Advertisement

The CUPRAC-paper microzone plates as a simple and rapid method for total antioxidant capacity determination of plant extract

  • Mochammad Amrun Hidayat
  • Rizka Illa Chassana
  • Indah Yulia Ningsih
  • Mochammad Yuwono
  • Bambang KuswandiEmail author
Short Communication
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

The current work was aimed to develop the paper microzone plates (PµZP) as a scanometric system for determining the total antioxidant capacity of plant extracts. The PµZP was constructed by immobilizing CUPRAC reagent onto 70-well of patterned paper as a sensing zone for the scanometric detection system. The light blue-sensing zone showed a sensitive response to standard antioxidant (rutin) by forming light yellow color adducts which can be scanned and quantitatively measured by image processing program as a scanometric method. The sensor gave a notable signal at 8 min after rutin addition and presented a linear response in the concentration span of 1–10 mM. The developed method was shown to be reproducible (RSD < 3%) and accurate (98–101% recovery) for determining the TAC of plant extracts (as mM rutin equivalents) and showed strong correlation (r = 0.9887) with the standard CUPRAC method, suggesting that it can be applied for the simple and rapid method for TAC determination.

Keywords

Antioxidant CUPRAC Paper-based sensor Scanometric Plant extracts 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by The Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of Indonesia (Grant number 0500/UN25.3.1/LT/2017).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

The article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

References

  1. 1.
    Halliwell B (1996) Commentary oxidative stress, nutrition and health. experimental strategies for optimization of nutritional antioxidant intake in humans. Free Radic Res 25:57–74.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769609145656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miller NJ, Rice-Evans C, Davies MJ et al (1993) A novel method for measuring antioxidant capacity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant status in premature neonates. Clin Sci 84:407–412.  https://doi.org/10.1042/cs0840407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT Food Sci Technol 28:25–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogliano V, Verde V, Randazzo G, Ritieni A (1999) Method for measuring antioxidant activity and its application to monitoring the antioxidant capacity of wines. J Agric Food Chem 47:1035–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf980496s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP Assay. Anal Biochem 239:70–76.  https://doi.org/10.1006/abio.1996.0292 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Apak R, Güçlü K, Özyürek M, Karademir SE (2004) Novel total antioxidant capacity index for dietary polyphenols and vitamins C and E, using their cupric ion reducing capability in the presence of neocuproine: CUPRAC method. J Agric Food Chem 52:7970–7981.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf048741x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Güçlü K, Altun M, Özyürek M et al (2006) Antioxidant capacity of fresh, sun- and sulphited-dried Malatya apricot (Prunus armeniaca) assayed by CUPRAC, ABTS/TEAC and folin methods. Int J Food Sci Technol 41:76–85.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2006.01347.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Karaman Ş, Tütem E, Sözgen Başkan K, Apak R (2010) Comparison of total antioxidant capacity and phenolic composition of some apple juices with combined HPLC–CUPRAC assay. Food Chem 120:1201–1209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sariburun E, Şahin S, Demir C et al (2010) Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of raspberry and blackberry cultivars. J Food Sci 75:C328–C335.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01571.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Apak R, Güçlü K, Özyürek M et al (2006) The cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity and polyphenolic content of some herbal teas. Int J Food Sci Nutr 57:292–304.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09637480600798132 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Çelik SE, Özyürek M, Altun M et al (2008) Antioxidant capacities of herbal plants used in the manufacture of van herby cheese: ‘Otlu Peynir’. Int J Food Prop 11:747–761.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910701594210 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bener M, Özyürek M, Güçlü K, Apak R (2010) Polyphenolic contents of natural dyes produced from industrial plants assayed by HPLC and novel spectrophotometric methods. Ind Crops Prod 32:499–506.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tufan AN, Çelik SE, Özyürek M et al (2013) Direct measurement of total antioxidant capacity of cereals: QUENCHER–CUPRAC method. Talanta 108:136–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.02.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Apak R, Güçlü K, Özyürek M et al (2005) Total antioxidant capacity assay of human serum using copper(II)–neocuproine as chromogenic oxidant: the CUPRAC method. Free Radic Res 39:949–961.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10715760500210145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bekdeşer B, Özyürek M, Güçlü K, Apak R (2012) Novel spectroscopic sensor for the hydroxyl radical scavenging activity measurement of biological samples. Talanta 99:689–696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2012.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haque SA, Cañete SJP (2018) HPLC-CUPRAC post-column derivatization method for the determination of antioxidants: a performance comparison between porous silica and core-shell column packing. J Anal Sci Technol 9:4.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-018-0137-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    González-Centeno MR, Jourdes M, Femenia A et al (2012) Proanthocyanidin composition and antioxidant potential of the stem winemaking byproducts from 10 different grape varieties (Vitis vinifera L.). J Agric Food Chem 60:11850–11858.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf303047k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    González-Centeno MR, Knoerzer K, Sabarez H et al (2014) Effect of acoustic frequency and power density on the aqueous ultrasonic-assisted extraction of grape pomace (Vitis vinifera L.)—a response surface approach. Ultrason Sonochem 21:2176–2184.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.01.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ruiz A, Bustamante L, Vergara C et al (2015) Hydroxycinnamic acids and flavonols in native edible berries of South Patagonia. Food Chem 167:84–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.06.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ribeiro JPN, Magalhães LM, Reis S et al (2011) High-throughput total cupric ion reducing antioxidant capacity of biological samples determined using flow injection analysis and microplate-based methods. Anal Sci 27:483.  https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.27.483 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bener M, Özyürek M, Güçlü K, Apak R (2010) Development of a low-cost optical sensor for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity measurement of food extracts. Anal Chem 82:4252–4258.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100646k CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bener M, Özyürek M, Güçlü K, Apak R (2013) Novel optical fiber reflectometric CUPRAC sensor for total antioxidant capacity measurement of food extracts and biological samples. J Agric Food Chem 61:8381–8388.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf402327x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bener M, Apak R (2018) Novel optical sensor-based method for determining total tocopherol content in serum. Turk J Chem 42:1687–1694.  https://doi.org/10.3906/kim-1804-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Krylova E, Gavrilenko N, Saranchina N, Gavrilenko M (2016) Novel colorimetric sensor for cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC) measurement. Procedia Eng 168:355–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.120 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bener M, Şen FB, Kaşgöz A, Apak R (2018) Carrageenan-based colorimetric sensor for total antioxidant capacity measurement. Sens Actuators B Chem 273:439–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2018.06.061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hidayat MA, Fitri A, Kuswandi B (2017) Scanometry as microplate reader for high throughput method based on DPPH dry reagent for antioxidant assay. Acta Pharm Sin B 7:395–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2017.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hidayat MA, Sari P, Kuswandi B (2018) Simple scanometric assay based on DPPH immobilized on pharmaceutical blister for determination of antioxidant capacity in the herbal extracts. J Res Pharm 22:134–143.  https://doi.org/10.12991/jrp.2018.87 Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nuchtavorn N, Macka M (2016) A novel highly flexible, simple, rapid and low-cost fabrication tool for paper-based microfluidic devices (μPADs) using technical drawing pens and in-house formulated aqueous inks. Anal Chim Acta 919:70–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.03.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sirivibulkovit K, Nouanthavong S, Sameenoi Y (2018) Paper-based DPPH assay for antioxidant activity analysis. Anal Sci 34:795–800.  https://doi.org/10.2116/analsci.18P014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Puangbanlang C, Sirivibulkovit K, Nacapricha D, Sameenoi Y (2019) A paper-based device for simultaneous determination of antioxidant activity and total phenolic content in food samples. Talanta 198:542–549.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.02.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carrilho E, Phillips ST, Vella SJ et al (2009) Paper microzone plates. Anal Chem 81:5990–5998.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac900847g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jokerst JC, Adkins JA, Bisha B et al (2012) Development of a paper-based analytical device for colorimetric detection of select foodborne pathogens. Anal Chem 84:2900–2907.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac203466y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang S, Ge L, Song X et al (2012) Paper-based chemiluminescence ELISA: lab-on-paper based on chitosan modified paper device and wax-screen-printing. Biosens Bioelectron 31:212–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2011.10.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Murdock RC, Shen L, Griffin DK et al (2013) Optimization of a paper-based ELISA for a human performance biomarker. Anal Chem 85:11634–11642.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403040a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Caglayan MG, Sheykhi S, Mosca L, Anzenbacher P (2016) Fluorescent zinc and copper complexes for detection of adrafinil in paper-based microfluidic devices. Chem Commun 52:8279–8282.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6CC03640F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vaher M, Borissova M, Seiman A et al (2014) Automatic spot preparation and image processing of paper microzone-based assays for analysis of bioactive compounds in plant extracts. Food Chem 143:465–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vaher M, Kaljurand M (2012) The development of paper microzone-based green analytical chemistry methods for determining the quality of wines. Anal Bioanal Chem 404:627–633.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-012-5930-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aid T, Kaljurand M, Vaher M (2015) Colorimetric determination of total phenolic contents in ionic liquid extracts by paper microzones and digital camera. Anal Methods 7:3193–3199.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY00194C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Amatatongchai M, Sroysee W, Laosing S, Chairam S (2013) Rapid screening method for assessing total phenolic content using simple flow injection system with laccase based-biosensor. Int J Electrochem Sci 8:10526–10539Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nadifiyine S, Calas-Blanchard C, Amine A, Marty J-L (2013) Tyrosinase biosensor used for the determination of catechin derivatives in tea: correlation with HPLC/DAD method. Food Nutr Sci 4:108–118.  https://doi.org/10.4236/fns.2013.41015 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Hidayat MA, Jannah F, Kuswandi B (2016) Development of paper based sensor for the determination of total phenolic content in green tea beverages. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 9:424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.159 Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hidayat MA, Puspitaningtyas N, Gani AA, Kuswandi B (2017) Rapid test for the determination of total phenolic content in brewed-filtered coffee using colorimetric paper. J Food Sci Technol 54:3384–3390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-017-2757-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yuwono M, Indrayanto G (2005) Validation of chromatographic methods of analysis. In: Brittain H (ed) Profiles of drug substances, excipients and related methodology. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 243–259Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Huber L (2007) Validation and qualification in analytical laboratories, 2nd edn. Informa Healthcare, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Seo J, Lee S, Elam ML et al (2014) Study to find the best extraction solvent for use with guava leaves (Psidium guajava L.) for high antioxidant efficacy. Food Sci Nutr 2:174–180.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lee L-S, Kim S-H, Kim Y-B, Kim Y-C (2014) Quantitative analysis of major constituents in green tea with different plucking periods and their antioxidant activity. Molecules 19:9173–9186.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules19079173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Martins RM, Pereira SV, Siqueira S et al (2013) Curcuminoid content and antioxidant activity in spray dried microparticles containing turmeric extract. Food Res Int 50:657–663.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.06.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bhebhe M, Füller TN, Chipurura B, Muchuweti M (2016) Effect of solvent type on total phenolic content and free radical scavenging activity of black tea and herbal infusions. Food Anal Methods 9:1060–1067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0270-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pharmaceutical Chemistry Department, Faculty of PharmacyAirlangga UniversitySurabayaIndonesia
  2. 2.Chemo and Biosensor Group, Faculty of PharmacyUniversity of JemberJemberIndonesia

Personalised recommendations