vitamin D in RA pathogenesis and treatment.

Keywords

Vitamin D Vitamin D receptor Autoimmune disease Rheumatoid arthritis Inflammation T cell 

Introduction

Vitamin D is a secosteroid which can be obtained from the diet (in particular from oily fish, eggs, dairy products and fortified foods). However, in humans, the majority of vitamin D is synthesised in the skin from the precursor molecule 7-dehydrocholesterol, which undergoes a series of UV light-mediated modifications to generate parental vitamin D3 [1]. Vitamin D was first recognised for its role in bone mineralisation and calcium regulation, with vitamin D deficiency associated with the bone disease rickets [2]. More recently, vitamin D has been reported to exert many extra-skeletal effects [3] with association studies linking vitamin D status to a broad range of human health issues. Prominent amongst these is the proposed role of vitamin D in the pathophysiology of autoimmune disease, including insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) [4], autoimmune thyroid disease [5, 6], multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [7], systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [8] and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [9]. The underlying mechanisms by which vitamin D impacts autoimmune disease remain elusive, and it is still not clear whether vitamin D deficiency contributes to autoimmune disease pathogenesis or whether it is marker of disease progression and severity. In this article, we address these issues with specific reference to the role of vitamin D in RA. We discuss the potential clinical significance, and the mechanisms of action of vitamin D in RA, and suggest areas where future research is needed.

Vitamin D in Health

Humans obtain vitamin D in two forms; vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol, derived from plant ergosterols) and vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), which differ in the number/location of double carbon–carbon bonds. Vitamin D2 has only two C=C bonds, whilst vitamin D3 has three, affording D2 a lower affinity for vitamin D-binding protein (DBP), increasing clearance and reduced bioavailability; thus, vitamin D3 is the main form of vitamin D used by humans. Generation of active, hormonal, vitamin D3 involves a series of non-enzymatic and enzymatic processes. Firstly, 7-dehydrocholesterol is converted to vitamin D3 when exposed to UVB light in the dermis. Vitamin D3 is then converted to 25-hydroxycholecalciferol (25-OHD3) by the enzyme 25-hydroxylase (CYP2R1) located predominantly in the liver [10]. The final step in generating active 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25-(OH)2D3) is mediated by the enzyme 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1), which is abundant in the proximal tubule cells of the kidney [11]. This step is responsible for the majority of circulating 1,25-(OH)2D3, but CYP27B1 is also expressed by a variety of non-renal tissues [12], including several immune cell subsets [13, 14, 15], suggesting that these cells also have significant capacity to generate 1,25-(OH)2D3, with this process being instrumental in various autocrine and paracrine cell responses to vitamin D [16, 17]. Moreover, whilst renal CYP27B1 is tightly regulated by parathyroid hormone, fibroblast growth factor 23 and 1,25-(OH)2D3 itself, extra-renal CYP27B1 does not appear to be subject to the same regulatory constraints [18, 19]. Instead extra-renal synthesis of 1,25-(OH)2D3 appears to be more dependent on the availability of 25-OHD3. In view of the fact that 25-OHD3 is the main determinant of serum vitamin D status, it is highly likely that extra-renal synthesis of 1,25-(OH)2D3 will therefore be strongly influenced by vitamin D deficiency/sufficiency. The availability of 25-OHD3 is also affected by circulating serum carrier proteins for vitamin D: Vitamin D-Binding Protein (VBP), and to a lesser extent albumin [20, 21]. Levels of 1,25-(OH)2D3 in either renal or extra-renal settings are also influenced by catabolism of 1,25-(OH)2D3 to inactive metabolites which is primarily controlled by the enzyme 24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1) [22], with mutations in the CYP24A1 gene being associated with dysregulated catabolism of 1,25-(OH)2D3 [23].

Active 1,25-(OH)2D3 has an established role in regulating bone metabolism and calcium homeostasis, but it has also been shown to modulate key mechanisms in innate and adaptive immunity [24, 25, 26] (Fig. 1). The nuclear receptor for 1,25-(OH)2D3 (the vitamin D receptor (VDR)) is expressed by a plethora of immune cells, including monocytes/macrophage, dendritic cells (DC), neutrophils and B and T cells [27, 28]. This, coupled with the capacity for localised CYP27B1-mediated synthesis of 1,25-(OH)2D3 by monocytes, macrophages and DC [13, 14], supports a role for vitamin D as an important contributor to normal immune function. The remainder of the review will focus on this activity of vitamin D and the impact that this may have on the chronic inflammatory/autoimmune disease RA.
Fig. 1

Role of vitamin D in the immune system. Schematic representation of cells from the innate and adaptive immune systems. Monocyte/macrophages from the innate immune system expression pattern recognition receptors (PRR) such as toll-like receptors (TLR), and response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS). PAMP–PRR responses include induction of transcription to increased expression of the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and the vitamin D-activating enzyme 1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) via STAT 1 or 5, AP-1, NF-κB or CEBP response elements. This increases monocyte/macrophage capacity to metabolise 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 (25-OHD3) to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3), which then interacts with VDR to regulate gene expression via DNA vitamin D response elements (VDRE). Prominent target genes for regulation by 1,25-(OH)2D3 include Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2), hepcidin antimicrobial protein (HAMP), cathelicidin (CAMP) and β-defensin 2 (DEFB4). 1,25-(OH)2D3 also enhances pathogen killing by inducing autophagy and reactive oxygen species (ROS), but acts to inhibit inflammation by suppressing inflammatory cytokines and expression of TLR2/4. Monocytes/macrophages may contribute to local levels of 1,25-(OH)2D3 which may then act on non-immune cells such as local tissue fibroblasts, chondrocytes or epithelial cells. For other innate immunity cells such as dendritic cells (DC), differentiation of these cells from immature (iDC) to mature (mDC) phenotypes is associated with increased expression of CYP27B1 but decreased expression of VDR, suggesting local conversion of 25-OHD3 to 1,25-(OH)2D3, which results in a paracrine effect to generate tolerogenic DC. Synthesis of 1,25-(OH)2D3 by mDC may also have paracrine effects on cells from the adaptive immune system such as T cells which, when activated, express VDR and respond to 1,25-(OH)2D3 by inducing Th2 and Treg phenotypes whilst suppressing Th1 and Th17 inflammatory phenotypes. 1,25-(OH)2D3 can also act on B cells to decrease CD40 expression and enhance class switching

Vitamin D and Immunity

The multi-modal innate immune system is the body’s first line of defence against pathogens, comprising physical barriers (e.g. epithelium), chemical barriers (e.g. stomach acid), complement proteins and cellular responses such as those mediated by macrophage, DC and neutrophils. Vitamin D participates in several of these processes, including the maintenance of barrier function in the intestine, by regulating tight junctions [29] and intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis [30]. However, to date, studies of vitamin D and innate immunity have predominantly explored its impact on antigen-presenting cells, such as macrophages and DC, which participate in the recognition of and response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) via pattern recognition receptors (PRR) [25, 26] (see Fig. 1). DNA target sequences for 1,25-(OH)2D3-bound to VDR, referred to as vitamin D response elements (VDRE) have been found in multiple genes associated with PRR responses, including the antibacterial proteins NOD2 [31], hepcidin antimicrobial protein (HAMP) [32], cathelicidin (CAMP) [33], B-defensin 2 (DEFB4) [33, 34] and TREM-1 [35]. Toll-Like Receptors (TLRs) are an important group of PRR, and 1,25-(OH)2D3 has been shown to downregulate TLR2 and TLR4 in monocytes [36], abrogating over-elaboration of TLR immune responses to PAMPs and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). In a separate study, methylation of the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) gene and single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the VDR were also found to alter VDR-mediated TLR1/2 signalling in monocytes [37].

Vitamin D is also known to differentially regulate innate immune cell subsets, influencing cell maturation, metabolism and antigen presentation, alongside response to and production of cytokines and chemokines [13, 14, 38, 39]. Notably, mature DC express CYP27B1 but little VDR, whereas the converse is true for immature DC [13]. This has led to the hypothesis that mature DC may in fact produce vitamin D locally on activation, which then acts on immature DC to modulate immune responses [13, 40]. The principal effect of 1,25-(OH)2D3 on DC is to suppress maturation markers such as CD80/CD86 [41, 42, 43] and CD83 [44], increase IL-10 production and decrease pro-inflammatory cytokines [41, 45, 46]. In this way, 1,25(OH)2D3 promotes an immature, tolerogenic DC phenotype [47, 48, 49], thereby reducing antigen presentation to T cells.

Adaptive immune cells are also modulated directly by 1,25-(OH)2D3, with VDR being transiently expressed by developing thymocytes, and re-activation of VDR expression in peripheral T and B cells following immune challenge [50, 51]. 1,25-(OH)2D3 was initially thought to act primarily as a regulator of T and B cell proliferation, but is now known to play a more important role in regulating T cell phenotype [24, 52, 53, 54]. In particular, 1,25-(OH)2D3 has been shown to suppress inflammatory interleukin-17 expressing CD4+ T-helper (Th) cells (Th17) [55] and Th1 cells [56], whilst promoting differentiation of Th2 cells [57] and regulatory T cells (Treg) [58, 59] (see Fig. 1). However, vitamin D may also promote some immune responses by enhancing effector T cell responses including CD8+ cytotoxic function [53], and other studies have reported a role for 1,25-(OH)2D3 in promoting T cell receptor (TCR) expression and T cell activation [60]. Although less well studied, 1,25-(OH)2D3 has also been shown to modulate the function of other cytotoxic lymphocytes such as natural killer cells (NK), with apparent effects of NK cell activation [61]. Likewise, effects of vitamin D have been described for natural killer T cells (NKT), and NKT cell development is lost in mice lacking the VDR gene [62]. In contrast to the wide range of data on vitamin D and T cells, there is a scarcity of detailed studies for effects of 1,25-(OH)2D3 on B cells, which may include indirect effects via T cell modulation [63], and direct B cell effects on class switching [64], IL-10 production [65] and CCR10 production [66].

Vitamin D in Autoimmune Disease

Given the proposed role for vitamin D as an immune regulator, it is perhaps unsurprising that vitamin D deficiency has been linked to both allergic [67] and autoimmune diseases [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 68, 69]. The increasing incidence/prevalence of MS proportional to distance from the equator, suggests that environmental factors such as sunlight and vitamin D may be involved in disease aetiology [70]. This is further underlined by studies from the UK showing that risk of immune-related diseases is significantly influenced by the season of birth as the serum 25-OHD3 levels is associated with this [71]. Likewise, genetic variants associated with heritable effects on vitamin D status have also been linked to MS disease onset and progression [72, 73]. However, differences between genders [74], ethnic groups [75] and potentially different subtypes of MS [76], make it difficult to decipher the exact role of vitamin D in MS. Furthermore, although vitamin D supplementation has been successful in ameliorating MS symptoms in some studies [77, 78, 79, 80], this has not been demonstrated consistently [81]. Larger randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are now needed to establish whether vitamin D supplementation can reduce risk, severity and/or progression of MS. Similar to MS, vitamin D deficiency is also prevalent in SLE [82], where low serum vitamin D has been associated with dysregulation of autophagy [83], increased circulating levels of IFNα [84], increased CD4+/CD8+ T cells and a reduction in pro-inflammatory cytokines [85]. Vitamin D intake has been shown to have variable impact on SLE, with some studies showing no effect on disease severity [86, 87, 88] whilst another study reported decreased disease activity in young adults with SLE [89]. As with MS, more research is needed to fully define optimal doses and timing of intervention for vitamin D supplementation.

T1D is another autoimmune disease with reported links to vitamin D status, with vitamin D deficiency correlating with T1D risk severity [90, 91]. A prospective, non-blinded non-randomised controlled trial has also shown that T1D patients supplemented with vitamin D and with higher serum 25-OHD3 are more likely to have improved glycemic control [92]. T1D has also been linked to single-nucleotide polymorphic variants in the CYP27B1 [93, 94, 95] and VDR [96, 97] genes. In vivo treatment with the active form of vitamin D, 1,25-(OH)2D3, was shown to completely suppress T1D disease in the NOD experimental mouse [98]. In humans, clinical trials involving supplementation with vitamin D3 or the precursor molecule 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 in T1D patients have produced mixed results; some studies have reported delay of β-cell destruction in supplemented trial groups compared to non-supplemented groups [99, 100, 101], whilst others found no significant improvements of on β-cell preservation [102, 103].

Vitamin D deficiency has also being linked to autoimmune gastrointestinal disorders such as Crohn’s disease, a major form of IBD [104, 105, 106, 107]. The role of vitamin D as a regulator of immune function in IBD has also been studied in vivo in mouse models. Knockout of the mouse genes for VDR (Vdr) [108] or 1α-hydroxylase (Cyp27b1) [109] shows increased severity of artificially induced colitis similar to IBD. Other studies have shown that vitamin D-deficient mice have increased severity of induced colitis, with this effect being linked to aberrant innate immune responses within the gastrointestinal tract [110]. Furthermore, it has been shown that the VDR, in conjunction with 1,25-(OH)2D3, protects against the onset of colitis in mice by maintaining barrier function within the gastrointestinal mucosal epithelium [111]. Despite these positive studies, it is still unclear whether vitamin D deficiency is a direct cause of IBD including Crohn’s disease, or whether there is a reverse causation effect.

Vitamin D and Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory/autoimmune arthritis characterised by synovitis of peripheral joints, with extra-articular manifestations. If untreated, unopposed inflammation leads to joint destruction, loss of function and disability, and RA is also associated with premature mortality secondary, at least in part, to the effects of chronic inflammation on cardiovascular health [112]. Like other autoimmune diseases, there is growing interest in the role of vitamin D deficiency in the aetiopathogenesis of RA [9]. RA is thought to be triggered by environmental factors [113], in patients with an underlying genetic susceptibility [114, 115] leading to dysfunction of innate and adaptive immunity, tipping the balance in preference of autoimmunity over tolerance [116]. Whilst smoking is well recognised as a strong environmental risk factor other potential factors include vitamin D [9].

Vitamin D Status and RA Disease Risk and Progress

In a recent meta-analysis and systematic review, Lin J et al. analysed 24 studies published prior to May 2015 whose focus was the relationship between serum 25-OHD3 and clinical/laboratory indices of RA disease activity. Overall, they reported an inverse relationship between serum 25-OHD3 and RA disease activity [117]. However, they also identified important differences between patient subgroups, including a stronger inverse relationship between RA disease activity and serum 25-OHD3 in studies from developing countries, and in low-latitude climates. Since the publication of this meta-analysis, further studies have been conducted. Therefore, to establish a clearer picture of whether vitamin D levels are indeed significantly lower in RA, and are linked to disease activity, all studies of vitamin D levels in RA patients currently listed on Pubmed are summarised in Table 1. The search terms “vitamin D levels” and “rheumatoid arthritis” were used, and no restrictions on study date were applied. In addition, studies included in the meta-analysis (referenced above) were also included. The collected studies listed in Table 1 underline the significant heterogeneity between studies and their findings, making it difficult to determine a clear role for vitamin D deficiency in the onset, progression and/or severity of RA. Studies to date have been conducted in over 20 countries, which invariably means that there will be confounding differences in environmental factors including sunlight exposure and diet, and genetic factors. Moreover, the overwhelming majority of the reported studies were observational or cross-sectional by design, and as such can only report on the association between RA disease and vitamin D, rather than a causal role.
Table 1

Summary of studies comparing serum vitamin D levels with disease activity in RA

Study details (year, lead author)

Population size and ethnicity

Disease duration

Analytical method(s)

Metabolite(s) measured

Cut off for vit D def.

Vit D lower in HC vs. RA

Association of vitamin D with disease parameter(s)1

1998, Oelzner

RA = 96, Germany

Mean 12.2 years (range 6 months–38 years)

RAI

1,25(OH)2 D3

Unclear

n/a

Neg: disease activity

Pos; urinary collagen crosslinks

↑ DA is assoc. neg. Ca balance and ↓ bone formation

2006, Cutolo

RA = 118, HC = 75, Estonia and Italy

Not stated

RAI

25OHD

n/a

n/a

Neg: DAS-28, however, correlation varied according to time of year and country of origin

2010, Craig

RA = 266 (African Americans)

Mean 31.2 months (SD = 7.3 months)

Unclear

25OHD

< 15 ng/mL

n/a

Nil

2010, Haque

RA = 62, USA

Mean 11.6 years (SD = 12.3 years)

Standardised (Quest + Lab − corp)

25OHD

< 30 ng/mL

n/a

Neg: DAS28, pain and HAQ in active RA (DAS28 > 2.6) only

2010, Rossini

RA = 1191, HC = 1019, Italy

Mean 11.5 years (SD = 8.7 years)

ELISA

25OHD

< 30 ng/mL

No

Neg: HAQ disability, DAS28, MADLS, high Steinbrocker functional state

2011, Braun-Moscovici

Rheumatic disease = 121 (RA = 85), Israel

Mean = 9.9 years (SD = 8.5 years)

NOS

25OHD

Unclear

n/a

Nil

2011, Turhanoglu

RA = 65, HC = 40, Turkey

Mean = 7.73–7.95 years

EIA

25OHD

Not specified

No

Neg: DAS-28, CRP, HAQ

2012, Kostoglou-Athanassiou

RA = 44, HC = 44, Greece

Not stated

RAI

25OHD3

n/a

Yes

Neg: DAS-28, CRP, ESR

2012, Baker

RA = 499, USA, China

Not stated

ELISA

25OHD

< 50 nmol/L

(< 30 ng/mL)

Yes

Nil

2012, Attar

RA = 100, HC = 100, Saudi Arabia

Mean 4.7 years (SD = 5 years)

LC MS/MS

25OHD

< 30 and < 10 ng/mL^

No

Neg: DAS28

^nb study used two definitions for deficiency

2012, Baykal

RA = 55, HC = 45, Turkey

Not stated

Elecsys 25(OH)D reactive kit

25OHD

< 30 nmol/L

Yes

Nil

2012, Heidari

RA = 108, UIA = 39, HC = 239, Iran

Not stated

ELISA

25OHD

< 20 ng/mL

No

Correlation of vitamin D with RA disease parameters was not an objective of this study; the study simply compared 25OHD between disease/control

2013, Atwa

RA = 55, PsA = 43, HC = 40, Egypt

Mean 4.93 years (SD = 3.11 years)

CLA

25OHD

n/a

Yes

Nil

2013, Chen

RA = 110, HC = 110, China

Mean = 6.51yr, SD = 6.82 yr

RAI

25OHD

Not specified

n/a

Neg: DAS28

2013, Furuya

RA = 4793, Japanese

Mean = 12 years

RAI

25OHD

< 20 ng/mL

n/a

Neg: Japanese HAQ disability score, NSAID use

2013, Haga

RA = 302, Denmark

Mean = 10.5 years (range 0–50 years)

HPLC–MS

25OHD

< 50 nmol/L

(< 30 ng/mL)

n/a

No assoc. overall; however, severe deficiency (< 15 nmol/L 25OHD3) was associated with increased DAS28 > 5.1, CRP, RF and ≥ 3 DMARDs

2013, Higgins

RA = 126, New Zealand

Mean = 12 years (range 1–37 years)

Immunoassay method NOS

25OHD

< 50 nmol/L

(< 30 ng/mL)

n/a

Neg: VAS. This parameter of the DAS28 score alone accounted for assoc. with RA

2013, Sabbagh

Rheum dx = 56 (RA = 39), non-rheum dx = 60

Not stated

NOS

25OHD

< 50 nmol/L (< 30 ng/mL)

Yes

Neg: DAS28-ESR

2013, Yazmalar

RA = 71, AS = 72, OA = 74, HC = 70, Turkey

Not stated

HPLC

25OHD

n/a

No

Nil

2014, Cote

RA = 120, HC = 1341, USA

Not stated

RAI or LC MS/MS

Vit D

< 20 ng/mL + < 30 ng/mL

n/a

Nil assoc. between vit D and RA onset

2014, Gheita

RA = 63, HC = 62, Egypt

Mean = 5.89 years (SD = 3.67)

CLA

25OHD

< 20 ng/mL

Yes

Neg: QoL, HAQ II, FMS

RA + FMS had lower vit D than RA alone

2014, Hong

RA = 130, HC = 80

Mean 6 years (range 2 months–40 years)

ELISA

25OHD

n/a

Yes

Neg: SJC, TJC, joint pain, EMS, HAQ, Plt, ESR, IL-17, IL-23

2014, Hiraki

Pre-RA = 166, HC = 490

n/a

RAI

25OHD

n/a

n/a

Nil association found between 25OHD and development of RA, except in a small subset of females just prior to RA onset

2014, Sahebari

RA = 99, HC = 68, Iran

Mean = 59 years (SD 5.6 years; range 0.2–20 years)

ELISA

25OHD

< 30 nmol/L

No

Nil; however, all patient, were on vit D replacement

2014, Sharma

RA = 80, HC = 80

Not stated

ELISA

25OHD

< 10 ng/mL

Yes

Neg: DAS28

2015, Cooles

RA = 73, UA = 40, OA = 58, NIA = 89, other IA = 50, ReA = 14, CrA = 19

RA—49 years (range 18–88)

Not stated

25OHD

n/a

No

Nil

2015, Raczkiewicz

RA = 97, OA = 28, Poland

5.8 ± 5.4 years (vit D > 20 ng/dL)

8.8 ± 9.8 years (vit D < 20 ng/dL)

CLA

25OHD

< 20 ng/dL

n/a

Neg: DAS28, HAQ, BDI

Pos: PA, SF-36*

* remained sig. after multivariate analysis

2015, Matsumoto

RA = 181, HC = 186, Japan

Mean = 10.2 years (5.2–20 years)

RAI

25OHD

Not specified

Yes

Nil

2015, Azzeh

RA = 102, Saudi

Not stated

CLA

25OHD

< 30 ng/mL

n/a

Neg: DAS28

2015, Brance

RA = 34, HC = 41, Argentina

Mean = 7.6 years (SD = 1.4 years)

CLA

25OHD

< 20 ng/mL (< 50 nmol/L)

Yes

Neg: DAS-28

2015, Cen

RA = 116, China

Not stated

ELISA

25OHD

< 50 nmol/L

(< 30 ng/mL)

Yes

Nil

2015, Wang

Early RA = 154, HC = 60, China

Disease duration < 1 year

CLA

25OHD

<20 ng/mL

Yes

Neg: ACPA, ESR, DAS

2016, Cecchetti

RA = 894, HC = 861, multiple countries

Not available

NOS

25OHD

≤ 10 ng/mL

Yes

Neg: DAS28-CRP, SDAI, CDAI

2016, Pakchotanon

RA = 239, Thai

Median 84 months (range 48–132 months)

CLA

25OHD2

25OHD3

n/a

n/a

Nil

2016, Zakeri

RA = 66, Iran

Not stated

CLA

25OHD

n/a

n/a

Neg: DAS-ESR, SJC, TJC, GHS, EMS

2017, Mateen

RA = 100, HC = 50

Not stated

CLA

25OHD

n/a

Yes

Neg: TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-17, ROS

2017, Hajjaj-Hassouni

RA = 1413, 15 countries

8.3 years (range 3.6–15.2 years)

NOS

25OHD

≤ 10 ng/mL

n/a

Neg: DAS + Corticosteroid dose

2017, Vojinovic

RA = 625, HC = 276,13 European countries

Mean = 11 years (SD = 9 years)

CLA

25OHD

< 20 ng/mL

Yes

Neg: DAS28-CRP, RAID, HAQ, SRS/HRS/GRS domains of D-PRO

2018, Herly

RA = 160, Denmark

Median 14.1 weeks (range 6.1–26.6)

LC MS/MS

……….

RAI

25OHD2

25OHD3

……….

1,25(OH)2 D

< 50 nmol/L

……….

n/a

……….

Nil

Nil

………………………..

Neg: DAS28-CRP, HAQ, CRP, VAS-pain

Pos: ACPA

2018, de la Torre Lossa

RA = 100, Ecuador

Full article in Spanish

Full article in Spanish

25OHD

Full article in Spanish

Full article in Spanish

Nil

2018, Khoja

RA = 41, HC = 41

Not available

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Yes

Neg: PROs

References are shown with Supplementary Table 1

ACPA anti-citrullinated peptide antibody, CDAI clinical disease activity index, CLA chemiluminescent assay, DA disease activity, DAS28 disease activity score 28, ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, EMS early morning stiffness, FMS fibromyalgia syndrome, GHS global health score, GRS global risk score (SRS + HRS), HAQ health assessment questionnaire, HRS habitus risk score, LC MS/MS liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, Neg negative correlation between vitamin D and outcome measure, NOS Not otherwise specified, OA osteoarthritis, Pos positive correlation between vitamin D and outcome measure, PROs patient-reported outcomes, PsA psoriatic arthritis, RA rheumatoid arthritis, HC healthy control, RAI Radioimmunoassay, ROS reactive oxygen species, SDAI simple disease activity index, SJC swollen joint count, SRS symptom risk score, TCJ tender joint count, VAS visual analogue score

RA is a heterogeneous disease, yet few studies have considered analysing RA subgroups based on antibody status, disease severity or duration. Where subgroups have been defined, this is often based on disease activity score 28 (DAS-28); a composite score that captures different subjective and objective measures of disease activity, hence the potential for skewing of results by one component. One study that did address this reported no correlation between vitamin D levels and DAS-28, with or without the inclusion of the patient global visual analogue scale score (Patient global VAS)—a scale for evaluating the patient’s overall perception of their RA activity. However, patient global VAS on its own did correlate with serum vitamin D levels [118]. In 2015, Cooles et al. reported data showing the relationship between serum 25-OHD3 levels and various clinical parameters in early RA (median symptom duration 12 weeks, range 4–104 weeks) [119]. They found no clear association between 25-OHD3 and early RA, but in early osteoarthritis (OA) 25-OHD3 was inversely associated with global health visual analogue scale scores (GH-VAS). This suggests that OA, which commonly co-exists with RA, may act as a confounder in interpreting the relationship between vitamin D and RA. These observations are intriguing, and need to be further explored to determine the role, if any, for vitamin D in pain and fatigue associated with RA.

Relatively few studies have assessed the impact of RA treatment regimens on the apparent inverse correlation between serum 25-OHD3 and RA disease activity [120, 121, 122]. Treatment for RA is aimed at reducing disease activity, and therefore comparing serum 25-OHD3 levels with measures of disease activity after the initiation of treatment could mask prior effects of vitamin D deficiency on treatment naïve disease. Since the 1990s, an early and aggressive approach to the management of new RA has been widely used in order to maximise chances of inducing remission [123]. Today, this strategy is fully integrated in clinical practice, but its application in the context of low vitamin D, and vitamin D replacement, for treatment naive, newly diagnosed RA patients, is still unclear.

As well as clinical and biochemical differences in subgroups of RA, there are also likely genetic differences which may influence the relative importance of vitamin D in the immunopathogenesis of disease. For example, Dennis et al. identified four distinct synovial tissue gene expression profiles in a cohort of RA patients [124]. Although some of these differences in gene expression may be related to the patient’s disease duration or treatment regimen, it seems unlikely that this sufficiently explains all the observed differences, and that distinctly different gene signatures may indeed characterise different subsets of RA. Accordingly, it seems plausible that vitamin D deficiency may play slightly different roles in the aetiopathogenesis and progression of disease in different groups of patients. Ultimately, the role of vitamin D in RA appears far too complex to be understood through simple observational methods.

To date, studies of RA disease and vitamin D have focused on the link between RA and serum levels of the main circulating form of vitamin D, 25-OHD3. However, 25OHD3 is an inactive precursor for 1,25-(OH)2D3 and therefore has limited functional relevance for immunomodulation. Consequently, there has been a revival of interest in the role of other vitamin D metabolites both in serum and disease-affected synovial fluid as potentially more informative markers for vitamin D function in RA. Research on this subject began more than 25 years ago with seminal studies of vitamin D metabolism in RA tissues [125, 126, 127]. These reports indicated that concentrations of 25-OHD3 were significantly lower in synovial fluid relative to paired patient blood, but also revealed significant capacity for the generation of 1,25-(OH)2D3 by macrophages isolated from synovial fluid [127]. In more recent studies, we have measured multiple vitamin D metabolites—the vitamin D ‘metabolome’ in paired serum and synovial fluid from patients with established RA, reactive arthritis and healthy controls using the current gold standard for vitamin D analysis, liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) [128]. These studies showed that for markers such as swollen joint count (SJC), synovial fluid levels of vitamin D metabolites correlated better with RA disease activity than their circulating serum counterparts [128].

Another area of contention for vitamin D and RA concerns the definition of vitamin D deficiency itself (Table 1). In the UK, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommends diagnosis of vitamin D deficiency when serum 25-OHD3 is < 30 ng/mL, and states that for some people 30-50 ng/mL may be insufficient, citing recommendations from the national osteoporosis society guidelines [129, 130]. Hence, there appears to be an ambiguity around whether or not some patients need more vitamin D than others. Current NICE guidance does not define what constitutes adequate vitamin D status in patients of different ages, sex, ethnicities or disease states; for example, patients at risk of RA vs patients with established RA, or in other inflammatory diseases. To date, few studies have attempted to define what adequate supplementation means in RA. A cohort study published in 2012 observed that even supplementation 800-880 IU/day did not achieve adequate repletion of vitamin D (defined as > 20 ng/mL) in 27.7% of RA patients who were vitamin D-deficient, although duration of therapy was not reported [131]. This suggests that different levels of vitamin D replacement may be required in different RA patients, depending on pre-supplementation of vitamin D levels, sunlight exposure and skin colour (darker skin absorbs less UV light to make vitamin D). Failure to adequately replete RA patients could also be related to poor treatment compliance or inadequate duration of supplementation. Importantly, inadequate repletion was related to higher HAQ scores for RA patients, implying that inadequate improvement of vitamin D status following supplementation had poorer outcomes [131]. Alternatively higher disease activity may simply be associated with less time spent outdoors, indirectly impacting sunlight exposure and skin synthesis of vitamin D. Further RCTs are needed to more clearly define the optimal levels of vitamin D for patients with RA, and how to achieve and maintain these levels. The next section of the review describes the reported supplementation trials for vitamin D and RA.

Vitamin D Supplementation Trials in RA

Ultimately, defining vitamin D deficiency in the context of RA is of clinical interest only if replacing vitamin D in RA patients who are deficient is likely to improve disease symptoms, or even prevent the onset of RA in those at risk. To date, vitamin D supplementation trials for RA have varied appreciably in terms of patient numbers, characteristics, disease duration and severity, concomitant medication regimen, type of/duration of supplementation regimen, number of outcomes and period over which these outcomes were measured (Table 2). A recent meta-analysis identified 9 RCTs of vitamin D supplementation for ≥ 3 months in rheumatic diseases, including 5 studies of RA patients [132]. In RA, there was a decrease in the rate of disease flare, VAS and DAS-28 with vitamin D supplementation; however, all failed to reach statistical significance. Similar findings have also been reported in previous meta-analyses on this subject [133]. Conversely, a meta-analysis conducted in 2012 found that all but one of the 11 studies included in the meta-analysis suggested low vitamin D intake was linked with both increased risk of RA and greater disease activity [134]; however, the studies included in that analysis were cohort/association by design, and not RCTs. Challenges associated with identifying whether vitamin D supplementation has a beneficial effect in RCTs to date include inter-study heterogeneity and relatively small sample numbers for a meta-analysis, with only 5 RCTs included, thus emphasising the need for larger RCTs in different subsets of RA patients to fully elucidate the role, if any, for vitamin D supplementation in the management of RA. In addition, there may be differences in vitamin D-binding protein levels, and other genetic variants, which influence the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation [135]. Vitamin D supplementation in low/moderate doses is not thought to be harmful to patients, has wider health benefits, is relatively inexpensive and has fewer side effects/interactions compared with many other commonly used treatments for RA, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Evidence is also emerging that vitamin D may augment certain therapies in RA. In one in vitro study, vitamin D 1,25-(OH)2D3 was shown to act synergistically with the biologic drug abatacept to inhibit T cell activation driven by anti-CD3 cross-linking, and promote a pro-regulatory CD28 phenotype [136]. The potential for enhancing the effects of biologics with simple, low-risk addition of 1,25-(OH)2D3 is interesting, and further work is required to validate this initial in vitro finding.
Table 2

Vitamin D supplementation trials in rheumatoid arthritis

Study

Study participants (no. eligible + DMARD tx)

Treatment groups/trial design/BL vit D

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Summary of key findings

Andjelkovic et al. (1999)

RA = 19 (on MTX ± GC, active dx)

2 microg/day oral alfacalcidol for 3/12 in 2 groups; mod + highly active RA. Control group = same patients data collected over 3 months prior to suppl

Open-label trial

ESR, CRP, EMS, Richie index, Lee index at 3 months

CRP, SJC, TJC, Richie index and Lee index all significantly decreased after 3/12

RF and CRP were decreased, but this was not statistically significant

Gopinath et al. (2011)

RA = 121 (on triple DMARDs)

500 IU 1,25OH2D3 + CaCO3 vs. CaCO3

Open-label

25OHD3 < 20 ng/mL at BL

Pain relief assessed by patient VAS at first relief of pain and again at 3/12

No difference in time achieves first pain relief; however, there was higher pain relief in the vit D group at 3/12 (NNT = 5)

Salesi et al. (2012)

RA = 117 (on MTX ± HCQ/CQ, active dx)

50,000 IU/week for 3 months vs. placebo

Double-blinded trial

>0.6 or > 1.2 improvement in DAS28 at wk 12

No improvement in outcome measures reported

Dehghan et al. 2014

RA = 80 (remission for 2/12)

Cholecalciferol 50,000 IU/week versus placebo

Double-blind RCT

25OHD levels were < 30 ng/mL at BL

DAS28 as a marker of relapse, over 6/12

No statistical significant reduction in relapse rate was observed

Yang J et al. (2015)

RA = 377 (RA in remission)

Alfacalcidol 0.25 microg BD for 24 months in vit D def. RA vs. placebo vs. RA with normal vit D levels and no treatment

Open-label

Deficiency = 25OHD3 < 30 ng/mL

VAS, SHC, TJC, CRP, ESR and DAS-28 every 2-3/12

Normal vit D assoc. with ↓recurrence. No difference was observed with or without vit D suppl. In RA with low vit D

Buondonno et al. (2017)

Early RA = 39 (Tx naïve), HC = 31

MTX + GC vs. MTX + GC + 300,000 IU (one-off dose)

Double-blind RCT

T cell phenotypes, OC precursors, inflammatory cytokines, clinical parameters at 3/12

Reduced IL-23, incr. GHS reported in the vit D suppl. group

Chandrashekara et al. (2017)

RA = 73 (on DMARDs, active dx)

60, 000 IU/week for 6 weeks then 60,000 IU/month for 3/12

Open-label

25OHD3 < 20 ng/mL at BL + DAS28-CRP > 2.6

Improvement in DAS28-CRP, vitamin D status

↓ DAS28-CRP and ↑ vit D > 20 ng/mL in the tx group

References are shown with Supplementary Table 2

BD twice daily, BL baseline, CQ chloroquine, CRP C-reactive protein, DAS disease activity score, DMARDs disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, EMS early morning stiffness, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate, GC glucocorticoids, HCQ hydroxychloroquine, MTX methotrexate, NNT number needed to treat, RA rheumatoid arthritis, RF rheumatoid factor, SJC swollen joint count, TJC tender joint count, Tx treatment, VAS visual analogue scale

Cellular Targets for Vitamin D in RA

The pathogenesis of RA involves both innate and adaptive immune activities. Adaptive CD4+ T cells are critical in the pathogenesis of RA. For example, T cells are a source of RANKL, leading to osteoclast activation and subsequent joint destruction in RA [137]. However, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as DC also contribute to RA by providing the necessary co-stimulatory signals required for CD4+ T cell activation [138, 139]. Not only do APCs activate T cell proliferation, but they also influence T cell phenotype (Th1/Th2/Th17/Treg) and subsequent cytokine profile, and Th1/17 are both known to be relevant to the pathogenesis of RA [140, 141]. With this in mind, it is clear that the immunomodulatory activities of 1,25-(OH)2D3 described earlier in the review (see Fig. 1) have the potential to influence both the innate and adaptive immune cell types that contribute to the dysregulated immunity associated with RA. In a murine model of RA, tolerogenic DCs (tolDCs) were observed to reduce severity and progression of RA disease by increasing IL-10-producing T cell numbers and reducing Th17 cell counts [142]. It is therefore interesting to note that 1,25-(OH)2D3 can induce tolDC [143], and tolDCs, generated ex vivo using 1,25-(OH)2D3 have been proposed as a potential strategy for RA therapy [144]. In this instance, 1,25-(OH)2D3 was used in combination with the glucocorticoid dexamethasone which is known to promote a tolDC phenotype [58].

In addition to enhanced activity of Th1 and Th17 cells, RA disease is also characterised by reduced Treg activity, including decreased Treg numbers [145], a reduction in Treg: Th1/Th17 ratio [146], altered Treg function [147] and differences in Treg number and function in the peripheral blood compared with the synovium [148]. However, in some studies, numbers of circulating Treg in RA were similar to those found in healthy controls [149] and osteoarthritis patients [150]. Tregs are likely to be a key target for vitamin D in RA. In animal models of experimental autoimmune encephalitis (the most widely used mouse model of MS), IBD and T1D, 1,25-(OH)2D3 promotes a Treg phenotype and augment IL-10 production, thus inhibiting Th17 responses and ameliorating disease [54]. In studies using human Tregs, the 1,25-(OH)2D3 analogue TX527 skewed the Treg cell phenotype in favour of migration to sites of inflammation [151], whilst also promoting a stable Treg phenotype [152]. The growing pool of ex vivo and in vitro evidence linking vitamin D and Treg function now requires replication in vivo, particularly in diseases such as RA.

To date, most studies of the T cell actions of 1,25-(OH)2D3 have been based on the analysis of mixed populations of circulating T cells from healthy donors. However, in recent studies, we have shown that T cells from synovial fluid of RA patients’ inflamed joints are relatively insensitive to 1,25-(OH)2D3, despite expressing the VDR machinery required for 1,25-(OH)2D3 signalling [153]. This is due, in part, to decreased 1,25-(OH)2D3 responsiveness in the memory T cells that predominate in RA synovial fluid, but also involves tissue-specific effects, with synovial fluid memory T cells showing decreased responses to 1,25-(OH)2D3 relative to peripheral blood memory T cells [153]. Based on these observations, we have proposed that immunomodulatory responses to vitamin D at tissue sites of inflammation are impaired by target cell insensitivity to 1,25-(OH)2D3. If this is the case, then conventional analysis of the effects of vitamin D using circulating blood immune cells can only provide a limited picture of immunomodulation by vitamin D in diseases such as RA. Likewise, to overcome the vitamin D-insensitivity observed in RA patient, inflamed joints may require alternative strategies. This could include the use of higher doses of vitamin D supplements to enhance localised tissue levels of 1,25-(OH)2D3, or the use of vitamin D as an adjunct to other RA therapies. With respect to the latter, we have recently shown that 1,25-(OH)2D3 can more potently inhibit T cell activation when used in combination with the CD28 co-stimulatory blocker abatacept [154].

Beyond the actions of innate and adaptive immune cells, synovial fibroblasts (synoviocytes) also play an important role in the pathogenesis of RA. In studies using the immortalised synoviocyte cell line, MH7A, 1,25-(OH)2D3 has been shown to promote synoviocyte apoptosis, which might protect against RA, but only when cells were treated with both tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) and 1,25-(OH)2D3 [155]. These observations suggest that TNFα is required for 1,25-(OH)2D3 to have anti-inflammatory effects in RA, which is a paradoxical observation given the use of TNFα inhibitors as biological treatment in RA. Conversely, other studies have reported synergistic effects of TNFα inhibition and 1,25-(OH)2D3 in suppressing Th17-mediated inflammation [156], suggesting a complex interaction between TNFα and 1,25-(OH)2D3. Other studies using MH7A cells have shown synergistic effects of interleukin 1β (IL-1β) and 1,25-(OH)2D3 in suppressing the production of IL-6 and TNFβ levels, and Th17-inducing cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-23) synergistically enhanced the pro-regulatory effect of 1,25-(OH)2D3 on T cell phenotype [136], further emphasising important interactions between 1,25-(OH)2D3 and pro-inflammatory cytokines in RA [157]. Collectively, these observations suggest that the beneficial effects of 1,25-(OH)2D3 are most potent when the threshold for activation of the immune response is breached, leading to concomitant production of inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, in the setting of inflammation, vitamin D appears to function as a negative-feedback regulator, attenuating the inflammatory immune responses. Vitamin D may also influence the synovial microenvironment by modulating factors that influence joint bone and cartilage damage. In studies using synoviocytes and articular chondrocytes from RA patients, 1,25-(OH)2D3 was shown to regulate matric metalloproteinases and prostaglandins, but only in the presence of IL-1β [158], suggesting, as outlined earlier, that 1,25-(OH)2D3 is only effective as a regulator of synoviocytes in the setting of RA disease inflammation.

Conclusions

Future studies of vitamin D and RA are needed firstly to expand our current understanding of the mechanisms by which 1,25-(OH)2D3 is able to regulate key cells associated with RA. In particular, the observation that T cells from the inflamed joints of RA patients are insensitive to 1,25-(OH)2D3 [153] indicates that RA disease is associated with a corruption of vitamin D signalling that may be fundamentally important for RA disease pathology, and the therapeutic use of vitamin D. A key question that remains to be answered is whether vitamin D has greater benefits in protecting against the onset of RA as opposed to its potential application as a therapy for established RA disease. Thus, future studies to assess the effects of vitamin D supplementation on disease prevention in individuals at risk of RA, and disease development in those at early stages of RA, are required. These studies are likely to be informed by recent meta-analyses for immune effects of vitamin D. Notably, the observation from the analysis of acute respiratory infection trials that vitamin D supplementation was more beneficial in patients with low baseline serum vitamin D, and was more effective when supplementation was used as lower daily or weekly dosing [159], provides some important pointers for future studies of vitamin D and RA. Repeated lower doses of vitamin D supplementation would also help to avoid potential adverse effects of higher doses of vitamin D, in particular the reported increased risk of falls in elderly patients receiving a single bolus of higher-dose vitamin D [160]. Future studies also need to take into consideration clinical subgroups of patients, including distinguishing between ethnic groups and disease of different durations. The potential for a simple, low-risk and low-cost intervention such as vitamin D as a plausible adjunctive treatment for RA is an exciting notion. Robust evidence to support wider routine use of vitamin D supplementation in RA has the potential to significantly enhance treatment for RA and other autoimmune diseases.

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by Royal Society (Grant No. WM130118), National Institutes of Health Research (Grant No. Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre), Medical Research Council (Grant No. PhD Studentship).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Stephanie R. Harrison, Danyang Li, Louisa E. Jefery, Karim Raza, and Martin Hewison declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

223_2019_577_MOESM1_ESM.doc (123 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 123 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Christakos S, Ajibade D, Dhawan P, Fechner A, Mady L (2011) Vitamin D: metabolism. Endocrinol Metab 39:243–253Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    DeLuca HF (2014) History of the discovery of vitamin D and its active metabolites. BoneKEy Rep 3:1–8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Christakos S, Hewison M, Gardner DG, Wagner CL, Sergeev IN, Rutten E, Pittas AG, Boland R, Ferrucci L, Bikle DD (2013) Vitamin D: beyond bone. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1287:45–58CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mathieu C (2015) Vitamin D and diabetes: where do we stand? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 108:201–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bizzaro G, Shoenfeld Y (2015) Vitamin D and autoimmune thyroid diseases: facts and unresolved questions. Immunol Res 61:46–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kivity S, Agmon-Levin N, Zisappl M, Shapira Y, Nagy EV, Danko K, Szekanecz Z, Langevitz P, Shoenfeld Y (2011) Vitamin D and autoimmune thyroid diseases. Cell Mol Immunol 8:243–247CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cantorna MT (2012) Vitamin D, multiple sclerosis and inflammatory bowel disease. Arch Biochem Biophys 523:103–106CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cutolo M, Otsa K (2008) Review: vitamin D, immunity and lupus. Lupus 17:6–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jeffery LE, Raza K, Hewison M (2016) Vitamin D in rheumatoid arthritis-towards clinical application. Nat Rev Rheumatol 12:201–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhu JG, Ochalek JT, Kaufmann M, Jones G, Deluca HF (2013) CYP2R1 is a major, but not exclusive, contributor to 25-hydroxyvitamin D production in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:15650–15655CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hewison M, Zehnder D, Bland R, Stewart PM (2000) 1alpha-Hydroxylase and the action of vitamin D. J Mol Endocrinol 25:141–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zehnder D, Bland R, Williams MC, McNinch RW, Howie AJ, Stewart PM, Hewison M (2001) Extrarenal expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin d(3)-1 alpha-hydroxylase. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:888–894PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hewison M, Freeman L, Hughes SV, Evans KN, Bland R, Eliopoulos AG, Kilby MD, Moss PA, Chakraverty R (2003) Differential regulation of vitamin D receptor and its ligand in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol 170:5382–5390CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kreutz M, Andreesen R, Krause SW, Szabo A, Ritz E, Reichel H (1993) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 production and vitamin D3 receptor expression are developmentally regulated during differentiation of human monocytes into macrophages. Blood 82:1300–1307PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jeffery LE, Wood AM, Qureshi OS, Hou TZ, Gardner D, Briggs Z, Kaur S, Raza K, Sansom DM (2012) Availability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 to APCs controls the balance between regulatory and inflammatory T cell responses. J Immunol 189:5155–5164CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hewison M, Burke F, Evans KN, Lammas DA, Sansom DM, Liu P, Modlin RL, Adams JS (2007) Extra-renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1alpha-hydroxylase in human health and disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 103:316–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hewison M (2010) Vitamin D and the intracrinology of innate immunity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 321:103–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hewison M (2010) Vitamin D and the intracrinology of innate immunity. Mol Cell Endocrinol 321:103–111CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Adams JS, Rafison B, Witzel S, Reyes RE, Shieh A, Chun R, Zavala K, Hewison M, Liu PT (2014) Regulation of the extrarenal CYP27B1-hydroxylase. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 144:22–27CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chun RF, Peercy BE, Orwoll ES, Nielson CM, Adams JS, Hewison M (2014) Vitamin D and DBP: the free hormone hypothesis revisited. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 144(Pt A):132–137CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chun RF, Lauridsen AL, Suon L, Zella LA, Pike JW, Modlin RL, Martineau AR, Wilkinson RJ, Adams J, Hewison M (2010) Vitamin D-binding protein directs monocyte responses to 25-hydroxy- and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:3368–3376CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones G, Prosser DE, Kaufmann M (2012) 25-Hydroxyvitamin D-24-hydroxylase (CYP24A1): its important role in the degradation of vitamin D. Arch Biochem Biophys 523:9–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schlingmann KP, Kaufmann M, Weber S, Irwin A, Goos C, John U, Misselwitz J, Klaus G, Kuwertz-Broking E, Fehrenbach H, Wingen AM, Guran T, Hoenderop JG, Bindels RJ, Prosser DE, Jones G, Konrad M (2011) Mutations in CYP24A1 and idiopathic infantile hypercalcemia. N Engl J Med 365:410–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Adams JS, Hewison M (2008) Unexpected actions of vitamin D: new perspectives on the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 4:80–90CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hewison M (2011) Vitamin D and innate and adaptive immunity. Vitam Horm 86:23–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hewison M (2011) Antibacterial effects of vitamin D. Nat Rev 7:337–345Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang Y, Zhu J, DeLuca HF (2012) Where is the vitamin D receptor? Arch Biochem Biophys 523:123–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bouillon R, Carmeliet G, Verlinden L, van Etten E, Verstuyf A, Luderer HF, Lieben L, Mathieu C, Demay M (2008) Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice. Endocr Rev 29:726–776CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang Y-G, Wu S, Lu R, Zhou D, Zhou J, Carmeliet G, Petrof E, Claud EC, Sun J (2015) Tight junction CLDN2 gene is a direct target of the vitamin D receptor. Sci Rep 5:10642CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    He L, Liu T, Shi Y, Tian F, Hu H, Deb DK, Chen Y, Bissonnette M, Li YC (2018) Gut epithelial vitamin d receptor regulates microbiota-dependent mucosal inflammation by suppressing intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis. Endocrinology 159:967–979CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang TT, Dabbas B, Laperriere D, Bitton AJ, Soualhine H, Tavera-Mendoza LE, Dionne S, Servant MJ, Bitton A, Seidman EG, Mader S, Behr MA, White JH (2010) Direct and indirect induction by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 of the NOD2/CARD15-defensin beta2 innate immune pathway defective in Crohn disease. J Biol Chem 285:2227–2231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bacchetta J, Zaritsky JJ, Sea JL, Chun RF, Lisse TS, Zavala K, Nayak A, Wesseling-Perry K, Westerman M, Hollis BW, Salusky IB, Hewison M (2014) Suppression of iron-regulatory hepcidin by vitamin D. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:564–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu PT, Stenger S, Li H, Wenzel L, Tan BH, Krutzik SR, Ochoa MT, Schauber J, Wu K, Meinken C, Kamen DL, Wagner M, Bals R, Steinmeyer A, Zugel U, Gallo RL, Eisenberg D, Hewison M, Hollis BW, Adams JS, Bloom BR, Modlin RL (2006) Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 311:1770–1773CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu PT, Schenk M, Walker VP, Dempsey PW, Kanchanapoomi M, Wheelwright M, Vazirnia A, Zhang X, Steinmeyer A, Zugel U, Hollis BW, Cheng G, Modlin RL (2009) Convergence of IL-1beta and VDR activation pathways in human TLR2/1-induced antimicrobial responses. PLoS ONE 4:e5810CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim TH, Lee B, Kwon E, Choi SJ, Lee YH, Song GG, Sohn J, Ji JD (2013) Regulation of TREM-1 expression by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human monocytes/macrophages. Immunol Lett 154:80–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sadeghi K, Wessner B, Laggner U, Ploder M, Tamandl D, Friedl J, Zugel U, Steinmeyer A, Pollak A, Roth E, Boltz-Nitulescu G, Spittler A (2006) Vitamin D3 down-regulates monocyte TLR expression and triggers hyporesponsiveness to pathogen-associated molecular patterns. Eur J Immunol 36:361–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Meyer V, Saccone DS, Tugizimana F, Asani FF, Jeffery TJ, Bornman L (2017) Methylation of the Vitamin D Receptor (VDR) gene, together with genetic variation, race, and environment influence the signaling efficacy of the toll-like receptor 2/1-VDR pathway. Front Immunol 8:1–15Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fritsche J, Mondal K, Ehrnsperger A, Andreesen R, Kreutz M (2003) Regulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3-1 alpha-hydroxylase and production of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 by human dendritic cells. Blood 102:3314–3316CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dionne S, Duchatelier CF, Seidman EG (2017) The influence of vitamin D on M1 and M2 macrophages in patients with Crohn’s disease. Innate Immun 23:557–565CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hewison M, Zehnder D, Chakraverty R, Adams JS (2004) Vitamin D and barrier function: a novel role for extra-renal 1 alpha-hydroxylase. Mol Cell Endocrinol 215:31–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Penna G, Adorini L (2000) 1 Alpha, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits differentiation, maturation, activation, and survival of dendritic cells leading to impaired alloreactive T cell activation. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md.: 1950) 164:2405–2411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    van Halteren AG, Tysma OM, van Etten E, Mathieu C, Roep BO (2004) 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 or analogue treated dendritic cells modulate human autoreactive T cells via the selective induction of apoptosis. J Autoimmun 23:233–239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pedersen AW, Holmstrøm K, Jensen SS, Fuchs D, Rasmussen S, Kvistborg P, Claesson MH, Zocca MB (2009) Phenotypic and functional markers for 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-modified regulatory dendritic cells. Clin Exp Immunol 157:48–59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Griffin MD, Lutz W, Phan VA, Bachman LA, McKean DJ, Kumar R (2001) Dendritic cell modulation by 1alpha,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its analogs: a vitamin D receptor-dependent pathway that promotes a persistent state of immaturity in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:6800–6805CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Willheim M, Thien R, Schrattbauer K, Bajna E, Holub M, Gruber R, Baier K, Pietschmann P, Reinisch W, Scheiner O, Peterlik M (1999) Regulatory effects of 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on the cytokine production of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:3739–3744PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bartels LE, Jørgensen SP, Agnholt J, Kelsen J, Hvas CL, Dahlerup JF (2007) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and dexamethasone increase interleukin-10 production in CD4+ T cells from patients with Crohn’s disease. Int Immunopharmacol 7:1755–1764CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Penna G, Adorini L (2000) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits differentiation, maturation, activation, and survival of dendritic cells leading to impaired alloreactive T cell activation. J Immunol 164:2405–2411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Piemonti L, Monti P, Sironi M, Fraticelli P, Leone BE, Dal Cin E, Allavena P, Di Carlo V (2000) Vitamin D3 affects differentiation, maturation, and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md.: 1950) 164:4443–4451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Szeles L, Keresztes G, Torocsik D, Balajthy Z, Krenacs L, Poliska S, Steinmeyer A, Zuegel U, Pruenster M, Rot A, Nagy L (2009) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 is an autonomous regulator of the transcriptional changes leading to a tolerogenic dendritic cell phenotype. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md.: 1950) 182:2074–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bhalla AK, Amento EP, Clemens TL, Holick MF, Krane SM (1983) Specific high-affinity receptors for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: presence in monocytes and induction in T lymphocytes following activation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 57:1308–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Provvedini DM, Tsoukas CD, Deftos LJ, Manolagas SC (1986) 1 alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3-binding macromolecules in human B lymphocytes: effects on immunoglobulin production. J Immunol 136:2734–2740PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hewison M (2012) Vitamin D and immune function: an overview. Proc Nutr Soc 71:50–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Sarkar S, Hewison M, Studzinski GP, Li YC, Kalia V (2016) Role of vitamin D in cytotoxic T lymphocyte immunity to pathogens and cancer. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 53:132–145CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cantorna MT, Snyder L, Lin Y-D, Yang L (2015) Vitamin D and 1,25(OH)2D regulation of T cells. Nutrients 7:3011–3021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Joshi S, Pantalena LC, Liu XK, Gaffen SL, Liu H, Rohowsky-Kochan C, Ichiyama K, Yoshimura A, Steinman L, Christakos S, Youssef S (2011) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) ameliorates Th17 autoimmunity via transcriptional modulation of interleukin-17A. Mol Cell Biol 31:3653–3669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cantorna MT, Nashold FE, Chun TY, Hayes CE (1996) Vitamin A down-regulation of IFN-gamma synthesis in cloned mouse Th1 lymphocytes depends on the CD28 costimulatory pathway. J Immunol 156:2674–2679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Boonstra A, Barrat FJ, Crain C, Heath VL, Savelkoul HF, O’Garra A (2001) 1alpha,25-Dihydroxyvitamin d3 has a direct effect on naive CD4(+) T cells to enhance the development of Th2 cells. J Immunol 167:4974–4980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Barrat FJ, Cua DJ, Boonstra A, Richards DF, Crain C, Savelkoul HF, de Waal-Malefyt R, Coffman RL, Hawrylowicz CM, O’Garra A (2002) In vitro generation of interleukin 10-producing regulatory CD4(+) T cells is induced by immunosuppressive drugs and inhibited by T helper type 1 (Th1)- and Th2-inducing cytokines. J Exp Med 195:603–616CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jeffery LE, Burke F, Mura M, Zheng Y, Qureshi OS, Hewison M, Walker LS, Lammas DA, Raza K, Sansom DM (2009) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and IL-2 combine to inhibit T cell production of inflammatory cytokines and promote development of regulatory T cells expressing CTLA-4 and FoxP3. J Immunol 183:5458–5467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    von Essen MR, Kongsbak M, Schjerling P, Olgaard K, Odum N, Geisler C (2010) Vitamin D controls T cell antigen receptor signaling and activation of human T cells. Nat Immunol 11:344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Merino F, Alvarez-Mon M, de la Hera A, Ales JE, Bonilla F, Durantez A (1989) Regulation of natural killer cytotoxicity by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Cell Immunol 118:328–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Yu S, Cantorna MT (2008) The vitamin D receptor is required for iNKT cell development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:5207–5212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Muller K, Heilmann C, Poulsen LK, Barington T, Bendtzen K (1991) The role of monocytes and T cells in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 mediated inhibition of B cell function in vitro. Immunopharmacology 21:121–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Chen S, Sims GP, Chen XX, Gu YY, Chen S, Lipsky PE (2007) Modulatory effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on human B cell differentiation. J Immunol 179:1634–1647CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Heine G, Niesner U, Chang HD, Steinmeyer A, Zugel U, Zuberbier T, Radbruch A, Worm M (2008) 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) promotes IL-10 production in human B cells. Eur J Immunol 38:2210–2218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Shirakawa AK, Nagakubo D, Hieshima K, Nakayama T, Jin Z, Yoshie O (2008) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 induces CCR16 expression in terminally differentiating human B cells. J Immunol 180:2786–2795CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Hufnaql K, Jensen-Jarolim E (2018) Vitamin A and D in allergy: from experimental animal models and cellular studies to human disease. Allergo J Int 27:72–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Anaya JM, Restrepo-Jiménez P, Ramírez-Santana C (2018) The autoimmune ecology: an update. Curr Opin Rheumatol 30:350–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Nikiphorou E, Uksila J, Sokka T (2018) A cross-sectional study of vitamin D levels in a large cohort of patients with rheumatic diseases. Clin Rheumatol 37:803–810CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lucas R, Rodney Harris R (2018) On the nature of evidence and ‘proving’ causality: smoking and lung cancer vs. sun exposure, vitamin D and multiple sclerosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:1726CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Disanto G, Chaplin G, Morahan JM, Giovannoni G, Hypponen E, Ebers GC, Ramagopalan SV (2012) Month of birth, vitamin D and risk of immune-mediated disease: a case control study. BMC Med 10:69CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Harroud A, Richards JB (2018) Mendelian randomization in multiple sclerosis: a causal role for vitamin D and obesity? Mult Scler 24:80–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Mokry LE, Ross S, Ahmad OS, Forgetta V, Smith GD, Goltzman D, Leong A, Greenwood CM, Thanassoulis G, Richards JB (2015) Vitamin D and risk of multiple sclerosis: a mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med 12:e1001866CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Krementsov DN, Asarian L, Fang Q, McGill MM, Teuscher C (2018) Sex-specific gene-by-vitamin D interactions regulate susceptibility to central nervous system autoimmunity. Front Immunol 9:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Kamisli O, Acar C, Sozen M, Tecellioglu M, Yücel FE, Vaizoglu D, Özcan C (2018) The association between vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and multiple sclerosis in a Turkish population. Mult Scler Relat Disord 20:78–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Křenek P, Benešová Y, Bienertová-Vašků J, Vašků A (2018) The impact of five VDR polymorphisms on multiple sclerosis risk and progression: a case–control and genotype-phenotype study. J Mol Neurosci 64:559–566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kouchaki E, Afarini M, Abolhassani J, Mirhosseini N, Bahmani F, Masoud SA, Asemi Z (2018) High-dose ω-3 fatty acid plus vitamin D3 supplementation affects clinical symptoms and metabolic status of patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Nutr 148:1380–1386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Rolf L, Muris AG, Theunissen R, Hupperts R, Damoiseaux J, Smolders J (2018) Vitamin D3 supplementation and the IL-2/IL-2R pathway in multiple sclerosis: attenuation of progressive disturbances? J Neuroimmunol 314:50–57CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Miclea A, Miclea M, Pistor M, Hoepner A, Chan A, Hoepner R (2017) Vitamin D supplementation differentially affects seasonal multiple sclerosis disease activity. Brain Behav 7:e00761CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Rosjo E, Lossius A, Abdelmagid N, Lindstrom JC, Kampman MT, Jorgensen L, Sundstrom P, Olsson T, Steffensen LH, Torkildsen O, Holmoy T (2017) Effect of high-dose vitamin D3 supplementation on antibody responses against Epstein-Barr virus in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 23:395–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Rosjo E, Steffensen LH, Jorgensen L, Lindstrom JC, Saltyte Benth J, Michelsen AE, Aukrust P, Ueland T, Kampman MT, Torkildsen O, Holmoy T (2015) Vitamin D supplementation and systemic inflammation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 262:2713–2721CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bae SC, Lee YH (2018) Association between Vitamin D level and/or deficiency, and systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis. Cell Mol Biol 64:7–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Zhao M, Duan X-H, Wu Z-Z, Gao C-C, Wang N, Zheng Z-H (2017) Severe vitamin D deficiency affects the expression of autophagy related genes in PBMCs and T-cell subsets in active systemic lupus erythematosus. Am J Clin Exp Immunol 6:43–51PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Abdel Galil SM, El-Shafey AM, Abdul-Makoud RS, El-Boshy M (2018) Interferon alpha gene expression and serum level association with low vitamin D levels in Egyptian female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Lupus 27:199–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Shahin D, El-Farahaty RM, Houssen ME, Machaly SA, Sallam M, ElSaid TO, Neseem NO (2017) Serum 25-OH vitamin D level in treatment-naive systemic lupus erythematosus patients: relation to disease activity, IL-23 and IL-17. Lupus 26:917–926CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Aranow C, Kamen DL, Dall’Era M, Massarotti EM, Mackay MC, Koumpouras F, Coca A, Chatham WW, Clowse ME, Criscione-Schreiber LG, Callahan S, Goldmuntz EA, Keyes-Elstein L, Oswald M, Gregersen PK, Diamond B (2015) Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of vitamin D3 on the interferon signature in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol 67:1848–1857CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Karimzadeh H, Shirzadi M, Karimifar M (2017) The effect of Vitamin D supplementation in disease activity of systemic lupus erythematosus patients with Vitamin D deficiency: a randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci 22:4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Costenbader KH, Feskanich D, Holmes M, Karlson EW, Benito-Garcia E (2008) Vitamin D intake and risks of systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis in women. Ann Rheum Dis 67:530–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Lima GL, Paupitz J, Aikawa NE, Takayama L, Bonfa E, Pereira RM (2016) Vitamin D supplementation in adolescents and young adults with juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus for improvement in disease activity and fatigue scores: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 68:91–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Zella JB, DeLuca HF (2003) Vitamin D and autoimmune diabetes. J Cell Biochem 88:216–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Mathieu C, Badenhoop K (2005) Vitamin D and type 1 diabetes mellitus: state of the art. Trends Endocrinol Metab 16:261–266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Aljabri KS, Bokhari SA, Khan MJ (2010) Glycemic changes after vitamin D supplementation in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and vitamin D deficiency. Ann Saudi Med 30:454–458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Bailey R, Cooper JD, Zeitels L, Smyth DJ, Yang JH, Walker NM, Hypponen E, Dunger DB, Ramos-Lopez E, Badenhoop K, Nejentsev S, Todd JA (2007) Association of the vitamin D metabolism gene CYP27B1 with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 56:2616–2621CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Cooper JD, Smyth DJ, Walker NM, Stevens H, Burren OS, Wallace C, Greissl C, Ramos-Lopez E, Hypponen E, Dunger DB, Spector TD, Ouwehand WH, Wang TJ, Badenhoop K, Todd JA (2011) Inherited variation in vitamin D genes is associated with predisposition to autoimmune disease type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 60:1624–1631CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Lopez ER, Regulla K, Pani MA, Krause M, Usadel KH, Badenhoop K (2004) CYP27B1 polymorphisms variants are associated with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Germans. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 89–90:155–157CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Ramos-Lopez E, Jansen T, Ivaskevicius V, Kahles H, Klepzig C, Oldenburg J, Badenhoop K (2006) Protection from type 1 diabetes by vitamin D receptor haplotypes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1079:327–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Ramagopalan SV, Heger A, Berlanga AJ, Maugeri NJ, Lincoln MR, Burrell A, Handunnetthi L, Handel AE, Disanto G, Orton SM, Watson CT, Morahan JM, Giovannoni G, Ponting CP, Ebers GC, Knight JC (2010) A ChIP-seq defined genome-wide map of vitamin D receptor binding: associations with disease and evolution. Genome Res 20:1352–1360CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Mathieu C, Waer M, Laureys J, Rutgeerts O, Bouillon R (1994) Prevention of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice by 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3. Diabetologia 37:552–558CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Li X, Liao L, Yan X, Huang G, Lin J, Lei M, Wang X, Zhou Z (2009) Protective effects of 1-alpha-hydroxyvitamin D3 on residual beta-cell function in patients with adult-onset latent autoimmune diabetes (LADA). Diabetes/Metab Res Rev 25:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Gabbay MA, Sato MN, Finazzo C, Duarte AJ, Dib SA (2012) Effect of cholecalciferol as adjunctive therapy with insulin on protective immunologic profile and decline of residual beta-cell function in new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 166:601–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Ataie-Jafari A, Loke SC, Rahmat AB, Larijani B, Abbasi F, Leow MK, Yassin Z (2013) A randomized placebo-controlled trial of alphacalcidol on the preservation of beta cell function in children with recent onset type 1 diabetes. Clini Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 32:911–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Bizzarri C, Pitocco D, Napoli N, Di Stasio E, Maggi D, Manfrini S, Suraci C, Cavallo MG, Cappa M, Ghirlanda G, Pozzilli P (2010) No protective effect of calcitriol on beta-cell function in recent-onset type 1 diabetes: the IMDIAB XIII trial. Diabetes Care 33:1962–1963CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Walter M, Kaupper T, Adler K, Foersch J, Bonifacio E, Ziegler AG (2010) No effect of the 1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 on beta-cell residual function and insulin requirement in adults with new-onset type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 33:1443–1448CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ananthakrishnan AN (2016) Vitamin D and inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterol Hepatol 12:513–515Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Ham M, Longhi MS, Lahiff C, Cheifetz A, Robson S, Moss AC (2014) Vitamin D levels in adults with Crohn’s disease are responsive to disease activity and treatment. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20:856–860CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Jørgensen SP, Hvas CL, Agnholt J, Christensen LA, Heickendorff L, Dahlerup JF (2013) Active Crohn’s disease is associated with low vitamin D levels. J Crohn’s Colitis 7:e407–e413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Mohammad MS, Mayberry J (2013) PWE-103 vitamin D deficiency in crohns disease and ulcerative colitis. Gut 62:A172–A172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Froicu M, Weaver V, Wynn TA, McDowell MA, Welsh JE, Cantorna MT (2003) A crucial role for the vitamin D receptor in experimental inflammatory bowel diseases. Mol Endocrinol 17:2386–2392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Liu N, Nguyen L, Chun RF, Lagishetty V, Ren S, Wu S, Hollis B, DeLuca HF, Adams JS, Hewison M (2008) Altered endocrine and autocrine metabolism of vitamin D in a mouse model of gastrointestinal inflammation. Endocrinology 149:4799–4808CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Lagishetty V, Misharin AV, Liu NQ, Lisse TS, Chun RF, Ouyang Y, McLachlan SM, Adams JS, Hewison M (2010) Vitamin D deficiency in mice impairs colonic antibacterial activity and predisposes to colitis. Endocrinology 151:2423–2432CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Liu W, Chen Y, Golan MA, Annunziata ML, Du J, Dougherty U, Kong J, Musch M, Huang Y, Pekow J, Zheng C, Bissonnette M, Hanauer SB, Li YC (2013) Intestinal epithelial vitamin D receptor signaling inhibits experimental colitis. J Clin Investig 123:3983–3996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    England BR, Thiele GM, Anderson DR, Mikuls TR (2018) Increased cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: mechanisms and implications. BMJ 361:k1036–k1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Tobon GJ, Youinou P, Saraux A (2010) The environment, geo-epidemiology, and autoimmune disease: rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev 9:A288–292CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Kim K, Bang SY, Lee HS, Cho SK, Choi CB, Sung YK, Kim TH, Jun JB, Yoo DH, Kang YM, Kim SK, Suh CH, Shim SC, Lee SS, Lee J, Chung WT, Choe JY, Shin HD, Lee JY, Han BG, Nath SK, Eyre S, Bowes J, Pappas DA, Kremer JM, Gonzalez-Gay MA, Rodriguez-Rodriguez L, Arlestig L, Okada Y, Diogo D, Liao KP, Karlson EW, Raychaudhuri S, Rantapaa-Dahlqvist S, Martin J, Klareskog L, Padyukov L, Gregersen PK, Worthington J, Greenberg JD, Plenge RM, Bae SC (2015) High-density genotyping of immune loci in Koreans and Europeans identifies eight new rheumatoid arthritis risk loci. Ann Rheum Dis 74:e13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Yarwood A, Huizinga TW, Worthington J (2014) The genetics of rheumatoid arthritis: risk and protection in different stages of the evolution of RA. Rheumatology 55:199–209CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Tracy A, Buckley CD, Raza K (2017) Pre-symptomatic autoimmunity in rheumatoid arthritis: when does the disease start? Semin Immunopathol 39:423–435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Lin J, Liu J, Davies ML, Chen W (2016) Serum vitamin D level and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity: review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0146351CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Higgins MK, Mackie SL, Thalayasingam N, Bingham SJ, Hamilton J, Kelly CA (2013) The effect of vitamin D levels on the assessment of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 32:863–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Cooles FA, Pratt AG, Lendrem DW, Ng WF, Aspray TJ, Isaacs JD (2015) Retrospective analysis of the role of serum vitamin D in early rheumatic disease. Rheumatology 54:374–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Di Franco M, Barchetta I, Iannuccelli C, Gerardi MC, Frisenda S, Ceccarelli F, Valesini G, Cavallo MG (2015) Hypovitaminosis D in recent onset rheumatoid arthritis is predictive of reduced response to treatment and increased disease activity: a 12 month follow-up study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Furuya T, Hosoi T, Tanaka E, Nakajima A, Taniguchi A, Momohara S, Yamanaka H (2013) Prevalence of and factors associated with vitamin D deficiency in 4793 Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 32:1081–1087CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Haga HJ, Schmedes A, Naderi Y, Moreno AM, Peen E (2013) Severe deficiency of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) (25-OH-D(3)) is associated with high disease activity of rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 32:629–633CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Emery P, Salmon M (1995) Early rheumatoid arthritis: time to aim for remission? Ann Rheum Dis 54:944–947CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Jr GD, Holweg CTJ, Kummerfeld SK, Choy DF, Setiadi AF, Hackney JA, Haverty PM, Gilbert H, Lin WY, Diehl L, Fischer S, Song A, Musselman D, Klearman M, Gabay C, Kavanaugh A, Endres J, Fox DA, Martin F, Townsend MJ (2014) Synovial phenotypes in rheumatoid arthritis correlate with response to biologic therapeutics. Arthritis Res Ther 16:1–18Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Hayes ME, Denton J, Freemont AJ, Mawer EB (1989) Synthesis of the active metabolite of vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D3, by synovial fluid macrophages in arthritic diseases. Ann Rheum Dis 48:723–729CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Mawer EB, Hayes ME, Still PE, Davies M, Lumb GA, Holt PJ (1991) Evidence for nonrenal synthesis of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in patients with inflammatory arthritis. J Bone Miner Res 6:733–739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Hayes ME, Bayley D, Still P, Palit J, Denton J, Freemont AJ, Cooper RG, Mawer EB (1992) Differential metabolism of 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 by cultured synovial fluid macrophages and fibroblast-like cells from patients with arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 51:220–226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Li D, Jeffery L, Jenkinson C, Harrison SR, Chun RF, Adams JS, Raza K, Hewison M (2018) Serum and synovial fluid vitamin D metabolites and rheumatoid arthritis. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 187:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    National Institute of Clinical Excellence - Clincal Knowledge S (2016) Vitamin D deficiency in adults—treatment and preventionGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    National Osteoporosis S (2013) Vitamin D and bone health: a practical clinical guideline for patient managementGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Varenna M, Manara M, Cantatore FP, Del Puente A, Di Munno O, Malavolta N, Minisola G, Adami S, Sinigaglia L, Rossini M (2012) Determinants and effects of vitamin D supplementation on serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 30:714–719PubMedGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Franco AS, Freitas TQ, Bernardo WM, Pereira RMR (2017) Vitamin D supplementation and disease activity in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. Medicine 96:e7024–e7024CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Allan GM, Cranston L, Lindblad A, McCormack J, Kolber MR, Garrison S, Korownyk C (2016) Vitamin D: a narrative review examining the evidence for ten beliefs. J Gen Intern Med 31:780–791CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Song GG, Bae SC, Lee YH (2012) Association between vitamin D intake and the risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Clin Rheumatol 31:1733–1739CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Barry EL, Rees JR, Peacock JL, Mott LA, Amos CI, Bostick RM, Figueiredo JC, Ahnen DJ, Bresalier RS, Burke CA, Baron JA (2014) Genetic variants in CYP2R1, CYP24A1, and VDR modify the efficacy of vitamin D3 supplementation for increasing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:E2133–2137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Jeffery LE, Qureshi OS, Gardner D, Hou TZ, Briggs Z, Soskic B, Baker J, Raza K, Sansom DM (2015) Vitamin D antagonises the suppressive effect of inflammatory cytokines on CTLA-4 expression and regulatory function. PLoS ONE 10:e0131539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Danks L, Komatsu N, Guerrini MM, Sawa S, Armaka M, Kollias G, Nakashima T, Takayanagi H (2016) RANKL expressed on synovial fibroblasts is primarily responsible for bone erosions during joint inflammation. Ann Rheum Dis 75:1187–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Rodriguez-Fernandez JL (2013) Antigen presentation by dendritic cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Curr Top Med Chem 13:712–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Klareskog L (1991) Antigen presentation in joints in the pathogenesis of arthritis. Br J Rheumatol 30(Suppl 1):53–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Nistala K, Adams S, Cambrook H, Ursu S, Olivito B, de Jager W, Evans JG, Cimaz R, Bajaj-Elliott M, Wedderburn LR (2010) Th17 plasticity in human autoimmune arthritis is driven by the inflammatory environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:14751–14756CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    van Hamburg JP, Asmawidjaja PS, Davelaar N, Mus AM, Colin EM, Hazes JM, Dolhain RJ, Lubberts E (2011) Th17 cells, but not Th1 cells, from patients with early rheumatoid arthritis are potent inducers of matrix metalloproteinases and proinflammatory cytokines upon synovial fibroblast interaction, including autocrine interleukin-17A production. Arthritis Rheum 63:73–83CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Stoop JN, Harry RA, von Delwig A, Isaacs JD, Robinson JH, Hilkens CMU (2010) Therapeutic effect of tolerogenic dendritic cells in established collagen-induced arthritis is associated with a reduction in Th17 responses. Arthritis Rheum 62:3656–3665CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Bscheider M, Butcher EC (2016) Vitamin D immunoregulation through dendritic cells. Immunology 148:227–236CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Anderson AE, Swan DJ, Wong OY, Buck M, Eltherington O, Harry RA, Patterson AM, Pratt AG, Reynolds G, Doran JP, Kirby JA, Isaacs JD, Hilkens CM (2017) Tolerogenic dendritic cells generated with dexamethasone and vitamin D3 regulate rheumatoid arthritis CD4(+) T cells partly via transforming growth factor-beta1. Clin Exp Immunol 187:113–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Ponchel F, Goëb V, Parmar R, El-Sherbiny Y, Boissinot M, El Jawhari J, Burska A, Vital EM, Harrison S, Conaghan PG, Hensor E, Emery P (2014) An immunological biomarker to predict MTX response in early RA. Ann Rheum Dis 73:2047–2053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Langdon K, Haleagrahara N (2018) Regulatory T-cell dynamics with abatacept treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. Int Rev Immunol 37:206–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Li N, Wei W, Yin F, Chen M, Ma TR, Wu Q, Zhou JR, Zheng S-G, Han J (2015) The abnormal expression of CCR47 and CCR47 on Tregs in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8:15043–15053PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Wang T, Sun X, Zhao J, Zhang J, Zhu H, Li C, Gao N, Jia Y, Xu D, Huang F-P, Li N, Lu L, Li Z-G (2015) Regulatory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis showed increased plasticity toward Th17 but retained suppressive function in peripheral blood. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1293–1301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Cooles FAH, Isaacs JD, Anderson AE (2013) Treg cells in rheumatoid arthritis: an update. Curr Rheumatol Rep 15:352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Moradi B, Schnatzer P, Hagmann S, Rosshirt N, Gotterbarm T, Kretzer JP, Thomsen M, Lorenz H-M, Zeifang F, Tretter T (2014) CD4+CD25+/high CD127 low/− regulatory T cells are enriched in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis joints–analysis of frequency and phenotype in synovial membrane, synovial fluid and peripheral blood. Arthritis Res Ther 16:R97–R97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Baeke F, Korf H, Overbergh L, Verstuyf A, Thorrez L, Van Lommel L, Waer M, Schuit F, Gysemans C, Mathieu C (2011) The vitamin D analog, TX527, promotes a human CD4+ CD25 high CD127 low regulatory T cell profile and induces a migratory signature specific for homing to sites of inflammation. J Immunol 186:132–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Van Belle TL, Vanherwegen A-S, Feyaerts D, De Clercq P, Verstuyf A, Korf H, Gysemans C, Mathieu C (2014) 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 and Its Analog TX527 Promote a Stable Regulatory T Cell Phenotype in T Cells from Type 1 Diabetes Patients. PLoS ONE 9:e109194–e109194CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Jeffery LE, Henley P, Marium N, Filer A, Sansom DM, Hewison M, Raza K (2018) Decreased sensitivity to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in T cells from the rheumatoid joint. J Autoimmun 88:50–60CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Gardner DH, Jeffery LE, Soskic B, Briggs Z, Hou TZ, Raza K, Sansom DM (2015) 1,25(OH)2D3 promotes the efficacy of CD28 costimulation blockade by abatacept. J Immunol 195:2657–2665CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Gu X, Gu B, Lv X, Yu Z, Wang R, Zhou X, Qiao W, Mao Z, Zuo G, Li Q, Miao D, Jin J (2016) 1, 25-dihydroxy-vitamin D3 with tumor necrosis factor-alpha protects against rheumatoid arthritis by promoting p53 acetylation-mediated apoptosis via Sirt1 in synoviocytes. Cell Death Dis 7:e2423CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    van Hamburg JP, Asmawidjaja PS, Davelaar N, Mus AMC, Cornelissen F, van Leeuwen JPTM, Hazes JMW, Dolhain RJEM, Bakx PAGM, Colin EM, Lubberts E (2012) TNF blockade requires 1,25(OH)2D3 to control human Th17-mediated synovial inflammation. Ann Rheum Dis 71:606–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Feng X, Lv C, Wang F, Gan K, Zhang M, Tan W (2013) Modulatory effect of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 on IL1 β-induced RANKL, OPG, TNF α, and IL-6 expression in human rheumatoid synoviocyte MH7A. Clin Dev Immunol 2013:160123CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Tetlow LC, Woolley DE (1999) The effects of 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D(3) on matrix metalloproteinase and prostaglandin E(2) production by cells of the rheumatoid lesion. Arthritis Res 1:63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Martineau AR, Jolliffe DA, Hooper RL, Greenberg L, Aloia JF, Bergman P, Dubnov-Raz G, Esposito S, Ganmaa D, Ginde AA, Goodall EC, Grant CC, Griffiths CJ, Janssens W, Laaksi I, Manaseki-Holland S, Mauger D, Murdoch DR, Neale R, Rees JR, Simpson S Jr, Stelmach I, Kumar GT, Urashima M, Camargo CA Jr (2017) Vitamin D supplementation to prevent acute respiratory tract infections: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 356:i6583CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Sanders KM, Stuart AL, Williamson EJ, Simpson JA, Kotowicz MA, Young D, Nicholson GC (2010) Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 303:1815–1822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Metabolism and Systems ResearchThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and WestBirmingham Hospitals NHS TrustBirminghamUK
  3. 3.Institute of Translation MedicineThe University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  4. 4.Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, Arthritis Research UK Rheumatoid Arthritis Pathogenesis Centre of Excellence and MRC Arthritis Research UK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  5. 5.Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health PartnersBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations