Advertisement

Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

, Volume 411, Issue 25, pp 6697–6709 | Cite as

A rapid UHPLC-MS/MS screening method for the detection of the addition of porcine blood plasma to emulsion-type pork sausages

  • Christian Stader
  • Michael Judas
  • Wolfgang JiraEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

The adulteration of meat products by the undeclared addition of commercially available blood plasma powder is quite conceivable due to low costs, high protein contents (about 70%), and advantageous functional properties. This applies particularly to pork, which has the highest meat production rate in the European Union. Evidence of this type of food fraud has been rather difficult to identify due to the lack of appropriate analytical methods, especially when adding plasma to meat of the same animal species. Consequently, a rapid UHPLC-MS/MS method for the detection of porcine blood plasma in emulsion-type pork sausages was developed. After protein extraction and tryptic digestion in a quick and simple one-pot process, species-specific marker peptides for porcine blood cell proteins (four markers) and plasma proteins (12 markers) were measured by UHPLC-MS/MS. Emulsion-type pork sausages were produced from a variety of raw materials that differed in the age or sex of the slaughtered pigs. Sausages were spiked with 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, or 5% meat substitution by one of two plasma powders, or produced as corresponding blank samples, and subjected to different thermal treatments as full or semi-preserves. Four plasma peptides were identified for the overall sample that allowed detection down to 0.7% meat substitution from the sum of their peak areas, with 5% error probability for both false positives and negatives.

Keywords

Porcine blood plasma Pork sausages Meat substitution Mass spectrometry Marker peptides Food fraud 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sebastian Zimmermann for his valuable support in veterinarian questions, Yvonne Höhn and Liane Weber for their excellent technical assistance, and Manfred Behrschmidt, Josef Haida, and Marco Zäh for the professional production of the various sausages.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_2043_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (141 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 140 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Hees H, Tschudi P. Blut und Knochenmark. In: Mosimann W, Kohler T, editors. Zytologie, Histologie und mikroskopische Anatomie der Haussäugetiere. Berlin, Hamburg: Verlag Paul Parey; 1990. p. 98–113.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Warriss PD. Meat science: an introductory text. Wallingford: CABI Publishers; 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gatnau R. Spray dried porcine plasma as a source of protein and immunoglobulins for weanling pigs. Retrospective theses and dissertations. 16877. 1990. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/16877. Accessed 2 May 2019.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Tändler K, Stiebing A. Utilisation of blood, bloodplasma and bloodserum as human food. 24th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology, Kulmbach, Germany; 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scheunemann R. Das 5. Viertel – Die sinnvolle Verwertung von Schlachtnebenprodukten (SNP). RFL. 2011;11:377–8.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bah CSF, Bekhit AEA, Carne A, McConnell MA. Slaughterhouse blood: an emerging source of bioactive compounds. Compr Rev Food Sci F. 2013;12:314–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tarte R. Meat-derived protein ingredients. In Tarte R, editor. Ingredients in meat products: properties, functionality and applications. Springer Science + Business Media, LLC; 2009. pp. 145–171.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    European Union. (2009). Regulation (EC) No. 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 laying down rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union. 14.11.2009. L 300/1–33.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Union. (2004). Regulation (EC) No. 853/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for on the hygiene of foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Union. 30.04.2004. L 139/55–205.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ockerman HW, Hansen CL. Animal by-product processing & utilization. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2000. p. 79–81.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Feiner G. Meat products handbook—practical science and technology. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006. p. 95–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hargin KD. Authenticity issues in meat and meat products. Meat Sci. 1996;43:277–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davila E, Pares D, Cuvelier G, Relkin P. Heat-induced gelation of porcine blood plasma proteins as affected by pH. Meat Sci. 2007;76:216–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lu GH, Chen TC. Application of egg white and plasma powders as muscle food binding agents. J Food Eng. 1999;42:147–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hurtado S, Daga I, Espigule E, Pares D, Saguer E, Toldra M, et al. Use of porcine blood plasma in “phosphate-free frankfurters”. Procedia Food Sci. 2011;1:477–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim S, Jin S, Choi J. Effects of the addition of blood plasma proteins on physico-chemical properties of emulsion-type pork sausage during cold storage. J Sci Food Agric. 2017;97:4501–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    European Union. (2011). Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No. 1924/2006 and (EC) No. 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 608/2004. Official journal of the European Union. 22.11.2011. Annex VI, Part A, 5.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leitsätze für Fleisch und Fleischerzeugnisse (2015). https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/Ernaehrung/Lebensmittelbuch/LeitsaetzeFleisch.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. Accessed 2 June 2019.
  20. 20.
    Maxstadt JJ, Pollmann RM. Spectrophotometric determination of sulfites, benzoates, sorbates, ascorbates, and added blood in ground beef—collaborative study. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1980;63:667–74.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bjarno OC. Multicomponent analysis of meat-products. J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1981;64:1392–6.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bauer F, Stachelberger H. Detection of blood plasma in heat-treated meat products by ultrathin-layer isoelectric focusing. Z Lebensm Unters For. 1984;178:86–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otto W, Sinell HJ. Immunochemical detection of dried blood-plasma in heat processed mixtures with meat. Berl Munch Tierarztl. 1989;102:14–8.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ofori JA, Hsieh YHP. Monoclonal antibodies as probes for the detection of porcine blood-derived food ingredients. J Agric Food Chem. 2016;64:3705–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grundy HH, Reece P, Sykes MD, Clough JA, Audsley N, Stones R. Method to screen for the addition of porcine blood-based binding products to foods using liquid chromatography/triple quadrupole mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Sp. 2008;22:2006–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jira W, Schwägele F. A sensitive HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of microbial transglutaminase, and bovine and porcine fibrinogen/thrombin in restructured meat. Food Chem. 2017;237:841–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    LFGB §64: Official Collection of Methods according to §64 of the German Food and Feed Code: L 06.00-3 (8/2014), L 06.00-4 (4/2007), L 06.00-6 (8/2014), and L 06.00-7 (8/2014).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jira W, Münch S. A sensitive HPLC-MS/MS screening method for the simultaneous detection of barley, maize, oats, rice, rye and wheat proteins in meat products. Food Chem. 2019;275:214–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lecrenier MC, Marbaix H, Dieu M, Yeys P, Saegerman C, Raes M, et al. Identification of specific bovine blood biomarkers with a non-targeted approach using HPLC ESI tandem mass spectrometry. Food Chem. 2016;213:417–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Orduna AR, Husby E, Yang CT, Ghosh D, Beaudry F. Detection of meat species adulteration using high-resolution mass spectrometry and a proteogenomics strategy. Food Addit Contam A. 2017;34:1110–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hoffmann B, Münch S, Schwägele F, Neusüß C, Jira W. A sensitive HPLC-MS/MS screening method for the simultaneous detection of lupine, pea, and soy proteins in meat products. Food Control. 2017;71:200–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Johnson PE, Baumgartner S, Aldick T, Bessant C, Giosafatto V, Heick J, et al. Current perspectives and recommendations for the development of mass spectrometry methods for the determination of allergens in food. J AOAC Int. 2011;94:1026–33.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Johnson KD, Clark A, Marshall S. A functional comparison of ovine and porcine trypsins. Comp Biochem Physiol B. 2002;131:423–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Elbers ARW, Counotte GHM, Tielen MJM. Haematological and clinicochemical blood profiles in slaughter pigs. Vet Q. 1992;14:57–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Warriss PD. Exsanguination of animals at slaughter and the residual blood content of meat. Vet Rec. 1984;115:292–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Halliday DA. Blood—a source of proteins. Process Biochem. 1973;8:15–7.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hsieh YP, Ofori JA. Food-grade proteins from animal by-products: their usage and detection methods. In: Nollet LM, Toldra F, editors. Handbook of analysis of edible animal by-products. New York: CRC Press; 2011. p. 13–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stoyke M, Becker R, Brockmeyer J, Jira W, Popping B, Uhlig S, et al. German government official methods board points the way forward: launch of a new working group for protein analysis to detect food fraud and food allergens. J AOAC Int. 2019;102:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Stader
    • 1
  • Michael Judas
    • 1
  • Wolfgang Jira
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Safety and Quality of MeatMax Rubner-Institut (MRI), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and FoodKulmbachGermany

Personalised recommendations