Advertisement

Evaluating the biochemical changes of LPS-stimulated endothelial cells by synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy at a single-cell level

  • Yue Wang
  • Yadi Wang
  • Lina Huang
  • Xiangyong LiuEmail author
  • Jun Hu
  • Junhong LüEmail author
Research Paper
  • 54 Downloads

Abstract

Endothelial damage is a major manifestation in many forms of heart and lung injuries induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), but the biochemical responses and activation mechanisms of endothelial cells have not been fully explicit. In this study, the biochemical changes to endothelial cells exposed to LPS were investigated by synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy at a single-cell level. We found that the whole infrared spectrum of endothelial cells shifted after LPS treatment, indicating chemical component changes within cells. Principal component analysis (PCA) and t tests on subspectra (fatty acid region, protein region, and nucleic acid-sugar region, respectively) further showed that sugar components as well as fatty acids changed dramatically while proteins had no significant variation following LPS exposure. These results suggested that the glycocalyx layer structure on endothelial cell membrane may be mainly influenced by LPS and also proved that synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy was a useful technique to evaluate the biochemical changes of endothelial damage at the single-cell level.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Endothelial cells Lipopolysaccharide Synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy Single-cell analysis Glycocalyx 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the staff of BL01B beamline at the National Center for Protein Sciences Shanghai and Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility for assistance during data collection.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No U1732130), Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ-SSW-SLH019), and the Scientific Research Foundation of Binzhou Medical University (BY2017KYQD02).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Volk T, Kox WJ. Endothelium function in sepsis. Inflamm Res. 2000;49(5):185–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kundra P, Goswami S. Endothelial glycocalyx: role in body fluid homeostasis and fluid management. Indian J Anaesth. 2019;63(1):6–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stasi A, Intini A, Divella C, Franzin R, Montemurno E, Grandaliano G, et al. Emerging role of lipopolysaccharide binding protein in sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017;32(1):24–31.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dauphinee SM, Karsan A. Lipopolysaccharide signaling in endothelial cells. Lab Investig. 2006;86(1):9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang XY, Meegan JE, Jannaway M, Coleman DC, Yuan SY. A disintegrin and metalloproteinase 15-mediated glycocalyx shedding contributes to vascular leakage during inflammation. Cardiovasc Res. 2018;114(13):1752–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhou HS, Li M, Sui BD, Wei L, Hou R, Chen WS, et al. Lipopolysaccharide impairs permeability of pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells via Connexin40. Microvasc Res. 2017;115:58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marechal X, Favory R, Joulin O, Montaigne D, Hassoun S, Decoster B, et al. Endothelial glycocalyx damage during endotoxemia coincides with microcirculatory dysfunction and vascular oxidative stress. Shock. 2008;29(5):572–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xiao JG, Song Q, Li TS, Sun RJ. Bacterial endotoxin-induced endothelial cell injury and calcium overload associated with Toll-like receptor and calcium signal. Chin Crit Care Med. 2017;29(2):150–5.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cui SX, Tang JM, Wang SS, Li L. Kaempferol protects lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory injury in human aortic endothelial cells (HAECs) by regulation of miR-203. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;115:108888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bae JS, Rezaie AR. Activated protein C inhibits high mobility group box 1 signaling in endothelial cells. Blood. 2011;118(14):3952–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yao WF, Li H, Liu QN, Gao Y, Dai J, Bao BH, et al. Cellular metabolomics revealed the cytoprotection of amentoflavone, a natural compound, in lipopolysaccharide-induced injury of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(9):1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Movasaghi Z, Rehman S, Rehman IU. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy of biological tissues. Appl Spectrosc Rev. 2008;43(2):134–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hu XJ, Liu ZX, Wang YD, Li XL, Hu J, Lü JH. Synchrotron FTIR spectroscopy reveals molecular changes in Escherichia coli upon Cu 2+ exposure. Nucl Sci Tech. 2016;27(3):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang YD, Li XL, Hu J, Lü JH. Synchrotron infrared spectral regions as signatures for foodborne bacterial typing. Nucl Sci Tech. 2019;30(2):25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang YD, Li XL, Liu ZX, Zhang XX, Hu J, Lü JH. Discrimination of foodborne pathogenic bacteria using synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy. Nucl Sci Tech. 2017;28(4):49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kazarian SG, Chan KL. Micro- and macro-attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic imaging. Appl Spectrosc. 2010;64(5):135–52A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu ZX, Tang YZ, Chen F, Liu X, Liu ZJ, Zhong JJ, et al. Synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy reveals early adipogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells at single-cell level. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478(3):1286–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wang LP, Huang X, Kong GQ, Xu HX, Li JK, Hao D, et al. Ulinastatin attenuates pulmonary endothelial glycocalyx damage and inhibits endothelial heparanase activity in LPS-induced ARDS. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478(2):669–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Petibois C, Cestelli-Guidi M, Piccinini M, Moenner M, Marcelli A. Synchrotron radiation FTIR imaging in minutes: a first step towards real-time cell imaging. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2010;397(6):2123–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alvarez-Ordóñez A, Mouwen DJM, López M, Prieto M. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy as a tool to characterize molecular composition and stress response in foodborne pathogenic bacteria. J Microbiol Methods. 2011;84(3):369–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hornemann A, Sinning D, Cortes S, Campino L, Emmer P, Kuhls K, et al. A pilot study on fingerprinting Leishmania species from the Old World using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409(29):6907–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kenig S, Bedolla DE, Birarda G, Faoro V, Mitri E, Vindigni A, et al. Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy reveals biochemical changes associated with glioma stem cell differentiation. Biophys Chem. 2015;207:90–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu J, Li G, Chen C, Chen DC, Zhou QS. MiR-6835 promoted LPS-induced inflammation of HUVECs associated with the interaction between TLR-4 and AdipoR1 in lipid rafts. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0188604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wongwattanakul M, Hahnvajanawong C, Tippayawat P, Chio-Srichan S, Leelayuwat C, Limpaiboon T, et al. Classification of gemcitabine resistant cholangiocarcinoma cell lines using synchrotron FTIR microspectroscopy. J Biophotonics. 2017;10(3):367–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Beekes M, Lasch P, Naumann D. Analytical applications of Fourier transform-infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy in microbiology and prion research. Vet Microbiol. 2007;123(4):305–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kamnev AA, Tugarova AV, Dyatlova YA, Tarantilis PA, Grigoryeva OP, Fainleib AM, et al. Methodological effects in Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy: implications for structural analyses of biomacromolecular samples. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2018;193:558–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cesar E, Ignacio M, Tamara H, Ricardo A, Velásquez LA, Claudio CV, et al. Endotoxin induces fibrosis in vascular endothelial cells through a mechanism dependent on transient receptor protein melastatin 7 activity. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zimkus A, Misiūnas A, Chaustova L. Li+ effect on the cell wall of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as probed by FTIR spectroscopy. Cent Euro J Bio. 2013;8(8):724–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of PharmacyBinzhou Medical UniversityYantaiChina
  2. 2.Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai Advanced Research InstituteChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  3. 3.CAS Key Laboratory of Interfacial Physics and Technology, Shanghai Institute of Applied PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesShanghaiChina
  4. 4.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations