Advertisement

Communications in Mathematical Physics

, Volume 367, Issue 1, pp 215–240 | Cite as

Quantum \({L_\infty}\) Algebras and the Homological Perturbation Lemma

  • Martin Doubek
  • Branislav Jurčo
  • Ján PulmannEmail author
Article

Abstract

Quantum \({L_\infty}\) algebras are a generalization of \({L_\infty}\) algebras with a scalar product and with operations corresponding to higher genus graphs. We construct a minimal model of a given quantum \({L_\infty}\) algebra via the homological perturbation lemma and show that it’s given by a Feynman diagram expansion, computing the effective action in the finite-dimensional Batalin–Vilkovisky formalism. We also construct a homotopy between the original and this effective quantum \({L_\infty}\) algebra.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research of M.D. and B.J. was supported by grant GAČR P201/12/G028. B.J. wants to thankMPIMin Bonn for hospitality. J.P. was supported by NCCR SwissMAP of the Swiss National Science Foundation and had also benefited from support by the project SVV-260089 of the Charles University. We would like to thank the anonymous reviewer, for suggestions that streamlined the paper considerably, and also for explaining to us what is now Remark 7. B.J. thanks Martin Markl and Owen Gwilliam for discussions. J.P would like to thank Florian Naef and Pavol Ševera for numerous discussions and Pavel Mnev for useful pointers. Finally, we would like to thank Lada Peksová for her useful comments on an earlier draft of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Albert, C.: Batalin–Vilkovisky Gauge-Fixing via Homological Perturbation Theory. http://www-math.unice.fr/~patras/CargeseConference/ACQFT09_CarloALBERT.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  2. 2.
    Barannikov S.: Solving the noncommutative Batalin–Vilkovisky equation. Lett. Math. Phys. 103(6), 605–628 (2013) arXiv:1004.2253 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batalin I., Vilkovisky G.: Gauge algebra and quantization. Phys. Lett. B 102(1), 27–31 (1981) http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269381902057. Accessed 22 Feb 2019ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blanes S., Casas F., Oteo J.A., Ros J.: The Magnus expansion and some of its applications. Phys. Rep. 470(5–6), 151–238 (2008) arXiv:0810.5488 ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Braun, C., Maunder, J.: Minimal models of quantum homotopy Lie algebras via the BV-formalism. arXiv:1703.00082
  6. 6.
    Braun C., Lazarev A.: Unimodular homotopy algebras and Chern–Simons theory. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 219(11), 5158–5194 (2015) arXiv:1309.3219 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, R.: The twisted Eilenberg–Zilber theorem. Simposio di Topologia (Messina, 1964)’, Edizioni Oderisi, Gubbio 33–37 (1965) http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.150.8277. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  8. 8.
    Cattaneo, A.S., Mnev, P., Reshetikhin, N.: A cellular topological field theory. arXiv:1701.05874
  9. 9.
    Chuang J., Lazarev A.: Feynman diagrams and minimal models for operadic algebras. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 81(2), 317–337 (2010) arXiv:0802.3507 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chuang J., Lazarev A.: Abstract Hodge decomposition and minimal models for cyclic algebras. Lett. Math. Phys. 89(1), 33–49 (2009) arXiv:0810.2393 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costello, K.: Renormalisation and the Batalin–Vilkovisky formalism. arXiv:0706.1533
  12. 12.
    Costello, K.: Renormalization and Effective Field Theory. Mathematical surveys and monographs. American Mathematical Society, (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Crainic, M.: On the perturbation lemma, and deformations. arXiv:math/0403266
  14. 14.
    Eilenberg S., Lane S.M.: On the groups H(\({\Pi}\), n), I. Ann. Math. 58(1), 55–106 (1953) http://www.jstor.org/stable/1969820. Accessed 22 Feb 2019MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Granåker, J.: Unimodular L-infinity algebras arXiv:0803.1763
  16. 16.
    Gugenheim V.K.A.M.: On the chain-complex of a fibration. Illinois J. Math. 16(3), 398–414 (1972)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gwilliam, O.: Factorization algebras and free field theories. (2013). http://people.math.umass.edu/~gwilliam/thesis.pdf. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  18. 18.
    Huebschmann, J.: The homotopy type of \({F\Psi^q}\). The complex and symplectic cases. In: Applications of Algebraic \({K}\)-Theory to Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory, Part I, II (Boulder, Colo., 1983), vol. 55 of Contemp. Math., pp. 487–518. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, (1986)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson-Freyd T.: Homological perturbation theory for nonperturbative integrals. Lett. Math. Phys. 105(11), 1605–1632 (2012) arXiv:1206.5319 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kajiura H.: Noncommutative homotopy algebras associated with open strings. Rev. Math. Phys. 19(01), 1–99 (2003) arXiv:math/0306332 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khudaverdian H.M.: Semidensities on odd symplectic supermanifolds. Commun. Math. Phys. 247(2), 353–390 (2004) arXiv:math/0012256 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lambe L., Stasheff J.: Applications of perturbation theory to iterated fibrations. Manuscripta Math. 58(3), 363–376 (1987) http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF01165893. Accessed 22 Feb 2019MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Markl M.: Loop homotopy algebras in closed string field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 221(2), 367–384 (2001) arXiv:hep-th/9711045 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McDuff D., Salamon D.: Introduction to Symplectic Topology. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mnev, P.: Discrete BF theory. arXiv:0809.1160
  26. 26.
    Moser, J.: On the volume elements on a manifold. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 120, 286–294 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muenster K., Sachs I.: Quantum open-closed homotopy algebra and string field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 321(3), 769–801 (2011) arXiv:1109.4101 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muenster K., Sachs I.: Homotopy classification of Bosonic string field theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 330(3), 1227–1262 (2012) arXiv:1208.5626 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schlessinger M., Stasheff, J.: Deformation theory and rational homotopy type. arXiv:1211.1647
  30. 30.
    Pulmann, J.: S-matrix and homological perturbation lemma. Diploma thesis, Charles University in Prague, (2016). https://is.cuni.cz/webapps/zzp/detail/161931/?lang=en. Accessed 22 Feb 2019
  31. 31.
    Schwarz A.: Geometry of Batalin–Vilkovisky quantization. Commun. Math. Phys. 155(2), 249–260 (1993) arXiv:hep-th/9205088 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Shih W.: Homologie des espaces fibrés. Publications Mathématiques de l’IHES 13, 5–87 (1962)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zwiebach B.: Closed string field theory: quantum action and the Batalin–Vilkovisky master equation. Nucl. Phys. B 390(1), 33–152 (1993) arXiv:hep-th/9206084 ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mathematics and PhysicsMathematical Institute, Charles UniversityPragueCzech Republic
  2. 2.Section of MathematicsUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations