This study of ion accumulation/release behavior relevant to ion mobility–mass spectrometry (IM-MS) as employed for non-targeted metabolomics involves insight from theoretical studies, and controlled reference experiments involving measurement of low and high molecular mass metabolites in varying concentrations within a complex matrix (yeast extracts). Instrumental settings influencing ion trapping (accumulation time) and release conditions in standard and multiplexed operation have been examined, and translation of these insights to liquid chromatography (LC) in combination with drift tube IM-MS measurements has been made. The focus of the application is non-targeted metabolomics using carefully selected samples to allow quantitative interpretations to be made. Experimental investigation of the IM-MS ion utilization efficiency particularly focusing on the use of the Hadamard transform multiplexing with 4-bit pseudo-random pulsing sequence for assessment of low and high molecular mass metabolites is compared with theoretical modeling of gas-phase behavior of small and large molecules in the IM trapping funnel. Increasing the trapping time for small metabolites with standard IM-MS operation is demonstrated to have a deleterious effect on maintaining a quantitative representation of the metabolite abundance. The application of these insights to real-world non-targeted metabolomics assessment of intracellular extracts from biotechnologically relevant production processes is presented, and the results were compared to LC×IM-MS measurements of the same samples. Spiking of a uniformly 13C-labeled yeast extract (as a standard matrix) with varying amounts of natural metabolites is used to assess the linearity and sensitivity according to the instrument mode of operation (i.e., LC-MS, LC×IM-MS, and LC×[multiplexed]IM-MS). When comparing metabolite quantification using standard and multiplexed operation, sensitivity gain factors of 2–8 were obtained for metabolites with m/z below 250. Taken together, the simulation and experimental results of this study provide insight for optimizing measurement conditions for metabolomics and highlight the need for implementation of multiplexing strategies using short trapping times as relative quantification (e.g., in the context with non-targeted differential analysis) with sufficient sensitivity and working range is a requirement in this field of application.
CCSHadamard Ion mobility Liquid chromatography Mass spectrometry Metabolomics Multiplexing Yeast
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Vienna Business Agency and EQ BOKU VIBT GmbH are acknowledged for providing mass spectrometry instrumentation.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Burnum-Johnson KE, Baker ES, Metz TO. Characterizing the lipid and metabolite changes associated with placental function and pregnancy complications using ion mobility spectrometry-mass spectrometry and mass spectrometry imaging. Placenta. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2017.03.016.
Zheng X, Aly NA, Zhou Y, Dupuis KT, Bilbao A, Paurus VL, et al. A structural examination and collision cross section database for over 500 metabolites and xenobiotics using drift tube ion mobility spectrometry. Chem Sci. 2017;8:7724–36. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC03464D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Righetti L, Bergmann A, Galaverna G, Rolfsson O, Paglia G, Dall’Asta C. Ion mobility-derived collision cross section database: application to mycotoxin analysis. Anal Chim Acta. n.d.. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.047.
Kyle JE, Casey CP, Stratton KG, Zink EM, Kim Y-M, Zheng X, et al. Comparing identified and statistically significant lipids and polar metabolites in 15-year old serum and dried blood spot samples for longitudinal studies. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017;31:447–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.7808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols CM, Dodds JN, Rose B, Picache JA, Morris CB, Codreanu SG, et al. Untargeted molecular discovery in primary metabolism: collision cross section as a molecular descriptor in ion mobility-mass spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b04322.
Picache JA, Rose BS, Balinski A, Leaptrot KL, Sherrod SD, May JC, et al. Collision cross section compendium to annotate and predict multi-omic compound identities. Chem Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SC04396E.
Clowers BH, Ibrahim YM, Prior DC, Danielson WF, Belov ME, Smith RD. Enhanced ion utilization efficiency using an electrodynamic ion funnel trap as an injection mechanism for ion mobility spectrometry. Anal Chem. 2008;80:612–23. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac701648p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Causon T, Kurulugama R, Hann S. Drift-tube ion mobility mass spectrometry for non-targeted ‘omics. Methods Mol Biol Submitt. n.d..Google Scholar
Ortmayr K, Hann S, Koellensperger G. Complementing reversed-phase selectivity with porous graphitized carbon to increase the metabolome coverage in an on-line two-dimensional LC-MS setup for metabolomics. Analyst. 2015;140:3465–73. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5an00206k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar