Advertisement

Word scanning in native and non-native languages: insights into reading with declined accommodation

  • Wataru Teramoto
  • Shinji Kawano
  • Shuji Mori
  • Kaoru SekiyamaEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of declined accommodation on reading performance in non-native and native languages. Eighteen native Japanese speakers participated: eight presbyopes and ten non-presbyopes. In the experiment, participants were asked to scan, or sequentially read six-word items presented in two-line texts, identify a non-word target as quickly as possible, and indicate its location. In addition to the participant type (presbyopes/non-presbyopes) and language of the reading material (Japanese/English), viewing distance (35 cm/70 cm) and contrast (18%/100%) were manipulated. The results showed that the presbyopes exhibited worse reading performance than the non-presbyopes at closer distances irrespective of the language. Notably, the inferiority of the presbyopes’ reading performance was more pronounced when they read in a non-native language than in their native language. It should be noted that differences in reading performance between the presbyopes and non-presbyopes were subtle for high-contrast words at longer viewing distances, indicating that age- or cohort-related perceptual, motor, and cognitive differences were almost negligible, but accommodation mattered. These results suggest that the effect of accommodation decline is influenced by the language of the reading material.

Keywords

Presbyopia Accommodation Reading Native language Non-native language Visual scanning Viewing distance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is based on the Master’s thesis of the second author, submitted to Kumamoto University. This study was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grants 16H06325 to KS, 25240023 to SM, and 17K18708 to WT.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Akutsu H, Legge GE, Ross JA, Schuebel KJ (1991) Psychophysics of reading—X. Effects of age-related changes in vision. J Gerontol 46:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amano N, Kondo T (2003) NTT database series Nihongo-no Goitokusei (Lexical properties of Japanese) Part 1 [CD]. Sanseido, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersen GJ (2012) Aging and vision: changes in function and performance from optics to perception. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci 3:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arditi A (2005) Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Res Sci 46:2225–2229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnoult MD, Attneave F (1956) The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol Bull 53:452–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beymer D, Russell D, Orton P (2008) An eye tracking study of how font size and type influence online reading. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI group annual conference on people and computers: culture, creativity, interaction, pp 15–18Google Scholar
  7. Bullimore MA, Bailey IL (1995) Reading and eye movements in age-related maculopathy. Optom Vis Sci 72(2):125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calabrèse A, Cheong AM, Cheung SH, He Y, Kwon M, Mansfield JS, Subramanian A, Yu D, Legge GE (2016) Baseline MNREAD measures for normally sighted subjects from childhood to old age. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 57:3836–3843.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.16-19580 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll JB, White MN (1973) Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Q J Exp Psychol 25:85–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duyck W, Vanderelst D, Desmet T, Hartsuiker RJ (2008) The frequency effect in second-language visual word recognition. Psychon Bull Rev 4:850–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Faubert J (2002) Visual perception and aging. Can J Exp Psychol 56:164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Favreau M, Komoda MK, Segalowitz N (1980) Second language reading: implications of the word superiority effect in skilled bilinguals. Can J Psychol 34:370–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferretti G, Mazzotti S, Brizzolara D (2008) Visual scanning and reading ability in normal and dyslexic children. Behav Neurol 19:87–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Forster KI, Chambers SM (1973) Lexical access and naming time. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 12:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jeffreys H (1961) Theory of probability, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Legge GE (2007) Psychophysics of reading in normal and low vision. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, USGoogle Scholar
  17. Legge GE, Ross JA, Luebker A, LaMay JM (1989a) Psychophysics of reading. VIII. The Minnesota low-vision reading test. Optom Vis Sci 66(12):843–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Legge GE, Ross JA, Maxwell KT, Luebker A (1989b) Psychophysics of reading—VII. Comprehension in normal and low vision. Clin Vis Sci 4:51–60Google Scholar
  19. Legge GE, Ahn SJ, Klitz TS, Luebker A (1997) Psychophysics of reading–XVI. The visual span in normal and low vision. Vision Res 37(14):1999–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Legge GE, Cheung S, Yu D, Chung STL, Lee H, Owens DP (2007) The case for the visual span as a sensory bottleneck in reading. J Vision 7:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGowan VA, White SJ, Jordan TR, Paterson KB (2013) Aging and the use of interword spaces during reading: evidence from eye movements. Psychon Bull Rev 21(3):740–747.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0527-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morton J (1964) The effects of context upon speed of reading, eye movements, and eye–voice span. Q J Exp Psychol 16(4):340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Oller JW (1972) Assessing competence in ESL: reading. TESOL Q 6:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Regan JK (1990) Eye movements and reading. In: Kowler E (ed) Eye movements and their role in visual and cognitive processes. Elsevier, New York, pp 395–453Google Scholar
  25. Pelli DG, Burns CW, Farell B, Moore-Page DC (2006) Feature detection and letter identification. Vis Res 46:4646–4674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Raney GE, Rayner K (1995) Word frequency effects and eye movements during two readings of a text. Can J Exp Psychol 49:151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rastle K, Harrington J, Coltheart M (2002) 358,534 nonwords: the ARC nonword database. Q J Exp Psychol 55A:1339–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rayner K, Fischer MH, Pollatsek A (1998) Unspaced text interferes with both word identification and eye movement control. Vis Res 38:1129–1144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rayner K, Yang J, Schuett S, Slattery TJ (2013) Eye movements of older and younger readers when reading unspaced text. Exp Psychol 60(5):354–361.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sass SM, Legge GE, Lee HW (2006) Low-vision reading speed: influences of linguistic inference and aging. Optom Vis Sci 83:166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB (2000) Age-related changes, optical factors, and neutral processes. In: Kazdim AE (ed) Encyclopedia of psychology, vol 8. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 180–183Google Scholar
  32. Teramoto W, Tao K, Sekiyama K, Mori S (2012) Reading performance in middle-aged adults with declined accommodation. Atten Percept Psychophys 74:1722–1731.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0360-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang H, He X, Legge GE (2014) Effect of pattern complexity on the visual span for Chinese and alphabet characters. J Vis 14:6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Warrington KL, McGowan VA, Paterson KB, White SJ (2018) Effects of aging, word frequency, and text stimulus quality on reading across the adult lifespan: Evidence from eye movements. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 44(11):1714–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whaley CP (1978) Word–nonword classification time. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 17:143–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wataru Teramoto
    • 1
  • Shinji Kawano
    • 1
  • Shuji Mori
    • 2
  • Kaoru Sekiyama
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Cognitive Psychology, Faculty of LettersKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Informatics, Faculty of Information Science and Electrical EngineeringKyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of Advanced Integrated Studies for Human SurvivabilityKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations