Advertisement

Dynamic bimanual force control in chronic stroke: contribution of non-paretic and paretic hands

  • Prakruti Patel
  • Neha LodhaEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Dynamic force modulation is critical for performing skilled bimanual tasks. Unilateral motor impairments after stroke contribute to asymmetric hand function. Here, we investigate the impact of stroke on dynamic bimanual force control and compare the contribution of each hand to a bimanual task. Thirteen chronic stroke and thirteen healthy control participants performed bimanual, isometric finger flexion during visually guided, force tracking of a trapezoidal trajectory with force increment and decrement phases. We quantified the accuracy and variability of total force from both hands. Individual hand contribution was quantified with the proportion of force contributed to total force and force variability of each hand. The total force output was 53.10% less accurate and 56% more variable in the stroke compared with the control group. The variability of total force was 91.10% greater in force decrement than increment phase. In stroke group, the proportion of force and force variability contributed by each hand differed across the two phases. During force decrement, the proportion of force contributed by the non-paretic hand reduced and force variability of the non-paretic hand increased, compared with the increment phase. The control group showed no differences in each hand’s contribution across the two force phases. In conclusion, dynamic bimanual force modulation is impaired after stroke, with greater deficits in force decrement than force increment. The non-paretic and paretic hands adapt differentially to dynamic bimanual task constraints. During force decrement, the non-paretic hand preferentially assumes force modulation, while the paretic hand produces steady force to meet the force requirements.

Keywords

Hemiparesis Force modulation Force variability Task constraint Motor control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

AHA Scientist Development Award 14SDG20450151 to NL.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

References

  1. Allgower K, Hermsdorfer J (2017) Fine motor skills predict performance in the Jebsen Taylor Hand Function Test after stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 128:1858–1871.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.07.408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archer DB, Misra G, Patten C, Coombes SA (2016) Microstructural properties of premotor pathways predict visuomotor performance in chronic stroke. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2039–2054.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Archer DB, Kang N, Misra G, Marble S, Patten C, Coombes SA (2018) Visual feedback alters force control and functional activity in the visuomotor network after stroke. NeuroImage Clin 17:505–517.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basilio ML, de Faria-Fortini I, Polese JC, Scianni AA, Faria CD, Teixeira-Salmela LF (2016) Handgrip strength deficits best explain limitations in performing bimanual activities after stroke. J Phys Ther Sci 28:1161–1165.  https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.28.1161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand AM, Mercier C, Shun PL, Bourbonnais D, Desrosiers J (2004) Effects of weakness on symmetrical bilateral grip force exertion in subjects with hemiparesis. J Neurophysiol 91:1579–1585.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00597.2003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bertrand AM, Fournier K, Wick Brasey MG, Kaiser ML, Frischknecht R, Diserens K (2015) Reliability of maximal grip strength measurements and grip strength recovery following a stroke. J Hand Ther 28:356–362.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2015.04.004 (quiz 363) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blennerhassett JM, Carey LM, Matyas TA (2006) Grip force regulation during pinch grip lifts under somatosensory guidance: comparison between people with stroke and healthy controls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87:418–429.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.11.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blennerhassett JM, Carey LM, Matyas TA (2008) Clinical measures of handgrip limitation relate to impaired pinch grip force control after stroke. J Hand Ther 21:245–252.  https://doi.org/10.1197/j.jht.2007.10.021 (quiz 253) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bohannon RW, Smith MB (1987) Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther 67:206–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonan IV, Colle FM, Guichard JP, Vicaut E, Eisenfisz M, Tran Ba Huy P, Yelnik AP (2004) Reliance on visual information after stroke. Part I: balance on dynamic posturography. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chow JW, Stokic DS (2011) Force control of quadriceps muscle is bilaterally impaired in subacute stroke. J Appl Physiol (1985) 111:1290–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00462.2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christou EA (2011) Aging and variability of voluntary contractions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 39:77–84.  https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e31820b85ab CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruz EG, Waldinger HC, Kamper DG (2005) Kinetic and kinematic workspaces of the index finger following stroke. Brain 128:1112–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dispa D, Thonnard JL, Bleyenheuft Y (2014) Impaired predictive and reactive control of precision grip in chronic stroke patients. Int J Rehabil Res 37:130–137.  https://doi.org/10.1097/mrr.0000000000000045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S (1975) The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7:13–31Google Scholar
  16. Gebruers N, Vanroy C, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, De Deyn PP (2010) Monitoring of physical activity after stroke: a systematic review of accelerometry-based measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:288–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gorniak SL, Alberts JL (2013) Effects of task complexity on grip-to-load coordination in bimanual actions. Exp Brain Res 225:559–567.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3395-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gorniak SL, Zatsiorsky VM, Latash ML (2010) Manipulation of a fragile object. Exp Brain Res 202:413–430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2148-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grichting B, Hediger V, Kaluzny P, Wiesendanger M (2000) Impaired proactive and reactive grip force control in chronic hemiparetic patients. Clin Neurophysiol 111:1661–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, Prist V, Zhang X, Dispa D, Bleyenheuft Y (2016) Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci 10:442.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hermsdorfer J, Hagl E, Nowak DA, Marquardt C (2003) Grip force control during object manipulation in cerebral stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 114:915–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu X, Suresh AK, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2015) Assessing altered motor unit recruitment patterns in paretic muscles of stroke survivors using surface electromyography. J Neural Eng 12:066001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/12/6/066001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johansson RS (2002) Dynamic use of tactile afferent signals in control of dexterous manipulation. Adv Exp Med Biol 508:397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Vive-Larsen J, Stoier M, Olsen TS (1995) Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part I: outcome. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kamper DG, Harvey RL, Suresh S, Rymer WZ (2003) Relative contributions of neural mechanisms versus muscle mechanics in promoting finger extension deficits following stroke. Muscle Nerve 28:309–318.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10443 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kang N, Cauraugh JH (2014) Bimanual force variability and chronic stroke: asymmetrical hand control. PLoS One 9:e101817.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kang N, Cauraugh JH (2015) Bimanual force variability in chronic stroke: with and without visual information. Neurosci Lett 587:41–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2014.12.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kurillo G, Zupan A, Bajd T (2004) Force tracking system for the assessment of grip force control in patients with neuromuscular diseases. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:1014–1021.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2004.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li S (2013) Analysis of increasing and decreasing isometric finger force generation and the possible role of the corticospinal system in this process. Mot Control 17:221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindberg P, Ody C, Feydy A, Maier MA (2009) Precision in isometric precision grip force is reduced in middle-aged adults. Exp Brain Res 193:213–224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1613-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lodha N, Christou EA (2017) Low-frequency oscillations and control of the motor output. Front Physiol 8:78.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lodha N, Naik SK, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH (2010) Force control and degree of motor impairments in chronic stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 121:1952–1961.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2010.04.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lodha N, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH (2012a) Bimanual isometric force control: asymmetry and coordination evidence post stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 123:787–795.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.08.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lodha N, Patten C, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH (2012b) Bimanual force control strategies in chronic stroke: finger extension versus power grip. Neuropsychologia 50:2536–2545.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, Stam HJ, Ribbers GM, Bussmann JB (2012) Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93:1975–1981.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.03.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morrison S, Newell KM (1998) Interlimb coordination as a function of isometric force output. J Mot Behav 30:323–342.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222899809601347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mottram CJ, Heckman CJ, Powers RK, Rymer WZ, Suresh NL (2014) Disturbances of motor unit rate modulation are prevalent in muscles of spastic-paretic stroke survivors. J Neurophysiol 111:2017–2028.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00389.2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Naik SK, Patten C, Lodha N, Coombes SA, Cauraugh JH (2011) Force control deficits in chronic stroke: grip formation and release phases. Exp Brain Res 211:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2637-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nasreddine ZS et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newell KM, Broderick MP, Deutsch KM, Slifkin AB (2003) Task goals and change in dynamical degrees of freedom with motor learning. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 29:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ohtaka C, Fujiwara M (2016) Control strategies for accurate force generation and relaxation. Percept Mot Skills 123:489–507.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0031512516664778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Park SH, Kwon M, Solis D, Lodha N, Christou EA (2016) Motor control differs for increasing and releasing force. J Neurophysiol 115:2924–2930.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00715.2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rose DK, Winstein CJ (2004) Bimanual training after stroke: are two hands better than one? Top Stroke Rehabil 11:20–30.  https://doi.org/10.1310/ncb1-jwaa-09qe-7txb CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seo NJ, Rymer WZ, Kamper DG (2009) Delays in grip initiation and termination in persons with stroke: effects of arm support and active muscle stretch exercise. J Neurophysiol 101:3108–3115.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91108.2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sosnoff JJ, Voudrie SJ (2009) Practice and age-related loss of adaptability in sensorimotor performance. J Mot Behav 41:137–146.  https://doi.org/10.3200/jmbr.41.2.137-146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stein J, Krebs HI, Frontera WR, Fasoli SE, Hughes R, Hogan N (2004) Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83:720–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vaillancourt DE, Slifkin AB, Newell KM (2002) Inter-digit individuation and force variability in the precision grip of young, elderly, and Parkinson’s disease participants. Mot Control 6:113–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. van Delden AL, Peper CL, Nienhuys KN, Zijp NI, Beek PJ, Kwakkel G (2013) Unilateral versus bilateral upper limb training after stroke: the Upper Limb Training After Stroke clinical trial. Stroke 44:2613–2616.  https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.113.001969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Voelcker-Rehage C, Alberts JL (2005) Age-related changes in grasping force modulation. Exp Brain Res 166:61–70.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-2342-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Waddell KJ, Strube MJ, Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Birkenmeier RL, Dromerick AW, Lang CE (2017) Does task-specific training improve upper limb performance in daily life poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 31:290–300.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316680493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Witney AG, Wing A, Thonnard JL, Smith AM (2004) The cutaneous contribution to adaptive precision grip. Trends Neurosci 27:637–643.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2004.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wu CY, Huang PC, Chen YT, Lin KC, Yang HW (2013) Effects of mirror therapy on motor and sensory recovery in chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 94:1023–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Movement Neuroscience and Rehabilitation Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise ScienceColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations