Advertisement

Effect of different leavening agents on the nutritional characteristics of two durum wheat breads

  • Rita AcquistucciEmail author
  • Valentina Melini
  • Salvatore Tusa
  • Mauro Mecozzi
Original Paper
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Two durum wheat bread samples produced using the same re-milled semolina but different leavening agents (sourdough and compressed yeast) have been considered in this study. Chemical composition, color characteristics, lutein content and starch digestibility have been addressed in both samples. In addition, to evaluate possible modifications induced on the protein structure attributable to the different leavening agents used, the secondary structure of proteins was also studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The crumb of bread sample produced by compressed yeast exhibited a higher yellow index compared to the other sample but this difference was completely lost in crust because of the high baking temperature applied. Lutein resulted more preserved after the yeast fermentation due to the shorter time required for the fermentation with respect to sourdough. Total starch and resistant starch content resulted comparable in the two samples with the latter about 1% in both samples. The infrared spectroscopic study of the protein amide I band showed the lack of the random coil structure, related to the protein denaturation, and negligible changes in the relative ratios among the α-helix, β-sheet and β-turn secondary structures of proteins.

Keywords

Durum bread Sourdough Compressed yeast Re-milled semolina Protein secondary structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was undertaken within the Project TERRAVITA financially supported by the Italian Ministry of Agricultural, Food, Forestry and Tourism Policies.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain experiments with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Pasqualone A (2012) Italian durum wheat bread. In: Pedrosa Silva Clerici MT (ed) Bread consumption and health. Nova Science Publisher, New York, pp 57–79Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pasqualone A, Caponio F, Simeone R (2004) Quality evaluation of re-milled durum wheat semolinas used for bread-making in Southern Italy. Eur Food Res Technol 219:630–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poutanen K, Flander L, Katina K (2009) Sourdough and cereal fermentation in a nutritive perspective. Food Microbiol 26:693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liukkonen KH, Katina K, Wilhelmson A, Myllymaki O, Lampi AM, Kariluoto S, Piironen V, Heinonen SM, Nurmi T, Adlercreutz H, Peltoketo A, Pihlava JM, Hietaniemi V, Poutanen K (2003) Process-induced changes on bioactive compounds in whole grain rye. Proc Nutr Soc 62:117–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hidalgo A, Brandolini A, Pompei C (2010) Food carotenoids evolution during pasta, bread and water biscuit preparation from wheat flours. Food Chem 121:746–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vogrincic M, Timoracka M, Melichacova S, Vollmannova A, Kreft I (2010) Degradation of rutin and polyphenols during the preparation of tartary buckwheat bread. J Agric Food Chem 58:4883–4887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leenhardt F, Lyan B, Rock E, Boussard A, Potus J, Chanliaud E, Remesy C (2006) Wheat lipoxygenase activity induces greater loss of carotenoids than vitamin E during breadmaking. J Agric Food Chem 54:1710–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liljeberg H, Akerberg A, Bjorck I (1996) Resistant starch formation in bread as influenced by choice of ingredients or baking conditions. Food Chem 56(4):389–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scazzina F, Del Rio D, Pellegrini N, Brighenti F (2009) Sourdough bread: starch digestibility and postprandial glycemic response. J Cereal Sci 49:419–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Angelis M, Coda R, Silano M, Minervini F, Rizzello CG, Di Cagno R, Vicentini O, De Vincenzi M, Gobbetti M (2006) Fermentation by selected sourdough lactic acid bacteria to decrease coeliac intolerance to rye flour. J Cereal Sci 43:301–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nionelli L, Rizzello CG (2016) Sourdough-based biotechnologies for the production of gluten-free foods. Foods 5:65.  https://doi.org/10.3390/foods5030065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barth A (2007) Infrared spectroscopy of proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1767:1073–1100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dyson HU, Wright PE (1990) Peptide conformation and protein folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 3:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO 2171 (2007) Cereals, pulses and by-products. Determination of ash yield by incineration. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ICC (2003) Determination of crude protein in cereals and cereal products for food and for feed (method 105/2). Determination of the Moisture content of cereals and cereal products (method 110/1). International Association for Cereal Science and Technology. The Association, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Metodi ufficiali di analisi dei cereali. Determinazione delle sostanze grasse totali. Metodo per idrolisi acida. Serie Generale n.186 del 10-08-1994- Suppl n. 114Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Acquistucci R, Melini V, Carbonaro M, Finotti E (2013) Bioactive molecules and antioxidant activity in durum wheat grains and related millstream fractions. Int J Food Sci Nutr 64:959–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zupan J (1989) Algorithms for chemists. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Savitzky A, Golay MJE (1964) Smoothing and differentiation of data by a simplified least squares method. Anal Chem 36:1627–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Noda I (2008) Scaling techniques to enhance two-dimensional correlation spectra. J Mol Struct 883:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mecozzi M, Scarpiniti M (2013) An empirical and semi blind algorithm for resolving overlapped peaks in chromatography: application to the analysis of environmental samples. APCBEE Procedia 5:145–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mecozzi M, Sturchio E (2015) Effects of essential oil treatments on the secondary protein structure of Vicia faba roots: a mid-infrared spectroscopic study supported by two-dimensional correlation analysis. Spectrochim Acta A 137:90–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Raffo A, Pasqualone A, Sinesio F, Paoletti F, Quaglia G, Simeone R (2003) Influence of durum wheat cultivar on the sensory profile and staling rate of Altamura bread. Eur Food Res Technol 218:49–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bourekoua H, Djeghim F, Benatallah L, Zidoune MN, Wójtowicz A, Łysiak G, Różyło R (2017) Durum Wheat bread: flow diagram and quality characteristics of traditional Algerian bread Khobz Eddar. Acta Agrophys 24:405–417Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasqualone A, Piergiovanni AR, Caponio F, Paradiso VM, Summo C, Simeone R (2011) Evaluation of the technological characteristics and bread-making quality of alternative wheat cereals in comparison with common and durum wheat. Food Sci Technol Int 17:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ahrne L, Andersson CG, Floberg P, Rosen J, Lingnert H (2007) Effect of crust temperature and water content on acrylamide formation during baking of white bread: steam and falling temperature baking. LWT Food Sci Technol 40:1708–1715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Purliis E (2010) Browning development in bakery products—a review. J Food Eng 99:239–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Friedman M (1996) Food browning and its prevention: an overview. J Agric Food Chem 44:631–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Acquistucci R (2000) Influence of Maillard reaction on protein modification and colour development in pasta. Comparison of different drying conditions. LWT Food Sci Technol 33:48–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Angioloni A, Collar C (2009) Bread crumb quality assessment: a plural physical approach. Eur Food Res Technol 229:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Makinde FM, Akinoso R (2014) Physical, nutritional and sensory qualities of bread samples made with wheat and black sesame (Sesamum indicum Linn) flours. Int Food Res J 21:1635–1640Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Josoh YMM, Chin NL, Rahman NA, Yusof YA (2008) Bread crust thickness estimation using L a b colour system. Pertanika J Sci Technol 16:239–247Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Decreto Presidente della Repubblica 9 febbraio 2001, n. 187 Regolamento per la revisione della normativa sulla produzione e commercializzazione di sfarinati e paste alimentariGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Antognoni F, Mandrioli R, Bordoni A, Di Nunzio M, Viadel B, Gallego E, Villalba MP, Tomás-Cobos L, Taneyo Saa DL, Gianotti A (2017) Integrated evaluation of the potential health benefits of einkorn-based breads. Nutrients 9:1232.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nu9111232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    O’Connell O, Ryan L, O’Sullivan L, Aherne-Bruce SA, O’Brien NM (2008) Carotenoid micellarization varies greatly between individual and mixed vegetables with or without the addition of fat or fiber. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 78:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kean EG, Hamaker BR, Ferruzzi MG (2008) Carotenoid bioaccessibility fr om whole grain and degermed maize meal products. J Agric Food Chem 56:9918–9926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Englyst HN, Cummings JH (1990) Non-starch polysaccharides (dietary fiber) and resistant starch. Adv Exp Med Biol 270:205–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fardet A, Leenhardt F, Lioger D, Scalbert A, Rémésy C (2006) Parameters controlling the glycaemic response to breads. Nutr Res Rev 19:18–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amaral O, Guerriero CS, Gomes A, Cravo M (2016) Resistant starch production in wheat bread: effect of ingredients, baking conditions and storage. Eur Food Res. Technol 242:1747–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carcea M, Salvatorelli S, Turfani V (2009) Measurement of resistant starch in cooked cereal-based foods. Qual Assur Saf Crop 1:240–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Byler DM, Susi H (1986) Examination of the secondary structure of proteins by deconvolved FTIR spectra. Biopolymers 25:469–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Katina K, Arendt E, Liukkonen KH, Autio K, Flander L, Poutanen K (2005) Potential of sourdough for healthier cereal products. Trends Food Sci Technol 16:104–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Reale A, Konietzny U, Coppola R, Sorrentino E, Greiner R (2007) The importance of lactic acid bacteria for phytate degradation during cereal dough fermentation. J Agric Food Chem 55:2993–2997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ganzle M, Loponen J, Gobbetti M (2008) Proteolysis in sourdough fermentations: mechanisms and potential for improved bread quality. Trends Food Sci Technol 19:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Yu P (2004) Application of advanced syncrhroton-based-Fourier transform microspectroscopy (SR-FTIR) to animal nutrition and feed science: a novel approach. Br J Nutr 92:869–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Carbonaro M, Maselli P, Nucara A (2012) Relationship between digestibility and secondary structure of raw and thermally treated legume proteins: a Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopic study. Amino Acids 43:911–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yang Y, Wang Z, Wang R, Sui X, Qi B, Han F, Li Y, Jiang L (2016) Secondary structure and subunit composition of soy protein in vitro digested by pepsin and its relation with digestibility. Biomed Res Int 2016:5498639.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5498639 Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yu P (2005) Protein secondary structures (α-helix and β-sheet) at a cellular level and protein fractions in relation to rumen degradation behaviors of protein: a new approach. Brit J Nutr 94:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Acquistucci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Valentina Melini
    • 1
  • Salvatore Tusa
    • 2
  • Mauro Mecozzi
    • 3
  1. 1.Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria, Centro di ricerca Alimenti e NutrizioneRomeItaly
  2. 2.Antica Forneria TusaMonrealeItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale, Laboratorio di ChemiometriaRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations