Advertisement

Experimental Brain Research

, Volume 237, Issue 1, pp 223–236 | Cite as

Age differences in arm–trunk coordination during trunk-assisted reaching

  • Sajida Khanafer
  • Heidi Sveistrup
  • Mindy F. Levin
  • Erin K. CressmanEmail author
Research Article
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

Reaching for an object is a basic motor skill that requires precise coordination between elbow, shoulder and trunk motion. The purpose of this research study was to examine age-related differences in compensatory arm–trunk coordination during trunk-assisted reaching. To engage the arm and trunk, an older and younger group of participants were asked to (1) maintain a fixed hand position while flexing forward at the trunk [stationary hand task (SHT)] and (2) reach to a within-arm’s reach target while simultaneously flexing forward at the trunk [reaching hand task (RHT)] (Raptis et al. in J Neurophysiol 97:4069–4078, 2007; Sibindi et al. in J Vestib Res 23:237–247, 2013). Both tasks were completed with eyes closed. Participants completed the two tasks with their dominant and non-dominant arms, and at both a fast and a preferred speed. On average, young and older participants performed in a similar manner in the SHT, such that they maintained their hand position by compensating for trunk movement with modifications of the elbow and shoulder joints. In the RHT, young and older participants had similar endpoint accuracy. This similarity in performance between young and older participants in the SHT and RHT tasks was observed regardless of the arm used or movement speed. However, for both tasks, movements in older adults were significantly more variable compared to younger adults as shown by the larger variability in arm–trunk coordination performance (gain scores) in the SHT and higher movement time variability in the RHT. Thus, results imply that older adults maintain their ability to coordinate arm and trunk movements efficiently during reaching actions but are not as consistent as younger adults.

Keywords

Older adults Trunk-assisted reaching Arm–trunk coordination Variable performance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

(MFL and HS) Heart and Stroke Foundation Center for Stroke Recovery (HSFCSR PT-59562) Catalyst Grant. Elucidating the underlying mechanisms of disordered upper limb function in stroke: the relationship between deficits in trunk control and upper limb coordination. April 1, 2013-March 31, 2015. Thanks are extended to S.K. Subramanian for help with the experimental set-up and to all the participants in the study.

References

  1. Adamovich SV, Berkinblit MB, Smetanin B, Fookson O, Poizner H (1994) Influence of movement speed on accuracy of pointing to memorized targets in 3D space. Neurosci Lett 172:171–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adamovich SV, Archambault PS, Ghafouri M, Levin MF, Poizner H, Feldman AG (2001) Hand trajectory invariance in reaching movements involving the trunk. Exp Brain Res 138:288–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Senawi D, Cooke JD (1985) Matching of movements made independently by the two arms in normal humans. J Mot Behav 17:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archambault P, Pigeon P, Feldman AG, Levin MF (1999) Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. Exp Brain Res 126:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering: a study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernstein N (1967) The coordination and regulation of movements. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  7. Bresciani JP, Blouin J, Sarlegna F, Bourdin C, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM (2002b) On-line versus off-line vestibular-evoked control of goal-directed arm movements. Neuroreport 13:1563–1566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bresciani JP, Gauthier GM, Vercher JL, Blouin J (2005) On the nature of the vestibular control of arm-reaching movements during whole-body rotations. Exp Brain Res 164(4):431–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carson RG, Elliott D, Goodman D, Thyer L, Romeo C, Eric AR (1993) The role of impulse variability in manual-aiming asymmetries. Psychol Res 55:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christou EA (2009) Aging and neuromuscular adaptations with practice. In: Shinohara M (ed) Advances in neuromuscular physiology of motor skills and muscle fatigue. Research Signpost, Thiruvananthapuram, pp 65–79Google Scholar
  11. Christou EA (2010) Motor output variability. In: Kompoliti K, Verhagen-Metman L (eds) Encyclopedia of movement disorders. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 202–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Christou EA (2011) Aging and variability of voluntary contractions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 39:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christou EA, Tracy BL (2005) Aging and motor output variability. In: Davids K, Bennett S, Newell K (eds) Movement system variability. Human Kinetics, Champaign, pp 199–215Google Scholar
  14. Christou EA, Poston B, Enoka JA, Enoka RM (2007) Different neural adjustments improve endpoint accuracy with practice in young and old adults. J Neurophysiol 97:3340–3350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Contreras-Vidal JL, Teulings HL, Stelmach GE (1998) Elderly subjects are impaired in spatial coordination in fine motor control. Acta Physiol (Oxf) 100(1–2):25–35Google Scholar
  16. Darling WG, Cole KJ, Abbs JH (1988) Kinematic variability of grasp movements as a function of practice and movement speed. Exp Brain Res 73:225–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darling WG, Cooke JD, Brown SH (1989) Control of simple arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiol Aging 10:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diggles-Buckles V (1993) Age-related slowing. In: Stelmach GE, Homberg V (eds) Sensorimotor impairment in the elderly. Kluwer Academic, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  19. Eisen A, Entezari-Taher M, Stewart H (1996) Cortical projections to spinal motoneurons: changes with aging and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Neurology 46(5):1396–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Enoka RM, Christou EA, Hunter SK, Kornatz KW, Semmler JG, Taylor AM, Tracy BL (2003) Mechanisms that contribute to differences in motor performance between young and old adults. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 13:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gleeson MJ, Felix H (1987) A comparative study of the effect of age on the human cochlear and vestibular neuroepithelia. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) Suppl 436:103–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon J, Ghilardi MF, Cooper SE, Ghez C (1994b) Accuracy of planar reaching movements. II. Systematic extent errors resulting from inertial anisotropy. Exp Brain Res 99:112–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guillaud E, Gauthier G, Vercher JL, Blouin J (2006) Fusion of visuo-ocular and vestibular signals in arm motor control. J Neurophysiol 95:1134–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Head H (1920) Studies in neurology, vol 2. Oxford University Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Hollerbach JM, Flash T (1982) Dynamic interactions between limb segments during planar arm movements. Biol Cybern 44:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacobson GP, Newman CW (1990) The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116(4):424–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Janicke B, Wrobel D (1984) Changes in motor activity with age and the effects of pharmacologictreatment. Exp Gerontol 19:321–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeannerod M (1988) The Neural and behavioural organization of goal-directed movements. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaminski TR, Bock C, Gentile AM (1995) The coordination between trunk and arm motion during pointing movements. Exp Brain Res 106:457–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lashley KS (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Jeffress LA (eds). Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (the Hixon symposium). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Latash ML, Scholz JF, Danion F, Schöner G (2002) Finger coordination during discrete and oscillatory force production tasks. Exp Brain Res 146:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Latash ML, Scholz JP, Schöner G (2007) Toward a new theory of motor synergies. Mot Control 11:276–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lobel E, Kleine JF, Le Bihan D, Leroy-Willig A, Berthoz A (1998) Functional MRI of galvanic vestibular stimulation. J Neurophysiol 80:2699–2709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lopez I, Honrubia V, Baloh RW (1997) Aging and the human vestibular nucleus. J Vestib Res 7(1):77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ma S, Feldman AG (1995) Two functionally different synergies during arm reaching movements involving the trunk. J Neurophysiol 73:2120–2122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mark LS, Nemeth K, Gardner D, Dainoff MJ, Paasche J, Duffy M, Grandt K (1997) Postural dynamics and the preferred critical boundary for visually guided reaching. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 23:1365–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mars F, Archambault PS, Feldman AG (2003) Vestibular contribution to combined arm and trunk motion. Exp Brain Res 150:515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Messier J, Adamovich S, Berkinblit M, Tunik E, Poizner H (2003) Influence of movement speed on accuracy and coordination of reaching movements to memorized targets in three-dimensional space in a deafferented subject. Exp Brain Res 150(4):399–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morasso P (1981) Spatial control of arm movements. Exp Brain Res 42:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Bediriam V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings J, Chertkow H (2005) The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(4):695–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychololgia 9:97–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Park JJ, Tang Y, Lopez I, Ishiyama A (2001) Age-related change in the number of neurons in the human vestibular ganglion. J Comp Neurol 431(4):437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pigeon P, Feldman AG (1998) Compensatory arm–trunk coordination in pointing movements is preserved in the absence of visual feedback. Brain Res 802:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pigeon P, Yahia LH, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG (2000) Superposition of independent units of coordination during pointing movements involving the trunk with and without visual feedback. Exp Brain Res 131:336–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Raptis H, Dannenbaum E, Paquet N, Feldman A (2007) Vestibular system may provide equivalent motor actions regardless of the number of body segments involved in the task. J Neurophysiol 97:4069–4078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenthal U, Rubin W (1975) Degenerative changes in the human vestibular sensory epithelia. Acta Otolaryngologica (Stockh) 79:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rossi E, Mitnitski A, Feldman AG (2002) Sequential control signals determine arm and trunk contributions to hand transport during reaching in humans. J Physiol 538:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rothstein D, Larish D, Petruzzello S, Crew D, Nahom A (1989) Bimanual coordination in the healthy old. Gerontologist 29:258A–259ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Roy E, Elliott D (1989) Manual asymmetries in aimed movements. Q J Exp Psychol Sect A 41(3):501–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sainburg RL, Kalakanis D (2000) Differences in control of limb dynamics during dominant and non dominant arm reaching. J Neurophysiol 83(5):2661–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Salthouse TA (1985) Speed of behavior and its implications for cognition. In: Birren JE, Schaie KW (eds) Handboolc of the psychology of aging. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, pp 400–426Google Scholar
  52. Schmidt RA (1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Rev 82(4):225–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Seidler-Dobrin RD, Stelmach GE (1998) Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly. Exp Brain Res 119(4):467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Seidler RD, Alberts JL, Stelmach GE (2002) Changes in multi-joint performance with age. Mot Control 6(1):19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sibindi TM, Krasovsky T, Feldman AG, Dannenbaum E, Zeitouni A, Levin MF (2013) Arm–trunk coordination as a measure of vestibulospinal efficiency. J Vestib Res 23:237–247Google Scholar
  56. Stelmach GE, Worringham CJ (1985) Sensorimotor deficits related to postural stability: implications for falling in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med 1(3):679–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Stelmach GE, Goggin NL, Amrhein PC (1988) Aging and the restructuring of precued movements. Psychol Aging 3:151–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thornton M, Sveistrup H (2010) Intra- and inter-rater reliability and validity of the Ottawa Sitting Scale: a new tool to characterise sitting balance in acute care patients. Disabil Rehabil 32(19):1568–1575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tunik E, Poizner H, Levin M, Adamovich SV, Messier J, Lamarre Y, Feldman A (2003) Arm–trunk coordination in the absence of proprioception. Exp Brain Res 153(3):343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tunik E, Poizner H, Adamovich SV, Levin M, Feldman A (2004) Deficits in adaptive upper limb control in response to trunk perturbations in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 159:23–32Google Scholar
  61. Wallace JE, Krauter EE, Campbell BA (1980) Motor and reflexive behavior in the aging rat. J Gerontol 35:364–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Welford AT (1977) Motor performance. In: Birren JE, Schai KW (eds) Handbook for the psychology of aging. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sajida Khanafer
    • 1
  • Heidi Sveistrup
    • 2
  • Mindy F. Levin
    • 3
  • Erin K. Cressman
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Human KineticsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.School of Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.School of Physical and Occupational TherapyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations