Advertisement

Gender differences in empathic responses to others’ economic payoffs: an event-related potentials study

  • Jing Jie
  • Pinchao Luo
  • Mengdi Zhuang
  • Min Fan
  • Yijing Wang
  • Yong Yang
  • Xifu ZhengEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

Although gender differences in empathy have been well established through measuring subjective outcomes, some studies of the neural mechanisms of pain empathy have not found gender differences. This inconsistent evidence may be caused by different research methods or different paradigms. The present study adopted a different approach from the pain empathy paradigm to examine gender differences in empathic responses to others’ economic payoffs using event-related potentials. The results showed that the N2 amplitudes in female participants were more negative than those in male participants, indicating a greater female than male susceptibility to facial expressions at the early stage of empathy. The LPP amplitudes for male participants were found to be more positive in the observation condition (involving no self-interest) than in the participation condition (involving self-interest), but there was no significant difference in the LPP amplitudes for the female participants between the two conditions. The results suggest that females’ empathic responses are more likely to be elicited automatically by the perception of others’ emotional states. In contrast, males’ empathic responses are more likely to be mediated by self-interest, which subsequently reduces their empathic responses.

Keywords

Affective empathy Cognitive empathy N2 Late positive potential (LPP) Event-related potential 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31771218), the Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 14ZDB259), and the Educational Science Project during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period of Hainan, China (Grant no. QJY1251505).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of South China Normal University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Avenanti A, Minio-Paluello I, Bufalari I, Aglioti SM (2006) Stimulus-driven modulation of motor-evoked potentials during observation of others’ pain. Neuroimage 32(1):316–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.03.010 Google Scholar
  2. Balconi M, Mazza G (2009) Brain oscillations and BIS/BAS (behavioral inhibition/activation system) effects on processing masked emotional cues. ERS/ERD and coherence measures of alpha band. Int J Psychophysiol 74(2):158–165.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.08.006 Google Scholar
  3. Balconi M, Pozzoli U (2007) Event-related oscillations (EROs) and event-related potentials (ERPs) comparison in facial expression recognition. J Neuropsychol 1(2):283–294.  https://doi.org/10.1348/174866407x184789 Google Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen S (2009) Autism: the empathizing–systemizing (E–S) theory. Ann NY Acad Sci 1156(1):68–80.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04467.x Google Scholar
  5. Baron-Cohen S, Wheelwright S (2004) The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. J Autism Dev Disord 34(2):163–175Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen S, Knickmeyer R, Belmonte MK (2005) Sex differences in the brain: implications for explaining autism. Science 310(5749):819–823Google Scholar
  7. Berthoz S, Wessa M, Kedia G, Wicker B, Grezes J (2008) Cross-cultural validation of the empathy quotient in a French-speaking sample. Can J Psychiatry 53(7):469–477Google Scholar
  8. Chen C, Yang CY, Cheng Y (2012) Sensorimotor resonance is an outcome but not a platform to anticipating harm to others. Soc Neurosci 7(6):578–590.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.686924 Google Scholar
  9. Cheng Y, Chou K, Decety J, Chen I, Hung DM, Tzeng OJ, Lin C (2009) Sex differences in the neuroanatomy of human mirror-neuron system: a voxel-based morphometric investigation. Neuroscience 158(2):713–720Google Scholar
  10. Cheng Y, Chen C, Decety J (2014) An EEG/ERP investigation of the development of empathy in early and middle childhood. Dev Cogn Neurosci 10:160–169Google Scholar
  11. Collignon O, Girard S, Gosselin F, Saint-Amour D, Lepore F, Lassonde M (2010) Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia 48(1):220–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007 Google Scholar
  12. Cuthbert BN, Schupp HT, Bradley MM, Birbaumer N, Lang PJ (2000) Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biol Psychol 52(2):95–111Google Scholar
  13. Davis MH (1983) Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence for a multidimensional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 44(1):113–126Google Scholar
  14. Decety J (2011) Dissecting the neural mechanisms mediating empathy. Emot Rev 3:92–108Google Scholar
  15. Decety J, Jackson PL (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 3(2):71–100.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1534582304267187 Google Scholar
  16. Decety J, Michalska KJ, Kinzler KD (2012) The contribution of emotion and cognition to moral sensitivity: a neurodevelopmental study. Cereb Cortex 22(1):209–220Google Scholar
  17. Decety J, Lewis KL, Cowell JM (2015) Specific electrophysiological components disentangle affective sharing and empathic concern in psychopathy. J Neurophysiol 114(1):493–504Google Scholar
  18. Dennis TA, Hajcak G (2009) The late positive potential: a neurophysiological marker for emotion regulation in children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50(11):1373–1383.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02168.x Google Scholar
  19. Derntl B, Habel U, Windischberger C, Robinson S, Kryspin-Exner I, Gur RC et al (2009) General and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition in females and males. BMC Neurosci 10(1):91–91.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-91 Google Scholar
  20. Eagly AH (2009) The his and hers of prosocial behavior: an examination of the social psychology of gender. Am Psychol 64(8):644–658Google Scholar
  21. Eisenberg N, Lennon R (1983) Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychol Bull 94(1):100–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100 Google Scholar
  22. Fan Y, Han S (2008) Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: an event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia 46(1):160–173.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023 Google Scholar
  23. Fritsch N, Kuchinke L (2013) Acquired affective associations induce emotion effects in word recognition: an ERP study. Brain Lang 124:75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.001 Google Scholar
  24. Fukushima H, Hiraki K (2006) Perceiving an opponent’s loss: gender-related differences in the medial-frontal negativity. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 1(2):149–157.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsl020 Google Scholar
  25. Gallese V (2003) The roots of empathy: the shared manifold hypothesis and the neural basis of intersubjectivity. Psychopathology 36(4):171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000072786 Google Scholar
  26. Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2008) Gender differences in competition: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664Google Scholar
  27. Groen Y, Wijers AA, Tucha O, Althaus M (2013) Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoking pictures? Neuropsychologia 51(1):142–155Google Scholar
  28. Gu X, Han S (2007) Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain. Neuroimage 36(1):256–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.025 Google Scholar
  29. Hampson E, Vananders S, Mullin L (2006) A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evol Hum Behav 27(6):401–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002 Google Scholar
  30. Hein G, Singer T (2008) “I feel how you feel but not always”: the empathic brain and its modulation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18(2):153–158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012 Google Scholar
  31. Hoffmann H, Kessler H, Eppel T, Rukavina S, Traue HC (2010) Expression intensity, gender and facial emotion recognition: women recognize only subtle facial emotions better than men. Acta Psychol 135(3):278–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.012 Google Scholar
  32. Ibanez A, Hurtado E, Lobos A, Escobar J, Trujillo N, Baez S, … Decety J (2011) Subliminal presentation of other faces (but not own face) primes behavioral and evoked cortical processing of empathy for pain. Brain Res 1398:72–85Google Scholar
  33. Ibanez A, Melloni M, Huepe D, Helgiu E, Rivera-Rei A, Canales-Johnson A, Baker P, Moya A (2012) What do event-related potentials (ERPs) bring to social neuroscience? Soc Neurosci 7(6):632–649.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2012.691078 Google Scholar
  34. Itagaki S, Katayama J (2008) Self-relevant criteria determine the evaluation of outcomes induced by others. Neuroreport 19(3):383–387Google Scholar
  35. Jie J, Luo P, Zhuang M, Li B, Pang Y, Li J, Zheng X (2019) Self-interest induces counter-empathy at the late stage of empathic responses to others’ economic payoffs. Front Psychol 10:372.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00372 Google Scholar
  36. Kiat JE, Cheadle JE (2017) The impact of individuation on the bases of human empathic responding. Neuroimage 155:312–321.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.006 Google Scholar
  37. Klein KJ, Hodges SD (2001) Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: when it pays to understand. Pers Soc Psychol B 27(6):720–730Google Scholar
  38. Knafo A, Zahn-Waxler C, Van Hulle C, Robinson JL, Rhee SH (2008) The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion 8(6):737–752.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014179 Google Scholar
  39. Lam CB, Solmeyer AR, McHale SM (2012) Sibling relationships and empathy across the transition to adolescence. J Youth Adolesc 41(12):1657–1670.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9781-8 Google Scholar
  40. Lamm C, Decety J, Singer T (2011) Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage 54(3):2492–2502Google Scholar
  41. Lawrence E, Shaw P, Baker D, Baroncohen S, David AS (2004) Measuring empathy: reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychol Med 34(5):911–919Google Scholar
  42. Lehmann A, Bahçesular K, Brockmann E-M, Biederbick S-E, Dziobek I, Gallinat J et al (2014) Subjective experience of emotions and emotional empathy in paranoid schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res 220(3):825–833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2014.09.009 Google Scholar
  43. Luo P, Zheng X, Chen X, Li Y, Wang J, Deng L, Zheng X (2014) Sex differences in affective response to different intensity of emotionally negative stimuli: an event-related potentials study. Neurosci Lett 578:85–89Google Scholar
  44. Luo P, Wang J, Jin Y, Huang S, Xie M, Deng L et al (2015) Gender differences in affective sharing and self-other distinction during empathic neural responses to others’ sadness. Brain Imaging Behav 9(2):312–322.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-014-9308-x Google Scholar
  45. Luo P, Pang Y, Li B, Jie J, Zhuang M, Yang S et al (2018) Competitive intensity modulates the pain empathy response: an event-related potentials study. Front Psychol 9:1854.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01854 Google Scholar
  46. Ma Q, Shen Q, Xu Q, Li D, Shu L, Weber B (2011) Empathic responses to others’ gains and losses: an electrophysiological investigation. Neuroimage 54(3):2472–2480.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.045 Google Scholar
  47. Mella N, Studer J, Gilet A-L, Labouvie-Vief G (2012) Empathy for pain from adolescence through adulthood: an event-related brain potential study. Front Psychol 3:501.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00501 Google Scholar
  48. Michalska KJ, Kinzler KD, Decety J (2013) Age-related sex differences in explicit measures of empathy do not predict brain responses across childhood and adolescence. Dev Cogn Neurosci 3:22–32Google Scholar
  49. Niedenthal PM (2007) Embodying emotion. Science 316:1002–1005Google Scholar
  50. Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Q J Econ 122(3):1067–1101Google Scholar
  51. Olofsson JK, Polich J (2007) Affective visual event-related potentials: arousal, repetition, and time-on-task. Biol Psychol 75(1):101–108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.12.006 Google Scholar
  52. Olofsson JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J (2008) Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biol Psychol 77(3):247–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006 Google Scholar
  53. Perry A, Bentin S, Bartal IB, Lamm C, Decety J (2010) “Feeling” the pain of those who are different from us: modulation of EEG in the mu/alpha range. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 10(4):493–504Google Scholar
  54. Rand DG, Brescoll VL, Everett JA, Capraro V, Barcelo H (2016) Social heuristics and social roles: intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. J Exp Psychol Gen 145(4):389–396.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000154 Google Scholar
  55. Reniers RL, Corcoran R, Drake R, Shryane N, Vollm B (2011) The QCAE: a questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. J Pers Assess 93(1):84–95Google Scholar
  56. Rose AJ, Rudolph KD (2006) A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychol Bull 132(1):98–131.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98 Google Scholar
  57. Saarela MV, Hlushchuk Y, Williams AC, Schurmann M, Kalso E, Hari R (2007) The compassionate brain: humans detect intensity of pain from another’s face. Cereb Cortex 17(1):230–237.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhj141 Google Scholar
  58. Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD (2003) The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300(5626):1755–1758Google Scholar
  59. Schulte-Rüther M, Markowitsch HJ, Shah NJ, Fink GR, Piefke M (2008) Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy. Neuroimage 42(1):393–403.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.180 Google Scholar
  60. Sessa P, Meconi F, Castelli L, Dell’Acqua R (2014) Taking one’s time in feeling other-race pain: an event-related potential investigation on the time-course of cross-racial empathy. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 9(4):454–463.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst003 Google Scholar
  61. Shamay-Tsoory SG, Aharon-Peretz J, Perry D (2009) Two systems for empathy: a double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain 132(3):617–627.  https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awn279 Google Scholar
  62. Singer T, Lamm C (2009) The social neuroscience of empathy. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1156:81–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x Google Scholar
  63. Singer T, Seymour B, O’Doherty JP, Stephan KE, Dolan RJ, Frith CD (2006) Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439(7075):466–469.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04271 Google Scholar
  64. Topcu C, Erdur-Baker O (2012) Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. Sch Psychol Int 33(5):550–561Google Scholar
  65. Vromen JM, Lipp OV, Remington RW (2015) The spider does not always win the fight for attention: disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set. Cogn Emot 29(7):1185–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.969198 Google Scholar
  66. Wen G, Bo C, Shiguang S, Xilin C, Delong Z, Xiaohua Z et al (2008) The CAS-PEAL large-scale Chinese face database and baseline evaluations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A Syst Hum 38(1):149–161.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmca.2007.909557 Google Scholar
  67. Williford A, Boulton AJ, Forrestbank SS, Bender K, Dieterich WA, Jenson JM (2016) The effect of bullying and victimization on cognitive empathy development during the transition to middle school. Child Youth Care Forum 45(4):525–541.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9343-9 Google Scholar
  68. Wölfer R, Cortina KS, Baumert J (2012) Embeddedness and empathy: how the social network shapes adolescents’ social understanding. J Adolesc 35(5):1295–1305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.015 Google Scholar
  69. World Medical Organization (1999) Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Br Med J 313:1448–1449Google Scholar
  70. Xiang Y, Wang Y, Gao S, Zhang X, Cui R (2018) Neural mechanisms with respect to different paradigms and relevant regulatory factors in empathy for pain. Front Neurosci 12:507.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00507 Google Scholar
  71. Yamada M, Lamm C, Decety J (2011) Pleasing frowns, disappointing smiles: an ERP investigation of counter-empathy. Emotion 11(6):1336–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023854 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jing Jie
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pinchao Luo
    • 1
  • Mengdi Zhuang
    • 1
  • Min Fan
    • 1
  • Yijing Wang
    • 1
  • Yong Yang
    • 1
  • Xifu Zheng
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Psychological Application, and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive ScienceSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Center for Mental Health EducationHainan UniversityHaikouChina

Personalised recommendations