Advertisement

Quantitative monitoring of a panel of stress-induced biomarkers in human plasma by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry: an application in a comparative study between depressive patients and healthy subjects

  • HuaLin CaiEmail author
  • Ting Cao
  • NaNa Li
  • PingFei Fang
  • Ping Xu
  • XiangXin Wu
  • BiKui Zhang
  • DaXiong XiangEmail author
Research Paper

Abstract

Using a metabolomic approach, we have found that stress can induce oxidative damage by disturbing the creatine/phosphocreatine shuttle system and purinergic pathway, leading to an excessive membrane breakdown. To further validate our findings and to monitor the biological impact of stress in research of clinical psychiatry, a liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed to simultaneously determine a panel of biomarkers comprising choline, creatine, purinergic metabolites, neurosteroids, lysophosphatidylcholines, and phosphatidylethanolamines in human plasma. After optimization of the extraction protocol, all the 15 analytes plus 4 internal standards with distinct polarities were extracted into an organic phase using methyl tert-butyl ether/methanol (1:1, v/v). A reversed-phase C8 column under gradient elution consisting of aqueous phase A of 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer solution containing 0.1% formic acid and organic phase B of acetonitrile/2-propanol (3:7, v/v) was utilized for separation. Four sequential periods under positive or negative ion mode were combined for the determination of analytes with specific multiple reaction monitoring transitions. For all analytes, this method exhibited good linearity with coefficients of determination (R2) higher than 0.99. The lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) values ranged from 0.05 to 80.0 ng/mL. Recovery between 70.5 and 97.3% was obtained by spiking standards to plasma samples stripped by powdered activated carbon. The intra- and inter-assay relative standard deviations (RSDs) of the analyses varied between 2.0 and 13.3%. The mean accuracy ranged from 90.6 to 109.0%. The matrix effect ranged from 91.2 to 107.3% with variations less than 9.0%. Stability under different conditions was tested, with mean recoveries varying between 90.4 and 109.7%. Finally, the established method was successfully applied to analyze the plasma samples from a small cohort of 30 patients with major depressive disorder and 30 matched healthy controls.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Liquid chromatography Tandem mass spectrometry Stress Purines Neurosteroids Phospholipids 

Notes

Funding information

This work was supported by Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2017JJ3444 (HLC)] and Nature Science Foundation of China [NSFC81401113 (HLC)].

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Hunan, China. The patients were recruited at their first admission to the Second Xiangya Hospital after they signed the informed consent. All healthy volunteers were recruited from the same community of MDD patients. Their fasting morning plasma samples were also collected after the informed consent to participate in the study was obtained.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

216_2019_1956_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1398 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Aronson JK, Ferner RE. Biomarkers—a general review. Curr Protoc Pharmacol. 2017;76:9–23.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holmes E, Wilson ID, Nicholson JK. Metabolic phenotyping in health and disease. Cell. 2008;134:714–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weickert CS, Weickert TW, Pillai A, Buckley PF. Biomarkers in schizophrenia: a brief conceptual consideration. Dis Markers. 2013;35:3–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fernandes B, Berk M. Enabling precision psychiatry through ‘omics’: from biomarkers to biological pathways. Biol Psychiatry. 2017;81:S138–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schwarz E, Bahn S. The utility of biomarker discovery approaches for the detection of disease mechanisms in psychiatric disorders. Br J Pharmacol. 2008;153:S133–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker AJ, Kim Y, Price JB, Kale RP, McGillivray JA, Berk M, et al. Stress, inflammation, and cellular vulnerability during early stages of affective disorders: biomarker strategies and opportunities for prevention and intervention. Front Psychiatry. 2014;5:34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eley TC, Liang H, Plomin R, Sham P, Sterne A, Williamson R, et al. Parental familial vulnerability, family environment, and their interactions as predictors of depressive symptoms in adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;43:298–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim EY, Miklowitz DJ, Biuckians A, Mullen K. Life stress and the course of early-onset bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2007;99:37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tessner KD, Mittal V, Walker EF. Longitudinal study of stressful life events and daily stressors among adolescents at high risk for psychotic disorders. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37:432–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vavakova M, Durackova Z, Trebaticka J. Markers of oxidative stress and neuroprogression in depression disorder. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:898393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Berk M, Kapczinski F, Andreazza AC, Dean OM, Giorlando F, Maes M, et al. Pathways underlying neuroprogression in bipolar disorder: focus on inflammation, oxidative stress and neurotrophic factors. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35:804–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson G, Berk M, Dodd S, Bechter K, Altamura AC, Dell'osso B, et al. Immuno-inflammatory, oxidative and nitrosative stress, and neuroprogressive pathways in the etiology, course and treatment of schizophrenia. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2013;42:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cai HL, Jiang P, Tan QY, Dang RL, Tang MM, Xue Y, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of atypical antipsychotic drugs by targeting multiple stress-related metabolic pathways. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cai HL, Cao T, Zhou X, Yao JK. Neurosteroids in schizophrenia: pathogenic and therapeutic implications. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cai HL, Zhou X, Dougherty GG, Reddy RD, Haas GL, Montrose DM, et al. Pregnenolone-progesterone-allopregnanolone pathway as a potential therapeutic target in first-episode antipsychotic-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2018;90:43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carling RS, Hogg SL, Wood TC, Calvin J. Simultaneous determination of guanidinoacetate, creatine and creatinine in urine and plasma by un-derivatized liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Ann Clin Biochem. 2008;45:575–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim KM, Henderson GN, Ouyang X, Frye RF, Sautin YY, Feig DI, et al. A sensitive and specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method for the determination of intracellular and extracellular uric acid. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009;877:2032–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keevil BG. Novel liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) methods for measuring steroids. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;27:663–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhao Z, Xu Y. Measurement of endogenous lysophosphatidic acid by ESI-MS/MS in plasma samples requires pre-separation of lysophosphatidylcholine. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2009;877:3739–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    The World Medical Association (WMA): Declaration of Helsinki-ethical principles of medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
  21. 21.
    Cai HL, Zhu RH, Li HD, Zhang J, Li LF. MultiSimplex optimization of chromatographic separation and dansyl derivatization conditions in the ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis of risperidone, 9-hydroxyrisperidone, monoamine and amino acid neurotransmitters in human urine. J Chromatogr B Anal Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011;879:1993–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cai HL, Zhu RH, Li HD. Determination of dansylated monoamine and amino acid neurotransmitters and their metabolites in human plasma by liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2010;396:103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Howell CA, Sandeman SR, Phillips GJ, Lloyd AW, Davies JG, Mikhalovsky SV, et al. The in vitro adsorption of cytokines by polymer-pyrolysed carbon. Biomaterials. 2006;27:5286–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Müller BR. Effect of particle size and surface area on the adsorption of albumin-bonded bilirubin on activated carbon. Carbon. 2010;48:3607–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Food, U. S., & Administration, Guidance for industry: bioanalytical method validation. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, and Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 2001.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Majors RE, Przybyciel M. Columns for reversed-phase LC separations in highly aqueous mobile phases. LC GC N Am. 2002;20:584–93.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ogiso H, Suzuki T, Taguchi R. Development of a reverse-phase liquid chromatography electrospray ionization mass spectrometry method for lipidomics, improving detection of phosphatidic acid and phosphatidylserine. Anal Biochem. 2008;375:124–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hewavitharana AK. Matrix matching in liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry with stable isotope labelled internal standards—is it necessary? J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:359–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Annesley TM. Ion suppression in mass spectrometry. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1041–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Want EJ, Masson P, Michopoulos F, Wilson ID, Theodoridis G, Plumb RS, et al. Global metabolic profiling of animal and human tissues via UPLC-MS. Nat Protoc. 2013;8:17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • HuaLin Cai
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Ting Cao
    • 1
    • 2
  • NaNa Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • PingFei Fang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ping Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • XiangXin Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • BiKui Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
  • DaXiong Xiang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of PharmacyThe Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.Institute of Clinical PharmacyCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations