Saccade accuracy as an indicator of the competition between functional asymmetries in vision
Hemispheric specialization refers to the fact that cerebral hemispheres are not equivalent and that cognitive processes are lateralized in the brain. Although the potential links between handedness and the left hemisphere specialization for language have been widely studied, little attention has been paid to other motor preferences, such as eye dominance, that also are lateralized in the brain. For example, saccadic accuracy is higher in the hemifield contralateral to the dominant eye compared to the ipsilateral hemifield. Saccade accuracy is, however, also known to be sensitive to other functional asymmetries, such as the lateralization of visuo-spatial attention in the right hemisphere of the brain. Using a global effect paradigm in three different saccade latency ranges, we here propose to use saccade accuracy as an indicator of visual functional asymmetries. We show that for the shortest latencies, saccade accuracy is higher in the left than in the right visual hemifield, which could be due to the lateralization of visuo-spatial attention in the right hemisphere. For the longest latencies, however, saccade accuracy is higher toward the right than the left hemifield, probably due to the lateralization of local and global processing in the left and right hemispheres, respectively. These results could have a major impact on studies designed to measure the degree of lateralization of individuals. We here discuss both the theoretical and clinical contributions of these results.
KeywordsSaccadic eye movements Saccadic accuracy Global effect Distractor Hemispheric specialization Asymmetries
The authors warmly thank Dr. Agnès Charvillat for her language help. They also gratefully acknowledge the two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions.
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Becker W (1989) The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements. Metrics. In: Wurtz RH, Goldberg ME (eds) Reviews of oculomotor research, 3. Elsevier, Michigan, pp 13–66Google Scholar
- Chaumillon R, Alahyane N, Senot P, Vergne J, Lemoine-Lardennois C, Blouin J, Vergilino-Perez D (2017) Asymmetry in visual information processing depends on the strength of eye dominance. Neuropsychologia 96:129–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Deubel H, Wolf W, Hauske G (1984) The evaluation of the oculomotor error signal. In: Gale AG, Johnson F (eds) Advances in psychology: theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research, vol 22. Elsevier, Nottingham, pp 55–62Google Scholar
- Deubel H, Findlay JM, Jacobs AM, Brogan D (1988) Saccadic eye movements to targets defined by structure differences. In: Luer G, Lass U, Shallo-Hoffman J (eds) Eye movement research: physiological and psychological aspects. Hogrefe, Toronto, pp 107–145Google Scholar
- Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
- Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (2000) Principles of neural science, 4th edn. Appleton & Lange, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Lee MD, Wagenmakers EJ (2014) Bayesian cognitive modeling: a practical course. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Mesulam MM (1999) Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 354(1387):1325–1346. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1999.0482 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Morey RD, Rouder JN (2018) Package “BayesFactor”. R package version 0.9.12-4.2. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/BayesFactor/index.html
- Tagu J, Doré-Mazars K, Vergne J, Lemoine-Lardennois C, Vergilino-Perez D (2018a) Quantifying eye dominance strength—new insights into the neurophysiological bases of saccadic asymmetries. Neuropsychologia 117:530–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.07.020 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toba M-N, Cavanagh P, Bartolomeo P (2011) Attention biases the perceived midpoint of horizontal lines. Neuropsychologia 49(2):238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vallar G (1993) The anatomical basis of spatial hemineglect in humans. In: Marshall J, Robertson I (eds) Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 27–60Google Scholar
- White BJ, Munoz DP (2011) The superior colliculus. In: Liversedge SP, Gilchrist ID, Everling S (eds) The Oxford handbook of eye movements. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 195–213Google Scholar
- Zago L, Petit L, Mellet E, Jobard G, Crivello F, Joliot M, Tzourio-Mazoyer N (2016) The association between hemispheric specialization for language production and for spatial attention depends on left-hand preference strength. Neuropsychologia 93:394–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zago L, Petit L, Jobard G, Hay J, Mazoyer B, Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Mellet E (2017) Pseudoneglect in line bisection judgement is associated with a modulation of right hemispheric spatial attention dominance in right-handers. Neuropsychologia 94:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.11.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar