Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 2, pp 573–583 | Cite as

Alterations in oscillatory cortical activity indicate changes in mnemonic processing during continuous item recognition

  • Sebastian GraetzEmail author
  • Jonathan Daume
  • Uwe Friese
  • Thomas Gruber
Research Article
  • 66 Downloads

Abstract

The classification of repeating stimuli as either old or new is a general mechanism of everyday perception. However, the cortical mechanisms underlying this process are not fully understood. In general, mnemonic processes are thought to rely on changes in oscillatory brain activity across several frequencies as well as their interaction. Lower frequencies, mainly theta-band (3–7 Hz) and alpha-band (8–14 Hz) activity, are attributed to executive control and resource management, respectively; whereas recent studies revealed higher frequencies, e.g. gamma-band (> 25 Hz) activity, to reflect the activation of cortical object representations. Furthermore, low-frequency phase to high-frequency amplitude coupling (PAC) was recently found to coordinate the involved mnemonic networks. To further unravel the processes behind memorization of repeatedly presented stimuli, we applied a continuous item recognition task with up to five presentations per item (mean time between repetitions ~ 10 s) while recording high-density EEG. We examined spectral amplitude modulations as well as PAC. We observed theta amplitudes reaching a peak at second presentation, a reduction of alpha suppression after second presentation, decreased response time, as well as reduced theta–gamma PAC (3 to 7 to − 30 to 45 Hz) at frontal sites after third presentation. We conclude a shift from an explicit- to an implicit-like mnemonic processing, occurring around third presentation, with theta power to signify encoding of repetition-based episodic information and PAC as a neural correlate of the coordination of local neural networks.

Keywords

EEG Working memory Oscillations Cross-frequency coupling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (GR2684/5-1). We thank Moritz Köster for helpful methodological discussions, and Simeon Platte, Sophia Sylvester and Marlene Wessels for assistance in data recording.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (GR2684/5-1).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Osnabrück University and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was reviewed and approved by the local ethics committee of Osnabrück University.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Axmacher N, Henseler MM, Jensen O, Weinreich I, Elger CE, Fell J (2010) Cross-frequency coupling supports multi-item working memory in the human hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(7):3228–3233Google Scholar
  2. Bertrand O, Pantev C (1994) Stimulus frequency dependence of the transient oscillatory auditory evoked responses (40 Hz) studied by electric and magnetic recordings in human. In: Oscillatory event-related brain dynamics. Springer US, New York, pp 231–242Google Scholar
  3. Bertrand O, Tallon-Baudry C (2000) Oscillatory gamma activity in humans: a possible role for object representation. Int J Psychophysiol 38(3):211–223Google Scholar
  4. Brainard DH, Vision S (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436Google Scholar
  5. Burgess AP, Ali L (2002) Functional connectivity of gamma EEG activity is modulated at low frequency during conscious recollection. Int J Psychophysiol 46(2):91–100Google Scholar
  6. Canolty RT, Knight RT (2010) The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci 14(11):506–515Google Scholar
  7. Canolty RT, Edwards E, Dalal SS, Soltani M, Nagarajan SS, Kirsch HE, Berger MS, Barbaro NM, Knight RT (2006) High gamma power is phase-locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science 313(5793):1626–1628Google Scholar
  8. Chaumon M, Schwartz D, Tallon-Baudry C (2009) Unconscious learning versus visual perception: dissociable roles for gamma oscillations revealed in MEG. J Cogn Neurosci 21(12):2287–2299Google Scholar
  9. Cowan N (1999) An embedded-processes model of working memory. Models of working memory. Mech Active Maint Exec Control 20:506Google Scholar
  10. Cowan N (2008) What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Progress Brain Res 169:323–338Google Scholar
  11. Craddock M, Martinovic J, Müller MM (2016) Accounting for microsaccadic artifacts in the EEG using independent component analysis and beamforming. Psychophysiology 53(4):553–565Google Scholar
  12. Curran T (1999) The electrophysiology of incidental and intentional retrieval: erp old/ new effects in lexical decision and recognition memory. Neuropsychologia 37(7):771–785Google Scholar
  13. Daume J, Graetz S, Gruber T, Engel AK, Friese U (2017a) Cognitive control during audiovisual working memory engages frontotemporal theta-band interactions. Sci Rep 7(1):12585Google Scholar
  14. Daume J, Gruber T, Engel AK, Friese U (2017b) Phase-amplitude coupling and long-range phase synchronization reveal frontotemporal interactions during visual working memory. J Neurosci 37(2):313–322Google Scholar
  15. Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134(1):9–21Google Scholar
  16. Fries P, Nikolić D, Singer W (2007) The gamma cycle. Trends Neurosci 30(7):309–316Google Scholar
  17. Friese U, Supp GG, Hipp JF, Engel AK, Gruber T (2012a) Oscillatory MEG gamma band activity dissociates perceptual and conceptual aspects of visual object processing: a combined repetition/conceptual priming study. Neuroimage 59(1):861–871Google Scholar
  18. Friese U, Rahm B, Hassler U, Kaiser J, Gruber T (2012b) Repetition suppression and effects of familiarity on blood oxygenation level dependent signal and gamma-band activity. Neuroreport 23(13):757–761Google Scholar
  19. Friese U, Köster M, Hassler U, Martens U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T (2013) Successful memory encoding is associated with increased cross-frequency coupling between frontal theta and posterior gamma oscillations in human scalp-recorded EEG. Neuroimage 66:642–647Google Scholar
  20. Gevins A, Smith ME, McEvoy L, Yu D (1997) High-resolution EEG mapping of cortical activation related to working memory: effects of task difficulty, type of processing, and practice. Cereb Cortex (New York, NY: 1991) 7(4):374–385Google Scholar
  21. Graf P, Schacter DL (1985) Implicit and explicit memory for new associations in normal andamnesic subjects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 11(3):501Google Scholar
  22. Gruber T, Müller MM (2006) Oscillatory brain activity in the human EEG during indirect and direct memory tasks. Brain Res 1097(1):194–204Google Scholar
  23. Gruber T, Tsivilis D, Montaldi D, Müller MM (2004) Induced gamma band responses: an early marker of memory encoding and retrieval. Neuroreport 15(11):1837–1841Google Scholar
  24. Gruber T, Tsivilis D, Giabbiconi CM, Müller MM (2008) Induced electroencephalogram oscillations during source memory: familiarity is reflected in the gamma band, recollection in the theta band. J Cogn Neurosci 20(6):1043–1053Google Scholar
  25. Hanslmayr S, Staudigl T (2014) How brain oscillations form memories—a processing based perspective on oscillatory subsequent memory effects. Neuroimage 85:648–655Google Scholar
  26. Hanslmayr S, Spitzer B, Bäuml KH (2008) Brain oscillations dissociate between semantic and nonsemantic encoding of episodic memories. Cereb Cortex 19(7):1631–1640Google Scholar
  27. Hassler U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T (2011) Induced gamma band responses in human EEG after the control of miniature saccadic artifacts. Neuroimage 57(4):1411–1421Google Scholar
  28. Hassler U, Friese U, Martens U, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T (2013) Repetition priming effects dissociate between miniature eye movements and induced gamma-band responses in the human electroencephalogram. Eur J Neurosci 38(3):2425–2433Google Scholar
  29. Headley DB, Paré D (2017) Common oscillatory mechanisms across multiple memory systems. npj Sci Learn 2(1):1Google Scholar
  30. Heusser AC, Poeppel D, Ezzyat Y, Davachi L (2016) Episodic sequence memory is supported by a theta–gamma phase code. Nat Neurosci 19(10):1374Google Scholar
  31. Jacobs J, Hwang G, Curran T, Kahana MJ (2006) EEG oscillations and recognition memory: theta correlates of memory retrieval and decision making. Neuroimage 32(2):978–987Google Scholar
  32. Jensen O, Colgin LL (2007) Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations. Trends Cogn Sci 11(7):267–269Google Scholar
  33. Jensen O, Mazaheri A (2010) Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front Hum Neurosci 4:186Google Scholar
  34. Jensen O, Kaiser J, Lachaux JP (2007) Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory. Trends Neurosci 30(7):317–324Google Scholar
  35. Johnson DR, Gronlund SD (2009) Individuals lower in working memory capacity are particularly vulnerable to anxiety’s disruptive effect on performance. Anxiety Stress Coping 22(2):201–213Google Scholar
  36. Johnson JD, Muftuler LT, Rugg MD (2008) Multiple repetitions reveal functionally and anatomically distinct patterns of hippocampal activity during continuous recognition memory. Hippocampus 18(10):975–980Google Scholar
  37. Jokisch D, Jensen O (2007) Modulation of gamma and alpha activity during a working memory task engaging the dorsal or ventral stream. J Neurosci 27(12):3244–3251Google Scholar
  38. Jutras MJ, Buffalo EA (2010) Synchronous neural activity and memory formation. Curr Opin Neurobiol 20(2):150–155Google Scholar
  39. Kleiner M, Brainard D, Pelli D, Ingling A, Murray R, Broussard C (2007) What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3. Perception 36(14):1Google Scholar
  40. Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Schwaiger J, Winkler T, Gruber W (2000) Theta oscillations and the ERP old/new effect: independent phenomena? Clin Neurophysiol 111(5):781–793Google Scholar
  41. Klimesch W, Sauseng P, Hanslmayr S (2007) EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis. Brain Res Rev 53(1):63–88Google Scholar
  42. Köster M, Friese U, Schöne B, Trujillo-Barreto N, Gruber T (2014) Theta–gamma coupling during episodic retrieval in the human EEG. Brain Res 1577:57–68Google Scholar
  43. Kramer MA, Tort AB, Kopell NJ (2008) Sharp edge artifacts and spurious coupling in EEG frequency comodulation measures. J Neurosci Methods 170(2):352–357Google Scholar
  44. LaRocque JJ, Lewis-Peacock JA, Drysdale AT, Oberauer K, Postle BR (2013) Decoding attended information in short-term memory: an EEG study. J Cogn Neurosci 25(1):127–142Google Scholar
  45. Lewis-Peacock JA, Drysdale AT, Oberauer K, Postle BR (2012) Neural evidence for a distinction between short-term memory and the focus of attention. J Cogn Neurosci 24(1):61–79Google Scholar
  46. Lisman JE, Jensen O (2013) The theta-gamma neural code. Neuron 77(6):1002–1016Google Scholar
  47. Mormann F, Fell J, Axmacher N, Weber B, Lehnertz K, Elger CE, Fernández G (2005) Phase/amplitude reset and theta–gamma interaction in the human medial temporal lobe during a continuous word recognition memory task. Hippocampus 15(7):890–900Google Scholar
  48. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB (2010) FASTER: fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J Neurosci Methods 192(1):152–162Google Scholar
  49. Nyhus E, Curran T (2010) Functional role of gamma and theta oscillations in episodic memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34(7):1023–1035Google Scholar
  50. Osipova D, Takashima A, Oostenveld R, Fernández G, Maris E, Jensen O (2006) Theta and gamma oscillations predict encoding and retrieval of declarative memory. J Neurosci 26(28):7523–7531Google Scholar
  51. Roux F, Uhlhaas PJ (2014) Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha–gamma versus theta–gamma codes for distinct WM information? Trends Cogn Sci 18(1):16–25Google Scholar
  52. Ruchkin DS, Grafman J, Cameron K, Berndt RS (2003) Working memory retention systems: a state of activated long-term memory. Behav Brain Sci 26(6):709–728Google Scholar
  53. Rugg MD, Curran T (2007) Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends Cogn Sci 11(6):251–257Google Scholar
  54. Sarnthein J, Petsche H, Rappelsberger P, Shaw GL, Von Stein A (1998) Synchronization between prefrontal and posterior association cortex during human working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95(12):7092–7096Google Scholar
  55. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Doppelmayr M, Hanslmayr S, Schabus M, Gruber WR (2004) Theta coupling in the human electroencephalogram during a working memory task. Neurosci Lett 354(2):123–126Google Scholar
  56. Sauseng P, Klimesch W, Schabus M, Doppelmayr M (2005) Fronto-parietal EEG coherence in theta and upper alpha reflect central executive functions of working memory. Int J Psychophysiol 57(2):97–103Google Scholar
  57. Sauseng P, Griesmayr B, Freunberger R, Klimesch W (2010) Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 34(7):1015–1022Google Scholar
  58. Sederberg PB, Kahana MJ, Howard MW, Donner EJ, Madsen JR (2003) Theta and gamma oscillations during encoding predict subsequent recall. J Neurosci 23(34):10809–10814Google Scholar
  59. Sederberg PB, Gauthier LV, Terushkin V, Miller JF, Barnathan JA, Kahana MJ (2006) Oscillatory correlates of the primacy effect in episodic memory. NeuroImage 32(3):1422–1431Google Scholar
  60. Sirota A, Montgomery S, Fujisawa S, Isomura Y, Zugaro M, Buzsáki G (2008) Entrainment of neocortical neurons and gamma oscillations by the hippocampal theta rhythm. Neuron 60(4):683–697Google Scholar
  61. Tallon-Baudry C, Bertrand O (1999) Oscillatory gamma activity in humans and its role in object representation. Trends Cogn Sci 3(4):151–162Google Scholar
  62. Tort AB, Komorowski R, Eichenbaum H, Kopell N (2010) Measuring phase-amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. J Neurophysiol 104(2):1195–1210Google Scholar
  63. Tulving E, Schacter DL (1990) Priming and human memory systems. Science 247(4940):301–306Google Scholar
  64. Vidal JR, Chaumon M, O’Regan JK, Tallon-Baudry C (2006) Visual grouping and the focusing of attention induce gamma-band oscillations at different frequencies in human magnetoencephalogram signals. J Cogn Neurosci 18(11):1850–1862Google Scholar
  65. Wiggs CL, Martin A (1998) Properties and mechanisms of perceptual priming. Curr Opin Neurobiol 8(2):227–233Google Scholar
  66. Wixted JT (2007) Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114(1):152Google Scholar
  67. Xu Y (2017) Reevaluating the sensory account of visual working memory storage. Trends Cogn Sci 21(10):794–815Google Scholar
  68. Yassa MA, Stark CE (2008) Multiple signals of recognition memory in the medial temporal lobe. Hippocampus 18(9):945–954Google Scholar
  69. Yonelinas AP (2002) The nature of recollection and familiarity: a review of 30 years of research. J Mem Lang 46(3):441–517Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Experimental Psychology I, Institute of PsychologyOsnabrück UniversityOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Department of Neurophysiology and PathophysiologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations