Cognitive-perceptual load modulates hand selection in left-handers to a greater extent than in right-handers
Previous studies have proposed that selecting which hand to use for a reaching task appears to be modulated by a factor described as “task difficulty,” defined by either the requirement for spatial precision or movement sequences. However, we previously reported that analysis of the movement costs associated with even simple movements plays a major role in hand selection. We further demonstrated, in right-handers, that cognitive-perceptual loading modulates hand selection by interfering with the analysis of such costs. It has been reported that left-handers tend to show less dominant hand bias in selecting which hand to use during reaching. We, therefore, hypothesized that hand selection would be less affected by cognitive-perceptual loading in left-handers than in right-handers. We employed a visual search task that presented different levels of difficulty (cognitive-perceptual load), as established in previous studies. Our findings indicate that left-handed participants tend to show greater modulation of hand selection by cognitive-perceptual loading than right-handers. Left-handers showed lower dominant hand reaction times than right-handers, and greater high-cost movements that reached to extremes of the contralateral workspace under the most difficult task conditions. We previously showed in this task that midline crossing has high-energy and time costs and that they occur more frequently under cognitively demanding conditions. The current study revealed that midline crossing was associated with the lowest reaction times, in both handedness groups. The fact that left-handers showed lower dominant hand reaction times, and a greater number of high-cost cross-midline reaches under the most cognitively demanding conditions suggests that these actions were erroneous.
KeywordsCognitive-perceptual load Hand selection Reaching Task difficulty Left-hander
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health [R01HD059783], and a Penn State SSRI Level 1 Award. The second author is co-funded by the Penn State SSRI. The authors thank Christine Regiec, Emily Neumann, and Tara O’Neill for their assistance throughout the development of this research.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
- Borod JC, Caron HS, Koff E (1984) Left-handers and right-handers compared on performance and preference measures of lateral dominance. Brit J Psychol 75(2):177–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1984.tb01889.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kilshaw D, Annett M (1983) Right-and left-hand skill I: effects of age, sex, and hand preference showing superior skill in left-handers. Br J Psychol 74:253–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1983.tb01861.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kingstone A, Enns JT, Mangun GR, Gazzaniga MS (1995) Guided visual search is a left-hemisphere process in split-brain patients. Psychol Sci 6(2):118–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00317.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liang J, Wilkinson K, Sainburg RL (2018) Is hand selection modulated by cognitive-perceptual load? Neuroscience 369:363–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.11.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayer-Johnson R (1992) The picture communication symbols. Mayer-Johnson, Solana BeachGoogle Scholar
- Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, Core Team R (2018) nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3:1–137. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme. Accessed 28 July 2018
- Przybyla A, Coelho CJ, Akpinar S, Kirazci S, Sainburg RL (2013) Sensorimotor performance asymmetries predict hand selection. Neuroscience 228:349–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.10.046 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 25 July 2018
- Wilkinson KM, O’Neill T, McIlvane WJ (2014) Eye-tracking measures reveal how changes in the design of aided aac displays influence the efficiency of locating symbols by school-age children without disabilities. J Speech Lang Hear R 57(2):455–466. https://doi.org/10.1044/2013_JSLHR-L-12-0159 CrossRefGoogle Scholar