Development and validation of a candidate reference method for serum cortisol by isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry combined with dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation
Accurate and precise cortisol measurements are requisite for ensuring appropriate diagnosis and management of diseases related with adrenal or pituitary gland disorders. Prompted by the needs in characterization of certified reference materials and quality assurance for serum cortisol measurements, we developed and evaluated a highly reliable measurement procedure based on isotope dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) combined with dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation as the sample pretreatment. An appropriate amount of serum was accurately weighed and spiked with the isotope labelled internal standard. After precipitation, massive lipids and lipoproteins were removed from serum matrix. The clear supernatant was transferred and extracted with ethyl acetate-hexane solution. The cortisol was analyzed with LC-MS/MS in positive electrospray ionization mode. The within-run and total coefficient of variations (CVs) ranged from 0.3 to 0.6% and 0.7 to 1.2%, respectively, for a concentration range of 76.30 to 768.04 nmol/L. A regression comparison of the results obtained by the present method and the certified values of ERM-DA451 showed agreement with no statistical difference (Y = 1.0092 X-0.7455; 95% CI for the slope, 0.9940 to 1.0212; 95% CI for the intercept, − 3.6575 to 2.6390, r2 = 0.999). All structural analogs of cortisol tested were well resolved from cortisol in 12 min on a phenyl ligand column under an isocratic elution. The limit of quantification was estimated to 5 pg cortisol in absolute amount. This method is accurate and simple and can be served as a candidate reference measurement procedure in establishment of serum cortisol reference system.
KeywordsSerum cortisol Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Lipoprotein precipitation Reference method
This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 81301488).
Compliance with ethical standards
Anonymized left-over sera were collected from patients receiving physical examinations or hospitalized at Beijing Hospital (BJH, Beijing, China). The study was reviewed and approved by the BJH Ethics Committee.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 1.Knutsson U, Dahlgren J, Marcus C, Rosberg S, Brönnegård M, Stierna P, et al. Circadian cortisol rhythms in healthy boys and girls: relationship with age, growth, body composition, and pubertal development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(2):536–40.Google Scholar
- 7.De Brabandere VI, Thienpont LM, Stöckl D, De Leenheer AP. Three routine methods for serum cortisol evaluated by comparison with an isotope dilution gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method. Clin Chem. 1995;41(12 Pt 1):1781–3.Google Scholar
- 8.Thienpont LM, Van Nieuwenhove B, Stöckl D, Reinauer H, De Leenheer AP. Determination of reference method values by isotope dilution-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry: a five years’ experience of two European Reference Laboratories. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1996;34(10):853–60.Google Scholar
- 19.Thienpont LM, Verhaeghe PG, Van Brussel KA, De Leenheer AP. Estradiol-17 beta quantified in serum by isotope dilution-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: reversed-phase C18 high-performance liquid chromatography compared with immuno-affinity chromatography for sample pretreatment. Clin Chem. 1988;34(10):2066–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.CLSI. C-62A: Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry methods; approved guideline. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.Google Scholar
- 25.ISO/IEC Guide 98–3:2008. Uncertainty of measurement - part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995). Geneva: ISO; 2008.Google Scholar
- 26.Ellison SLR. RossleinM, Williams A, editors. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4: quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement. 2nd ed. EURACHEM: Czech Republic; 2000.Google Scholar