Advertisement

Effect of different stabilizers on rheological properties, fat globule size and sensory attributes of novel spreadable processed whey cheese

  • Soumela E. Chatziantoniou
  • Apostolos S. ThomareisEmail author
  • Michael G. Kontominas
Original Paper

Abstract

Novel processed whey cheese samples were prepared with the addition of different polysaccharides (0.8% w/w), namely, xanthan gum, guar gum, locust bean gum (LBG), and κ-carrageenan, used as stabilizers and added individually or in 1:1 mixtures. Chemical composition of samples was constant, as well as final pH (5.2). The effect of added stabilizers on rheological properties, fat globule size, and sensory attributes of samples was studied, where significant (P < 0.05) differences among samples were observed in all examined parameters. Rheological properties, as determined by squeezing flow viscometry, showed strong correlations among individual parameters, as well as to sensory attributes. During squeezing flow, all samples behaved as pseudoplastic fluids. Viscosity of samples, expressed as biaxial stress growth coefficient at 0.025 s−1, ranged from 390 to 1549 kPa·s. Samples containing xanthan gum, guar gum, LBG, and mixture of xanthan and guar gums were less consistent and solid, while they were rated as having increased spreadability and smoothness. The mixtures of LBG with xanthan gum or κ-carrageenan exhibited strong synergistic effects in samples, whereas they were rated as the firmest and least spreadable. The partial substitution of κ-carrageenan with xanthan or guar gums was found to produce samples of decreased firmness and increased spreadability and smoothness. Xanthan gum allowed the formation of the largest fat globules, while the mixture of κ-carrageenan with LBG gave the smallest ones. The interactions between polysaccharides and whey proteins may be exploited so as to produce spreadable processed whey cheeses with specific functional properties and improved sensory attributes.

Keywords

Processed cheese Whey proteins Stabilizers Squeezing flow Fat globule size Sensory attributes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The preparation and provision of Myzithra cheese by Mevgal Dairy S.A. (Thessaloniki, Greece) are gratefully acknowledged.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Dermiki M, Ntzimani A, Badeka A, Savvaidis IN, Kontominas MG (2008) Shelf-life extension and quality attributes of the whey cheese “Myzithra Kalathaki” using modified atmosphere packaging. LWT Food Sci Technol 41:284–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (1998) In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH (eds) Dairy chemistry and biochemistry. Blackie Academic and Professional, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smithers GW (2008) Whey and whey proteins—from ‘gutter-to-gold’. Review. Int Dairy J 18:695–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gustaw W, Mleko S (2007) The effect of polysaccharides and sodium chloride on physical properties of processed cheese analogs containing whey proteins. Milchwissenschaft 62(1):59–62Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schäffer B, Szakály S, Lõrinczy D, Schäffer B (2001) Processed cheeses made with and without peptization. Submicroscopic structure and thermodynamic characteristics. J Therm Anal Calorim 64:671–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chatziantoniou SE, Thomareis AS, Kontominas MG (2015) Effect of chemical composition on physico-chemical, rheological and sensory properties of spreadable processed whey cheese. Eur Food Res Technol 241:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SK, Anema SG (2009) The effect of the pH at cooking on the properties of processed cheese spreads containing whey proteins. Food Chem 115:373–380Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kök MS, Hill SE, Mitchell JR (1999) Viscosity of galactomannans during high temperature processing: influence of degradation and solubilisation. Food Hydrocoll 13:535–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tavares C, da Silva JAL (2003) Rheology of galactomannan–whey protein mixed systems. Int Dairy J 13:699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bouyer E, Mekhloufi G, Rosilio V, Grossiord J-L, Agnely F (2012) Proteins, polysaccharides, and their complexes used as stabilizers for emulsions: alternatives to synthetic surfactants in the pharmaceutical field? Review. Int J Pharm 436:359–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pinheiro AC, Bourbon AI, Rocha C, Ribeiro C, Maia JM, Gonçalves MP, Teixeira JA, Vicente AA (2011) Rheological characterization of κ-carrageenan/galactomannan and xanthan/galactomannan gels: comparison of galactomannans from non-traditional sources with conventional galactomannans. Carbohydr Polym 83:392–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arda E, Kara S, Pekcan O (2009) Synergistic effect of the locust bean gum on the thermal phase transitions of κ-carrageenan gels. Food Hydrocoll 23:451–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saha D, Bhattacharya S (2010) Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: a critical review. J Food Sci Technol 47(6):587–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dunstan DE, Chen Y, Liao M-L, Salvatore R, Boger DV, Prica M (2001) Structure and rheology of the κ-carrageenan/locust bean gum gels. Food Hydrocoll 15:475–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thaiudom S, Goff HD (2003) Effect of κ-carrageenan on milk protein polysaccharide mixtures. Int Dairy J 13:763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rocha C, Teixeira JA, Hilliou L, Sampaio P, Gonçalves MP (2009) Rheological and structural characterization of gels from whey protein hydrolysates/locust bean gum mixed systems. Food Hydrocoll 23:1734–1745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bertrand ME, Turgeon SL (2007) Improved gelling properties of whey protein isolate by addition of xanthan gum. Food Hydrocoll 21:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benichou A, Aserin A, Garti N (2007) W/O/W double emulsions stabilized with WPI–polysaccharide complexes. Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 294:20–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cavallieri ALF, Cunha RL (2009) Cold-set whey protein gels with addition of polysaccharides. Food Biophys 4:94–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Le XT, Turgeon SL (2015) Textural and waterbinding behaviors of β-lactoglobulin-xanthan gum electrostatic hydrogels in relation to their microstructure. Food Hydrocoll 49:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stone AK, Nickerson MT (2012) Formation and functionality of whey protein isolate- (kappa-, iota-, and lambda-type) carrageenan electrostatic complexes. Food Hydrocoll 27:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Heilig A, Göggerle A, Hinrichs J (2009) Multiphase visualisation of fat containing β-lactoglobulin–κ-carrageenan gels by confocal scanning laser microscopy, using a novel dye, V03-01136, for fat staining. LWT Food Sci Technol 42:46–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li J, Eleya MMO, Gunasekaran S (2006) Gelation of whey protein and xanthan mixture: effect of heating rate on rheological properties. Food Hydrocoll 20:678–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sanchez C, Schmitt C, Babak VG, Hardy J (1997) Rheology of whey protein isolate-xanthan mixed solutions and gels. Effect of pH and xanthan concentration. Nahrung 41(6):336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bryant CM, McClements DJ (2000) Influence of xanthan gum on physical characteristics of heat-denatured whey protein solutions and gels. Food Hydrocoll 14:383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahmad S, Butt MS, Pasha I, Sameen A (2015) Quality of processed Cheddar cheese as a function of emulsifying salt replaced by κ-carrageenan. Int J Food Prop 19(8):1874–1883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Černíková M, Buňka F, Pospiech M, Tremlová B, Hladká K, Pavlínek K, Březina P (2010) Replacement of traditional emulsifying salts by selected hydrocolloids in processed cheese production. Int Dairy J 20(5):336–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Swenson BJ, Wendorff WL, Lindsay RC (2000) Effects of ingredients on the functionality of fat-free process cheese spreads. J Food Sci 65(5):822–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    IDF (2004) Cheese and processed cheese—determination of total solid content (reference method). Int Dairy Fed, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    ISO (2008) Cheese—Determination of fat content—Van Gulik method. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    AOAC (2005) Official methods of analysis, 17th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Corradini MG, Peleg M (2005) Consistency of dispersed food systems and its evaluation by squeezing flow viscometry. J Texture Stud 36:605–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shukla A, Rizvi SSH, Bartsch JA (1995) Rheological characterization of butter using lubricated squeezing flow. J Texture Stud 26:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Campanella OH, Peleg M (2002) Squeezing flow viscometry for nonelastic semiliquid foods-Theory and applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42(3):241–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oliver L, Scholten E, van Aken GA (2015) Effect of fat hardness on large deformation rheology of emulsion-filled gels. Food Hydrocoll 43:299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee SK, Anema SG, Klostermeyer H (2004) The influence of moisture content on the rheological properties of processed cheese spreads. Int J Food Sci Tech 39:763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    ISO (2012) Sensory analysis—general guidelines for the selection, training and monitoring of selected assessors and expert sensory assessors. ISO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rousseau B (2004) Sensory evaluation techniques. In: Nollet LML (ed) Handbook of food analysis: physical characterization and nutrient analysis, vol 1, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Guinee TP, Carić M, Kaláb M (2004) Pasteurized processed cheese and substitute/imitation cheese products. In: Fox PF, McSweeney PLH, Cogan TM, Guinee TP (eds) Cheese chemistry, physics and microbiology, vol 2, 3rd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tavares C, Monteiro SR, Moreno N, da Silva JAL (2005) Does the branching degree of galactomannans influence their effect on whey protein gelation? Coll Surf A Physicochem Eng Aspects 270–271:213–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stading M, Hermansson A-M (1993) Rheological behaviour of mixed gels of κ-carrageenan-locust bean gum. Carbohydr Polym 22:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Murayama A, Ichikawa Y, Kawabata A (1995) Rheological properties of mixed gels of κ-carrageenan with galactomannans. Biosci Biotech Biochem 59(1):5–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dea ICM, McKinnon AA, Rees DA (1972) Tertiary and quaternary structure in aqueous polysaccharide systems which model cell wall cohesion: reversible changes in conformation and association of agarose, carrageenan and galactomannan. J Mol Biol 68:153–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Renou F, Petibon O, Malhiac C, Grisel M (2013) Effect of xanthan structure on its interaction with locust bean gum: Toward prediction of rheological properties. Food Hydrocoll 32:331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    de Jong S, van de Velde F (2007) Charge density of polysaccharide controls microstructure and large deformation properties of mixed gels. Food Hydrocoll 21:1172–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mor-Rosenberg Y, Shoemaker CF, Rosenberg M (2004) Mechanical properties of composite gels consisting of fractionated whey proteins and fractionated milk fat. Food Hydrocoll 18:153–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Walkenström P, Nielsen M, Windhab E, Hermansson A-M (1999) Effects of flow behaviour on the aggregation of whey protein suspensions, pure or mixed with xanthan. J Food Eng 42:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Chatziantoniou S, Katopodis S, Thomareis AS (2013) Rheological behavior of suspensions and emulsions produced with different stabilizers. In: International Conference on Food and Biosystems Engineering (FaBE), Skiathos Island, Greece, pp 293–301Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Morris ER, Rees DA, Robinson G, Young GA (1980) Competitive inhibition of interchain interactions in polysaccharide systems. J Mol Biol 138:363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Boutin C, Giroux HJ, Paquin P, Britten M (2007) Characterization and acid-induced gelation of butter oil emulsions produced from heated whey protein dispersions. Int Dairy J 17:696–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Casiraghi EM, Bagley EB, Christianson DD (1985) Behavior of Mozzarella, Cheddar and processed cheese spread in lubricated and bonded uniaxial compression. J Texture Stud 16:281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Yovanoudi M, Dimitreli G, Raphaelides SN, Antoniou KD (2013) Flow behaviour studies of kefir type systems. J Food Eng 118:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Eleya MMO, Turgeon SL (2000) The effects of pH on the rheology of β-lactoglobulin/κ-carrageenan mixed gels. Food Hydrocoll 14:245–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sourdet S, Relkin P, César B (2003) Effects of milk protein type and pre-heating on physical stability of whipped and frozen emulsions. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 31:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Euston SR, Finnigan SR, Hirst RL (2002) Kinetics of droplet aggregation in heated whey protein-stabilized emulsions: effect of polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll 16:499–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dickinson E (2003) Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on the properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocoll 17:25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Garti N, Reichman D (1993) Hydrocolloids as food emulsifiers and stabilizers. Food Struct 12:411–426Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Wu Y, Cui YW, Eskin NAM, Goff HD (2009) An investigation of four commercial galactomannans on their emulsion and rheological properties. Food Res Int 42:1141–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nor Hayati I, Che Man YB, Tan CP, Nor Aini I (2009) Droplet characterization and stability of soybean oil/palm kernel olein O/W emulsions with the presence of selected polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll 23:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gu YS, Decker EA, McClements DJ (2005) Influence of pH and carrageenan type on properties of β-lactoglobulin stabilized oil-in-water emulsions. Food Hydrocoll 19(1):83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cho YH, Decker EA, McClements DJ (2009) Competitive adsorption of mixed anionic polysaccharides at the surfaces of protein-coated lipid droplets. Langmuir 25:2654–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dalgleish DG (2006) Food emulsions—their structures and structure-forming properties. Food Hydrocoll 20:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ruffin E, Schmit T, Lafitte G, Dollat J-M, Chambin O (2014) The impact of whey protein preheating on the properties of emulsion gel bead. Food Chem 151:324–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Euston SR, Hirst RL (1999) Comparison of the concentration-dependent emulsifying properties of protein products containing aggregated and non-aggregated milk protein. Int Dairy J 9:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ye A, Taylor S (2009) Characterization of cold-set gels produced from heated emulsions stabilized by whey protein. Int Dairy J 19:721–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sourdet S, Relkin P, Fosseux P-Y, Aubry V (2002) Composition of fat protein layer in complex food emulsions at various weight ratios of casein-to-whey proteins. Lait 82:567–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Ye A, Singh H (2006) Heat stability of oil-in-water emulsions formed with intact or hydrolysed whey proteins: influence of polysaccharides. Food Hydrocoll 20:269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Trivedi D, Bennett RJ, Hemar Y, Reid DCW, Lee SK, Illingworth D (2008) Effect of different starches on rheological and micro-structural properties of (I) model processed cheese. Int J Food Sci Tech 43:2191–2196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    van den Berg L, van Vliet T, van der Linden E, van Boekel MAJS, van de Velde F (2007) Breakdown properties and sensory perception of whey proteins/polysaccharide mixed gels as a function of microstructure. Food Hydrocoll 21:961–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Devezeaux de Lavergne MD, Strijbosch VMG, van den Broek AWM, van de Velde F, Stieger M (2016) Uncoupling the impact of fracture properties and composition on sensory perception of emulsion-filled gels. J Texture Stud 47:92–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Melito HS, Daubert CR, Foegeding EA (2013) Relating large amplitude oscillatory shear and food behavior: correlation of nonlinear viscoelastic, rheological, sensory and oral processing behavior of whey protein isolate/κ-carrageenan gels. J Food Process Eng 36(4):521–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soumela E. Chatziantoniou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Apostolos S. Thomareis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Michael G. Kontominas
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and TechnologyInternational Hellenic UniversityThessalonikiGreece
  2. 2.Laboratory of Food Chemistry and Technology, Department of ChemistryUniversity of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations