Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 5, pp 1257–1266 | Cite as

Synchronising to a frequency while estimating time of vibro-tactile stimuli

  • David Andrés Casilimas-DíazEmail author
  • Jose Lino Oliveira Bueno
Research Article

Abstract

It is well known that subjective time perception can be modified by the emotional experience related to a specific event, by pharmaceutical compounds or by sensory stimuli. As for the latter, visual and auditory stimuli have been widely studied compared to tactile ones. Two experiments were conducted using different vibratory frequencies to stimulate participants who were asked to reproduce stimulus duration. Experiment 1 compared differences in reproduced times for 8-s stimuli ranging between 0.5 and 6 Hz in 100 participants who performed a time reproduction task with the stimulus present or absent during the reproduction. The task was done under prospective and retrospective paradigms. Experiment 2 assessed differences in reproduced times by 80 participants under vibrotactile stimulation of two frequencies simultaneously delivered to each hand, frequencies with specific proportions of 0.5 and 0.75 times the standard frequency for two groups of standard frequency (2 or 12 Hz). Reproduced times in Experiment 1 did not show significant differences among frequencies. Significant differences were found for the absence/presence condition, solely, in prospective tasks, where estimations were longer in the absence of the vibrotactile stimulus. Significant differences were found in Experiment 2 for reproduced time by participants between groups of standard frequency. Data analysis suggests the need to improve the understanding of the subjective time perception processes for higher frequencies considering the intensity modulation based on the amplitude and frequency relation. Results open the possibility of designing new protocols in the study of time perception and other cognitive functions.

Keywords

Subjective time Vibrotactile stimulation Frequency Time perception 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES / PROEX)—Finance Code 001 for José L. O. Bueno and David A. Casilimas Díaz. Also, J. L. O. Bueno received a research fellowship from “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico” (CNPq) and research grants from CNPq.

References

  1. Allan LG (1979) The perception of time. Percept Psychophys 26:340–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auvray M, Gallace A, Hartcher-O’Brien J, Tan HZ, Spence C (2008) Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips. Brain Res 1213:111–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Block RA (1990) Cognitive models of psychological time. Psychology Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Block RA (2003) Psychological timing without a timer: the roles of attention and memory. In: Helfrich H (ed) Time and mind II. Hogrefe & Huber, Cambridge, pp 41–60Google Scholar
  5. Block RA, Gruber RP (2014) Time perception, attention, and memory: a selective review. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 149:129–133.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.003 Google Scholar
  6. Block RA, Hancock PA, Zakay D (2010) How cognitive load affects duration judgments: a meta-analytic review. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 134:330–343.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.03.006 Google Scholar
  7. Bolanowski SJ, Zwislocki JJ (1984a) Intensity and frequency characteristics of pacinian corpuscles. I. Action potentials. J Neurophysiol 51:793–811.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.51.4.793 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolanowski SJ, Zwislocki JJ (1984b) Intensity and frequency characteristics of pacinian corpuscles. II. Receptor potentials. J Neurophysiol 51:812–830.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1984.51.4.812 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunetti R, Indraccolo A, Mastroberardino S, Spence C, Santangelo V (2017) The impact of cross-modal correspondences on working memory performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 43:819–831.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bueti D, Macaluso E (2011) Physiological correlates of subjective time: Evidence for the temporal accumulator hypothesis. NeuroImage 57:1251–1263  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buonomano DV (2007) The biology of time across different scales. Nat Chem Biol 3:594.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio1007-594 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen L, Zhou X (2014) Fast transfer of crossmodal time interval training. Exp Brain Res 232:1855–1864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Droit-Volet S (2003) Alerting attention and time perception in children. J Exp Child Psychol 85:372–384.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00103-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Droit-Volet S (2010) Speeding up a master clock common to time, number and length? Behav Process 85:126–134.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Droit-Volet S, Bigand E, Ramos D, Bueno JLO (2010) Time flies with music whatever its emotional valence. Acta Psychol 135:226–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eagleman DM (2008) Human time perception and its illusions. Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ekman G, Frankenhaeuser M, Berglund B, Waszak M (1969) Apparent duration as a function of intensity of vibrotactile stimulation. Percept Mot Skills 28:151–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Firmino ÉA, Bueno JLO (2008) Tonal modulation and subjective time. J New Music Res 37:275–297.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09298210802711652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fraisse P (1984) Perception and estimation of time. Ann Rev Psychol 35:1–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Getty DJ (1976) Counting processes in human timing. Percept Psychophys 20:191–197.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorea A (2011) Ticks per thought or thoughts per tick? A selective review of time perception with hints on future research. J Physiol Paris 105:153–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.09.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grondin S, Rousseau R (1991) Judging the relative duration of multimodal short empty time intervals. Percep Psychophys 49:245–256.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03214309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasuo E, Kuroda T, Grondin S (2014) About the time-shrinking illusion in the tactile modality. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 147:122–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.007 Google Scholar
  24. Hopkins K, Kass SJ, Blalock LD, Brill JC (2017) Effectiveness of auditory and tactile crossmodal cues in a dual-task visual and auditory scenario. Ergonomics 60:692–700.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2016.1198495 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivry RB, Spencer RMC (2004) The neural representation of time. Curr Opin Neurobiol 14:225–232.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones MR, Boltz M (1989) Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychol Rev 96:459–491.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaneko S, Murakami I (2009) Perceived duration of visual motion increases with speed. J Vis 9:14–14.  https://doi.org/10.1167/9.7.14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karmarkar UR, Buonomano DV (2007) Timing in the absence of clocks: encoding time in neural network states. Neuron 53:427–438.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kellaris James J, Kent Robert J (1992) The influence of music on consumers’ temporal perceptions: Does time fly when you’re having fun? J Consumer Psychol 1:365–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(08)80060-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khoshnejad M, Martinu K, Grondin S, Rainville P (2016) The delayed reproduction of long time intervals defined by innocuous thermal sensation. Exp Brain Res 234:1095–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4537-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Khoshnoodi MA, Motiei-Langroudi R, Omrani M, Diamond ME, Abbassian AH (2008) Effect of tactile stimulus frequency on time perception: the role of working memory. Exp Brain Res 185:623–633.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1190-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lakens D, Semin GR, Garrido MV (2011) The sound of time: Cross-modal convergence in the spatial structuring of time. Conscious Cogn 20:437–443.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2010.09.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matthews WJ (2013) How does sequence structure affect the judgment of time? Exploring a weighted sum of segments model. Cogn Psychol 66:259–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matthews WJ, Meck WH (2016) Temporal cognition: connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychol Bull 142:865–907.  https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Motala A, Heron J, McGraw PV, Roach NW, Whitaker D (2018) Rate after-effects fail to transfer cross-modally: evidence for distributed sensory timing mechanisms. Sci Rep 8:924.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19218-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nather FC, Bueno JLO (2011) Static images with different induced intensities of human body movements affect subjective time. Percept Motor Skills 113:157–170.  https://doi.org/10.2466/24.25.27.PMS.113.4.157-170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nather FC, Bueno JLO (2012) Exploration time of static images implying different body movements causes time distortions. Percept Motor Skills 115:105–110.  https://doi.org/10.2466/27.07.24.PMS.115.4.105-110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nather FC, Bueno JLO, Bigand E, Droit-Volet S (2011) Time changes with the embodiment of another’s body posture. PLOS One 6:e19818.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019818 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nather FC, Mecca FF, Bueno JLO (2013) Motion illusions in optical art presented for long durations are temporally distorted. Perception 42:742–750.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p7505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Noesselt T, Rieger JW, Schoenfeld MA, Kanowski M, Hinrichs H, Heinze H-J, Driver J (2007) Audiovisual temporal correspondence modulates human multisensory superior temporal sulcus plus primary sensory cortices. J Neurosci 27:11431–11441.  https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2252-07.2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Occelli V, Spence C, Zampini M (2011) Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception. Psychon Bull Rev 18:429–454.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0070-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ogden RS, Moore D, Redfern L, McGlone F (2015) Stroke me for longer this touch feels too short: the effect of pleasant touch on temporal perception. Conscious Cogn 36:306–313.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ornstein RE (1969) On the experience of time. Penguin, HarmondsworthGoogle Scholar
  44. Ramos D, Bueno JLO, Bigand E (2011) Manipulating Greek musical modes and tempo affects perceived musical emotion in musicians and nonmusicians Brazilian. J Med Biol Res 44:165–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Staddon JER, Higa JJ, Chelaru IM (1999) Time, trace, memory. J Exp Anal Behav 71:293–301.  https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1999.71-293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tomassini A, Gori M, Burr D, Sandini G, Morrone C (2011) Perceived duration of visual and tactile stimuli depends on perceived speed frontiers in integrative. Neuroscience 5:51Google Scholar
  47. Treisman M, Faulkner A, Naish PL, Brogan D (1990) The internal clock: evidence for a temporal oscillator underlying time perception with some estimates of its characteristic frequency. Perception 19:705–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van Erp JBF, Werkhoven PJ (2004) Vibro-tactile and visual asynchronies sensitivity consistency. Perception 33:103–111.  https://doi.org/10.1068/p5014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Watanabe J, Amemiya T, Nishida SY, Johnston A (2010) Tactile duration compression by vibrotactile adaptation. Neuroreport 21:856–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yamamoto S, Kitazawa S (2016) Tactile temporal order. In: Prescott T, Ahissar E, Izhikevich E (eds) Scholarpedia of touch. Atlantis Press, Paris, pp 279–292.  https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6239-133-8_23 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zampini M, Brown T, Shore DI, Maravita A, Röder B, Spence C (2005) Audiotactile temporal order judgments. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 118:277–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.10.017 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão PretoUniversidade de São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations