Effect of added enzymes and quinoa flour on dough characteristics and sensory quality of a gluten-free bakery product

  • Annalisa Romano
  • Paolo Masi
  • Annachiara Bracciale
  • Alessandra Aiello
  • Maria Adalgisa Nicolai
  • Pasquale Ferranti
Original Paper
  • 53 Downloads

Abstract

The study is aimed at developing a new cereal-based product, with increased nutritional quality, using quinoa flour. The effect of the use of transglutaminase (TGase) and proteolytic enzymes on the microstructure, properties and in vitro digestion of gluten-free bakery products based on quinoa flour was evaluated. Microstructural results evaluated by means of Scanning Electron Microscopy showed that the quinoa starch granules are rather small (0.4–2 µm) and the presence of TGase induced significantly changes in dough and baked samples microstructures. The overall acceptability of the breads was improved by TGase addition. The results achieved showed that these enzymes have different effects on the bread characteristics and may improve properties of formulations, setting the basis for the development of baked quinoa products.

Keywords

Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Quinoa proteins Transglutaminase Microstructure In vitro digestibility MS/MS analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Mr. Gaetano Coppola—Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II for technical help.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

References

  1. 1.
    Leonard MM, Sapone A, Catassi C, Fasano A (2017) Celiac disease and nonceliac gluten sensitivity: a review. JAMA 318(7):647–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Capriles VD, Areas J (2014) Novel approaches in gluten-free breadmaking: interface between food science, nutrition, and health. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Saf 13(5):871–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aponte M, Boscaino F, Sorrentino A, Coppola R, Masi P, Romano A (2013) Volatile compounds and bacterial community dynamics of chestnut flour based sourdoughs. Food Chem 141(3):2394–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deora NS, Deswal A, Mishra HN (2015) Functionality of alternative protein in gluten-free product development. Food Sci Technol Int 21(5):364–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Martínez MM, Gomez M (2017) Rheological and microstructural evolution of the most common gluten-free flours and starches during bread fermentation and baking. J Food Eng 197:78–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Moroni AV, Dal Bello F, Arendt EK (2009) Sourdough in gluten-free bread-making: an ancient technology to solve a novel issue? Food Microbiol 26:676–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elgeti D, Nordlohne SD, Föste M, Besl M, Linden MH, Heinz V, Jekle M, Becker T (2014) Volume and texture improvement of gluten-free bread using quinoa white flour. J Cereal Sci 59:41–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Turkut GM, Cakmak H, Kumcuoglu S, Tavman S (2016) Effect of quinoa flour on gluten-free bread batter rheology and bread quality. J Cereal Sci 69:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rizzello CG, Lorusso A, Montemurro M, Gobbetti M (2016) Use of sourdough made with quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) flour and autochthonous selected lactic acid bacteria for enhancing the nutritional, textural and sensory features of white bread. Food Microbiol 56:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang S, Zhu F (2016) Formulation and quality attributes of quinoa food products. Food Bioprocess Technol 91:49–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pellegrini M, Gonzales RL, Ricci A, Fontecha J, Fernández-López J,. Pérez-Álvarez JA, Viuda-Martos M (2018) Chemical, fatty acid, polyphenolic profile, techno-functional and antioxidant properties of flours obtained from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). seeds. Ind Crops Prod 111:38–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stikic R, Glamoclija DJ, Demın M, Vucelıc-Radovıc B, Jovanovıc Z, Jacobsen SE, Mılovanovıc M (2012) Agronomical and nutritional evaluation of quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as an ingredient in bread formulation. J Cereal Sci 55:132–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Navruz-Varli S, Sanlier N (2016) Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Cereal Sci 69:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    FAOSTAT (2013) What is quinoa? Distribution and production. Santiago, Chile: International Year of Quinoa Secretariat Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean. http://www.fao.org/quinoa-2013/what-is-quinoa/distribution-and-production/en/. Accessed 24 Jul 2014
  15. 15.
    Medina W, Skurtys O, Aguilera JM (2010) Study on image analysis application for identification quinoa seeds (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) geographical provenance. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nowak V, Du J, Charrondière UR (2016) Assessment of the nutritional composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Food Chem 193:47–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Alvarez-Jubete L, Arendt EK, Gallagher E (2010) Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients. Trends Food Sci Tech 21(2):106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ando H, Chen YC, Tang H, Shimizu M, Watanabe K, Mitsunaga T (2002) Food components in fractions of quinoa seed. Food Sci Technol Res 8(1):80–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Haros M, Rosell CM, Benedito C (2002) Effect of different carbohydrases on fresh bread texture and bread staling. Eur Food Res Technol 215(5):425–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hemalatha MS, Prasada Rao UJS, Leelavathi K, Salimath PV (2010) Influence of amylases and xylanase on chemical, sensory, amylograph properties and microstructure of chapatti. LWT Food Sci Technol 43:1394–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barbosa-Ríos JA, Castill Jardòn J, Guadarrama-Lezama AY, Alvarez-Ramirez J, Meraz M, Carrillo-Navas H (2018) Effect of new generation enzymes addition on the physical, viscoelastic and textural properties of traditional Mexican sweet bread. J Cereal Sci 79:160–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gray JA, Bemiller JN (2003) Bread staling: molecular basis and control. Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safety 2(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Renzetti S, Bello FD, Arendt EK (2008) Microstructure, fundamental rheology and baking characteristics of batters and breads from different gluten-free flours treated with a microbial transglutaminase. J Cereal Sci 48:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steffolani ME, Ribotta PD, Perez GT, Leon AE (2010) Effect of glucose oxidase, transglutaminase, and pentosanase on wheat proteins: relationship with dough properties and bread-making quality. J Cereal Sci 51:366–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Scarnato L, Montanari C, Serrazanetti DI, Aloisi I, Balestra F, Del Duca S, Lanciotti R (2017) New bread formulation with improved rheological properties and longer shelf-life by the combined use of transglutaminase and sourdough. LWT Food Sci Technol 81:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Monogioudi E, Faccio G, Lille M, Poutanen K, Buchert J, Mattinen ML (2011) Effect of enzymatic cross-linking of β-casein on proteolysis by pepsin. Food Hydrocoll 25:71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Romano A, Giosafatto V, Di Pierro P, Romano R, Masi P, Mariniello L (2016) Impact of transglutaminase treatment on properties and in vitro digestibility of white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) flour. Food Res Int 88:239–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Renzetti S, Arendt EK (2009) Effect of protease treatment on the baking quality of brown rice bread: from textural and rheological properties to biochemistry and microstructure. J Cereal Sci 50:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Iglesias-Puig E, Monedero V, Haros M (2015) Bread with whole quinoa flour and bifidobacterial phytases increases dietary mineral intake and bioavailability. LWT Food Sci Technol 60:71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    AACC (2000) Approved methods of the AACC, 10th edn. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul (Methods 44–19, 46–30) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Romano A, Masi P, Pucci E, Oliviero V, Ferranti P (2017) Encapsulated proanthocyanidins as novel ingredients. Chem Eng Trans 57:1885–1890.  https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1757315 Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stone H, Sidel JL (1998) Quantitative descriptive analysis: developments, applications and the future. Food Technol 52:48–52Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Romano A, Blaiotta G, Di Cerbo A, Coppola R, Masi P, Aponte M (2014) Spray-dried chestnut extract containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus cells as novel ingredient for a probiotic chestnut mousse. J Appl Microbiol 116(6):1632–1641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alencar NMM, Carvalho de Morais E, Steel CJ, Bolini HMA (2017) Sensory characterisation of gluten-free bread. Int J Food Sci Technol 52:872–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atwell WA, Patrick BM, Johnson LA, Glass RW (1983) Characterization of quinoa starch. Cereal Chem 60:9–11Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Li G, Zhu F (2018) Quinoa starch: structure, properties, and applications. Carbohydr Polym 181:851–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hsieh HM, Swanson BG, Lumpkin TA (1999) Starch gelatinization and microstructure of azuki an granules prepared from whole, abraded, or ground beans. LWT Food Sci Technol 32:469–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Young CT, Pattee HE, Schadel WE, Sanders TH (2004) Microstructure of peanut (Arachis Hypogaea L. Cv. ‘NC 7’) cotyledons during development. LWT Food Sci Technol 37:439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Romano A, Giosafatto CVL, Masi P, Mariniello L (2015) Impact of dehulling on the physico-chemical properties and in vitro protein digestion of common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Food Funct 6:1345–1351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lorenz K (1990) Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) starch–physico-chemical properties and functional characteristics. Starch/Stärke 42:81–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ruales J, Nair BM (1994) Properties of starch and dietary fibre in raw and processed quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa, Willd) seeds. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 45:223–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Srichuwong S, Curti D, Austin S, King R, Lamothe L, Gloria-Hernandez H (2017) Physicochemical properties and starch digestibility of whole grain sorghums, millet, quinoa and amaranth flours, as affected by starch and non-starch constituents. Food Chem 233:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jekle M, Becker T (2011) Dough microstructure: novel analysis by quantification using confocal laser scanning microscopy. Food Res Int 44:984–991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Renzetti S, Dal Bello F, Arendt EK (2008) Microstructure, fundamental rheology and baking characteristics of batters and breads from different gluten-free flours treated with a microbial transglutaminase. J Cereal Sci 48:33–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bonet A, Rosell CM, Caballero PA, Gòmez M, Pérez-Munuera I, Luch MA (2006) Glucose oxidase effect on dough rheology and bread quality: a study from macroscopic to molecular level. Food Chem 99:408–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abugoch JLI (2009) Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Adv Food Nutr Res 58:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Capriotti AL, Cavaliere C, Piovesana S, Stampachiacchiere S, Ventura S, Zenezini Chiozzi R, Laganà A (2015) Characterization of quinoa seed proteome combining different protein precipitation techniques: Improvement of knowledge of nonmodel plant proteomics. J Sep Sci 38(6):1017–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Onyango C, Mutungi C, Unbehend G, Lindhauer MG (2010) Rheological and baking characteristics of batter and bread prepared from pregelatinized cassava starch and sorghum and modified using microbial transglutaminase. J Food Eng 97:465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chlopika J, Pasko P, Gorinstein S, Jedryas A, Zagrodzki P (2012) Total phenolic and total flavonoid content, antioxidant activity and sensory evaluation of pseudocereals breads. LWT Food Sci Technol 46:548–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annalisa Romano
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paolo Masi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Annachiara Bracciale
    • 1
  • Alessandra Aiello
    • 1
  • Maria Adalgisa Nicolai
    • 1
  • Pasquale Ferranti
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Centre for Food Innovation and Development in the Food IndustryUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  3. 3.ISAAvellinoItaly

Personalised recommendations