Gender differences in empathic responses to others’ economic payoffs: an event-related potentials study
Although gender differences in empathy have been well established through measuring subjective outcomes, some studies of the neural mechanisms of pain empathy have not found gender differences. This inconsistent evidence may be caused by different research methods or different paradigms. The present study adopted a different approach from the pain empathy paradigm to examine gender differences in empathic responses to others’ economic payoffs using event-related potentials. The results showed that the N2 amplitudes in female participants were more negative than those in male participants, indicating a greater female than male susceptibility to facial expressions at the early stage of empathy. The LPP amplitudes for male participants were found to be more positive in the observation condition (involving no self-interest) than in the participation condition (involving self-interest), but there was no significant difference in the LPP amplitudes for the female participants between the two conditions. The results suggest that females’ empathic responses are more likely to be elicited automatically by the perception of others’ emotional states. In contrast, males’ empathic responses are more likely to be mediated by self-interest, which subsequently reduces their empathic responses.
KeywordsAffective empathy Cognitive empathy N2 Late positive potential (LPP) Event-related potential
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 31771218), the Major Program of the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 14ZDB259), and the Educational Science Project during the Twelfth Five-year Plan Period of Hainan, China (Grant no. QJY1251505).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
All procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Committee of South China Normal University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Balconi M, Mazza G (2009) Brain oscillations and BIS/BAS (behavioral inhibition/activation system) effects on processing masked emotional cues. ERS/ERD and coherence measures of alpha band. Int J Psychophysiol 74(2):158–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.08.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Collignon O, Girard S, Gosselin F, Saint-Amour D, Lepore F, Lassonde M (2010) Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia 48(1):220–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Derntl B, Habel U, Windischberger C, Robinson S, Kryspin-Exner I, Gur RC et al (2009) General and specific responsiveness of the amygdala during explicit emotion recognition in females and males. BMC Neurosci 10(1):91–91. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-10-91 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Fan Y, Han S (2008) Temporal dynamic of neural mechanisms involved in empathy for pain: an event-related brain potential study. Neuropsychologia 46(1):160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2008) Gender differences in competition: evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77(5):1637–1664Google Scholar
- Hampson E, Vananders S, Mullin L (2006) A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evol Hum Behav 27(6):401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Medical Organization (1999) Declaration of Helsinki (1964). Br Med J 313:1448–1449Google Scholar