Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 26, pp 6837–6845 | Cite as

New photothermal immunoassay of human chorionic gonadotropin using Prussian blue nanoparticle-based photothermal conversion

  • Guolin Hong
  • Dongdong Zhang
  • Yinghao He
  • Yuanyuan Yang
  • Ping Chen
  • Huijing Yang
  • Zhiyang Zhou
  • Yinhuan LiuEmail author
  • Yan WangEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

A new near-infrared-based photothermal immunosensing strategy was developed for the sensitive and feasible detection of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) by use of a Prussian blue nanoparticle-based photothermal conversion system. Prussian blue nanospheres synthesized by the one-pot method were used for the labeling of anti-HCG detection antibody. A sandwich-type immunoreaction was initially conducted on a monoclonal anti-HCG antibody-coated microplate with a nanoparticle-labeled signal antibody. Accompanying formation of the sandwiched immunocomplex, Prussian blue nanospheres caused photothermal conversion under 980-nm laser irradiation, thereby resulting in an increase of the temperature of the detection system measured by a portable digital thermometer. The properties and factors influencing the analytical performance of the photothermal immunoassay were studied in detail. Under the optimal conditions, the Prussian blue nanoparticle-based photothermal immunoassay exhibited good temperature responses relative to target HCG concentrations within the dynamic range of 0.01–100 ng mL-1 at a low detection limit of 5.8 pg mL-1. This system also displayed good anti-interference behavior with regard to other cancer biomarkers, good reproducibility, and relatively long storage stability. The method accuracy was evaluated for analysis of human serum specimens, giving results that matched well with those obtained with a commercial HCG enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Importantly, this protocol is promising for advanced development of photothermal immunoassays.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Photothermal immunoassay Human chorionic gonadotropin Prussian blue photothermal material Photothermal conversion system Protein diagnostics 

Notes

Funding information

We sincerely acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772287 and 81371902), the Joint Project of Major Diseases in Xiamen City of China (3502Z20179044), and the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2016J01643).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were approved by the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Fujian Medical University and in accordance with the ethical standards of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University and Fujian Medical University ethics committees and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang W, Liu J, Zuo W. Immunotherapy in ovarian cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2019;28:447–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Franier B, Thompson M. Early stage detection and screening of ovarian cancer: a research opportunity and significant challenge for biosensor technology. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;135:71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan J, Wang M, Wang C, Cao Y. Advances in human chorionic gonadotropin detection technologies: a review. Bioanalysis. 2017;9:1509–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Szabova L, Karim B, Gordon M, Lu L, Pate N, Ohler Z. A transplantable syngeneic allograft mouse model for nongestational chorocarcinoma of the ovary. Vet Pathol. 2019;56:399–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhong Y, Wang Y, Huang J, Xu X, Pan W, Gao S, et al. Association of hCG and LHCGR expression patterns with clinicopathological parameters in ovarian cancer. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215:748–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang W, Duan H, Chen R, Ma T, Zeng L, Leng Y, et al. Effect of different-sized gold nanoflowers on the detection performance of immunochromatographic assay from human chorionic gonadotropin detection. Talanta. 2019;194:604–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Camperi J, De Cock B, Pichon V, Combes A, Guibourdenche J, Fourier T, et al. First characterization by capillary electrophoresis of human chorionic gonadotropin at the intact level. Talanta. 2019;193:77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rizwan M, Hazmi M, Lim S, Ahmed M. A highly sensitive electrochemical detection of human chorionic gonadotropin on a carbon nano-onions/gold nanoparticles/polyethylene glycol nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electroanal Chem. 2019;833:462–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Egeland S, Reubsaet L, Paus E, Halvorsen T. Dual-immuno-MS technique for improved differentiation power in heterodimeric protein biomarker analysis: determination and differentiation of human chorionic gonadotropin variants in serum. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:7379–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Luo Z, Qi Q, Zhang L, Zeng R, Su L, Tang D. Branched polyethylenimine-modified upconversion nanohybrids-mediated photoelectrochemical immunoassay with synergistic effect of dual-purpose copper ions. Anal Chem. 2019;91:4149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yu Z, Tang Y, Cai G, Ren R, Tang D. Paper electrode-based flexible pressure sensor for point-of-care immunoassay with digital multimeter. Anal Chem. 2019;91:1222–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lv S, Zhang K, Tang D. A new visual immunoassay for prostate-specific antigen using near-infrared excited CuxS nanocrystals and imaging on a smartphone. Analyst. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c9an00724e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kimura H, Kitamori T, Sawada T. Critical increment of Lewis blood group antigen in serum by cancer found by photothermal immunoassay. Anal Biochem. 1999;274:98–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li X, Yang L, Men C, Xie Y, Liu J, Zou H, et al. Photothermal soft nanoballs developed by loading plasmonic Cu2-xSe nanocrystals into liposomes for photothermal immunoassay of aflatoxin B1. Anal Chem. 2019;91:4444–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu Y, Wang W, Jiang Q, Wang F, Pang D, Liu X. Plasmonic and photothermal immunoassay via enzyme-triggered crystal growth on gold nanostars. Anal Chem. 2019;91:2086–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fu G, Sanjay S, Zhou W, Brekken R, Kirken R, Li X. Exploration of nanoparticle-mediated photothermal effect of TMB-H2O2 colorimetric system and its application in a visual quantitative photothermal immunoassay. Anal Chem. 2018;90:5930–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li J, Zhang F, Hu Z, Song W, Li G, Liang G, et al. Drug “pent-up” in hollow magnetic Prussian blue nanoparticles for NIR-induced chemo-photothermal tumor therapy with trimodal imaging. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2017;6:1700005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cai X, Gao W, Zhang L, Ma M, Liu T, Du W, et al. Enabling Prussian blue with tunable localized surface plasmon resonance: simultaneously enhanced dual-mode imaging and tumor photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2016;10:11115–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cai S, Qian J, Yang S, Kuang L, Hua D. Acetylcysteine- decorated Prussian blue nanoparticles for strong photothermal sterilization and focal infection treatment. Colloids Surf B. 2019;181:31–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu G, Liu W, Feng S, Yue X. Prussian blue nanoparticles operate as a new generation of photothermal ablation agents for cancer therapy. Chem Commun. 2012;48:11567–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cheng L, Gong H, Zhu W, Liu J, Wang X, Liu G, et al. PEGylated Prussian blue nanocubes as a theranostic agent for simultaneous cancer imaging and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials. 2014;35:9844–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tang D, Tang J, Su B, Chen H, Huang J, Chen G. Highly sensitive electrochemical immunoassay for human IgG using double-encoded magnetic redox-active nanoparticles. Microchim Acta. 2010;171:457–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cano-Mejia J, Bookstaver M, Sweeney E, Jewell C, Fernandes R. Prussian blue nanoparticle-based antigenicity and adjuvanticity trigger robust antitumor immune responses against neuroblastoma. Biomater Sci. 2019;7:1875–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tang D, Su B, Tang J, Ren J, Chen G. Nanoparticle-based sandwich electrochemical immunoassay for carbohydrate antigen 125 with signal enhancement using enzyme-coated nanometer-sized enzyme-doped silica beads. Anal Chem. 2010;82:1527–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang B, Liu B, Tang D, Niessner R, Chen G, Knopp D. DNA-based hybridization chain reaction for amplified bioelectronic signal and ultrasensitive detection of proteins. Anal Chem. 2012;84:5392–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Charoenkitamorn K, Trong Tue P, Chilae M, Chailapakul O, Takamura Y. Gold nanoparticle-labeled electrochemical immunoassay using open circuit potential for human chorionic gonadotropin detection. Electroanalysis. 2018;30:1766–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Partington L, Atkin S, Kilpatrick E, Morris S, Piper M, Lawrence N, et al. Electrochemical measurement of antibody-antigen recognition biophysics: Thermodynamic and kinetics of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) binding to redox-tagged antibodies. J Electroanal Chem. 2018;819:533–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang A, Guo W, Ke H, Zhang X, Zhang H, Huang C, et al. Sandwich-format ECL immunosensor based on Au star@BSA-luminol nanocomposites for determination of human chorionic gonadotropin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018;101:219–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liang A, Li C, Li D, Luo Y, Wen G, Jiang Z. A facile and sensitive peptide-modulating graphene oxide nanoribbon catalytic nanoplasmon analytical platform for human chorionic gonadotropin. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:8725–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chiu N, Kuo C, Lin T, Chang C, Chen C. Ultra-high sensitivity of the non-immunological affinity of graphene oxide-peptide-based surface plasmon resonance biosensors to detection human chorionic gonadotropin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;94:351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cao L, Fang C, Zeng R, Zhao X, Jiang Y, Chen Z. Paper-based microfluidic devices for electrochemical immunofiltration analysis of human chorionic gonadotropin. Biosens Bioelectron. 2017;92:87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Valipour A, Roushani M. Immunoassay for human chorionic gonadotropin based on glassy carbon electrode modified with an epitaxial nanocomposite. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;4:79–90.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Valipour A, Roushani M. Fabrication of an electrochemical immunosensor for determination of human chorionic gonadotropin based on PtNPs/cycteamine/AgNPs as an efficient interface. Anal Bioanal Chem Res. 2017;4:342–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guolin Hong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dongdong Zhang
    • 1
  • Yinghao He
    • 1
  • Yuanyuan Yang
    • 1
  • Ping Chen
    • 1
  • Huijing Yang
    • 2
  • Zhiyang Zhou
    • 2
  • Yinhuan Liu
    • 3
    Email author
  • Yan Wang
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Laboratory MedicineThe First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen UniversityXiamenChina
  2. 2.Department of Clinical MedicineFujian Medical UniversityFuzhouChina
  3. 3.Department of Laboratory MedicineFuzhou Second Hospital Affiliated to Xiamen UniversityFuzhouChina
  4. 4.Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Cardiovascular Hospital of Xiamen UniversityMedical College of Xiamen UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations