Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 5, pp 1339–1346 | Cite as

Postural coordination and control to the precision demands of light finger touch

  • I-Chieh LeeEmail author
  • Matheus M. Pacheco
  • Karl M. Newell
Research Article


We examine the proposition that information availability and postural facilitation—usually viewed as opposing views in postural control—are intertwined with the effects of one being related to the other. If that is the case, a single control parameter (precision demands) would capture the changes in postural control relating information and postural facilitation. Using the dynamical systems approach, we investigated whether, manipulating touch requirements as to increase precision demands, would induce quantitative and qualitative changes in postural dynamics. Additionally, we tested whether the COM-COP coupling reflects the qualitative dynamics of the system. Seventeen participants were instructed to maintain quiet standing while maintaining or not a light finger force with either precision or no precision. Standard deviation (SD) of the COP decreased with the precision demands and the correlation dimension (CD) of COP showed higher values for the touch conditions. Participants showed reduced synchronization of COP–COM coupling; following changes in CD. These results point out the integrated nature of information availability, task requirements, and the emergent postural organization reflected in COP–COM coupling.


Light touch Dual-task Quiet standing Correlation dimension Wavelet analysis 



  1. Bacsi AM, Colebatch JG (2005) Evidence for reflex and perceptual vestibular contributions to postural control. Exp Brain Res 160(1):22–28. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Balasubramaniam R, Riley MA, Turvey MT (2000) Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task. Gait Posture 11(1):12–24. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldan AMS, Alouche SR, Araujo IMG, Freitas SMSF (2014) Effect of light touch on postural sway in individuals with balance problems: a systematic review. Gait Posture 40(1):1–10. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardy BG, Oullier O, Bootsma RJ, Stoffregen TA (2002) Dynamics of human postural transitions. J Exp Psychol Hum 28(3):499–514. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendat JS, Piersol AG (2011) Random data: analysis and measurement procedures. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen FC, Stoffregen TA (2012) Specificity of postural sway to the demands of a precision task at sea. J Exp Psychol Appl 18(2):203–212. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen FC, Tsai CL (2015) The mechanisms of the effect of light finger touch on postural control. Neurosci Lett 605:69–73. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen FC, Chu CH, Pan CY, Tsai CL (2018) Not just a light fingertip touch: a facilitation of functional integration between body sway and visual search in older adults. Gait Posture 62:105–110. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dickstein R (2005) Stance stability with unilateral and bilateral light touch of an external stationary object. Somatosens Mot Res 22(4):319–325. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Characterization of strange attractors. Phys Rev Lett 50(5):346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gurses S, Celik H (2013) Correlation dimension estimates of human postural sway. Hum Movement Sci 32(1):48–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haddad JM, Ryu JH, Seaman JM, Ponto KC (2010) Time-to-contact measures capture modulations in posture based on the precision demands of a manual task. Gait Posture 32(4):592–596. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Haken H, Kelso JS, Bunz H (1985) A theoretical model of phase transitions in human hand movements. Biol Cybern 51(5):347–356. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Holden M, Ventura J, Lackner JR (1994) Stabilization of posture by precision contact of the index finger. J Vestibul Res 4(4):285–293Google Scholar
  15. Jeka JJ (1997) Light touch contact as a balance aid. Phys Ther 77(5):476–487. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeka JJ, Lackner JR (1994) Fingertip contact influences human postural control. Exp Brain Res 79(2):495–502. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jeka JJ, Lackner JR (1995) The role of haptic cues from rough and slippery surfaces in human postural control. Exp Brain Res 103(2):267–276. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanekar N, Lee YJ, Aruin AS (2013) Effect of light finger touch in balance control of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture 38(4):643–647. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kouzaki M, Masani K (2008) Reduced postural sway during quiet standing by light touch is due to finger tactile feedback but not mechanical support. Exp Brain Res 188(1):153–158. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee IC, Pacheco MM, Newell KM (2018) Constraints specific influences of vision, touch and surface compliance in postural dynamics. Gait Posture 59:117–121. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Menz HB, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC (2006) A tactile stimulus applied to the leg improves postural stability in young, old and neuropathic subjects. Neurosci Lett 406(1):23–26. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitra S (2004) Adaptive utilization of optical variables during postural and suprapostural dual-task performance: comment on Stoffregen, Smart, Bardy, and Pagulayan (1999). J Exp Psych Hum 30(1):28–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitra S, Fraizer E (2004) Effects of explicit sway-minimization on postural–suprapostural dual-task performance. Hum Movement Sci 23(1):1–20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Newell KM (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination. Mot Dev Child Asp Coord Control 34:341–360. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Osborne A, Provenzale A (1989) Finite correlation dimension for stochastic systems with power-law spectra. Physica D 35(3):357–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rabin E, DiZio P, Ventura J, Lackner JR (2008) Influences of arm proprioception and degrees of freedom on postural control with light touch feedback. J Neurophysiol 99(2):595–604. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Riley MA, Wong S, Mitra S, Turvey MT (1997) Common effects of touch and vision on postural parameters. Exp Brain Res 117(1):165–170. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Riley MA, Stoffregen TA, Grocki MJ, Turvey MT (1999) Postural stabilization for the control of touching. Hum Mov Sci 18(6):795–817. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rogers MW, Wardman DL, Lord SR, Fitzpatrick RC (2001) Passive tactile sensory input improves stability during standing. Exp Brain Res 136(4):514–522. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ, De Luca CJ (1994) Reconstruction expansion as a geometry-based framework for choosing proper delay times. Phys D 73(1):82–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stoffregen TA, Smart LJ, Bardy BG, Pagulayan RJ (1999) Postural stabilization of looking. J Exp Psych Hum 25(6):1641–1658. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors. In: Rand D, Young LS (eds) Dynamical systems and turbulence, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin, pp 366–381. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tremblay F, Mireault AC, Dessureault L, Manning H, Sveistrup H (2004) Postural stabilization from fingertip contact: I. Variations in sway attenuation, perceived stability and contact forces with aging. Exp Brain Res 157(3):275–285. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Vaillancourt DE, Haibach PS, Newell KM (2006) Visual angle is the critical variable mediating gain-related effects in manual control. Exp Brain Res 173(4):742–750. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Warren WH, Kay BA, Yilmaz EH (1996) Visual control of posture during walking: functional specificity. J Exp Psych Hum 22(4):818–838. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zatsiorsky V, Seluyanov V (1985) Estimation of the mass and inertia characteristics of the human body by means of the best predictive regression equations. In: Winter DA, Norman RW, Wells RP, Hayes KC, Patlaa AE (eds) Biomechanics IX-B. Human Kinetics, ChampaignGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UNC-NCSU Joint Department of Biomedical EngineeringNC State University and The University of North Carolina-CHRaleighUSA
  2. 2.School of Physical Education and SportUniversity of São PauloSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of KinesiologyUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations