Development and comparison of mimotope-based immunoassays for the analysis of fumonisin B1
Mycotoxins can be found as natural contaminants in many foods and feeds, and owing to their toxic effects, it is essential to detect them before they enter the food chain. An interesting approach for the analysis of mycotoxins by competitive immunoassays is the use of epitope-mimicking peptides, or mimotopes, which can replace the toxin conjugates traditionally used in such assays. Mimotopes can be selected from phage-displayed peptide libraries even without any prior knowledge of the antibody–antigen interaction, and after identifying the target specific clones, individual clones can be efficiently amplified in bacteria and used directly in the immunoassay. Following such approach, we have previously selected and identified a dodecapeptide which functions as a mimotope for the mycotoxin fumonisin B1. In this work, we present the development and comparison of various immunoassays based on this mimotope, named A2, which has been used in the phage-displayed format in which it was selected, but also as a fluorescent recombinant fusion protein or as a synthetic peptide. The highest sensitivity was obtained with a magnetic bead–based assay using the synthetic peptide and enzymatic detection which provided a detection limit of 0.029 ng mL−1. Analysis of the binding kinetics by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) further reinforced the suitability of the synthetic peptide for the competitive immunoassays, as this mimotope showed a slightly lower affinity for the target antibody in comparison with the recombinant fusion protein.
KeywordsMycotoxin Immunoassay Mimotope Peptide Phage Magnetic bead
R.P. acknowledges UCM for a pre-doctoral grant and R.B. the PI17CIII/00045 grant from the AES-ISCIII program.
This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, grant RTI2018-096410-B-C21.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Wild D. The immunoassay handbook: theory and applications of ligand binding, ELISA, and related techniques. 4th ed. Oxford: Elsevier; 2013.Google Scholar
- 4.Xiao H, Clarke JR, Marquardt RR, Frohlich AA. Improved methods for conjugating selected mycotoxins to carrier proteins and dextran for immunoassays. J Agric Food Chem. 1995;43:2092–7.Google Scholar
- 6.Berthiller F, Brera C, Crews C, Iha MH, Krska R, Lattanzio VMT, et al. Developments in mycotoxin analysis: an update for 2014-2015. World Mycotoxin J. 2016;9:5–30.Google Scholar
- 7.Freire FDCO, da Rocha MEB. Impact of mycotoxins on human health. In: Mérillon J-M, Ramawat KG, editors. Fungal metabolites. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.Google Scholar
- 8.Goyal S, Ramawat KG, Mérillon JM. Different shades of fungal metabolites: an overview. In: Mérillon J-M, Ramawat KG, editors. Fungal metabolites. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.Google Scholar
- 10.European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006. Off J Eur Union. 2006;L364:5–24.Google Scholar
- 11.European Commission Regulation (EC) No 1126/2007. Off J Eur Union. 2007;L255:14–7.Google Scholar
- 12.European Commission Regulation (EC) No 105/2010. Off J Eur Union. 2010;L35:7–8.Google Scholar
- 13.European Commission Regulation (EC) No 165/2010. Off J Eur Union. 2010;L50:8–12.Google Scholar
- 14.Senyuva HZ, Gilbert J, Stroka J. Determination of fumonisins B1 and B2 in corn by LC/MS with immunoaffinity column cleanup: Interlaboratory study. J AOAC Int. 2010;93:211–21.Google Scholar
- 19.Yuan Q, Pestka JJ, Hespenheide BM, Kuhn LA, Linz JE, Hart LP. Identification of mimotope peptides which bind to the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol-specific monoclonal antibody. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;8:65.Google Scholar
- 23.Liu R, Yu Z, He Q, Xu Y. An immunoassay for ochratoxin A without the mycotoxin. Food Control. 2007;18:872–7.Google Scholar
- 24.Lai W, Fung DYC, Yang X, Renrong L, Xiong Y. Development of a colloidal gold strip for rapid detection of ochratoxin A with mimotope peptide. Food Control. 2009;20:791–5.Google Scholar
- 28.He Q-H, Xu Y, Huang Y-H, Liu R-R, Huang Z-B, Li Y-P. Phage-displayed peptides that mimic zearalenone and its application in immunoassay. Food Chem. 2011;126:1312–5.Google Scholar
- 29.Barbas CFI, Burton DR, Scott JK, Silverman GJ. Phage display: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.Google Scholar
- 39.Clontech Living Colors User Manual, vol II. Red Fluorescent Protein, Protocol PT3404−1. www.clontech.com. Accessed 10 May 2018.
- 40.Marco M-P, Gee S, Hammock BD. Immunochemical techniques for environmental analysis I. Immunosensors. TrAC. 1995;14:341–50.Google Scholar
- 42.Davies J, Roberts CJ, Dawkes AC, Sefton J, Edwards JC, Glasbey TO, et al. Use of scanning probe microscopy and surface plasmon resonance as analytical tools in the study of antibody-coated microtiter wells. Langmuir. 1994;10:2654–61.Google Scholar
- 44.He Q, Xu Y, Zhang C, Li Y, Huang Z. Phage-borne peptidomimetics as immunochemical reagent in dot-immunoassay for mycotoxin zearalenone. Food Control. 2014;39:56–61.Google Scholar
- 45.New England Biolabs (NEB) Ph.D. Phage Display Libraries - instruction manual. www.neb.com. Accessed 31 Jan 2019.
- 46.Ji Y, He Q, Xu Y, Tu Z, Yang H, Qiu Y, et al. Phage displayed anti-idiotypic nanobody mediated immuno-PCR for sensitive and environmentally friendly detection of mycotoxin ochratoxin A. Anal Methods. 2016;8:7824–31.Google Scholar