Abstract
Reading involves saccadic eye movements. Measured reading time and the number of mistakes made while reading reflect the speed and accuracy of the saccades in target localization, if all other factors influencing these parameters are kept constant. The observed phenomenon that reading a book is easier when it is held in an individual’s hand than when it is not, especially when movement of the reading text occurs while travelling in a vehicle, raises the question of the role of sensory input from the moving arms in guiding saccades in the direction in which the text is moved. To address this question, 12 healthy subjects (6 males and 6 females), aged 19–21 years took part in this study where reading time and the number of mistakes made while reading a non-moving standardized printed text was noted. Similar printed texts were read by the subjects while mechanically moving them at different fixed speeds in the horizontal plane, with and without the subject’s arms moving with the text. At each speed, the reading time recorded when the subject’s arms moved with the text was significantly lesser than when they did not (P<0.05). The number of mistakes made were significantly more when not moving the arms than when moving them with the text, at higher speed of text movement (P<0.05). The results indicate that sensory input from the passively moving arms guided saccades in the direction of movement of the text during reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrahams VC, Rose PK (1975) The spinal course and distribution of fore and hind limb muscle afferent projections to the superior colliculus of the cat. J Physiol Lond 247:117–130
Goldberg ME (2000) The control of gaze. In: Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM (eds) Principles of neural sciences, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, USA, pp 782–800
Hepp K, Henn V, Vilis T, Cohen B (1989) Brainstem region related to saccade generation. In: Wulrlz RH, Goldberg ME (eds) The neurobiology of saccadic eye movements, vol 3. Reviews of Oculomotor Research. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 105–212
Knox PC, Weir CR, Murphy PJ (2000) Modification of visually guided saccades by a nonvisual afferent feedback signal. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41(9):2561–2565
Lunenburger L, Kutz DF, Hoffmann KP (2000) Influence of arm movements on saccades in humans. Eur J Neurosci 12(11):4107–4116
Scarchilli K, Vercher JL, Gauthier GM, Cole J (1999) Does the oculo-manual co-ordination control system use an internal model of the arm dynamics? Neurosci Lett 265(2):139–142
Smeets JBJ, Hooge ITC (2003) Nature of variability in saccades. J Neurophysiol 90:12–20
Sparks DL (1986) Translation of sensory signals into commands for control of saccadic eye movements: role of primate superior colliculus. Physiol Rev 66:118–171
Vercher JL, Sares F, Blouin J, Bourdin C, Gauthier G (2003) Role of sensory information in updating internal model of the effectors during arm tracking. Prog Brain Res 142:203–222
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arvind, V.H., Tharion, E. Sensory input from the moving hand influences saccadic eye movements during reading. Exp Brain Res 167, 458–461 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0177-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0177-9