Acinetobacter as a potentially important producer of urocanic acid in chub mackerel, a histidine metabolite of emerging health concern
- 16 Downloads
Urocanic acid, deaminated histidine and the first intermediate in the histidine utilization (Hut) pathway in bacteria, has recently been suggested to have adverse health effects by inducing scombrotoxicosis and immunosuppression after trans–cis isomerization. This work aimed to shed some light on the microbiology of its formation in scombroid fish, given that such information is very scarce. The isolation of urocanic acid producers from chub mackerel was basically based on enrichment of bacteria possessing the Hut pathway with histidine as the sole source of carbon, energy, and nitrogen. Morphological and molecular identification revealed that the isolates (n = 12), taken from the skin, gills, and intestine, were comprised entirely of Acinetobacter from at least five species. This implies that the Hut pathway in the microbes can be particularly active and as such conferred a growth advantage. Dynamic monitoring of bacterial growth and urocanic acid production in fish juice broth indicated that urocanic acid is a primary metabolite and its production is a closely growth-associated process. This in turn implies that its production can be controlled directly by suppressing the bacterial growth. Several potential methods are proposed through a study of the growth characteristics and preservative susceptibility of representative isolates. In conclusion, this work suggests that Acinetobacter can constitute a potentially important group of urocanic acid producers in chub mackerel.
KeywordsUrocanic acid Acinetobacter Histidine utilization pathway Chub mackerel
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant number 2016YFD0400301) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 31701715). The authors are indebted to Patrick Leung for English proofreading.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethics requirements
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
- 4.FAO/WHO (2012) Joint FAO/WHO expert meeting on the public health risks of histamine and other biogenic amines from fish and fishery products. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3390e.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2018
- 11.Zare D, Muhammad K, Bejo MH, Ghazali HM (2015) Determination of urocanic acid, a compound implicated in histamine toxicity, and assessment of biogenic amines relative to urocanic acid content in selected fish and fish products. J Food Compos Anal 37:95–103Google Scholar
- 12.Kawai A, Sakaguchi M (1968) Histidine metabolism in fish—II. Formation of urocanic, formiminoglutamic and glutamic acids from histidine in the livers of carp and mackerel. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 34(6):507–511Google Scholar
- 13.Sakaguchi M, Kawai A (1968) Histidine metabolism in fish—III. Purification and some properties of histidine deaminase from mackerel muscle. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 34(11):1040–1048Google Scholar
- 14.Sakaguchi M, Sugiyama M, Sugiyama T, Kawai A (1970) Histidine metabolism in fish—IV. Comparative study on histidine deaminases from muscle and liver of mackerel and from bacteria. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 36(2):200–206Google Scholar
- 19.Bender DA (2012) Amino acid metabolism, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
- 26.Parlapani FF, Mallouchos A, Haroutounian SA, Boziaris IS (2017) Volatile organic compounds of microbial and non-microbial origin produced on model fish substrate un-inoculated and inoculated with gilt-head sea bream spoilage bacteria. LWT Food Sci Technol 78:54–62Google Scholar
- 27.Serio A, Fusella GC, López CC, Sacchetti G, Paparella A (2014) A survey on bacteria isolated as hydrogen sulfide-producers from marine fish. Food Control 39:111–118Google Scholar
- 28.Juni E (2005) Genus II Acinetobacter. In: Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (eds) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2 (the proteobacteria), part B (the gammaproteobacteria), 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kämpfer P (2014) Acinetobacter. In: Batt CA, Tortorello ML (eds) Encyclopedia of food microbiology, vol 1. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 31.Betts G (2006) In: de Blackburn WC (ed) Food spoilage microorganisms. Woodhead Publishing, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- 32.Saha SC, Chopade BA (2002) Effect of food preservatives on Acinetobacter genospecies isolated from meat. J Food Sci Technol 39(1):26–32Google Scholar
- 33.Teixeira LM, Merquior VLC (2014) The family Moraxellaceae. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F (eds) The prokaryotes: gammaproteobacteria, 4th edn. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- 35.Imanaka H (1962) Urocanic acid production by sporogenous bacteria: Part II. Cultural conditions and mechanisms of urocanic acid accumulation. Agric Biol Chem 26(1):49–55Google Scholar
- 36.Lambert AD, Smith JP, Dodds KL (1991) Shelf life extension and microbiological safety of fresh meat—a review. Food Microbiol 8(4):267–297Google Scholar
- 37.Weng PF, Li WW, Wu ZF, Zhou XJ, Chen SB, Zhang JJ (2013) Analysis of bacteria diversity and predominant microorganism in aquatic products of mackerel. Oceanol Limnol Sin 44(3):788–795Google Scholar
- 38.Dalgaard P (2014) Microbiological changes. In: Ryder J, Iddya K, Ababouch L (eds) Assessment and management of seafood safety and quality: current practices and emerging issues. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- 39.Kowalski W (2010) Ultraviolet germicidal irradiation handbook: UVGI for air and surface disinfection. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
- 41.Metin S, Erkan N, Varlik C, Aran N (2001) Extension of shelf-life of chub mackerel (Scomber japonicus Houttuyn 1780) treated with lactic acid. Eur Food Res Technol 213(3):174–177Google Scholar
- 42.Mah JH, Hwang HJ (2009) Effects of food additives on biogenic amine formation in Myeolchi-jeot, a salted and fermented anchovy (Engraulis japonicus). Food Chem 114(1):168–173Google Scholar
- 43.Peterkofsky A, Mehler LN (1963) Inhibition of pseudomonas histidase: evidence for a metal cofactor. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Spec Sect Enzymol Subj 73(1):159–162Google Scholar
- 44.Silva CC, da Ponte DJ, Dapkevicius MLE (1998) Storage temperature effect on histamine formation in big eye tuna and skipjack. J Food Sci 63(4):644–647Google Scholar