Utricular function in vestibular neuritis: a pilot study of concordance/discordance between ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and ocular cycloposition
Vestibular neuritis (VN) can affect utricular afferents. Utricular function can be assessed by ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs) whose abnormalities include weak or absent responses, and ocular cycloposition whose abnormalities include ocular torsion (OT). When studied independently in vestibular neuritis, oVEMPs are abnormal in 61–82% of cases, and OT is present in 72–80% of cases. The similar range of abnormalities suggests the hypothesis that these tests should be concordantly abnormal. We tested this hypothesis by identifying consecutive adult cases of VN in whom both oVEMPs and OT were performed. OT and oVEMP overlapped (both were abnormal) in only 47% of cases. In 40% of cases oVEMPs alone were abnormal, and in 13% of cases, OT alone was present. These results suggest that oVEMPs and OT assess different aspects of utricular function believed to arise from discrete zones of the utricular macula; the former are thought to reflect the activity of extra-striolar afferents (which detect constant acceleration), and the latter reflects the activity of striolar afferents (which detect change in acceleration).
KeywordsUtricle Vestibular neuritis Vestibular function Evoked potential Ocular torsion
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
- Bergström B (1973) Morphological studies of the vestibular nerve. In: Otolaryngology. University of Uppsala, Uppsala, p 39Google Scholar
- Clarke AH, Schonfeld U, Helling K (2003) Unilateral examination of utricle and saccule function. J Vestib Res 13:215–225 (PMID: 15096665) Google Scholar
- de Burlet H (1924) Zur Innervation der Macula sacculi bei Säugetieren. Anatomischer Anzeiger 58:26–32Google Scholar
- Fife TD, Colebatch JG, Kerber KA et al (2017) Practice guideline: Cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing: report of the guideline development, dissemination, and implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 89:2288–2296. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kattah JC, Talkad AV, Wang DZ, Hsieh YH, Newman-Toker DE (2009) HINTS to diagnose stroke in the acute vestibular syndrome: three-step bedside oculomotor examination more sensitive than early MRI diffusion-weighted imaging. Stroke 40:3504–3510. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.551234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kim HA, Hong JH, Lee H et al (2008) Otolith dysfunction in vestibular neuritis: recovery pattern and a predictor of symptom recovery. Neurology 70:449–453. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000297554.21221.a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Magliulo G, Gagliardi S, Ciniglio Appiani M, Iannella G, Re M (2014) Vestibular neurolabyrinthitis: a follow-up study with cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and the video head impulse test. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 123:162–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414522974 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Takai Y, Murofushi T, Ushio M, Iwasaki S (2006) Recovery of subjective visual horizontal after unilateral vestibular deafferentation by intratympanic instillation of gentamicin. J Vestib Res 16:69–73Google Scholar
- Vibert D, Hausler R, Safran AB (1999) Subjective visual vertical in peripheral unilateral vestibular diseases. J Vestib Res 9:145–152Google Scholar
- Voit M (1907) Zur Frage der Verästelung des Nervus Acusticus bei den Sängetieren. Anatomischer Anzeiger 31:635–640Google Scholar