Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 26, pp 6959–6968 | Cite as

Quantification of microplastics in environmental samples via pressurized liquid extraction and pyrolysis-gas chromatography

  • Georg Dierkes
  • Tim Lauschke
  • Susanne Becher
  • Heike Schumacher
  • Corinna Földi
  • Thomas TernesEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

The quantification of microplastics (MP) in environmental samples is currently a challenging task. To enable low quantification limits, an analytical method has been developed combining pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) and pyrolysis GC-MS. The automated extraction includes a pre-extraction step via methanol followed by a subsequent PLE using tetrahydrofuran. For the most frequently used synthetic polymers polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), and polystyrene (PS), limits of quantification were achieved down to 0.007 mg/g. Recoveries above 80% were attained for solid matrices such as soil and sediments. The developed method was applied for MP quantification in environmental samples such as sediment, suspended matter, soil, and sewage sludge. In all these matrices, PE and PP were detected with concentrations ranging from 0.03 to 3.3 mg/g. In sewage sludge samples, all three polymers were present with concentration levels ranging between 0.08 ± 0.02 mg/g (PP) and 3.3 ± 0.3 mg/g (PE). However, especially for solid samples, the analysis of triplicates revealed elevated statistical uncertainties due to the inhomogeneous distribution of MP particles. Thus, care has to be taken when milling and homogenizing the samples due to the formation of agglomerates.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Microplastics Quantification Pressurized liquid extraction pyr-GC-MS 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was part of the FONA project “Microplastics in Inland Waters - Investigation and Modeling of Entries and whereabouts in the Danube Area as a Basis for Action Planning (MicBin)” funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF).

Funding information

Funding by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI) is acknowledged. Tim Lauschke is thankful for financial support by University of Koblenz.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Mani T, Hauk A, Walter U, Burkhardt-Holm P. Microplastics profile along the Rhine River. Sci Rep. 2015;5:17988.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17988.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blettler MCM, Ulla MA, Rabuffetti AP, Garello N. Plastic pollution in freshwater ecosystems: macro-, meso-, and microplastic debris in a floodplain lake. Environ Monit Assess. 2017;189(11):581.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6305-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chae Y, An Y-J. Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: a review. Environ Pollut. 2018;240:387–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dekiff JH, Remy D, Klasmeier J, Fries E. Occurrence and spatial distribution of microplastics in sediments from Norderney. Environ Pollut. 2014;186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.11.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Imhof HK, Laforsch C, Wiesheu AC, Schmid J, Anger PM, Niessner R, et al. Pigments and plastic in limnetic ecosystems: a qualitative and quantitative study on microparticles of different size classes. Water Res. 2016;98:64–74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.03.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peters CA, Hendrickson E, Minor EC, Schreiner K, Halbur J, Bratton SP. Pyr-GC/MS analysis of microplastics extracted from the stomach content of benthivore fish from the Texas Gulf Coast. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;137:91–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.049.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vidyasakar A, Neelavannan K, Krishnakumar S, Prabaharan G, Sathiyabama Alias Priyanka T, Magesh NS, et al. Macrodebris and microplastic distribution in the beaches of Rameswaram Coral Island, Gulf of Mannar, Southeast coast of India: a first report. Mar Pollut Bull. 2018;137:610–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piehl S, Leibner A, Löder MGJ, Dris R, Bogner C, Laforsch C. Identification and quantification of macro- and microplastics on an agricultural farmland. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17950.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36172-y.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Haave M, Lorenz C, Primpke S, Gerdts G. Different stories told by small and large microplastics in sediment - first report of microplastic concentrations in an urban recipient in Norway. Mar Pollut Bull. 2019;141:501–13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.02.015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mani T, Primpke S, Lorenz C, Gerdts G, Burkhardt-Holm P. Microplastic pollution in benthic midstream sediments of the Rhine River. Environ Sci Technol. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elert AM, Becker R, Duemichen E, Eisentraut P, Falkenhagen J, Sturm H, et al. Comparison of different methods for MP detection: what can we learn from them, and why asking the right question before measurements matters? Environ Pollut. 2017;231(Part 2):1256–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.074.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Renner G, Schmidt TC, Schram J. Analytical methodologies for monitoring micro(nano)plastics: which are fit for purpose? Curr Opin Environ Sci Health. 2018;1:55–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2017.11.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huppertsberg S, Knepper TP. Instrumental analysis of microplastics—benefits and challenges. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1210-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zarfl C. Promising techniques and open challenges for microplastic identification and quantification in environmental matrices. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-019-01763-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Käppler A, Fischer D, Oberbeckmann S, Schernewski G, Labrenz M, Eichhorn K-J, et al. Analysis of environmental microplastics by vibrational microspectroscopy: FTIR, Raman or both? Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408(29):8377–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-016-9956-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tagg AS, Sapp M, Harrison JP, Ojeda JJ. Identification and quantification of microplastics in wastewater using focal plane array-based reflectance micro-FT-IR imaging. Anal Chem. 2015;87(12):6032–40.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b00495.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Primpke S, Lorenz C, Rascher-Friesenhausen R, Gerdts G. An automated approach for microplastics analysis using focal plane array (FPA) FTIR microscopy and image analysis. Anal Methods. 2017;9(9):1499–511.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AY02476A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Araujo CF, Nolasco MM, Ribeiro AMP, Ribeiro-Claro PJA. Identification of microplastics using Raman spectroscopy: latest developments and future prospects. Water Res. 2018;142:426–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.060.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simon M, van Alst N, Vollertsen J. Quantification of microplastic mass and removal rates at wastewater treatment plants applying focal plane array (FPA)-based Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) imaging. Water Res. 2018;142:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mai L, Bao L-J, Shi L, Wong CS, Zeng EY. A review of methods for measuring microplastics in aquatic environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2018;25(12):11319–32.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1692-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Unice KM, Kreider ML, Panko JM. Use of a deuterated internal standard with pyrolysis-GC/MS dimeric marker analysis to quantify tire tread particles in the environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012;9(11):4033–55.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph9114033.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duemichen E, Braun U, Senz R, Fabian G, Sturm H. Assessment of a new method for the analysis of decomposition gases of polymers by a combining thermogravimetric solid-phase extraction and thermal desorption gas chromatography mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1354:117–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2014.05.057.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fischer M, Scholz-Böttcher BM. Simultaneous trace identification and quantification of common types of microplastics in environmental samples by pyrolysis-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(9):5052–60.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06362.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fuller S, Gautam A. A procedure for measuring microplastics using pressurized fluid extraction. Environ Sci Technol. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b00816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eisentraut P, Dümichen E, Ruhl AS, Jekel M, Albrecht M, Gehde M, et al. Two birds with one stone—fast and simultaneous analysis of microplastics: microparticles derived from thermoplastics and tire wear. Environ Sci Technol Lett. 2018;5(10):608–13.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    David J, Steinmetz Z, Kučerík J, Schaumann GE. Quantitative analysis of poly(ethylene terephthalate) microplastics in soil via thermogravimetry–mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Brand S, Schlüsener MP, Albrecht D, Kunkel U, Strobel C, Grummt T, et al. Quaternary (triphenyl-) phosphonium compounds: environmental behavior and toxicity. Water Res. 2018;136:207–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.032.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wick A, Jacobs B, Kunkel U, Heininger P, Ternes TA. Benzotriazole UV stabilizers in sediments, suspended particulate matter and fish of German rivers: new insights into occurrence, time trends and persistency. Environ Pollut. 2016;212:401–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.01.024.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    García MT, Gracia I, Duque G, Lucas A, Rodríguez JF. Study of the solubility and stability of polystyrene wastes in a dissolution recycling process. Waste Manag. 2009;29(6):1814–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2009.01.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scholz-Böttcher BM, Nissenbaum A, Rullkötter J. An 18th century medication “Mumia vera aegyptica” – fake or authentic? Org Geochem. 2013;65:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orggeochem.2013.09.011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dümichen E, Barthel A-K, Braun U, Bannick CG, Brand K, Jekel M, et al. Analysis of polyethylene microplastics in environmental samples, using a thermal decomposition method. Water Res. 2015;85:451–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.09.002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Bergmann M, Wirzberger V, Krumpen T, Lorenz C, Primpke S, Tekman MB, et al. High quantities of microplastic in Arctic deep-sea sediments from the HAUSGARTEN observatory. Environ Sci Technol. 2017;51(19):11000–10.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georg Dierkes
    • 1
  • Tim Lauschke
    • 1
    • 2
  • Susanne Becher
    • 1
  • Heike Schumacher
    • 1
  • Corinna Földi
    • 1
  • Thomas Ternes
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.German Federal Institute of HydrologyKoblenzGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Integrated Natural SciencesUniversity Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations