Advertisement

European Food Research and Technology

, Volume 245, Issue 12, pp 2739–2744 | Cite as

The role of hydrogen peroxide in the antibacterial activity of different floral honeys

  • Jarmila Farkasovska
  • Veronika Bugarova
  • Jana Godocikova
  • Viktor Majtan
  • Juraj MajtanEmail author
Short Communication
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

Because of its powerful therapeutic potential in wound care, honey has been given much attention. One of the most relevant and researched characteristics of honey is its multifactorial antibacterial activity. Several antibacterial compounds have been identified including hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). The goal of the study was to characterize the antibacterial potential of honeys from various botanical origins (n = 233) against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and establish the H2O2 content. Five types of honey were identified: acacia (n = 72), linden (n = 23), rapeseed (n = 9), sunflower (n = 8) and multi-floral (n = 121). The overall antibacterial activity of all the honey samples, expressed as a minimal inhibitory concentration of honey, strongly correlated with the level of H2O2. On the other hand, linden honey, which exhibited the strongest antibacterial effect, showed weak or no correlation between the antibacterial activity and the level of H2O2, depending on bacterial strain. The weakest antibacterial activity was documented in the rapeseed honey samples and it was associated with the low content of H2O2. These data suggest that antibacterial activity of honey is mainly H2O2-dependent; however, certain type of honey such as linden honey, showed a strong antibacterial effect which, may be, at least partially, attributed to non-peroxide factor(s).

Keywords

Glucose oxidase Blossom honey Antibacterial activity Catalase 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Slovak beekeepers and Slovak beekeeping association for providing honey samples. This research was supported by Slovak beekeeping association and the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences VEGA 2/0004/18.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Tian X, Yi LJ, Ma L, Zhang L, Song GM, Wang Y (2014) Effects of honey dressing for the treatment of DFUs: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Sci 1:224–231Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lindberg T, Andersson O, Palm M, Fagerström C (2015) A systematic review and meta-analysis of dressings used for wound healing: the efficiency of honey compared to silver on burns. Contemp Nurse 51:121–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang C, Guo M, Zhang N, Wang G (2019) Effectiveness of honey dressing in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Clin Pract 34:123–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Semprini A, Singer J, Braithwaite I, Shortt N, Thayabaran D, McConnell M, Weatherall M, Beasley R (2019) Kanuka honey versus aciclovir for the topical treatment of herpes simplex labialis: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 9:e026201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Moussa A, Noureddine D, Saad A, Abdelmelek M, Abdelkader B (2012) Antifungal activity of four honeys of different types from Algeria against pathogenic yeast: Candida albicans and Rhodotorula sp. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2:554–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sojka M, Valachova I, Bucekova M, Majtan J (2016) Antibiofilm efficacy of honey and bee-derived defensin-1 on multispecies wound biofilm. J Med Microbiol 65:337–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Majtan J, Majtanova L, Bohova J, Majtan V (2011) Honeydew honey as a potent antibacterial agent in eradication of multi-drug resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from cancer patients. Phytother Res 25:584–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Majtan J, Klaudiny J, Bohova J, Kohutova L, Dzurova M, Sediva M, Bartosova M, Majtan V (2012) Methylglyoxal-induced modifications of significant honeybee proteinous components in manuka honey: possible therapeutic implications. Fitoterapia 83:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valachova I, Bucekova M, Majtan J (2016) Quantification of bee-derived defensin-1 in honey by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a new approach in honey quality control. Czech J Food Sci 34(3):233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bucekova M, Buriova M, Pekarik L, Majtan V, Majtan J (2018) Phytochemicals-mediated production of hydrogen peroxide is crucial for high antibacterial activity of honeydew honey. Sci Rep 8(1):9061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bucekova M, Jardekova L, Juricova V, Bugarova V, Di Marco G, Gismondi A, Leonardi D, Farkasovska J, Godocikova J, Laho M, Klaudiny J, Majtan V, Canini A, Majtan J (2019) Antibacterial activity of different blossom honeys: new findings. Molecules 24:E1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinotti S, Laforenza U, Patrone M, Moccia F, Ranzato E (2019) Honey-mediated wound healing: H2O2 entry through AQP3 determines extracellular Ca2+ Influx. Int J Mol Sci 20:E764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bucekova M, Sojka M, Valachova I, Martinotti S, Ranzato E, Szep Z, Majtan V, Klaudiny J, Majtan J (2017) Bee-derived antibacterial peptide, defensin-1, promotes wound re-epithelialisation in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep 7(1):7340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Majtan J (2014) Honey: an immunomodulator in wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 22:187–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ferreira ICFR, Aires E, Barreira JCM, Estevinho LM (2009) Antioxidant activity of Portuguese honey samples: different contributions of the entire honey and phenolic extract. Food Chem 114:1438–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bucekova M, Valachova I, Kohutova L, Prochazka E, Klaudiny J, Majtan J (2014) Honeybee glucose oxidase—its expression in honeybee workers and comparative analyses of its content and H2O2-mediated antibacterial activity in natural honeys. Naturwissenschaften 101:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stagos D, Soulitsiotis N, Tsadila C, Papaeconomou S, Arvanitis C, Ntontos A, Karkanta F, Adamou-Androulaki S, Petrotos K, Spandidos DA, Kouretas D, Mossialos D (2018) Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of different types of honey derived from Mount Olympus in Greece. Int J Mol Med 42:726–734PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Matzen RD, Zinck Leth-Espensen J, Jansson T, Nielsen DS, Lund MN, Matzen S (2018) The antibacterial effect In vitro of honey derived from various Danish flora. Dermatol Res Pract 2018:7021713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kus PM, Szweda P, Jerkovic I, Tuberoso CI (2016) Activity of Polish unifloral honeys against pathogenic bacteria and its correlation with colour, phenolic content, antioxidant capacity and other parameters. Lett Appl Microbiol 62:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grecka K, Kuś PM, Worobo RW, Szweda P (2018) Study of the anti-staphylococcal potential of honeys produced in Northern Poland. Molecules 23:E260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Truchado P, Lopez-Galvez F, Gil MI, Tomas-Barberan FA, Allende A (2009) Quorum sensing inhibitory and antimicrobial activities of honeys and the relationship with individual phenolics. Food Chem 115:1337–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gobin I, Crnkovic G, Magdalenic M, Begic G, Babic A, Lusic D, Vuckovic D (2018) Antibacterial potential of Croatian honey against antibiotic resistant pathogenic bacteria. Med Glas 15:139–144Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Godocikova J, Bugarova V, Kast C, Majtan V, Majtan J (2019) Antibacterial potential of Swiss honeys and characterisation of their bee-derived bioactive compounds. J Sci Food Agric.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10043 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Socha R, Juszczak L, Pietrzyk S, Gałkowska D, Fortuna T, Witczak T (2011) Phenolic profile and antioxidant properties of Polish honeys. Int J Food Sci Tech 46:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Farhadi F, Khameneh B, Iranshahi M, Iranshahy M (2019) Antibacterial activity of flavonoids and their structure–activity relationship: an update review. Phytother Res 33:13–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Siriwong S, Teethaisong Y, Thumanu K, Dunkhunthod B, Eumkeb G (2016) The synergy and mode of action of quercetin plus amoxicillin against amoxicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 17:39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pal A, Tripathi A (2019) Quercetin potentiates meropenem activity among pathogenic carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii. J Appl Microbiol 127:1038–1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Alvarez-Suarez JM, Tulipani S, Diaz D, Estevez Y, Romandini S, Giampieri F, Damiani E, Astolfi P, Bompadre S, Battino M (2010) Antioxidant and antimicrobial capacity of several monofloral Cuban honeys and their correlation with color, polyphenol content and other chemical. Food Chem Toxicol 48:2490–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Moniruzzaman M, Ibrahim KM, Siti AS, Siew HG (2013) Physicochemical and antioxidant properties of Malaysian honeys produced by Apis cerana, Apis dorsata and Apis mellifera. BMC Complement Altern Med 13:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Al-Farsi M, Al-Amri A, Al-Hadhrami A, Al-Belushi S (2018) Color, flavonoids, phenolics and antioxidants of Omani honey. Heliyon 4:e00874CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Apidology and Apitherapy, Department of Genetics, Institute of Molecular BiologySlovak Academy of SciencesBratislavaSlovakia
  2. 2.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of MedicineSlovak Medical UniversityBratislavaSlovakia

Personalised recommendations