Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 6, pp 1493–1502 | Cite as

Dose of remote limb ischemic conditioning for enhancing learning in healthy young adults

  • Anna E. MattlageEmail author
  • Ellen N. Sutter
  • Marghuretta D. Bland
  • Swati M. Surkar
  • Jeffrey M. Gidday
  • Jin-Moo Lee
  • Tamara Hershey
  • Ling Chen
  • Catherine E. Lang
Research Article
  • 103 Downloads

Abstract

Remote limb ischemic conditioning (RLIC) is a technique in which tissues distant from the target organ are exposed to brief, sub-lethal bouts of ischemia. The effects of remotely applied ischemic conditioning are systemically transferred to the target organ, and typically manifested as protection from subsequent ischemic injury. Previous studies in our lab have found and confirmed that RLIC enhances learning and retention during motor training on a balance task. The current study tested the effect of RLIC dose (number of cycles) on learning enhancement in young, healthy adults. Forty healthy participants age 18–40 years were randomized to receive 5 cycles of sham conditioning (n = 9), 3 cycles of RLIC (n = 11), 4 cycles of RLIC (n = 10), or 5 cycles of RLIC (n = 10) using a blood pressure cuff around the upper arm once a day for 7 consecutive weekdays (Days 1–7). Participants concurrently trained on a balance task, bimanual cup stacking task, and a discrete sequence production task on Days 3–7. Change in performance on each of the three tasks was compared across groups. Participants in all four groups improved their performance on each of the three tasks over time. However, RLIC at any dose did not enhance learning on any of the three tasks. While RLIC is safe, inexpensive, and clinically feasible, reproducibility may be challenged by unidentified factors, raising critical challenges to the straightforward translation of RLIC for improving rehabilitation outcomes in individuals recovering from neurological injury.

Keywords

Ischemic conditioning Motor learning Psychomotor performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Nathan Baune, Allyson Getty, Gina Malito, Ali McGee, Allison Tsui, Kim Waddell, and Shelby Wilson for their assistance with data collection and the study participants for generously giving their time.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health (Grant number: R01 HD085930).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

221_2019_5519_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 23 KB)

References

  1. Ali ZA et al (2007) Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial. Circulation 116:I98-105  https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.106.679167 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bøtker HE et al (2010) Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 375:727–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(09)62001-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cherry-Allen KM, Gidday JM, Lee JM, Hershey T, Lang CE (2015) Remote limb ischemic conditioning enhances motor learning in healthy humans. J Neurophysiol 113:3708–3719.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01028.2014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cherry-Allen KM, Gidday JM, Lee JM, Hershey T, Lang CE (2016) Remote limb ischemic conditioning at two cuff inflation pressures yields learning enhancements in healthy adults J Mot Behav.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2016.1204268 Google Scholar
  5. Crimi G et al (2013) Remote ischemic post-conditioning of the lower limb during primary percutaneous coronary intervention safely reduces enzymatic infarct size in anterior myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 6:1055–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ding Q, Ying Z, Gomez-Pinilla F (2011) Exercise influences hippocampal plasticity by modulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor processing. Neuroscience 192:773–780.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.06.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dirnagl U, Becker K, Meisel A (2009) Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use. Lancet Neurol 8:398–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70054-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Drager LF, Jun JC, Polotsky VY (2010) Metabolic consequences of intermittent hypoxia: relevance to obstructive sleep apnea. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 24:843–851.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fan YY et al (2011) Activation of the central histaminergic system is involved in hypoxia-induced stroke tolerance in adult mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 31:305–314.  https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2010.94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Garcia S et al (2011) Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing postconditioning during ST-elevation myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Transl Res 4:92–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-010-9252-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gidday JM (2006) Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance. Nat Rev Neurosci 7:437–448.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granados C, Wulf G (2007) Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue. Res Q Exerc Sport 78:197–203Google Scholar
  13. Groothuis JT, van Vliet L, Kooijman M, Hopman MTE (2003) Venous cuff pressures from 30 mmHg to diastolic pressure are recommended to measure arterial inflow by plethysmography. J Appl Physiol 95:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG (2009) Research electronic data capture (redcap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hess DC, Blauenfeldt RA, Andersen G, Hougaard KD, Hoda MN, Ding Y, Ji X (2015) Remote ischaemic conditioning-a new paradigm of self-protection in the brain. Nat Rev Neurol 11:698–710.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2015.223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hougaard KD et al (2014) Remote ischemic perconditioning as an adjunct therapy to thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a randomized trial. Stroke 45:159–167.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001346 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hyngstrom A, Murphy S, Nguyen J, Schmit B, Negro F, Gutterman D, Durand M (2018) Ischemic conditioning increases strength and volitional activation of paretic muscle in chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Appl Physiol 124:1140–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iadecola C, Anrather J (2011) Stroke research at a crossroad: asking the brain for directions. Nat Neurosci 14:1363–1368.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2953 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2:e124.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnsen J, Pryds K, Salman R, Lofgren B, Kristiansen SB, Botker HE (2016) The remote ischemic preconditioning algorithm: effect of number of cycles, cycle duration and effector organ mass on efficacy of protection. Basic Res Cardiol 111:10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-016-0529-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Koch S, Gonzalez N (2013) Preconditioning the human brain: proving the principle in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 44:1748–1753.  https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000773 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Koch S, Della-Morte D, Dave KR, Sacco RL, Perez-Pinzon MA (2014) Biomarkers for ischemic preconditioning: finding the responders. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 34:933–941.  https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2014.42 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Laskey WK (2005) Brief repetitive balloon occlusions enhance reperfusion during percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: a pilot study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 65:361–367.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.20397 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lessa HT, Chiviacowsky S (2015) Self-controlled practice benefits motor learning in older adults. Hum Mov Sci 40:372–380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2015.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lonborg J et al (2010) Cardioprotective effects of ischemic postconditioning in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, evaluated by magnetic resonance. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:34–41.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.109.905521 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lorentsen E, Hansteen V, Sivertssen E (1970) The influence of venous collecting pressure on measurement of calf blood flow by venous occlusion plethysmography. Angiol Nov 21:661–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loukogeorgakis SP et al (2007) Transient limb ischemia induces remote preconditioning and remote postconditioning in humans by a K(ATP)-channel dependent mechanism. Circulation 116:1386–1395.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.653782 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ma XJ, Zhang XH, Li CM, Luo M (2006) Effect of postconditioning on coronary blood flow velocity and endothelial function in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Scand Cardiovasc J 40:327–333.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14017430601047864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meng R et al (2012) Upper limb ischemic preconditioning prevents recurrent stroke in intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 79:1853–1861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Open Science C (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349:aac4716.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pallares LC, Deane CR, Baudouin SV, Evans TW (1994) Strain gauge plethysmography and Doppler ultrasound in the measurement of limb blood flow. Eur J Clin Investig Apr 24:279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Porter BA et al (2012) Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation with a movement reorganizes primary motor cortex. Cereb Cortex 22:2365–2374.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prinz F, Schlange T, Asadullah K (2011) Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? Nat Rev Drug Discov 10:712.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd3439-c1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rahimi M et al (2015) The effect of high intensity interval training on cardioprotection against ischemia-reperfusion injury in wistar rats. EXCLI J 14:237–246.  https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2014-587 Google Scholar
  35. Ren C, Gao X, Steinberg GK, Zhao H (2008) Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning. Neuroscience 151:1099–1103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.11.056 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rybnikova E, Vataeva L, Tyulkova E, Gluschenko T, Otellin V, Pelto-Huikko M, Samoilov MO (2005) Mild hypoxia preconditioning prevents impairment of passive avoidance learning and suppression of brain NGFI-A expression induced by severe hypoxia. Behav Brain Res 160:107–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Staat P et al (2005) Postconditioning the human heart. Circulation 112:2143–2148.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.558122 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stetler RA et al (2014) Preconditioning provides neuroprotection in models of CNS disease: paradigms and clinical significance. Prog Neurobiol 114:58–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutter EN et al (2018) Remote limb ischemic conditioning and motor learning: evaluation of factors influencing response in older adults. Transl Stroke Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-018-0653-8 Google Scholar
  40. Tapuria N, Kumar Y, Habib MM, Abu Amara M, Seifalian AM, Davidson BR (2008) Remote ischemic preconditioning: a novel protective method from ischemia reperfusion injury—a review. J Surg Res 150:304–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.12.747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taubert M, Draganski B, Anwander A, Muller K, Horstmann A, Villringer A, Ragert P (2010) Dynamic properties of human brain structure: learning-related changes in cortical areas and associated fiber connections. J Neurosci 30:1670–11677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Thibault H et al (2008) Long-term benefit of postconditioning. Circulation 117:1037–1044.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.729780 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tretriluxana J, Taptong J, Chaiyawat P (2015) Dyad training protocol on learning of bimanual cup stacking in individuals with stroke: effects of observation duration. J Med Assoc Thail 98:106–112Google Scholar
  44. Udermann B, Murray S, Mayer J, Sagendorf K (2004) Influence of cup stacking on hand–eye coordination and reaction time of second-grade students. Percept Mot Skills 98:409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verwey WB, Abrahamse EL, de Kleine E (2010) Cognitive processing in new and practiced discrete keying sequences. Front Psychol 1:32.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00032 Google Scholar
  46. Wymbs NF, Grafton ST (2015) The human motor system supports sequence-specific representations over multiple training-dependent timescales. Cereb Cortex 25:4213–4225.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang X-C et al (2007) Reduction in myocardial infarct size by postconditioning in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Invasive Cardiology 19:424–430Google Scholar
  48. Yang Q, Wang Y, Feng J, Cao J, Chen B (2013) Intermittent hypoxia from obstructive sleep apnea may cause neuronal impairment and dysfunction in central nervous system: the potential roles played by microglia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 9:1077–1086.  https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S49868 Google Scholar
  49. Yarrow JF, White LJ, McCoy SC, Borst SE (2010) Training augments resistance exercise induced elevation of circulating brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). Neurosci Lett 479:161–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.05.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Program in Physical TherapyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  3. 3.Program in Occupational TherapyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Department of OphthalmologyLouisiana State University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA
  5. 5.Department of PhysiologyLouisiana State University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA
  6. 6.Department of NeuroscienceLouisiana State University Health Sciences CenterNew OrleansUSA
  7. 7.Department of PsychiatryWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  8. 8.Department of RadiologyWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  9. 9.Division of BiostatisticsWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations