Skip to main content
Log in

Wheat flour quality evaluation from the baker’s perspective: comparative assessment of 18 analytical methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we sourced 37 commercial flours from 14 mills based on 7 countries and analysed them with a total of 18 methods, generating 90 single analytical values for each flour. The 18 methods were chosen to cover the analytical practice of most European mills and bakery companies, as well as particle charge detection, GlutoPeak and solvent retention capacity as emerging methods. We investigated the relationship between the data from the individual methods, and performed a principal component analysis to describe the structure of the data set and identify the main underlying flour properties. Four principal components accounted for 64.8% of the total variance. They were interpreted as (PC1) starch gelatinization properties, (PC2) hydration properties, (PC3) dough resistance at variable water amount, and (PC4) dough strength at fixed water amount. From the emerging methods, solvent retention capacity (sodium carbonate and water) was highly correlated with PC2, while the GlutoPeak max torque was highly correlated with PC4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aamodt A, Magnus EM, Faergestad EM (2003) Effect of flour quality, ascorbic acid, and DATEM on dough rheological parameters and hearth loaves characteristics. J Food Sci 68:2201–2210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Barak S, Mudgil D, Khatkar BS (2013) Relationship of gliadin and glutenin proteins with dough rheology, flour pasting and bread making performance of wheat varieties. LWT-Food Sci Technol 51:211–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cauvin S (2015) Technology of breadmaking. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Dabčević T, Hadnađev M, Pojić M (2009) Evaluation of the possibility to replace conventional rheological wheat flour quality control instruments with the new measurement tool—Mixolab. Agric Conspec Sci 74:169–174

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dalla Marta A, Grifoni D, Mancini M, Zipoli G, Orlandini S (2011) The influence of climate on durum wheat quality in Tuscany, Central Italy. Int J Biometeorol 55:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deffenbaugh LB, Walker CE (1989) Comparison of starch pasting properties in the Brabender Viscoamylograph and the Rapid Visco-Analyzer. Cereal Chem 66:493–499

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Hady EA, El-Samahy SK, Brümmer JM (1999) Effect of oxidants, sodium-stearoyl-2-lactylate and their mixtures on rheological and baking properties of nonprefermented frozen doughs. LWT-Food Sci Technol 32:446–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fierens E, Helsmoortel L, Joye IJ, Courtin CM, Delcour JA (2015) Changes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) flour pasting characteristics as a result of storage and their underlying mechanisms. J Cereal Sci 65:81–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fremaux A (2015) Bake-off bakery markets in the EU. Gira, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fu BX, Wang K, Dupuis B (2017) Predicting water absorption of wheat flour using high shear-based GlutoPeak test. J Cereal Sci 76:116–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hammed AM, Ozsisli B, Ohm JB, Simsek S (2015) relationship between solvent retention capacity and protein molecular weight distribution, quality characteristics, and breadmaking functionality of hard red spring wheat flour. Cereal Chem 92:466–474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huen J, Börsmann J, Matullat I, Böhm L, Stukenborg F, Heitmann M, Zannini E, Arendt EK (2017) Pilot scale investigation of the relationship between baked good properties and wheat flour analytical values. Eur Food Res Technol. doi:10.1007/s00217-017-2975-2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koksel H, Kahraman K, Sanal T, Ozay DS, Dubat A (2009) Potential utilization of Mixolab for quality evaluation of bread wheat genotypes. Cereal Chem 86:522–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kweon M, Slade L, Levine H (2011) Solvent retention capacity (SRC) testing of wheat flour: principles and value in predicting flour functionality in different wheat-based food processes and in wheat breeding—a review. Cereal Chem 88(6):537–552

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li J, Hou GG, Chen Z, Chung A-L, Gehring K (2014) Studying the effects of whole-wheat flour on the rheological properties and the quality attributes of whole-wheat saltine cracker using SRC, alveograph, rheometer, and NMR technique. LWT Food Sci Technol 55(1):43–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Longin F, Ringer L, Lösche K, Starck N, Römer P (2015) Development of germplasm and strategies for sustainable breeding of Emmer (Triticum dicoccum) for organic farming in Germany, BÖLN project report. http://orgprints.org/27958/1/27958-10OE059-V-uni-hohenheim-longin-2014-qualitaetszuechtung-emmer.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2017

  17. Ma S, Li L, Wang XX, Zheng XL, Bian K, Bao QD (2016) Effect of mechanically damaged starch from wheat flour on the quality of frozen dough and steamed bread. Food Chem 202:120–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Marti A, Augst E, Cox S, Koehler P (2015) Correlations between gluten aggregation properties defined by the GlutoPeak test and content of quality-related protein fractions of winter wheat flour. J Cereal Sci 66:89–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Marti A, Ulrici A, Foca G, Quaglia L, Pagani MA (2015) Characterization of common wheat flours (Triticum aestivum L.) through multivariate analysis of conventional rheological parameters and gluten peak test indices. LWT-Food. Sci Technol 64(1):95–103

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peña RJ, Posadas-Romano R (2013) Potential use of the mixolab in wheat breading. In: Dubat A, Rosell CM, Gallagher E (eds) Mixolab: a new approach to rheology. AACC International Inc, St. Paul, pp 79–84

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Schick J, Lösche K (2010) Characterization of milled grain products by particle charge detection. In: Keil HM (ed) Review “Bread”, f2m food multimedia, Hamburg, pp 130–139

  22. Semenov MA, Stratonovitch P, Alghabari F, Gooding MJ (2014) Adapting wheat in Europe for climate change. J Cereal Sci 59:245–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Bockstaele F, De Leyn I, Eeckhout M, Dewettinck K (2008) Rheological properties of wheat flour dough and the relationship with bread volume. I. Creep-recovery measurements. Cereal Chem 85:753–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu J, Wang S, Wang J, Li C, Xin Q, Huang W, Zhang Y, Zhonghu H, Wang S (2015) Effect of laboratory milling on properties of starches isolated from different flour millstreams of hard and soft wheat. Food Chem 172:504–514

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project FLOURplus has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration under Grant Agreement No. 606198. The GlutoPeak device was provided to ttz Bremerhaven by Brabender, Germany. The measurements on the Chopin devices were performed by Chopin Technologies, France.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julien Huen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with ethics requirements

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huen, J., Börsmann, J., Matullat, I. et al. Wheat flour quality evaluation from the baker’s perspective: comparative assessment of 18 analytical methods. Eur Food Res Technol 244, 535–545 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-2974-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-017-2974-3

Keywords

Navigation