Comparative study on the acceptability and consumer appeal of commercial products and research-optimised low-salt frankfurters and cooked ham manufactured using high-pressure processing and organic acids
- 14 Downloads
The objective of this study was to assess the acceptability and consumer (n = 100) appeal of research-optimised low-salt (ROLS) frankfurters or cooked ham manufactured using high-pressure processing (HPP) and organic acids as hurdles and compared to research control and gold standard commercially available products. For frankfurters, consumers preferred the firmness and saltiness of the ROLS and research control frankfurters while the flavour and juiciness of commercial frankfurters was preferred. In terms of overall sensory acceptability (OSA), the ROLS frankfurter was liked just as much as the commercial brand frankfurter. For cooked ham, the appearance and firmness of ROLS and research control cooked ham was preferred while the juiciness of the commercial cooked ham was preferred. Consumers did not find significant differences in flavour, saltiness or OSA and the ROLS cooked ham was liked just as much as the commercial brand cooked ham. Overall, these results indicate that the ROLS processed meat products were just as acceptable or better than the gold standard commercially available products confirming the potential of the use of response surface methodology to optimise salt replacer Artisalt™, HPP and organic acids to manufacture consumer-accepted low-salt processed meat products with enhanced safety and shelf life.
KeywordsHigh-pressure processing Processed meat Organic acids Consumer study Hurdle technology Low salt
Funding for this research was provided under the National Development Plan, through the Food Institutional Research Measure (FIRM), administered by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, Ireland. Grant number: 11/F/031.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflict of interest.
Compliance with ethics requirements
This article does not contain any studies with animal or human subjects.
- 6.Ruusunen M, Poulanne E (2004) Sodium in meat products. International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. University of Helsinki, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lyndhurst B (2009) An evidence review of public attitudes to emerging food technologies. Social Science Research Unit, Food Standards Agency, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 13.Butz P, Needs EC, Baron A, Bayer O, Geisel B, Gupta B (2003) Consumer attitudes to high pressure food processing. Food Agric Environ 1(1):30–34Google Scholar
- 14.O’ Neill CM, Cruz-Romero MC, Duffy G, Kerry JP (2018) Application of response surface methodology for the development of sensory-acceptable, low-salt, shelf-stable frankfurters using high pressure processing and a mix of organic acids. European Food Research and Technology (accepted)Google Scholar
- 18.Skogsberg L (2017) Sodium reduction in emulsion-type sausage. Master´s thesis. Advanced A2E Publikation/Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, vol 455. Institutionen för livsmedelsvetenskapGoogle Scholar
- 29.NIZO (2018) NIZO food research centre, The Netherlands. https://www.nizo.com/juiciness-enhances-salt-perception-meat-products/. Accessed 21 July 2018
- 31.FSA (2017) Salt targets 2017. https://www.food.gov.uk/northern-ireland/nutritionni/salt-ni/salt-targets. Accessed 3 July 2018