Ease of hand rotation during active exploration of views of a 3-D object modulates view generalization
- 36 Downloads
Active exploration of views of 3-D objects by manually controlling a device, such as a trackball, facilitates subsequent object recognition, suggesting that motor simulation contributes to object recognition. Further, biomechanical constraints, such as range of hand rotation, can affect mental rotation. Thus, the ease with which an object can be rotated by hand may modulate the facilitative effect active exploration through manual control has on object recognition. In our experiment, participants performed two sessions of a view-matching task, with a learning task administered between the two. In the learning task, one group of participants (active group) viewed and explored a novel 3-D object using their hand to rotate a handle attached to a cathode-ray tube monitor. The other group (passive group) observed on the monitor a replay of the movements of the 3-D object as manipulated by an active-group participant. Active-group participants were interviewed to determine the direction they found easiest to rotate their hand. The view-generalization performances were compared between the pre and post sessions. Although we observed a facilitative effect on the view-matching process in both groups, the active group exhibited view-dependent facilitation. The view-generalization range of the active group in the post-session was asymmetric in terms of the rotation direction. Most intriguingly, for most participants, this asymmetric change corresponded to the direction that afforded the easiest hand rotation (ulnar deviation). These findings suggest that the object-recognition process can be affected by ease of hand rotation, which is based on the biomechanical constraints of the wrist joint.
KeywordsActive exploration Embodied recognition Mental rotation Object recognition
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (20220003) (C) (26330174, 18K12014) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS), and was partially supported by the Center of Innovation Program from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (1965) Joint motion: method of measuring and recording. E. & S. Livingstone Ltd., EdinburghGoogle Scholar
- Cohen MS, Kosslyn SM, Breiter HC, Digirolamo GJ, Thompson WL, Anderson AK, Bookheimer SY, Rosen BR, Belliveau JW (1996) Changes in cortical activity during mental rotation: a mapping study using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Brain 119:89–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.1.89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Glanville A, Kreezer G (1937) The maximum amplitude and velocity of joint movements in normal human male adults. Hum Biol 9:197–211Google Scholar
- Harvey LO (2007) Parameter estimation of signal detection models: RscorePlus user’s manual, version 5.5.8. http://psych.colorado.edu/~lharvey/ Accessed 2 Oct 2018
- Lamm C, Windischberger C, Moser E, Bauer H (2007) The functional role of dorso-lateral premotor cortex during mental rotation: an event-related fMRI study separating cognitive processing steps using a novel task paradigm. NeuroImage 36:1374–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mansfield PJ, Neumann DA (2014) Essentials of kinesiology for the physical therapist assistant, 2nd edn. e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Moore ML (1965) Clinical assessment of joint motion. In: Licht S (ed) Therapeutic exercise, 2nd edn. Elizabeth Licht, New Haven, pp 128–162Google Scholar
- Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M (1982) Two cortical visual systems. In: Ingle DJ, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW (eds) Analysis of visual behavior. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 549–586Google Scholar